Changing the i915_edp_psr_debug was enabling, disabling or switching
PSR version by directly calling intel_psr_disable_locked() and
intel_psr_enable_locked(), what is not the default PSR path that will
be executed by real users.
So lets force a fastset in the PSR CRTC to trigger a pipe update and
stress the default code path.
Recently a bug was found when switching from PSR2 to PSR1 while
enable_psr kernel parameter was set to the default parameter, this
changes fix it and also fixes the bug linked bellow were DRRS was
left enabled together with PSR when enabling PSR from debugfs.
v2: Handling missing case: disabled to PSR1
v3: Not duplicating the whole atomic state(Maarten)
v4: Adding back the missing call to intel_psr_irq_control(Dhinakaran)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108341
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190206211845.5322-1-jose.souza@intel.com
For now PSR2 is still disabled by default for all platforms but is
our intention to let debugfs to enable it for debug and tests
proporses, so intel_psr2_enabled() that is also used by debugfs to
decide if PSR2 is going to be enabled needs to take in consideration
the debug field.
v2: Using the switch/case that intel_psr2_enabled() already had to
handle this(DK)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190117205548.28378-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Mixed C99 and kernel types use is getting ugly. Prefer kernel types.
sed -i 's/\buint\(8\|16\|32\|64\)_t\b/u\1/g'
Minor checkpatch fixes sprinkled on top of the changed lines.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/14ed72e7f04c9340a057855c5950b54811f8a477.1547629303.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Needs just a few additional includes here and there.
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190108082709.3748-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Define IS_GEN() similarly to our IS_GEN_RANGE(). but use gen instead of
gen_mask to do the comparison. Now callers can pass then gen as a parameter,
so we don't require one macro for each gen.
The following spatch was used to convert the users of these macros:
@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN2(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 2)
|
- IS_GEN3(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 3)
|
- IS_GEN4(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 4)
|
- IS_GEN5(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 5)
|
- IS_GEN6(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 6)
|
- IS_GEN7(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 7)
|
- IS_GEN8(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 8)
|
- IS_GEN9(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 9)
|
- IS_GEN10(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 10)
|
- IS_GEN11(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 11)
)
v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN and compare to info.gen rather than
using the bitmask
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective update
granularity that source must comply.
Here caching the value if required and checking if source supports
it.
v3:
- Returning the default granularity in case DPCD read fails(Dhinakaran)
- Changed DPCD error message level(Dhinakaran)
v4:
- Setting granularity to defaul when granularity read is equal to
0(Dhinakaran)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-9-jose.souza@intel.com
Selective updates have a default granularity requirements as stated
by eDP spec(PSR2 SELECTIVE UPDATE X GRANULARITY CAPABILITY register
definition), so check if HW can match those requirements before
enabling PSR2.
v3:
- Changes in the comments and commit message(Dhinakaran)
- Printing the hdisplay that do not match with default granularity
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-8-jose.souza@intel.com
Our frontbuffer tracking improved over the years + the WA #0884
helped us keep PSR2 enabled while triggering screen updates when
necessary so this FIXME is not valid anymore.
Acked-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-6-jose.souza@intel.com
For ICL the bit 12 of CHICKEN_TRANS is reserved so we should not
touch it and as by default VSC_DATA_SEL_SOFTWARE_CONTROL is already
unset in gen10 + GLK we can just drop it and fix for both gens.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-5-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP spec states 2 different bits to enable sink to trigger a
interruption when there is a CRC mismatch.
DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION is for PSR only and
DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS is for PSR2 only.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-4-jose.souza@intel.com
As we have a else block for the 'if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {'
and this bit is only set for PSR1 move it to that block to make it
more easy to read.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-3-jose.souza@intel.com
For PSR2 there is no register to tell HW to keep main link enabled
while PSR2 is active, so don't configure sink DPCD with a
misleading value.
v2: Moving the set of DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION to the else block
of 'if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled)' to another patch. (Rodrigo)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-2-jose.souza@intel.com
i915 yet don't support PSR in Apple panels, so lets keep it disabled
while we work on that.
v2: Renamed DP_DPCD_QUIRK_PSR_NOT_CURRENTLY_SUPPORTED to
DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR (Ville)
v3:
Adding documentation to DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR(Dhinakaran and Jani)
Fixed typo in comment of the new quirk entry(Jani)
Fixes: 598c6cfe06 (drm/i915/psr: Enable PSR1 on gen-9+ HW)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-1-jose.souza@intel.com
As stated in struct drm_encoder, crtc field should only be used
by non-atomic drivers.
