For a channel to make use of SVM features, it requires a different GPU MMU
configuration than we would normally use, which is not desirable to switch
to unless a client is actively going to use SVM.
In order to supporting SVM without more extensive changes to the userspace
interfaces, the SVM_INIT ioctl needs to replace the previous configuration
safely.
The only way we can currently do this safely, accounting for some unlikely
failure conditions, is to allocate the new VMM without destroying the last
one, and prioritising the SVM-enabled configuration in the code that cares.
This will get cleaned up again further down the track.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some GPU units are capable of supporting "replayable" page faults, where
the execution unit will wait for SW to fixup GPU page tables rather than
triggering a channel-fatal fault.
This feature isn't useful (it's harmful, even) unless something like HMM
is being used to manage events appearing in the replayable fault buffer,
so, it's disabled by default.
This commit allows a client to request it be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Host methods exist to do at least some of what we need, but we are not
currently pushing replay/cancels through a channel like UVM does as it's
not clear whether it's necessary in our case (UVM also updates PTEs with
the GPU).
UVM also pushes a software method for fault cancels on Pascal, seemingly
because the host methods don't appear to be sufficient. If/when we want
to push the replay/cancel on the GPU, we can re-purpose the cancellation
code here to implement that swmthd.
Keep it simple for now, until we figure out exactly what we need here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This provides a somewhat more direct method of manipulating the GPU page
tables, which will be required to support SVM.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will be used to support a privileged client providing PTEs directly,
without a memory object to use as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NVKM is currently responsible for managing the allocation of a client's
GPU address-space, but there's various use-cases (ie. HMM address-space
mirroring) where giving a client more direct control is desirable.
This commit allows for a VMM to be created where the area allocated for
NVKM is limited to a client-specified window, the remainder of address-
space is controlled directly by the client.
Leaving a window is necessary to support various internal requirements,
but also to support existing allocation interfaces as not all of the HW
is capable of working with a HMM allocation.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There are a few statements that are indented incorrectly. Fix these.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There's no need to avoid using copy engines if gr init fails for some
reason (usually missing FW, or incomplete bring-up).
It's not terribly useful for an end-user, but it'll slightly speed up
suspend/resume when saving fb contents, and allow for host/ce code to
be validated.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some of the pre-NV50 depends on SW methods to implement synchronisation
for page flips, and we want to move this setup out of common code, thus
we require the channel to have been allocation before display init.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
As I currently understand it, this is related to features we have no
support for as of yet.
In theory, this change should be a noop, just without the warning.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Turing has its SEC2 instance in an alternate location, and this avoids
needing to duplicate the code here for it.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Will be using this in upcoming changes to avoid the need for entirely
new subdevs to deal with Turing register moves.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_PCI_DEVICE case is missing a break statement and falls
through to the following NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_BUS_TYPE case and may end up
re-assigning the getparam->value to an undesired value. Fix this by adding
in the missing break.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460507 ("Missing break in switch")
Fixes: 359088d5b8 ("drm/nouveau: remove trivial cases of nvxx_device() usage")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1434:53: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite
normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is
interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a
debugging message on VCPI failures instead.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: f479c0ba4a ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50: initial support for DP 1.2 multi-stream")
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10+
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Currently the uninitialized values in the array reply are printed out
when exec is false and nvkm_pmu_send has not updated the array. Avoid
confusion by only dumping out these values if they have been actually
updated.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1271291 ("Uninitialized scaler variable")
Fixes: ebb58dc2ef ("drm/nouveau/pmu: rename from pwr (no binary change)")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result
in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has
higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing
parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will
result in the desired result.
[ Note, not tested ]
Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result")
Fixes: c25bf7b615 ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Don't populate the array vsoff on the stack but instead make it
static. Makes the object code smaller by 67 bytes:
Before:
text data bss dec hex filename
5753 112 0 5865 16e9 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o
After:
text data bss dec hex filename
5622 176 0 5798 16a6 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o
(gcc version 8.2.0 x86_64)
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Ben Skeggs