If we see the seqno stop progressing, we abandon the test for fear that
the GPU died following the reset. However, during test teardown we still
wait for the GPU to idle before continuing, but we have already
confirmed that the GPU is dead. Furthermore, since we are inside a reset
test, we have disabled the hangchecker, and so there is no safety net and
we wait indefinitely. Detect the stuck GPU and declare it wedged as a
state of emergency so we can escape.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jari Tahvanainen <jari.tahvanainen@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170915130929.18892-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Tested-by: Jari Tahvanainen <jari.tahvanainen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM just doesn't work on the video decode engine under
Sandybridge, so refrain from using it. Then switch the selftests over to
using the now common test prior to using MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM.
Fixes: 7dd4f6729f ("drm/i915: Async GPU relocation processing")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.13-rc1+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170816085210.4199-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
The purpose of the test was to check per-engine resets would fallback to
the global reset when required, but first we actually need a test for a
basic i915_handle_error()!
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170728112110.6464-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
After applying af2788925ae0 ("drm/i915: Squelch reset messages during
selftests") out of sequence, I missed fixing up a call to i915_reset().
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <kbuild-all@01.org>
Fixes: af2788925ae0 ("drm/i915: Squelch reset messages during selftests")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170725125336.11969-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
During our selftests, we try reseting the GPU tens of thousands of
times, flooding the dmesg with our reset spam drowning out any potential
warnings. Add an option to i915_reset()/i915_reset_engine() to specify a
quiet reset for selftesting.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170721123238.16428-19-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Extract the common barrier against rogue hangchecks from disrupting our
direct testing of resets, and in the process expand the lock to include
the per-engine reset shortcuts.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170721123238.16428-17-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If all goes well, resetting one engine should not affect the operation of
any others. So to test this, we setup a continuous stream of requests
onto to each of the "innocent" engines whilst constantly resetting our
target engine.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170721123238.16428-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If we enter i915_handle_error() a second time and a global reset is
already in progress, we can simply wait for completion of the first
reset. Currently we exit early prior to the actual reset being
performed -- the worst of both worlds!
v2: Plug into the existing reset_queue, and remember that kselftests is
playing games with I915_RESET_BACKOFF to prevent hangcheck from screwing
up.
v3: Rename to i915_reset_device to fit in better with i915_reset_engine
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170620095751.13127-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we now distinguish everywhere that can call
i915_gem_retire_requests() following a successful wait_for_idle, we can
remove the duplication by moving that call into i915_gem_wait_for_idle()
itself.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170330145041.9005-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS is being used for both signaling the requirement
to i915_mutex_lock_interruptible() to avoid taking the struct_mutex and
to instruct a waiter (already holding the struct_mutex) to perform the
reset. To allow for a little more coordination, split these two meaning
into a couple of distinct flags. I915_RESET_BACKOFF tells
i915_mutex_lock_interruptible() not to acquire the mutex and
I915_RESET_HANDOFF tells the waiter to call i915_reset().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170316171305.12972-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Chris Wilson