Add support for new SCMI v3.0 Sensors extensions related to new sensors'
features, like multiple axis and update intervals, while keeping
compatibility with SCMI v2.0 features.
While at that, refactor and simplify all the internal helpers macros and
move struct scmi_sensor_info to use only non-fixed-size typing.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119174906.43862-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Few commands provide the list of description partially and require
to be called consecutively until all the descriptors are fetched
completely. In such cases, we don't release the buffers and reuse
them for consecutive transmits.
However, currently we don't reset the Rx size which will be set as
per the response for the last transmit. This may result in incorrect
response size being interpretted as the firmware may repond with size
greater than the one set but we read only upto the size set by previous
response.
Let us reset the receive buffer size to max possible in such cases as
we don't know the exact size of the response.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201012141746.32575-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: b6f20ff8bd ("firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol")
Reported-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In preparation to enable building SCMI as a single module, let us move
the SCMI protocol registration call into the driver. This enables us
to also add unregistration of the SCMI protocols.
The main reason for this is to keep it simple instead of maintaining
it as separate modules and dealing with all possible initcall races
and deferred probe handling. We can move it as separate modules if
needed in future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907195046.56615-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Event reports are used to convey information describing events to the
registered user-callbacks: they are necessarily derived from the underlying
raw SCMI events' messages but they are not meant to expose or directly
mirror any of those messages data layout, which belong to the protocol
layer.
Using fixed size types for report fields, mirroring messages structure,
is at odd with this: get rid of them using more generic, equivalent,
typing.
Substitute scmi_event_header fixed size fields with generic types too and
shuffle around fields definitions to minimize implicit padding while
adapting involved functions.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200710133919.39792-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add commands' enumerations and messages definitions for all existing
notify-enable commands across all protocols.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327143438.5382-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In order to avoid querying the individual protocol versions multiple
time with more that one device created for each protocol, we can simple
store the copy in the protocol specific private data and use them whenever
required.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Instead of type-casting the {tx,rx}.buf all over the place while
accessing them to read/write __le{32,64} from/to the firmware, let's
use the existing {get,put}_unaligned_le{32,64} accessors to hide all
the type cast ugliness.
Suggested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SENSOR_DESCRIPTION_GET provides attributes to indicate if the sensor
supports asynchronous read. We can read that flag and use asynchronous
reads for any sensors with that attribute set.
Let's use the new scmi_do_xfer_with_response to support asynchronous
sensor reads.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SENSOR_DESCRIPTION_GET provides attributes to indicate if the sensor
supports asynchronous read. Ideally we should be able to read that flag
and use asynchronous reads for any sensors with that attribute set.
In order to add that support, let's drop the async flag passed to
sensor_ops->reading_get and dynamically switch between sync and async
flags based on the attributes as provided by the firmware.
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Looks like more code developed during the draft versions of the
specification slipped through and they don't match the final
released version. This seem to have happened only with sensor
protocol.
Renaming few command and function names here to match exactly with
the released version of SCMI specification for ease of maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In preparation for dealing with scales within the SCMI HWMON driver,
fetch and store the sensor unit scale into the scmi_sensor_info
structure. In order to simplify computations for upper layer, take care
of sign extending the scale to a full 8-bit signed value.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
[sudeep.holla: update bitfield values as per specification]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
As per the SCMI specification the bitfields for SENSOR_DESC attributes
are as follows:
attributes_low [7:0] Number of trip points supported
attributes_high [15:11] The power-of-10 multiplier in 2's-complement
format that is applied to the sensor units
Looks like the code developed during the draft versions of the
specification slipped through and are wrong with respect to final
released version. Fix them by adjusting the bitfields appropriately.
Fixes: 5179c523c1 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for sensor protocol")
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Replace all the memcpy() for copying name strings from the firmware with
strlcpy() to make sure we are bounded by the source buffer size and we
also always have NULL-terminated strings.
This is needed to avoid out of bounds accesses if the firmware returns
a non-terminated string.
Reported-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Just after the initial patches were queued, Jonathan Cameron mentioned
that scmi_one_xfer_{get_put} were not very clear and suggested to use
scmi_xfer_{alloc,free}. While I agree to some extent, the reason not to
have alloc/free as these are preallocated buffers and these functions
just returns a reference to free slot in that preallocated array.
However it was agreed to drop "_one" as it's implicit that we are always
dealing with one slot anyways.
This patch updates the name accordingly dropping "_one" in both {get,put}
functions. Also scmi_one_xfer_init is renamed as scmi_xfer_get_init to
reflect the fact that it gets the free slots and then initialise it.
Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The sensor protocol provides functions to manage platform sensors, and
provides the commands to describe the protocol version and the various
attribute flags. It also provides commands to discover various sensors
implemented and managed by the platform, read any sensor synchronously
or asynchronously as allowed by the platform, program sensor attributes
and/or configurations, if applicable.
This patch adds support for most of the above features.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cristian Marussi