This patch set nukes all the dummy crtc mode_fixup implementations.
(made on top of Daniel topic/drm-misc branch)
Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
It's either init code or already protected by other means. Note
that psb_gtt_pin/unpin has it's own lock, and that's really the
only piece of driver private state - all the modeset state is
protected with modeset locks already.
The only important bit is to switch all gem_obj_unref calls to the
_unlocked variant.
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1448271183-20523-18-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Now that CRTC's have a primary plane, there's no need to track the
framebuffer in the CRTC. Replace all references to the CRTC fb with the
primary plane's fb.
This patch was generated by the Coccinelle semantic patching tool using
the following rules:
@@ struct drm_crtc C; @@
- (C).fb
+ C.primary->fb
@@ struct drm_crtc *C; @@
- (C)->fb
+ C->primary->fb
v3: Generate patch via coccinelle. Actual removal of crtc->fb has been
moved to a subsequent patch.
v2: Fixup several lingering crtc->fb instances that were missed in the
first patch iteration. [Rob Clark]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Add a callback hook to the chip ops struct to allow chips to have their
specific self-refresh function. Currently only used by cdv.
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Add a callback hook to the chip ops struct to allow chips to have their
specific fifo watermark update function. Currently only cdv actually
tries to set wms based on crtc configuration but if/when the other chips
needs it we can attach a callback for them as well.
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
This patch aims to unify the bits and pieces that are common (or similar
enough) for pll clock calculations. Nothing makes use of this code yet
That will come in later patches.
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Carlos Palminha