The SI5351 clkout clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-56-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5351 msynth clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-55-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5351 PLL clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-54-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5341 output clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-53-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The cdce706 clkout clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-52-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The cdce706 divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-51-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The AXI clkgen clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-50-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Atmel SAM9x5 SMD clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-49-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Actions composite factor clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-48-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Actions composite divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-47-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The tlv320aic32x4 clkin clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-46-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Allwinner sun6i RTC clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-45-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The TI J721e Wiz clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-44-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The TI AM654 SerDes clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-43-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Cadence Torrent refclk clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-42-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Cadence Sierra PLL clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-41-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra sor pad clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-40-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versatile sp810 "timerclken" clock implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
This mismatch is probably due to the fact that the driver introduction
predates the determine_rate introduction, and it was never revised since
then.
The default, implicit, behaviour that has been in use so far has thus
been to simply keep using the current parent in all cases. This is also
the behaviour of the new clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() helper, so
we can simply use it to make our expectation explicit.
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-39-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The UX500 sysctrl "set_parent" clocks implement a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-38-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The UX500 PRCMU "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The PRCMU binding also allows to specify the default clock parent
through a device tree cell. This will be enforced at prepare time by the
driver.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
The result is that the driver relies on prepare to set the default
parent, and thus the set_parent hook is effectively unused by design.
We can make that decision explicit by setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() that will keep the
same behaviour. Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided,
clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself
on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the
clock rate otherwise.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-37-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra periph nodiv clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-36-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra super mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-35-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra BPMP mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-34-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The STM32 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-33-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SoCFGPA gate clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-32-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Renesas r9a06g032 bitselect clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-31-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The PXA "CKEN" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-30-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Mediatek cpumux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-29-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX SCU mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-28-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX fixup mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-27-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX busy clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-26-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip "clk48" clock implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Acked-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-25-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Acked-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-24-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The WM381x "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-23-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versaclock5 "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-22-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versaclock5 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-21-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The STM32F4 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-20-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5341 clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-19-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Qoriq mux clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-18-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The lochnagar clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Since there's no upstream device tree using that driver, it's a bit hard
to tell if it uses the assigned-clock properties. The binding and its
example uses them though, so it's likely that the author intent was to
force the parent through the device tree and prevent any reparenting but
through an explicit call to clk_set_parent().
This case is equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to
clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Tested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-17-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The LKM04832 "CLKOUT" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Reviewed-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-16-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-15-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 ACLK clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-14-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 PLL clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-13-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The cdce706 "clkin" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-12-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Berlin2 divider clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-11-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SAM9x5 slow clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-10-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SAM9x5 main clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-9-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Actions "Pass" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-8-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The single parent clock in our kunit tests implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is not entirely unexpected, since its whole purpose it to have a
single parent. When determine_rate is missing, and since
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set for all its instances, the default behaviour
of the framework will be to forward it to the current parent.
This is totally fine as far as the tests are concerned, but we'll start
to mandate a determine_rate implementation when set_parent is set, so
let's fill it with __clk_mux_determine_rate() which will have the same
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-7-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Maxime Ripard