Commit Graph

446 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
NeilBrown b97390aec4 md/raid5: protect debug message against NULL derefernce.
The pr_debug in add_stripe_bio could race with something
changing *bip, so it is best to hold the lock until
after the pr_debug.

Reported-by: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:50:12 +11:00
NeilBrown 143c4d0573 md/raid5: add some missing locking in handle_failed_stripe.
We really should hold the stripe_lock while accessing
'toread' else we could race with add_stripe_bio and corrupt
a list.

Reported-by: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:50:12 +11:00
Shaohua Li 9e44476851 MD: raid5 avoid unnecessary zero page for trim
We want to avoid zero discarded dev page, because it's useless for discard.
But if we don't zero it, another read/write hit such page in the cache and will
get inconsistent data.

To avoid zero the page, we don't set R5_UPTODATE flag after construction is
done. In this way, discard write request is still issued and finished, but read
will not hit the page. If the stripe gets accessed soon, we need reread the
stripe, but since the chance is low, the reread isn't a big deal.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:49:49 +11:00
Shaohua Li 620125f2bf MD: raid5 trim support
Discard for raid4/5/6 has limitation. If discard request size is
small, we do discard for one disk, but we need calculate parity and
write parity disk.  To correctly calculate parity, zero_after_discard
must be guaranteed. Even it's true, we need do discard for one disk
but write another disks, which makes the parity disks wear out
fast. This doesn't make sense. So an efficient discard for raid4/5/6
should discard all data disks and parity disks, which requires the
write pattern to be (A, A+chunk_size, A+chunk_size*2...). If A's size
is smaller than chunk_size, such pattern is almost impossible in
practice. So in this patch, I only handle the case that A's size
equals to chunk_size. That is discard request should be aligned to
stripe size and its size is multiple of stripe size.

Since we can only handle request with specific alignment and size (or
part of the request fitting stripes), we can't guarantee
zero_after_discard even zero_after_discard is true in low level
drives.

The block layer doesn't send down correctly aligned requests even
correct discard alignment is set, so I must filter out.

For raid4/5/6 parity calculation, if data is 0, parity is 0. So if
zero_after_discard is true for all disks, data is consistent after
discard.  Otherwise, data might be lost. Let's consider a scenario:
discard a stripe, write data to one disk and write parity disk. The
stripe could be still inconsistent till then depending on using data
from other data disks or parity disks to calculate new parity. If the
disk is broken, we can't restore it. So in this patch, we only enable
discard support if all disks have zero_after_discard.

If discard fails in one disk, we face the similar inconsistent issue
above. The patch will make discard follow the same path as normal
write request. If discard fails, a resync will be scheduled to make
the data consistent. This isn't good to have extra writes, but data
consistency is important.

If a subsequent read/write request hits raid5 cache of a discarded
stripe, the discarded dev page should have zero filled, so the data is
consistent. This patch will always zero dev page for discarded request
stripe. This isn't optimal because discard request doesn't need such
payload. Next patch will avoid it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:49:05 +11:00
Shaohua Li 4ed8731d8e MD: change the parameter of md thread
Change the thread parameter, so the thread can carry extra info. Next patch
will use it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:34:00 +11:00
Linus Torvalds 25aa6a7ae4 Additional md update for 3.6
This contains a few patches that depend on
 plugging changes in the block layer so needs to wait
 for those.
 It also contains a Kconfig fix for the new RAID10 support
 in dm-raid.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iQIVAwUAUBnKUznsnt1WYoG5AQJOQA/+M7RoVnF63+TbGIqdNDotuF8FxvudCZBl
 Ou2yG47EOPtWf/RoqPyfpydDgdjyXsk4T5TfXoc0hsXVr4shCYo51uT9K34TMSDJ
 2GzGWuyugRJFyvxW7PBgM+zFWlcVdgUGcwsdmIUMtHRz8Q10TqO5fE22RNLkhwOl
 fvGCK1KYnQqlG87DbulHWMo22vyZVic8jBqFSw55CPuuFMSJMxCw0rOPUnvk5Q8v
 jWzZzuUqrM8iiOxTDHsbCA0IleCbGl/m0tgk02Vj4tkCvz9N/xzQW2se0H6uECiK
 k8odbAiNBOh1q135sa7ASrBzxT+JqSiQ25rLheTEzzNxjFv6/NlntXmYu6HB+lD3
 DoHAvRjgMxiLCdisW6TJb10NItitXwE/HSpQOVRxyYtINdzmhIDaCccgfN8ZMkho
 nmE/uzO+CAoCFpZC2C/nY8D0BZs5fw4hgDAsci66mvs+88dy+SoA4AbyNEMAusOS
 tiL8ZEjnYXvxTh3JFaMIaqQd6PkbahmtEtvorwXsUYUdY0ybkcs2FYVksvkgYdyW
 WlejOZVurY2i5biqck3UqjesxeJA5TMAlAUQR7vXu1Fa9fYFXZbqJom/KnPRTfek
 xerCWPMbhuzmcyEjUOGfjs6GFEnEmRT6Q6fN3CBaQMS2Q/z+6AkTOXKVl5Fhvoyl
 aeu1m8nZLuI=
 =ovN2
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'md-3.6' of git://neil.brown.name/md

Pull additional md update from NeilBrown:
 "This contains a few patches that depend on plugging changes in the
  block layer so needed to wait for those.

  It also contains a Kconfig fix for the new RAID10 support in dm-raid."

