The function names in the comment blocks for the functions
scaling_available_frequencies_show() and
scaling_boost_frequencies_show() do not match the actual names.
Fixes: 6f19efc0a1 ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 3c55e94c0a ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover
boost frequencies") attempted to address a performance issue involving
acpi-cpufreq, the schedutil governor and scale-invariance on x86 by
extending the frequency tables created by acpi-cpufreq to cover the
entire range of "turbo" (or "boost") frequencies, but that caused
frequencies reported via /proc/cpuinfo and the scaling_cur_freq
attribute in sysfs to change which may confuse users and monitoring
tools.
For this reason, revert the part of commit 3c55e94c0a adding the
extra entry to the frequency table and use the observation that
in principle cpuinfo.max_freq need not be equal to the maximum
frequency listed in the frequency table for the given policy.
Namely, modify cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() to allow cpufreq
drivers to set their own cpuinfo.max_freq above that frequency and
change acpi-cpufreq to set cpuinfo.max_freq to the maximum boost
frequency found via CPPC.
This should be sufficient to let all of the cpufreq subsystem know
the real maximum frequency of the CPU without changing frequency
reporting.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211305
Fixes: 3c55e94c0a ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies")
Reported-by: Matt McDonald <gardotd426@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Matt McDonald <gardotd426@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Michael Larabel <Michael@phoronix.com>
Cc: 5.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.11+
No attempt has been made to document any of the demoted functions here.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_available_freqs'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_available_freqs'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'show_boost' not described in 'show_available_freqs'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:269: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'scaling_available_frequencies_show'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:269: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'scaling_available_frequencies_show'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:281: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'scaling_boost_frequencies_show'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:281: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'scaling_boost_frequencies_show'
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In the process of modifying a cpufreq policy, the cpufreq core makes
a copy of it including all of the internals which is stored on the
CPU stack. Because struct cpufreq_policy is relatively large, this
may cause the size of the stack frame to exceed the 2 KB limit and
so the GCC complains when -Wframe-larger-than= is used.
In fact, it is not necessary to copy the entire policy structure
in order to modify it, however.
First, because cpufreq_set_policy() obtains the min and max policy
limits from frequency QoS now, it is not necessary to pass the limits
to it from the callers. The only things that need to be passed to it
from there are the new governor pointer or (if there is a built-in
governor in the driver) the "policy" value representing the governor
choice. They both can be passed as individual arguments, though, so
make cpufreq_set_policy() take them this way and rework its callers
accordingly. This avoids making copies of cpufreq policies in the
callers of cpufreq_set_policy().
Second, cpufreq_set_policy() still needs to pass the new policy
data to the ->verify() callback of the cpufreq driver whose task
is to sanitize the min and max policy limits. It still does not
need to make a full copy of struct cpufreq_policy for this purpose,
but it needs to pass a few items from it to the driver in case they
are needed (different drivers have different needs in that respect
and all of them have to be covered). For this reason, introduce
struct cpufreq_policy_data to hold copies of the members of
struct cpufreq_policy used by the existing ->verify() driver
callbacks and pass a pointer to a temporary structure of that
type to ->verify() (instead of passing a pointer to full struct
cpufreq_policy to it).
While at it, notice that intel_pstate and longrun don't really need
to verify the "policy" value in struct cpufreq_policy, so drop those
check from them to avoid copying "policy" into struct
cpufreq_policy_data (which allows it to be slightly smaller).
Also while at it fix up white space in a couple of places and make
cpufreq_set_policy() static (as it can be so).
Fixes: 3000ce3c52 ("cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAMuHMdX6-jb1W8uC2_237m8ctCpsnGp=JCxqt8pCWVqNXHmkVg@mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation #
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 2fb4719b25 ("cpufreq / boost: Kconfig: Support for
software-managed BOOST") added the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW config.
However EXYNOS based cpufreq drivers have been removed because of
switching to cpufreq-dt driver which will set boost-attr if required.
So, let's remove this option and update cpufreq_generic_attr[].
Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This isn't used anymore. Remove the helper and update documentation
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
By design, cpufreq drivers are responsible for calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() from their ->init()
callbacks to validate the frequency table.
However, if a cpufreq driver is buggy and fails to do so properly, it
lead to unexpected behavior of the driver or the cpufreq core at a
later point in time. It would be better if the core could
validate the frequency table during driver initialization.
To that end, introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort() and make
the cpufreq core call it right after invoking the ->init() callback
of the driver and destroy the cpufreq policy if the table is invalid.
For the time being the validation of the table happens twice, once
from the driver and then from the core. The individual drivers will
be updated separately to drop table validation if they don't need it
for other reasons.
The frequency table is marked "sorted" or "unsorted" by the new helper
now instead of in cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(), as it should only
be done after validating the table (which the drivers won't do going
forward).
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Pointer subtraction is slow and tedious. Therefore, replace all instances
where cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry loops contained such substractions
with an iteration macro providing an index to the frequency_table entry.
Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180120020237.GM13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq drivers aren't required to provide a sorted frequency table
today, and even the ones which provide a sorted table aren't handled
efficiently by cpufreq core.
