The intel_uncore structure is the owner of register access, so
subclass the function to it.
While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
There are 3 problems with the dsi code's pipe_bpp handling for 6 bpc
pixel-formats which this commit addresses:
1) It assumes that the pipe_bpp is the same as the bpp going over the dsi
lanes. This assumption is not valid for MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666, where pipe_bpp
should be 18 so that we do proper dithering but we actually send 24 bpp
over the dsi lanes (MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666_PACKED sends 18 bpp).
This assumption is enforced by an assert in *_dsi_get_pclk(). This assert
triggers on the initial hw-state readback on BYT/CHT devices which use
MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666, such as the Prowise PT301 tablet. PIPECONF is set to
6BPC / 18 bpp by the GOP, while mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp() returns 24.
This commits switches the calculations in *_dsi_get_pclk() to use the bpp
from mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(intel_dsi->pixel_format) which
returns the bpp going over the mipi lanes and drops the assert.
2) On BXT bxt_dsi_get_pipe_config() wrongly overrides the pipe_bpp which
i9xx_get_pipe_config() reads from PIPECONF with the return value from
mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(). This avoids the assert from 1. but is wrong
since the pipe is actually running at the value configured in PIPECONF.
This commit drops the override of pipe_bpp from bxt_dsi_get_pipe_config().
3) The dsi encoder's compute_config() never assigns a value to pipe_bpp,
unlike most other encoders. Falling back on compute_baseline_pipe_bpp()
which always picks 24. 24 is only correct for MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB88 for the
others we should use 18 bpp so that we correctly do 6bpc color dithering.
This commit adds code to intel_dsi_compute_config() to properly set
pipe_bpp based on intel_dsi->pixel_format.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181201113148.23184-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Avoid confusion with the functions to be added for the new ICL or gen 11
DSI implementation by renaming the current DSI functions. While at it,
permutate the words in the function names to make them all start with
"vlv_dsi" or "vlv_dsi_pll" etc.
Reduce the platform abstractions in the PLL file while at it, moving the
checks to vlv_dsi.c instead, where we typically already have the
necessary if ladders.
Leave the static functions as-is for now; they could be renamed later if
needed.
No functional changes.
v2: use "gen7" prefix.
v3: use "vlv" and "bxt" prefixes, reduce the abstractions.
References: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44823/
Cc: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180705132509.12881-2-jani.nikula@intel.com
Starting from ICL or gen 11 we have a new DSI block which requires
completely different programming from the current implementation. Having
them in the same file would be confusing. Rename the current DSI and DSI
PLL implementation files as vlv_dsi.c and vlv_dsi_pll.c.
No functional changes.
v2: use "gen7" prefix.
v3: use "vlv" prefix.
References: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44823/
Cc: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180705132509.12881-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio