The way state->enabled is computed is rather convoluted and hard to
read - both branches of the if() actually do the exact same thing. So
remove the if(), and further simplify "<boolean condition> ? true :
false" to "<boolean condition>".
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
It is surprising for a PWM consumer when the variable holding the
requested state is modified by pwm_apply_state(). Consider for example a
driver doing:
#define PERIOD 5000000
#define DUTY_LITTLE 10
...
struct pwm_state state = {
.period = PERIOD,
.duty_cycle = DUTY_LITTLE,
.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL,
.enabled = true,
};
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
...
state.duty_cycle = PERIOD / 2;
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
For sure the second call to pwm_apply_state() should still have
state.period = PERIOD and not something the hardware driver chose for a
reason that doesn't necessarily apply to the second call.
So declare the state argument as a pointer to a const type and adapt all
drivers' .apply callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The pwm-rockchip driver is one of only three PWM drivers which updates
the state for the caller of pwm_apply_state(). This might have
surprising results if the caller reuses the values expecting them to
still represent the same state.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Don't rely on *state being zero initialized and PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL
being zero. So always assign .polarity.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation #
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The rk3328 SoC supports atomic update, we could lock the configuration
of period and duty at first, after unlock is configured, the period and
duty are effective at the same time.
If the polarity, period and duty need to be configured together,
the way for atomic update is "configure lock and old polarity" ->
"configure period and duty" -> "configure unlock and new polarity".
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Just use the same PWM ops for each IP, and get rid of the ops in struct
rockchip_pwm_data, but still define the three different instances of the
struct to use common interface for each IP.
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
It is usually possible to configure the polarity, cycle and duty all at
once, so that the polarity and cycle and duty are applied atomically.
Move it from rockchip_pwm_set_enable() into rockchip_pwm_config(), as
well as prepare for the next atomic update commit.
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Drop the custom hook of pwm_enable() and implement pwm_apply_v1() and
pwm_apply_v2() instead.
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
It seems the rockchip_pwm_config() always returns the result 0, so
remove the judge.
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
New PWM module provides two individual clocks for APB clock and function
clock.
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
If the PWM was not enabled at U-Boot loader, PWM could not work for
clock always disabled at PWM driver. The PWM clock is enabled at
beginning of pwm_apply(), but disabled at end of pwm_apply().
If the PWM was enabled at U-Boot loader, PWM clock is always enabled
unless closed by ATF. The pwm-backlight might turn off the power at
early suspend, should disable PWM clock for saving power consume.
It is important to provide opportunity to enable/disable clock at PWM
driver, the PWM consumer should ensure correct order to call PWM enable
and disable, and PWM driver ensure state of PWM clock synchronized with
PWM enabled state.
Fixes: 2bf1c98aa5 ("pwm: rockchip: Add support for atomic update")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Implement the ->apply() function to add support for atomic update.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The current logic will disable the PWM clk even if the PWM was left
enabled by the bootloader (because it's controlling a critical device
like a regulator for example).
Keep the PWM clk enabled if the PWM is enabled to avoid any glitches.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Implement the ->get_state() function to expose initial state.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The current implementation always round down the duty and period values,
while it would be better to round them to the closest integer.
These changes are needed in preparation of atomic update support to
prevent a period/duty cycle drift when executing several times the
'pwm_get_state() / modify / pwm_apply_state()' sequence.
Say you have an expected period of 3.333 us and a clk rate of
112.666667 MHz -- the clock frequency doesn't divide evenly, so the
period (stashed in nanoseconds) shrinks when we convert to the register
value and back, as follows:
pwm_apply_state(): register = period * 112666667 / 1000000000;
pwm_get_state(): period = register * 1000000000 / 112666667;
or in other words:
period = period * 112666667 / 1000000000 * 1000000000 / 112666667;
which yields a sequence like:
3333 -> 3328
3328 -> 3319
3319 -> 3310
3310 -> 3301
3301 -> 3292
3292 -> ... (etc) ...
With this patch, we'd see instead:
period = div_round_closest(period * 112666667, 1000000000) *
1000000000 / 112666667;
which yields a stable sequence:
3333 -> 3337
3337 -> 3337
3337 -> ... (etc) ...
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Use the pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the fields
in struct pwm_device. This will allow us to smoothly move to the atomic
update approach.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The rk3288 has the ability to invert the polarity of the PWM. Let's
enable that ability. Note that this increases pwm_cells to 3 for
rk3288.
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This patch added to support the PWM controller found on
RK3288 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This commit adds a driver for the PWM controller found on Rockchip
RK29, RK30 and RK31 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Rasmus Villemoes