Rename ext4_quota_off_umount() to ext4_quotas_off(), and add type
parameter to replace open code in ext4_enable_quotas().
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327141630.156875-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Always enable 'JBD2_CYCLE_RECORD' journal option on ext4, letting the
jbd2 continue to record new journal transactions from the recovered
journal head or the checkpointed transactions in the previous mount.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322013353.1843306-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
For a newly mounted file system, the journal committing thread always
record new transactions from the start of the journal area, no matter
whether the journal was clean or just has been recovered. So the logdump
code in debugfs cannot dump continuous logs between each mount, it is
disadvantageous to analysis corrupted file system image and locate the
file system inconsistency bugs.
If we get a corrupted file system in the running products and want to
find out what has happened, besides lookup the system log, one effective
way is to backtrack the journal log. But we may not always run e2fsck
before each mount and the default fsck -a mode also cannot always
checkout all inconsistencies, so it could left over some inconsistencies
into the next mount until we detect it. Finally, transactions in the
journal may probably discontinuous and some relatively new transactions
has been covered, it becomes hard to analyse. If we could record
transactions continuously between each mount, we could acquire more
useful info from the journal. Like this:
|Previous mount checkpointed/recovered logs|Current mount logs |
|{------}{---}{--------} ... {------}| ... |{======}{========}...000000|
And yes the journal area is limited and cannot record everything, the
problematic transaction may also be covered even if we do this, but
this is still useful for fuzzy tests and short-running products.
This patch save the head blocknr in the superblock after flushing the
journal or unmounting the file system, let the next mount could continue
to record new transaction behind it. This change is backward compatible
because the old kernel does not care about the head blocknr of the
journal. It is also fine if we mount a clean old image without valid
head blocknr, we fail back to set it to s_first just like before.
Finally, for the case of mount an unclean file system, we could also get
the journal head easily after scanning/replaying the journal, it will
continue to record new transaction after the recovered transactions.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322013353.1843306-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
journal->j_format_version is no longer used, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315013128.3911115-7-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Current journal_get_superblock() couple journal superblock checking and
partial journal initialization, factor out initialization part from it
to make things clear.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315013128.3911115-6-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We should only check and set extented features if journal format version
is 2, and now we check the in memory copy of the superblock
'journal->j_format_version', which relys on the parameter initialization
sequence, switch to use the h_blocktype in superblock cloud be more
clear.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315013128.3911115-5-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
JBD2_HAS_[IN|RO_]COMPAT_FEATURE macros are no longer used, just remove
them.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315013128.3911115-4-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
As discussed in [1], 'sbi->s_journal_bdev != sb->s_bdev' will always
become true if sbi->s_journal_bdev exists. Filesystem block device and
journal block device are both opened with 'FMODE_EXCL' mode, so these
two devices can't be same one. Then we can remove the redundant checking
'sbi->s_journal_bdev != sb->s_bdev' if 'sbi->s_journal_bdev' exists.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f86584f6-3877-ff18-47a1-2efaa12d18b2@huawei.com/
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315013128.3911115-3-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Following process makes ext4 load stale buffer heads from last failed
mounting in a new mounting operation:
mount_bdev
ext4_fill_super
| ext4_load_and_init_journal
| ext4_load_journal
| jbd2_journal_load
| load_superblock
| journal_get_superblock
| set_buffer_verified(bh) // buffer head is verified
| jbd2_journal_recover // failed caused by EIO
| goto failed_mount3a // skip 'sb->s_root' initialization
deactivate_locked_super
kill_block_super
generic_shutdown_super
if (sb->s_root)
// false, skip ext4_put_super->invalidate_bdev->
// invalidate_mapping_pages->mapping_evict_folio->
// filemap_release_folio->try_to_free_buffers, which
// cannot drop buffer head.
blkdev_put
blkdev_put_whole
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bdev->bd_openers))
// false, systemd-udev happens to open the device. Then
// blkdev_flush_mapping->kill_bdev->truncate_inode_pages->
// truncate_inode_folio->truncate_cleanup_folio->
// folio_invalidate->block_invalidate_folio->
// filemap_release_folio->try_to_free_buffers will be skipped,
// dropping buffer head is missed again.
