Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ingo Molnar 131484c8da x86/debug: Remove perpetually broken, unmaintainable dwarf annotations
So the dwarf2 annotations in low level assembly code have
become an increasing hindrance: unreadable, messy macros
mixed into some of the most security sensitive code paths
of the Linux kernel.

These debug info annotations don't even buy the upstream
kernel anything: dwarf driven stack unwinding has caused
problems in the past so it's out of tree, and the upstream
kernel only uses the much more robust framepointers based
stack unwinding method.

In addition to that there's a steady, slow bitrot going
on with these annotations, requiring frequent fixups.
There's no tooling and no functionality upstream that
keeps it correct.

So burn down the sick forest, allowing new, healthier growth:

   27 files changed, 350 insertions(+), 1101 deletions(-)

Someone who has the willingness and time to do this
properly can attempt to reintroduce dwarf debuginfo in x86
assembly code plus dwarf unwinding from first principles,
with the following conditions:

 - it should be maximally readable, and maximally low-key to
   'ordinary' code reading and maintenance.

 - find a build time method to insert dwarf annotations
   automatically in the most common cases, for pop/push
   instructions that manipulate the stack pointer. This could
   be done for example via a preprocessing step that just
   looks for common patterns - plus special annotations for
   the few cases where we want to depart from the default.
   We have hundreds of CFI annotations, so automating most of
   that makes sense.

 - it should come with build tooling checks that ensure that
   CFI annotations are sensible. We've seen such efforts from
   the framepointer side, and there's no reason it couldn't be
   done on the dwarf side.

Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-02 07:57:48 +02:00
Borislav Petkov 6620ef28c8 x86/lib/clear_page_64.S: Convert to ALTERNATIVE_2 macro
Move clear_page() up so that we can get 2-byte forward JMPs when
patching:

  apply_alternatives: feat: 3*32+16, old: (ffffffff8130adb0, len: 5), repl: (ffffffff81d0b859, len: 5)
  ffffffff8130adb0: alt_insn: 90 90 90 90 90
  recompute_jump: new_displ: 0x0000003e
  ffffffff81d0b859: rpl_insn: eb 3e 66 66 90

even though the compiler generated 5-byte JMPs which we padded with 5
NOPs.

Also, make the REP_GOOD version be the default as the majority of
machines set REP_GOOD. This way we get to save ourselves the JMP:

  old insn VA: 0xffffffff813038b0, CPU feat: X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD, size: 5, padlen: 0
  clear_page:

  ffffffff813038b0 <clear_page>:
  ffffffff813038b0:       e9 0b 00 00 00          jmpq ffffffff813038c0
  repl insn: 0xffffffff81cf0e92, size: 0

  old insn VA: 0xffffffff813038b0, CPU feat: X86_FEATURE_ERMS, size: 5, padlen: 0
  clear_page:

  ffffffff813038b0 <clear_page>:
  ffffffff813038b0:       e9 0b 00 00 00          jmpq ffffffff813038c0
  repl insn: 0xffffffff81cf0e92, size: 5
   ffffffff81cf0e92:      e9 69 2a 61 ff          jmpq ffffffff81303900

  ffffffff813038b0 <clear_page>:
  ffffffff813038b0:       e9 69 2a 61 ff          jmpq ffffffff8091631e

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2015-02-23 13:44:16 +01:00
Borislav Petkov 4332195c56 x86/alternatives: Add instruction padding
Up until now we have always paid attention to make sure the length of
the new instruction replacing the old one is at least less or equal to
the length of the old instruction. If the new instruction is longer, at
the time it replaces the old instruction it will overwrite the beginning
of the next instruction in the kernel image and cause your pants to
catch fire.

So instead of having to pay attention, teach the alternatives framework
to pad shorter old instructions with NOPs at buildtime - but only in the
case when

  len(old instruction(s)) < len(new instruction(s))

and add nothing in the >= case. (In that case we do add_nops() when
patching).

This way the alternatives user shouldn't have to care about instruction
sizes and simply use the macros.

Add asm ALTERNATIVE* flavor macros too, while at it.

Also, we need to save the pad length in a separate struct alt_instr
member for NOP optimization and the way to do that reliably is to carry
the pad length instead of trying to detect whether we're looking at
single-byte NOPs or at pathological instruction offsets like e9 90 90 90
90, for example, which is a valid instruction.

Thanks to Michael Matz for the great help with toolchain questions.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2015-02-23 13:44:00 +01:00
Fenghua Yu e365c9df2f x86, mem: clear_page_64.S: Support clear_page() with enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB
Intel processors are adding enhancements to REP MOVSB/STOSB and the use of
REP MOVSB/STOSB for optimal memcpy/memset or similar functions is recommended.
Enhancement availability is indicated by CPUID.7.0.EBX[9] (Enhanced REP MOVSB/
STOSB).

Support clear_page() with rep stosb for processor supporting enhanced REP MOVSB
/STOSB. On processors supporting enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB, the alternative
clear_page_c_e function using enhanced REP STOSB overrides the original function
and the fast string function.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1305671358-14478-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-05-17 15:40:27 -07:00
H. Peter Anvin 83a7a2ad2a x86, alternatives: Use 16-bit numbers for cpufeature index
We already have cpufeature indicies above 255, so use a 16-bit number
for the alternatives index.  This consumes a padding field and so
doesn't add any size, but it means that abusing the padding field to
create assembly errors on overflow no longer works.  We can retain the
test simply by redirecting it to the .discard section, however.

[ v3: updated to include open-coded locations ]

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <tip-f88731e3068f9d1392ba71cc9f50f035d26a0d4f@git.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-07-07 10:36:28 -07:00
Mike Galbraith 9e314996e3 x86: Fix symbol annotation for arch/x86/lib/clear_page_64.S::clear_page_c
Noticed the zero-sized function symbol while looking at 'perf' profiles,
it causes the profiler to display those addresses in hexa.

Turns out that this was wrong/bogus for an eternity.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1246366820.6538.1.camel@marge.simson.net>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-30 23:43:15 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 185f3d3890 x86_64: move lib
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-11 11:17:08 +02:00