This patch adds infrastructure to verify if the freq-table provided by
the drivers is sorted or not, and use efficient helpers if they are
sorted.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This routine can't fail unless the frequency table is invalid and
doesn't contain any valid entries.
Make it return the index and WARN() in case it is used for an invalid
table.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The policy already has this pointer set, use it instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Most of the callers of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() already have the
pointer to a valid 'policy' structure and they don't really need to go
through the per-cpu variable first and then a check to validate the
frequency, in order to find the freq-table for the policy.
Directly use the policy->freq_table field instead for them.
Only one user of that API is left after above changes, cpu_cooling.c and
it accesses the freq_table in a racy way as the policy can get freed in
between.
Fix it by using cpufreq_cpu_get() properly.
Since there are no more users of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() left, get
rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> (cpu_cooling.c)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
All cpufreq drivers with a freq-table are migrated to use
cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() long back and the routine
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() isn't used outside of cpufreq core
now.
Unexport it and update Documentation as well.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In some cases it wouldn't be known at time of driver registration, if
the driver needs to support boost frequencies.
For example, while getting boost information from DT with opp-v2
bindings, we need to parse the bindings for all the CPUs to know if
turbo/boost OPPs are supported or not.
One way out to do that efficiently is to delay supporting boost mode
(i.e. creating /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost file), until the
time OPP bindings are parsed.
At that point, the driver can enable boost support. This can be done at
->init(), where the frequency table is created.
To do that, the driver requires few APIs from cpufreq core that let him
do this. This patch provides these APIs.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Users of freq table may want to access it for any CPU from
policy->related_cpus mask. One such user is cpu-cooling layer. It gets a
list of 'clip_cpus' (equivalent to policy->related_cpus) during
registration and tries to get freq_table for the first CPU of this mask.
If the CPU, for which it tries to fetch freq_table, is offline,
cpufreq_frequency_get_table() fails. This happens because it relies on
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() for its functioning which returns policy only for
online CPUs.
The fix is to access the policy data structure for the given CPU
directly (which also returns a valid policy for offline CPUs), but the
policy itself has to be active (meaning that at least one CPU using it
is online) for the frequency table to be returned.
Because we will be using 'cpufreq_cpu_data' now, which is internal to
the cpufreq core, move cpufreq_frequency_get_table() to cpufreq.c.
Reported-and-tested-by: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Introduce CPUFREQ_RELATION_C for frequency selection.
It selects the frequency with the minimum euclidean distance to target.
In case of equal distance between 2 frequencies, it will select the
greater frequency.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Many drivers keep frequencies in frequency table in ascending
or descending order. When governor tries to change to policy->min
or policy->max respectively then the cpufreq_frequency_table_target
could return on first iteration. This will save some iteration cycles.
So, break out early when a frequency in cpufreq_frequency_table
equals to target one.
Testing this during kernel compilation using ondemand governor
with a frequency table in ascending order, the
cpufreq_frequency_table_target returned early on the first
iteration at about 30% of times called.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry and
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macros helpers for iteration over the
cpufreq_frequency_table, so use them.
It should have no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Acked-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently cpufreq frequency table has two fields: frequency and driver_data.
driver_data is only for drivers' internal use and cpufreq core shouldn't use
it at all. But with the introduction of BOOST frequencies, this assumption
was broken and we started using it as a flag instead.
There are two problems due to this:
- It is against the description of this field, as driver's data is used by
the core now.
- if drivers fill it with -3 for any frequency, then those frequencies are
never considered by cpufreq core as it is exactly same as value of
CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ, i.e. ~2.
The best way to get this fixed is by creating another field flags which
will be used for such flags. This patch does that. Along with that various
drivers need modifications due to the change of struct cpufreq_frequency_table.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CPUFreq core doesn't control value of .driver_data and this field is
completely driver specific. This can contain any value and not only
indexes. For most of the drivers, which aren't using this field, its
value is zero. So, printing this from core doesn't make any sense.
Don't print it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
freq table is not per CPU but per policy, so it makes more sense to
keep it within struct cpufreq_policy instead of a per-cpu variable.
This patch does it. Over that, there is no need to set policy->freq_table
to NULL in ->exit(), as policy structure is going to be freed soon.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit adds boost frequency support in cpufreq core (Hardware &
Software). Some SoCs (like Exynos4 - e.g. 4x12) allow setting frequency
above its normal operation limits. Such mode shall be only used for a
short time.
Overclocking (boost) support is essentially provided by platform
dependent cpufreq driver.
This commit unifies support for SW and HW (Intel) overclocking solutions
in the core cpufreq driver. Previously the "boost" sysfs attribute was
defined in the ACPI processor driver code. By default boost is disabled.
One global attribute is available at: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost.
It only shows up when cpufreq driver supports overclocking.
Under the hood frequencies dedicated for boosting are marked with a
special flag (CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ) at driver's frequency table.
It is the user's concern to enable/disable overclocking with a proper call
to sysfs.
The cpufreq_boost_trigger_state() function is defined non static on purpose.
It is used later with thermal subsystem to provide automatic enable/disable
of the BOOST feature.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table
present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run
on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a
frequency which is specified in freq-table. This also makes cpufreq stats
inconsistent as cpufreq-stats would fail to register because current frequency
of CPU isn't found in freq-table.
Because we don't want this change to affect boot process badly, we go for the
next freq which is >= policy->cur ('cur' must be set by now, otherwise we will
end up setting freq to lowest of the table as 'cur' is initialized to zero).
In case current frequency doesn't match any frequency from freq-table, we throw
warnings to user, so that user can get this fixed in their bootloaders or
freq-tables.
Reported-by: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.
This patch introduces generic .attr, .exit() and .verify() cpufreq drivers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Most of the users of cpufreq_verify_within_limits() calls it for
limiting with min/max from policy->cpuinfo. We can make that code
simple by introducing another routine which will do this for them
automatically.
This patch adds another routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits()
and updates others to use it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq_frequency_table_verify() is rewritten here to make it more logical
and efficient.
- merge multiple lines for variable declarations together.
- quit early if any frequency between min/max is found.
- don't call cpufreq_verify_within_limits() in case any valid freq is
found as it is of no use.
- rename the count variable as found and change its type to boolean.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Almost every cpufreq driver is required to validate its frequency table with:
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and then expose it to cpufreq core with:
cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
This patch creates another helper routine cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() that
will do both these steps in a single call and will return 0 for success, error
otherwise.
This also fixes potential bugs in cpufreq drivers where people have called
cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() before calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(), as the later may fail.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch addresses the following issues in the header files in the
cpufreq core:
- Include headers in ascending order, so that we don't add same
many times by mistake.
- <asm/> must be included after <linux/>, so that they override
whatever they need to.
- Remove unnecessary includes.
- Don't include files already included by cpufreq.h or
cpufreq_governor.h.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an
index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful
for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes.
Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the
assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake.
Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its
users are updated accordingly.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
policy->cpu or cpus in policy->cpus can't be offline anymore. And so we don't
need to check if they are online or not.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
__cpufreq_remove_dev() is called on multiple occasions: cpufreq_driver
unregister and cpu removals.
Current implementation of this routine is overly complex without much need. If
the cpu to be removed is the policy->cpu, we remove the policy first and add all
other cpus again from policy->cpus and then finally call __cpufreq_remove_dev()
again to remove the cpu to be deleted. Haahhhh..
There exist a simple solution to removal of a cpu:
- Simply use the old policy structure
- update its fields like: policy->cpu, etc.
- notify any users of cpufreq, which depend on changing policy->cpu
Hence this patch, which tries to implement the above theory. It is tested well
by myself on ARM big.LITTLE TC2 SoC, which has 5 cores (2 A15 and 3 A7). Both
A15's share same struct policy and all A7's share same policy structure.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
With debug options on, it is difficult to locate cpufreq core's debug prints.
Fix this by prefixing debug prints with KBUILD_MODNAME.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
With dynamic debug having gained the capability to report debug messages
also during the boot process, it offers a far superior interface for
debug messages than the custom cpufreq infrastructure. As a first step,
remove the old cpufreq_debug_printk() function and replace it with a call
to the generic pr_debug() function.
How can dynamic debug be used on cpufreq? You need a kernel which has
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG enabled.
To enabled debugging during runtime, mount debugfs and
$ echo -n 'module cpufreq +p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
for debugging the complete "cpufreq" module. To achieve the same goal during
boot, append
ddebug_query="module cpufreq +p"
as a boot parameter to the kernel of your choice.
For more detailled instructions, please see
Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
This patch updates percpu related symbols in cpufreq such that percpu
symbols are unique and don't clash with local symbols. This serves
two purposes of decreasing the possibility of global percpu symbol
collision and allowing dropping per_cpu__ prefix from percpu symbols.
* drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c: s/policy_cpu/cpufreq_policy_cpu/
* drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c: s/show_table/cpufreq_show_table/
* arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: s/drv_data/acfreq_data/
s/old_perf/acfreq_old_perf/
Partly based on Rusty Russell's "alloc_percpu: rename percpu vars
which cause name clashes" patch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Change cpufreq_policy and cpufreq_governor pointer tables
from arrays to per_cpu variables in the cpufreq subsystem.
Also some minor complaints from checkpatch.pl fixed.
Based on:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
In freq_table.c, show_available_freqs()'s comment is oberviously wrong.
Change the comment to a new one to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
sysfs is now completely out of driver/module lifetime game. After
deletion, a sysfs node doesn't access anything outside sysfs proper,
so there's no reason to hold onto the attribute owners. Note that
often the wrong modules were accounted for as owners leading to
accessing removed modules.
This patch kills now unnecessary attribute->owner. Note that with
this change, userland holding a sysfs node does not prevent the
backing module from being unloaded.
For more info regarding lifetime rule cleanup, please read the
following message.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/510293
(tweaked by Greg to not delete the field just yet, to make it easier to
merge things properly.)
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Clean up cpufreq subsystem to fix coding style issues and to improve
the readability.
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Geert Uytterhoeven