Second mount:
ext4_fill_super
ext4_load_and_init_journal
ext4_load_journal
ext4_get_journal
jbd2_journal_init_inode
journal_init_common
bh = getblk_unmovable
bh = __find_get_block // Found stale bh in last failed mounting
journal->j_sb_buffer = bh
jbd2_journal_load
load_superblock
journal_get_superblock
if (buffer_verified(bh))
// true, skip journal->j_format_version = 2, value is 0
jbd2_journal_recover
do_one_pass
next_log_block += count_tags(journal, bh)
// According to journal_tag_bytes(), 'tag_bytes' calculating is
// affected by jbd2_has_feature_csum3(), jbd2_has_feature_csum3()
// returns false because 'j->j_format_version >= 2' is not true,
// then we get wrong next_log_block. The do_one_pass may exit
// early whenoccuring non JBD2_MAGIC_NUMBER in 'next_log_block'.
The filesystem is corrupted here, journal is partially replayed, and
new journal sequence number actually is already used by last mounting.
The invalidate_bdev() can drop all buffer heads even racing with bare
reading block device(eg. systemd-udev), so we can fix it by invalidating
bdev in error handling path in __ext4_fill_super().
Fetch a reproducer in [Link].
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217171
Fixes: 25ed6e8a54 ("jbd2: enable journal clients to enable v2 checksumming")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.5
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315013128.3911115-2-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We've had reports of significant performance regression of sub-block
(unaligned) direct writes due to the added exclusivity restrictions
in ext4. The purpose of the exclusivity requirement for unaligned
direct writes is to avoid data corruption caused by unserialized
partial block zeroing in the iomap dio layer across overlapping
writes.
XFS has similar requirements for the same underlying reasons, yet
doesn't suffer the extreme performance regression that ext4 does.
The reason for this is that XFS utilizes IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY
mode, which allows for optimistic submission of concurrent unaligned
I/O and kicks back writes that require partial block zeroing such
that they can be submitted in a safe, exclusive context. Since ext4
already performs most of these checks pre-submission, it can support
something similar without necessarily relying on the iomap flag and
associated retry mechanism.
Update the dio write submission path to allow concurrent submission
of unaligned direct writes that are purely overwrite and so will not
require block zeroing. To improve readability of the various related
checks, move the unaligned I/O handling down into
ext4_dio_write_checks(), where the dio draining and force wait logic
can immediately follow the locking requirement checks. Finally, the
IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY flag is set to enable a warning check as a
precaution should the ext4 overwrite logic ever become inconsistent
with the zeroing expectations of iomap dio.
The performance improvement of sub-block direct write I/O is shown
in the following fio test on a 64xcpu guest vm:
Test: fio --name=test --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --group_reporting
--overwrite=1 --thread --size=10G --filename=/mnt/fio
--readwrite=write --ramp_time=10s --runtime=60s --numjobs=8
--blocksize=2k --iodepth=256 --allow_file_create=0
v6.2: write: IOPS=4328, BW=8724KiB/s
v6.2 (patched): write: IOPS=801k, BW=1565MiB/s
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230314130759.642710-1-bfoster@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Line wrap and slightly clarify the comments describing mballoc's
cirtiera.
Define EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS as part of the enum, so that it will
automatically get updated when criteria is added or removed.
