Store in firmware NVRAM the radio state on machine shutdown for WWAN and
bluetooth. Also, try to set the initial boot state of these radios as the
rfkill default state for their respective classes.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Instruct the firmware to not enable the radios when resuming. This
is safer, and the rfkill core will take care to manually enable any
radios that need to be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This code is required to keep the thinkpad-acpi maintainer sane, and
it is disabled by default.
Add a debug facility to simulate an rfkill hardware rocker switch, a
bluetooth rfkill soft-switch, a WWAN rfkill soft-switch on thinkpads.
The simulated switches obviously do not kill any radios in hardware or
firmware (unlike the real one). They also don't issue deprecated proc
events.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Compilation of the HP WMI hotkeys code results in the following:
CC [M] drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.o
drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c: In function hp_wmi_bios_setup:
drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c:431: warning: ignoring return value of rfkill_register,
declared with attribute warn_unused_result
drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c:441: warning: ignoring return value of rfkill_register,
declared with attribute warn_unused_result
drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c:450: warning: ignoring return value of rfkill_register,
declared with attribute warn_unused_result
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
These are platform specific drivers that happen to use ACPI,
while drivers/acpi/ is for code that implements ACPI itself.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Move x86 platform specific drivers from drivers/misc/
to a new home under drivers/platform/x86/.
The community has been maintaining x86 vendor-specific
platform specific drivers under /drivers/misc/ for a few years.
The oldest ones started life under drivers/acpi.
They moved out of drivers/acpi/ because they don't actually
implement the ACPI specification, but either simply
use ACPI, or implement vendor-specific ACPI extensions.
In the future we anticipate...
drivers/misc/ will go away.
other architectures will create drivers/platform/<arch>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh