Add a new opaque void *priv parameter to scmi_rx_callback which can be
optionally provided by the transport layer when invoking scmi_rx_callback
and that will be passed back to the transport layer in xfer->priv.
This can be used by transports that needs to keep track of their specific
data structures together with the valid xfers.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-15-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The shared memory node used for communication between the firmware and
the OS should be compatible with "arm,scmi-shmem". Add the check for the
same while parsing the node before fetching the memory regions.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210602073851.1005607-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Cc: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The SMC/HVC SCMI transport is modified to allow the completion of an
SCMI message to be indicated by an interrupt rather than the return of
the smc/hvc call. This accommodates the existing behavior of the
BrcmSTB SCMI "platform".
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201222145603.40192-3-jim2101024@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
[sudeep.holla: added call to reinit_completion, whitespace cleanup, dropped
irrelavant info in the commit log]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SMC/HVC can transmit only one message at the time as the shared memory
needs to be protected and the calls are synchronous.
However, in order to allow multiple threads to send SCMI messages
simultaneously, we need a larger poll of memory.
Let us just use value of 20 to keep it in sync mailbox transport
implementation. Any other value must work perfectly.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201008143722.21888-4-etienne.carriere@linaro.org
Fixes: 1dc6558062 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add smc/hvc transport")
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
[sudeep.holla: reworded the commit message to indicate the practicality]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
gcc as well as clang now produce warnings for missing kerneldoc function
parameter.
Fix the following W=1 kernel build warning:
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c:32:
warning: Function parameter or member 'shmem_lock' not described in 'scmi_smc'
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709153155.22573-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The scmi protocol core driver checks for the channel availability
before evaluating the shmem property. If the individual protocols
don't have separate channel assigned to them, the channel alloted
for the BASE protocol is reused automatically.
Therefore there is no need to check for the shmem property in the
parent node if it is absent in the child protocol node.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327163654.13389-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Instead of declaring the channel availabilty unconditionally, let us
check for the presence of "shmem" property and return the channel
availablity accordingly.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327163654.13389-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The scmi protocol core driver check for non NULL mark_txdone before
invoking the same. There is no need to provide a empty stub. SMC/HVC
calls are synchronous and the call return indicates the completion.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327163654.13389-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In order to support multiple SMC/HVC transport channels with associated
shared memory, it is better to maintain the mutex per channel instead of
existing global one.
Move the smc_mutex into the scmi_smc structure and also rename it to
shmem_lock which is more appropriate for it's use.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327163654.13389-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Use the value of "arm,smc-id" property from the device tree as the first
argument for SMCCC call leaving all the other arguments as zero for now.
There is no Rx, only Tx because of smc/hvc not support Rx.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1583673879-20714-3-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
[sudeep.holla: reworded commit log/subject and fixed !HAVE_ARM_SMCCC build]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cristian Marussi