Also fix a potential unitialized use of 'cr' variable if
CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
After ext4_es_insert_extent() returns void, the return value in
ext4_zeroout_es() is also unnecessary, so make it return void too.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-13-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now ext4_es_insert_extent() never return error, so make it return void.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-12-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Similar to in ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(), we use preallocations that
do not fail to avoid inconsistencies, but we do not care about es that are
not must be kept, and we return 0 even if such es memory allocation fails.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-9-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Similar to in ext4_es_remove_extent(), we use a no-fail preallocation
to avoid inconsistencies, except that here we may have to preallocate
two extent_status.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-8-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If __es_remove_extent() returns an error it means that when splitting
extent, allocating an extent that must be kept failed, where returning
an error directly would cause the extent tree to be inconsistent. So we
use GFP_NOFAIL to pre-allocate an extent_status and pass it to
__es_remove_extent() to avoid this problem.
In addition, since the allocated memory is outside the i_es_lock, the
extent_status tree may change and the pre-allocated extent_status is
no longer needed, so we release the pre-allocated extent_status when
es->es_len is not initialized.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-7-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When splitting extent, if the second extent can not be dropped, we return
-ENOMEM and use GFP_NOFAIL to preallocate an extent_status outside of
i_es_lock and pass it to __es_remove_extent() to be used as the second
extent. This ensures that __es_remove_extent() is executed successfully,
thus ensuring consistency in the extent status tree. If the second extent
is not undroppable, we simply drop it and return 0. Then retry is no longer
necessary, remove it.
Now, __es_remove_extent() will always remove what it should, maybe more.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-6-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Pass a extent_status pointer prealloc to __es_insert_extent(). If the
pointer is non-null, it is used directly when a new extent_status is
needed to avoid memory allocation failures.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-5-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Factor out __es_alloc_extent() and __es_free_extent(), which only allocate
and free extent_status in these two helpers.
The ext4_es_alloc_extent() function is split into __es_alloc_extent()
and ext4_es_init_extent(). In __es_alloc_extent() we allocate memory using
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_ZERO if the memory allocation cannot
fail, otherwise we use GFP_ATOMIC. and the ext4_es_init_extent() is used to
initialize extent_status and update related variables after a successful
allocation.
This is to prepare for the use of pre-allocated extent_status later.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-4-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In the extent status tree, we have extents which we can just drop without
issues and extents we must not drop - this depends on the extent's status
- currently ext4_es_is_delayed() extents must stay, others may be dropped.
A helper function is added to help determine if the current extent can
be dropped, although only ext4_es_is_delayed() extents cannot be dropped
currently.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In our fault injection test, we create an ext4 file, migrate it to
non-extent based file, then punch a hole and finally trigger a WARN_ON
in the ext4_da_update_reserve_space():
EXT4-fs warning (device sda): ext4_da_update_reserve_space:369:
ino 14, used 11 with only 10 reserved data blocks
When writing back a non-extent based file, if we enable delalloc, the
number of reserved blocks will be subtracted from the number of blocks
mapped by ext4_ind_map_blocks(), and the extent status tree will be
updated. We update the extent status tree by first removing the old
extent_status and then inserting the new extent_status. If the block range
we remove happens to be in an extent, then we need to allocate another
extent_status with ext4_es_alloc_extent().
use old to remove to add new
|----------|------------|------------|
old extent_status
The problem is that the allocation of a new extent_status failed due to a
fault injection, and __es_shrink() did not get free memory, resulting in
a return of -ENOMEM. Then do_writepages() retries after receiving -ENOMEM,
we map to the same extent again, and the number of reserved blocks is again
subtracted from the number of blocks in that extent. Since the blocks in
the same extent are subtracted twice, we end up triggering WARN_ON at
ext4_da_update_reserve_space() because used > ei->i_reserved_data_blocks.
For non-extent based file, we update the number of reserved blocks after
ext4_ind_map_blocks() is executed, which causes a problem that when we call
ext4_ind_map_blocks() to create a block, it doesn't always create a block,
but we always reduce the number of reserved blocks. So we move the logic
for updating reserved blocks to ext4_ind_map_blocks() to ensure that the
number of reserved blocks is updated only after we do succeed in allocating
some new blocks.
Fixes: 5f634d064c ("ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-2-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
mballoc criterias have historically been called by numbers
like CR0, CR1... however this makes it confusing to understand
what each criteria is about.
Change these criterias from numbers to symbolic names and add
relevant comments. While we are at it, also reformat and add some
comments to ext4_seq_mb_stats_show() for better readability.
Additionally, define CR_FAST which signifies the criteria
below which we can make quicker decisions like:
* quitting early if (free block < requested len)
* avoiding to scan free extents smaller than required len.
* avoiding to initialize buddy cache and work with existing cache
* limiting prefetches
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a2dc6ec5aea5e5e68cf8e788c2a964ffead9c8b0.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
CR1_5 aims to optimize allocations which can't be satisfied in CR1. The
fact that we couldn't find a group in CR1 suggests that it would be
difficult to find a continuous extent to compleltely satisfy our
allocations. So before falling to the slower CR2, in CR1.5 we
proactively trim the the preallocations so we can find a group with
(free / fragments) big enough. This speeds up our allocation at the
cost of slightly reduced preallocation.
The patch also adds a new sysfs tunable:
* /sys/fs/ext4/<partition>/mb_cr1_5_max_trim_order
This controls how much CR1.5 can trim a request before falling to CR2.
For example, for a request of order 7 and max trim order 2, CR1.5 can
trim this upto order 5.
Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/150fdf65c8e4cc4dba71e020ce0859bcf636a5ff.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Make the logic of searching average fragment list of a given order reusable
by abstracting it out to a differnet function. This will also avoid
code duplication in upcoming patches.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/028c11d95b17ce0285f45456709a0ca922df1b83.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Before this patch, the call stack in ext4_run_li_request is as follows:
/*
* nr = no. of BGs we want to fetch (=s_mb_prefetch)
* prefetch_ios = no. of BGs not uptodate after
* ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait()
*/
next_group = ext4_mb_prefetch(sb, group, nr, prefetch_ios);
ext4_mb_prefetch_fini(sb, next_group prefetch_ios);
ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() will only try to initialize buddies for BGs in
range [next_group - prefetch_ios, next_group). This is incorrect since
sometimes (prefetch_ios < nr), which causes ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() to
incorrectly ignore some of the BGs that might need initialization. This
issue is more notable now with the previous patch enabling "fetching" of
BLOCK_UNINIT BGs which are marked buffer_uptodate by default.
Fix this by passing nr to ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() instead of
prefetch_ios so that it considers the right range of groups.
Similarly, make sure we don't pass nr=0 to ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() in
ext4_mb_regular_allocator() since we might have prefetched BLOCK_UNINIT
groups that would need buddy initialization.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/05e648ae04ec5b754207032823e9c1de9a54f87a.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently, ext4_mb_prefetch() and ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() skip
BLOCK_UNINIT groups since fetching their bitmaps doesn't need disk IO.
As a consequence, we end not initializing the buddy structures and CR0/1
lists for these BGs, even though it can be done without any disk IO
overhead. Hence, don't skip such BGs during prefetch and prefetch_fini.
This improves the accuracy of CR0/1 allocation as earlier, we could have
essentially empty BLOCK_UNINIT groups being ignored by CR0/1 due to their buddy
not being initialized, leading to slower CR2 allocations. With this patch CR0/1
will be able to discover these groups as well, thus improving performance.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dc3130b8daf45ffe63d8a3c1edcf00eb8ba70e1f.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When we are inside ext4_mb_complex_scan_group() in CR1, we can be sure
that this group has atleast 1 big enough continuous free extent to satisfy
our request because (free / fragments) > goal length.
Hence, instead of wasting time looping over smaller free extents, only
try to consider the free extent if we are sure that it has enough
continuous free space to satisfy goal length. This is particularly
useful when scanning highly fragmented BGs in CR1 as, without this
patch, the allocator might stop scanning early before reaching the big
enough free extent (due to ac_found > mb_max_to_scan) which causes us to
uncessarily trim the request.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a5473df4517c53ec940bc9b603ef83a547032a32.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Track number of allocations where the length of blocks allocated is equal to the
length of goal blocks (post normalization). This metric could be useful if
making changes to the allocator logic in the future as it could give us
visibility into how often do we trim our requests.
PS: ac_b_ex.fe_len might get modified due to preallocation efforts and
hence we use ac_f_ex.fe_len instead since we want to compare how much the
allocator was able to actually find.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/343620e2be8a237239ea2613a7a866ee8607e973.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This gives better visibility into the number of extents scanned in each
particular CR. For example, this information can be used to see how out
block group scanning logic is performing when the BG is fragmented.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/55bb6d80f6e22ed2a5a830aa045572bdffc8b1b9.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Convert criteria to be an enum so it easier to maintain and
update the tracefiles to use enum names. This change also makes
it easier to insert new criterias in the future.
There is no functional change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5d82fd467bdf70ea45bdaef810af3b146013946c.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_mb_stats & ext4_mb_max_to_scan are never used. We use
sbi->s_mb_stats and sbi->s_mb_max_to_scan instead.
Hence kill these extern declarations.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/928b3142062172533b6d1b5a94de94700590fef3.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
There will be changes coming in future patches which will introduce a new
criteria for block allocation. This removes the useless setting of ac_criteria.
AFAIU, this might be only used to differentiate between whether a preallocated
blocks was allocated or was regular allocator called for allocating blocks.
Hence this also adds the debug prints to identify what type of block allocation
was done in ext4_mb_show_ac().
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1dbae05617519cb6202f1b299c9d1be3e7cda763.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Function ext4_free_blocks_simple needs count in cluster. Function
ext4_free_blocks accepts count in block. Convert count to cluster
to fix the mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-12-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_free_blocks will retrieve block from bh if block parameter is zero.
Retrieve block before ext4_free_blocks_simple to avoid potentially
passing wrong block to ext4_free_blocks_simple.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple ignores the group before goal, so it will fail
if free blocks reside in group before goal. Try all groups to avoid
unexpected failure.
Search finishes either if any free block is found or if no available
blocks are found. Simpliy check "i >= max" to distinguish the above
cases.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
For ext4_block_group and ext4_block_group_offset, there are only
declaration without definition. Just remove them.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_mb_use_preallocated will ignore the demand to alloc goal blocks,
although the EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is requested.
For group pa, ext4_mb_group_or_file will not set EXT4_MB_HINT_GROUP_ALLOC
if EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set. So we will not alloc goal blocks from
group pa if EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set.
For inode pa, ext4_mb_pa_goal_check is added to check if free extent in
found inode pa meets goal blocks when EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Suggested-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stripe is misused in block unit and in cluster unit in different code
paths. User awared of stripe maybe not awared of bigalloc feature, so
treat stripe only in block unit to fix this.
Besides, it's hard to get stripe aligned blocks (start and length are both
aligned with stripe) if stripe is not aligned with cluster, just disable
stripe and alert user in this case to simpfy the code and avoid
unnecessary work to get stripe aligned blocks which likely to be failed.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We need start in block unit while fe_start is in cluster unit. Use
ext4_grp_offs_to_block helper to convert fe_start to get start in
block unit.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The "i" returned from mb_find_next_zero_bit is in cluster unit and we
need offset "block" corresponding to "i" in block unit. Convert "i" to
block unit to fix the unit mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
NRL_CHECK_SIZE will compare input req and size, so req and size should
be in same unit. Input req "fe_len" is in cluster unit while input
size "(8<<20)>>bsbits" is in block unit. Convert "fe_len" to block
unit to fix the mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now that fsverity supports working on entire folios, call
fsverity_verify_folio() instead of fsverity_verify_page()
Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230516192713.1070469-1-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_write_inline_data_end() is completely converted to work with folio.
Also all callers of ext4_write_inline_data_end() already works on folio
except ext4_da_write_end(). Mostly for consistency and saving few
instructions maybe, this patch just converts ext4_da_write_end() to work
with folio which makes the last caller of ext4_write_inline_data_end()
also converted to work with folio.
We then make ext4_write_inline_data_end() take folio instead of page.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1bcea771720ff451a5a59b3f1bcd5fae51cb7ce7.1684122756.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Chao Yu