Add a GR device for GK20A based on NVE4, with the correct classes
definitions (GK20A's 3D class is 0xa297).
Most of the NVE4 code can be used on GK20A, so make relevant bits of
NVE4 available to other chips as well.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GK20A's FIFO is compatible with NVE0, but only features 128 channels and
1 runlist.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add a simple FB device for GK20A, as well as a RAM implementation
suitable for chips that use system memory as video RAM.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add support for initializing the priv ring of GK20A. This is done by the
BIOS on desktop GPUs, but needs to be done by hand on Tegra.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74492
Reported-by: Ronald <ronald645@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Marcin Kościelnicki <koriakin@0x04.net>
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This is what NVIDIA do on these chipsets, let's hope it works around
the reported MSI failures for us on NV86.
v2: updated to include G92, as per information provided by NVIDIA.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
v2. updated to cover GF104, as per information provided by NVIDIA.
Reported-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The nv31/nv40 impls are actually fairly nv44-specific, since they assume
the presence of the instance register/context switching. Create a copy
before nv31/nv40 get fixed.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Not really "core" per-se. About to merge Ilia's work adding another
similar class for the VP2 xtensa engines, so, seems like a good time to
move all these to engine/.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
These are pretty much useless for reclocking purposes. Lets make it
clearer what they're for and move them to DEVINIT to signify they're
for the very simple PLL setting requirements of running the init
tables.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We need to be able to process interrupts before the DRM code is able to
actually enable them, set it up ourselves. Also, it's less convoluted
to *not* use the DRM wrappers it appears...
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
It'd be pretty awesome if someone would care enough to port this all
properly to a class interface, perhaps submitting a command stream to
the core via a sw object on PFIFO (emulating how EVO works basically,
and also what nvidia have done forever..)..
But, this seems unlikely given how old this hardware is now, so, lets
just hide it away.
There's a heap of other bits and pieces laying around that are still
tangled. I'll (re)move them in pieces.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This is needed because temperature management on nv50 can be enabled and it
looks about the same as nv40.
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@labri.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
If I build nouveau on ia64, Kconfig warns:
warning: (DRM_NOUVEAU) selects ACPI_WMI which has unmet direct dependencies (X86 && X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES && ACPI)
warning: (DRM_NOUVEAU) selects MXM_WMI which has unmet direct dependencies (X86 && X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES && ACPI_WMI)
Make all the ACPI support depend on X86 and select
X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Ben Skeggs