So here caching the pipe id in intel_psr_enable() what is way more
simple and efficient than at every call to
intel_psr_flush()/invalidate() get the
drm.mode_config.connection_mutex lock to safely be able to get the
pipe id by reading drm_connector_state.crtc.
This should fix the null pointer dereference crash below as the
previous way to get the pipe id was prone to race conditions.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181128072838.22773-1-jose.souza@intel.com
If a eDP panel supports both PSR2 and VDSC, our HW cannot
support both at a time. Give priority to PSR2 if a requested
resolution can be supported without compression else enable
VDSC and keep PSR2 disabled.
v4:
Fix the unrealted stuff removed during rebase (Ville)
v3:
* Rebase
v2:
* Add warning for DSC and PSR2 enabled together (DK)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181128202628.20238-3-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
We should not access hardware while computing config also we don't
support stereo 3D so this test was never true.
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-6-jose.souza@intel.com
If a PSR error happened and the driver is reloaded, the EDP_PSR_IIR
will still keep the error set even after the reset done in the
irq_preinstall and irq_uninstall hooks.
And enabling in this situation cause the screen to freeze in the
first time that PSR HW tries to activate so lets keep PSR disabled
to avoid any rendering problems.
v5: rebased: using edp_psr_shift()
v4: Moved handling from intel_psr_compute_config() to
intel_psr_init() to avoid hardware access during compute(Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
squash
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-5-jose.souza@intel.com
While PSR is active hardware will do aux transactions by it self to
wakeup sink to receive a new frame when necessary. If that
transaction is not acked by sink, hardware will trigger this
interruption.
So let's disable PSR as it is a hint that there is problem with this
sink.
The removed FIXME was asking to manually train the link but we don't
need to do that as by spec sink should do a short pulse when it is
out of sync with source, we just need to make sure it is awaken and
the SDP header with PSR inactive set it will trigger the short pulse
with a error set in the link status.
v3: added workarround to fix scheduled work starvation cause by
to frequent PSR error interruption
v4: only setting irq_aux_error as we don't care in clear it and
not using dev_priv->irq_lock as consequence.
v5: rebased: using edp_psr_shift()
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-4-jose.souza@intel.com
When we detect a error and disable PSR, it is kept disabled until the
next modeset but as the sink already show signs that it do not
properly work with PSR lets disabled it for good to avoid any
additional flickering.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-3-jose.souza@intel.com
When a PSR error happens sink sets the PSR error register and also
set the link status to a error status.
So in the short pulse handling it was returning earlier and doing a
full detection and attempting to retrain but it fails as PSR HW is
in change of the main-link.
Just call intel_psr_short_pulse() before
intel_dp_needs_link_retrain() is not the right fix as
intel_dp_needs_link_retrain() would return true and trigger a full
detection while PSR HW is still in change of main-link.
Check for PSR active is also not safe as it could be inactive due a
frontbuffer invalidate and still doing the PSR exit sequence.
v3: added comment in intel_dp_needs_link_retrain()
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Depending on the transcoder enum values to translate from transcoder to
the corresponding CHICKEN_TRANS register can easily break if we add a
new transcoder. Add an explicit mapping instead, by using helpers to
look up the register instance either by transcoder or port (since
unconveniently the registers have both port and transcoder specific
bits).
While at it also check for the correctness of GEN, port, transcoder. I
wasn't sure if psr2_enabled can only be set for GEN9+, but that seems to
be the case indeed (see setting of sink_psr2_support in
intel_psr_init_dpcd()).
v2 (Ville):
- Make gen9_chicken_trans_reg() internal to intel_psr.c.
- s/trans/cpu_transcoder/
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181119180021.370-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Depending on the transcoder enum values to translate from transcoder
to EDP PSR flags can easily break if we add a new transcoder. So remove
the dependency by using an explicit mapping.
While at it also add a WARN for unexpected trancoders.
v2:
- Simplify things by defining flag shift values instead of indices.
- s/trans/cpu_transcoder/ (Ville)
v3:
- Define flags to look like separate bits instead of the values of
the same bitfield. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181120092325.21249-2-imre.deak@intel.com
In the past we had hooks to configure HW for VLV/CHV too, in the drop
of VLV/CHV support the intel_psr_disable_source() code was not moved
to the caller, so doing it here.
