A USB port's position and connectability can't be identified on some boards
via USB hub registers. ACPI _UPC and _PLD can help to resolve this issue
and so it is necessary to bind USB with ACPI. This patch is to allow ACPI
binding with USB-3.0 hub.
Current ACPI only can bind one struct-device to one ACPI device node.
This can not work with USB-3.0 hub, because the USB-3.0 hub has two logical
devices. Each works for USB-2.0 and USB-3.0 devices. In the Linux USB subsystem,
those two logical hubs are treated as two seperate devices that have two struct
devices. But in the ACPI DSDT, these two logical hubs share one ACPI device
node. So there is a requirement to bind multi struct-devices to one ACPI
device node. This patch is to resolve such problem.
Following is the ACPI device nodes' description under xhci hcd.
Device (XHC)
Device (RHUB)
Device (HSP1)
Device (HSP2)
Device (HSP3)
Device (HSP4)
Device (SSP1)
Device (SSP2)
Device (SSP3)
Device (SSP4)
Topology in the Linux
device XHC
USB-2.0 logical hub USB-3.0 logical hub
HSP1 SSP1
HSP2 SSP2
HSP3 SSP3
HSP4 SSP4
This patch also modifies the output of /proc/acpi/wakeup. One ACPI node
can be associated with multiple devices:
XHC S4 *enabled pci:0000:00:14.0
RHUB S0 disabled usb:usb1
disabled usb:usb2
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
These files were relying on module.h to come in via the path
in an include/acpi header file, but we don't want to have
instances of module.h being included from include/* files
if it can be avoided. Have the files include export.h instead.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
There are ACPI devices (buttons and the laptop lid) that can wake up
the system from sleep states and have no "physical" companion
devices. The ACPI subsystem uses two flags, wakeup.state.enabled and
wakeup.flags.always_enabled, for handling those devices, but they
are not accessible through the standard device wakeup infrastructure.
User space can only control them via the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface
that is not really convenient (e.g. the way in which devices are
enabled to wake up the system is not portable between different
systems, because it requires one to know the devices' "names" used in
the system's ACPI tables).
To address this problem, use standard device wakeup flags instead of
the special ACPI flags for handling those devices. In particular,
use device_set_wakeup_capable() to mark the ACPI wakeup devices
during initialization and use device_set_wakeup_enable() to allow
or disallow them to wake up the system from sleep states. Rework
the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface to take these changes into account.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
If a device is enabled to wake up the system from sleep states via
/proc/acpi/wakeup and there are other devices associated with the
same wakeup GPE, all of these devices are automatically enabled to
wake up the system. This isn't correct, because the fact the GPE is
shared need not imply that wakeup power has to be enabled for all the
devices at the same time (i.e. it is possible that one device will
have its wakeup power enabled and it will wake up the system from a
sleep state if the shared wakeup GPE is enabled, while another device
having its wakeup power disabled will not wake up the system even
though the GPE is enabled). Rework acpi_system_write_wakeup_device()
so that it only enables wakeup for one device at a time.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Rmove deprecated ACPI procfs I/F, including
/proc/acpi/debug_layer
/proc/acpi/debug_level
/proc/acpi/info
/proc/acpi/dsdt
/proc/acpi/fadt
/proc/acpi/sleep
because the sysfs I/F is already available
and has been working well for years.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Some string messages misspell "separate"; this fixes them. No change in
functionality.
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
proc.c and video.c are a bit sloppy around types and style,
confusing gcc for a new feature that'll be in 2.6.33 and will
cause a warning on the current code.
This patch changes
if (foo + 1 > sizeof bar)
into
if (foo >= sizeof(bar))
which is more kernel-style.
it also changes a variable in proc.c to unsigned; it gets assigned
a value from an unsigned type, and is then only compared for > not
for negative, so using unsigned is just outright the right type
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The ACPI /proc write() code takes an unsigned length argument like any write()
function, but then assigned it to a *signed* integer called "len".
Only after this is a sanity check for len done to make it not larger than 4.
Due to the type change a len < 0 is in principle also possible; this patch
adds a check for this.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Convert acpi_device_lock to a mutex to avoid
a potential race upon access to /proc/acpi/wakeup
Delete the lock entirely in wakeup.c
since it is not necessary (and can not sleep)
Found-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_sleep_proc_init() directly.
Previously, acpi_sleep_proc_init() was a late_initcall (sequence 7),
apparently to make sure that the /proc hierarchy already exists:
2003/02/13 12:38:03-06:00 mochel
acpi sleep: demote sleep proc file creation.
- Make acpi_sleep_proc_init() a late_initcall(), and not called from
acpi_sleep_init(). This guarantees that the acpi proc hierarchy is at
least there when we create the dang file.
This should no longer be an issue because acpi_bus_init() (called early
in acpi_init()) creates acpi_root_dir (/proc/acpi).
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Lan Tianyu