Broxton and Geminilake are both gen9lp platforms. To avoid adding
IS_GEMINILAKE() checks everywhere alongside the IS_BROXTON() ones, add a
IS_GEN9_LP() macro.
v2: Rename macro parameter to dev_priv. (Joonas)
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Geminilake is an Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics
following Broxton.
Let's start by adding the platform definition. PCI IDs and plaform
specific code will follow.
v2: Rebase (don't allow dev to be used with the new macro).
v3: Update ddb size. (Matt)
Rebase on s/preliminary_hw/alpha/
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479133526-32389-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
The following LP platform inherits a lot of this platform
So let's simplify here to re-use this later.
v2: Keep ddb_size out of the new macro.
v3: Rebase (has_decoupled_mmio). (Imre)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1480584796-19466-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
Decoupled MMIO is an alternative way to access forcewake domain
registers, which requires less cycles for a single read/write and
avoids frequent software forcewake.
This certainly gives advantage over the forcewake as this new
mechanism “decouples” CPU cycles and allow them to complete even
when GT is in a CPD (frequency change) or C6 state.
This can co-exist with forcewake and we will continue to use forcewake
as appropriate. E.g. 64-bit register writes to avoid writing 2 dwords
separately and land into funny situations.
v2:
- Moved platform check out of the function and got rid of duplicate
functions to find out decoupled power domain (Chris)
- Added a check for forcewake already held and skipped decoupled
access (Chris)
- Skipped writing 64 bit registers through decoupled MMIO (Chris)
v3:
- Improved commit message with more info on decoupled mmio (Tvrtko)
- Changed decoupled operation to enum and used u32 instead of
uint_32 data type for register offset (Tvrtko)
- Moved HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO to device info (Tvrtko)
- Added lookup table for converting fw_engine to pd_engine (Tvrtko)
- Improved __gen9_decoupled_read and __gen9_decoupled_write
routines (Tvrtko)
v4:
- Fixed alignment and variable names (Chris)
- Write GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1 register in just one go (Zhe Wang)
v5:
- Changed HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO() argument name to dev_priv (Tvrtko)
- Sanitize info->had_decoupled_mmio at init (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Zhe Wang <zhe1.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Paneri <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479230360-22395-1-git-send-email-praveen.paneri@intel.com
The term "preliminary hardware support" has always caused confusion both
among users and developers. It has always been about preliminary driver
support for new hardware, and not so much about preliminary hardware. Of
course, initially both the software and hardware are in early stages,
but the distinction becomes more clear when the user picks up production
hardware and an older kernel to go with it, with just the early support
we had for the hardware at the time the kernel was released. The user
has to specifically enable the alpha quality *driver* support for the
hardware in that specific kernel version.
Rename preliminary_hw_support to alpha_support to emphasize that the
module parameter, config option, and flag are about software, not about
hardware. Improve the language in help texts and debug logging as well.
This appears to be a good time to do the change, as there are currently
no platforms with preliminary^W alpha support.
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477909108-18696-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
Move has_64bit_reloc into dev_priv->info. This will make it visible
in the feature listing debug output.
v2:
- Keep the struct member to keep GCC fragile but happy (Chris)
v3:
- More detailed commit message (Chris)
- Include forgotten CHV and BXT (Chris)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478162386-5018-1-git-send-email-joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1179:5: warning: symbol
'i915_driver_load' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1267:6: warning: symbol
'i915_driver_unload' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:2444:25: warning: symbol 'i915_pm_ops'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Fixes: 42f5551d27 ("drm/i915: Split out the PCI driver interface to i915_pci.c")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1473946137-1931-3-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
Adding the ddb size into the devide info will avoid
platform checks while computing wm.
v2: Added comment and WARN_ON if ddb size is zero.(Jani)
v3: Added WARN_ON at the right place.(Jani)
Suggested-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak M <m.deepak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1473931870-7724-1-git-send-email-m.deepak@intel.com
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platform
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Make the .hws_needs_physical the exception by switching the flag
on earlier platforms since they are fewer to support. Remove the flag on
later GPUs hardware since they all use GTT hws by default.
Switch the logic as well in the driver to reflect this change
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN2_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct definitions by
platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the
GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for 830, 845g, i85x, i865g.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN3_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct definitions by
platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the
GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for i915g, i915gm, i945g, i945gm, g33 and pnv.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN4_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct
definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common.
Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for i965g, i965gm, g45 and gm45.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN5_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct
definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common.
Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for ilk.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Remove runtime PM support for SNB as it breaks hotplug support.
Feedback from V. Syrjala.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN6_FEAUTRES macro to simplify the struct definitions by
platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the
GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for snb.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
As recommended by Ville Syrjala removing .is_mobile field from the
platform struct definition for vlv and hsw+ GPUs as there's no need to
make the distinction in later hardware anymore. Keep it for older GPUs
as it is still needed for ilk-ivb.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[patch series] Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition
allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct definition
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
It appears that we never told Pineview it has a RENDER_RING. This was
all fine until we started using the ring_mask for determining all the
available rings to initialise for legacy ringbuffer submission in commit
88d2ba2e95 ("drm/i915: Unify engine init loop"). Though really it is a
latent bug since the ring_mask inception in commit 73ae478cdf
("drm/i915: Replace has_bsd/blt/vebox with a mask").
To prevent similar mishaps in future, add a WARN_ON() if we find
ourselves with a device without any rings.
Fixes: 73ae478cdf ("drm/i915: Replace has_bsd/blt/vebox with a mask")
Fixes: 88d2ba2e95 ("drm/i915: Unify engine init loop")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469749535-2382-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
The module init/exit routines are a wrapper around the PCI device
init/exit, so move them across.
Note that in order to avoid exporting the driver struct, instead of
manipulating driver.features inside i915_init we instead opt to simply
exit if i915.modeset is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466773227-7994-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Ander Conselvan de Oliveira