Suggested-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181106190843.18009-4-jose.souza@intel.com
It should always wait for idle state when disabling PSR because PSR
could be inactive due a call to intel_psr_exit() and while PSR is
still being disabled asynchronously userspace could change the
modeset causing a call to psr_disable() that will not wait for PSR
idle and then PSR will be enabled again while PSR is still not idle.
v2: rebased on top of the patch reusing psr_exit()
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181106190843.18009-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Both functions have the same code to disable PSR, so let's reuse that
code instead of duplicate.
Suggested-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181106190843.18009-1-jose.souza@intel.com
This WA also works fine for PSR2, triggering a selective update when
possible.
Acked-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181003205031.32474-4-jose.souza@intel.com
ICL spec states that this bit is now reserved.
Bspec: 7722
v2(Dhinakaran and Jani):
- instead of remove bit in gen11 now only setting if if gen < 11
- changed commit title
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181003205031.32474-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Now both PSR and PSR2 have the same exit mask, so let's share then
instead of have the same code 2 times.
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181003205031.32474-1-jose.souza@intel.com
We have new tests and fixes in place since the feature was last
disabled. Try again for gen-9+ hardware and enable only PSR1 by default as
a first step.
v2: Remove typo fix and comment improvements (Rodrigo)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
References: commit 2ee7dc497e ("drm/i915: disable PSR by default on HSW/BDW")
References: commit dcb2e993f3 ("Revert "drm/i915: Enable PSR by default on Valleyview and Cherryview."")
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Tested-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180928061117.12394-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
If the previous modeset commit has completed and is no longer part of
the crtc state, skip waiting for it.
Ville pointed out that, in fact, the commit is never removed after a
modeset so the only way we could see a NULL here should be if there was
never a commit attached. Nevertheless, we have the evidence it can be
NULL and it has been defended against elsewhere, for example commit
93313538c1 ("drm/i915: Pass idle crtc_state to intel_dp_sink_crc").
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107792
Fixes: c44301fce6 ("drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180904162902.2578-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
CI runs show PSR2 does not go to IDLE with selective update enabled on
all PSR exit triggers. Specifically, logs indicate the hardware enters
"SLEEP Selective Update" and not "IDLE Reset state', like the kernel
expects, when vblank interrupts are enabled. This check was added for PSR1
but incorrectly extended to PSR2, remove the check as it breaks tests
and prints out misleading error messages.
v2: Split out non-code changes (Rodrigo)
Cc: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fixes: c43dbcbbcc ("drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle")
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180824230844.12428-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
gen8_de_irq_postinstall() wasn't masking the IRQ bit before passing the
debug flag to psr_irq_control(). This check was missed when new debug bits
were defined in 'commit c44301fce6 ("drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at
runtime through debugfs, v6")'. Instead of ANDing the irq bit in all the
callers, move it to the callee.
v2: Rebased.
Fixes: c44301fce6 ("drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through
debugfs, v6")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180821221156.2442-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Knowing the status of the PSR HW state machine is useful for debug,
especially since we are seeing errors with PSR2 in CI.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180821221156.2442-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
This will make it easier to test PSR1 on PSR2 capable eDP machines.
Changes since v1:
- Remove I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR2, it did nothing, not sure forcing
PSR2 would even work.
- Handle NULL crtc in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. (dhnkrn)
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180808141911.7647-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle
to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force
a certain PSR mode without a modeset.
To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow
the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking
to check whether a debugfs mode is specified.
Changes since v1:
- Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled.
- Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs.
- Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify
it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c
- Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr
lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY.
Changes since v2:
- Rebase on top of intel_psr changes.
Changes since v3:
- Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn)
- Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn)
- Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn)
- Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode.
- Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn)
- Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn)
Changes since v4:
- Return error in _set() function.
- Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn)
- Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn)
- Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp.
- Fix typo. (dhnkrn)
Changes since v5:
- Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn)
- Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn)
- Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn)
- Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn)
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reduce the module parameter to enable or disable.
The link stand by vs full link off was used only once.
And it was actually masking another bug fixed by commit
'84bb2916a683 ("drm/i915/psr: Check for SET_POWER_CAPABLE
bit at PSR init time.")'
So, let's remove these options for now. End goal is to
fully remove the mod param, moving it to a debugfs
interface in upcoming patches.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180712052715.8177-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
In commit "drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank
evasion", the idea was to limit the PSR IDLE checks when PSR is
actually supported. While CAN_PSR does do that check, it doesn't
applies on a per-crtc basis. crtc_state->has_psr is a more granular
check that only applies to pipe(s) that have PSR enabled.
Without the has_psr check, we end up waiting on the eDP transcoder's
PSR_STATUS register irrespective of whether the pipe being updated is
driving it or not.
v2: Remove unnecessary parantheses, make checkpatch happy.
v3: Move the has_psr check to intel_psr_wait_for_idle and commit
message changes (DK).
v4: Derive dev_priv from intel_crtc_state (DK)
v5: Commit message changes to reflect the HW behavior (DK)
Fixes: a608987970 ("drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank evasion")
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180712053323.26266-1-tarun.vyas@intel.com
This is a lockless version of the exisiting psr_wait_for_idle().
We want to wait for PSR to idle out inside intel_pipe_update_start.
At the time of a pipe update, we should never race with any psr
enable or disable code, which is a part of crtc enable/disable.
The follow up patch will use this lockless wait inside pipe_update_
start to wait for PSR to idle out before checking for vblank evasion.
We need to keep the wait in pipe_update_start to as less as it can be.
So,we can live and flourish w/o taking any psr locks at all.
Even if psr is never enabled, psr2_enabled will be false and this
function will wait for PSR1 to idle out, which should just return
immediately, so a very short (~1-2 usec) wait for cases where PSR
is disabled.
v2: Add comment to explain the 25msec timeout (DK)
v3: Rename psr_wait_for_idle to __psr_wait_for_idle_locked to avoid
naming conflicts and propagate err (if any) to the caller (Chris)
v5: Form a series with the next patch
v7: Better explain the need for lockless wait and increase the max
timeout to handle refresh rates < 60 Hz (Daniel Vetter)
v8: Rebase
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180627200250.1515-1-tarun.vyas@intel.com
Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame and
compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by
source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD
and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
Spec: 7723
v6:
andling DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR here and remove "bdw+" from commit
message
v4:
patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time timeout'
to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG.
v3:
disabling PSR instead of exiting on error
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180626201644.21932-5-jose.souza@intel.com
Specification requires that max time should be masked from bdw and
forward but it can be also safely enabled to hsw.
This will make PSR exits more deterministic and only when really
needed. If this was used to fix a issue in some panel than can
only self-refresh for a few seconds, that panel will interrupt
and assert one of the PSR errors handled in:
'drm/i915/psr: Handle PSR RFB storage error' and
'drm/i915/psr: Begin to handle PSR/PSR2 errors set by sink'
Spec: 21664
v4:
patch moved to before 'drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the
static frame on the sink side' to avoid touch in 2 patches
EDP_PSR_DEBUG.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180626201644.21932-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Sink will interrupt source when it have any PSR error.
DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR is a PSR2 but already
handling it here.
The only missing error to be handled is DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR that
will be taken in care in a futher patch.
v6:
not handling DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR here
v5:
handling all PSR errors here, so the commit message and
comment have changed
v3:
disabling PSR instead of exiting on error
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180626201644.21932-3-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP spec states that sink device will do a short pulse in HPD
line when there is a PSR/PSR2 error that needs to be handled by
source, this is handling the first and most simples error:
DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR.
Here taking the safest approach and disabling PSR(at least until
the next modeset), to avoid multiple rendering issues due to
bad pannels.
v5:
added lockdep_assert in psr_disable and renamed psr_disable()
to intel_psr_disable_locked()
v4:
Using CAN_PSR instead of HAS_PSR in intel_psr_short_pulse
v3:
disabling PSR instead of exiting on error
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180626201644.21932-2-jose.souza@intel.com
It was only used in VLV/CHV so after the removal of the PSR support
for those platforms it is not necessary any more.
v7: Rebased
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180626201644.21932-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Depending whether PSR1 or PSR2 was configured, we print a warning if the
corresponding control mmio indicated PSR was erroneously enabled. As
Chris pointed out, it makes more sense to check for both the mmio's
since we expect neither PSR1 nor PSR2 to be enabled when psr_activate() is
called.
v2: Read PSR2 control register only on supported platforms (Rodrigo)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180626090522.17682-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Commit 5422b37c90 ("drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr
back.") switched from delayed work to the plain variant and while doing so
removed the check for work_busy() before scheduling a PSR activation.
This appears to cause consecutive executions of psr_activate() in this
scenario - after a worker picks up the PSR work item for execution and
before the work function can acquire the PSR mutex, a psr_flush() can
get hold of the mutex and schedule another PSR work. Without a psr_exit()
between the two psr_activate() calls, warning messages get printed.
Further, since we drop the mutex in the midst of psr_work() to wait for
PSR to idle, another work item can also get scheduled. Fix this by
returning if PSR was already active.
Fixes: 5422b37c90 ("drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr back.")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106948
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180625054741.3919-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
José Roberto de Souza