* tag 'md-3.6' of git://neil.brown.name/md:
  md/dm-raid: DM_RAID should select MD_RAID10
  md/raid1: submit IO from originating thread instead of md thread.
  raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way
  raid5: make_request use batch stripe release
2012-08-02 11:34:40 -07:00
Shaohua Li 46a06401f6 raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way
Let raid5d handle stripe in batch way to reduce conf->device_lock locking.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-08-02 08:33:15 +10:00
Shaohua Li 8811b5968f raid5: make_request use batch stripe release
make_request() does stripe release for every stripe and the stripe usually has
count 1, which makes previous release_stripe() optimization not work. In my
test, this release_stripe() becomes the heaviest pleace to take
conf->device_lock after previous patches applied.

Below patch makes stripe release batch. All the stripes will be released in
unplug. The STRIPE_ON_UNPLUG_LIST bit is to protect concurrent access stripe
lru.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-08-02 08:33:00 +10:00
Linus Torvalds eff0d13f38 Merge branch 'for-3.6/drivers' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block
Pull block driver changes from Jens Axboe:

 - Making the plugging support for drivers a bit more sane from Neil.
   This supersedes the plugging change from Shaohua as well.

 - The usual round of drbd updates.

 - Using a tail add instead of a head add in the request completion for
   ndb, making us find the most completed request more quickly.

 - A few floppy changes, getting rid of a duplicated flag and also
   running the floppy init async (since it takes forever in boot terms)
   from Andi.

* 'for-3.6/drivers' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
  floppy: remove duplicated flag FD_RAW_NEED_DISK
  blk: pass from_schedule to non-request unplug functions.
  block: stack unplug
  blk: centralize non-request unplug handling.
  md: remove plug_cnt feature of plugging.
  block/nbd: micro-optimization in nbd request completion
  drbd: announce FLUSH/FUA capability to upper layers
  drbd: fix max_bio_size to be unsigned
  drbd: flush drbd work queue before invalidate/invalidate remote
  drbd: fix potential access after free
  drbd: call local-io-error handler early
  drbd: do not reset rs_pending_cnt too early
  drbd: reset congestion information before reporting it in /proc/drbd
  drbd: report congestion if we are waiting for some userland callback
  drbd: differentiate between normal and forced detach
  drbd: cleanup, remove two unused global flags
  floppy: Run floppy initialization asynchronous
2012-08-01 09:06:47 -07:00
NeilBrown 0021b7bc04 md: remove plug_cnt feature of plugging.
This seemed like a good idea at the time, but after further thought I
cannot see it making a difference other than very occasionally and
testing to try to exercise the case it is most likely to help did not
show any performance difference by removing it.

So remove the counting of active plugs and allow 'pending writes' to
be activated at any time, not just when no plugs are active.

This is only relevant when there is a write-intent bitmap, and the
updating of the bitmap will likely introduce enough delay that
the single-threading of bitmap updates will be enough to collect large
numbers of updates together.

Removing this will make it easier to centralise the unplug code, and
will clear the other for other unplug enhancements which have a
measurable effect.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2012-07-31 09:08:14 +02:00
majianpeng 895e3c5c58 md/raid5: For odirect-write performance, do not set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE.
'sync' writes set both REQ_SYNC and REQ_NOIDLE.
O_DIRECT writes set REQ_SYNC but not REQ_NOIDLE.

We currently assume that a REQ_SYNC request will not be followed by
more requests and so set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE to expedite the
request.
This is appropriate for sync requests, but not for O_DIRECT requests.

So make the setting of STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE conditional on REQ_NOIDLE
rather than REQ_SYNC.  This is consistent with the documented meaning
of REQ_NOIDLE:

        __REQ_NOIDLE,           /* don't anticipate more IO after this one */

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-31 10:05:44 +10:00
majianpeng 3f9e7c140e raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
operation like re-write and re-read.

V0->V1:Using REQ_FLUSH instead REQ_NOMERGE avoid bio merging at block
layer.

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-31 10:04:21 +10:00
Shaohua Li b17459c050 raid5: add a per-stripe lock
Add a per-stripe lock to protect stripe specific data. The purpose is to reduce
lock contention of conf->device_lock.

stripe ->toread, ->towrite are protected by per-stripe lock.  Accessing bio
list of the stripe is always serialized by this lock, so adding bio to the
lists (add_stripe_bio()) and removing bio from the lists (like
ops_run_biofill()) not race.

If bio in ->read, ->written ... list are not shared by multiple stripes, we
don't need any lock to protect ->read, ->written, because STRIPE_ACTIVE will
protect them. If the bio are shared,  there are two protections:
1. bi_phys_segments acts as a reference count
2. traverse the list uses r5_next_bio, which makes traverse never access bio
not belonging to the stripe

Let's have an example:
|  stripe1 |  stripe2    |  stripe3  |
...bio1......|bio2|bio3|....bio4.....

stripe2 has 4 bios, when it's finished, it will decrement bi_phys_segments for
all bios, but only end_bio for bio2 and bio3. bio1->bi_next still points to
bio2, but this doesn't matter. When stripe1 is finished, it will not touch bio2
because of r5_next_bio check. Next time stripe1 will end_bio for bio1 and
stripe3 will end_bio bio4.

before add_stripe_bio() addes a bio to a stripe, we already increament the bio
bi_phys_segments, so don't worry other stripes release the bio.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-19 16:01:31 +10:00
Shaohua Li 7eaf7e8eb3 raid5: remove unnecessary bitmap write optimization
Neil pointed out the bitmap write optimization in handle_stripe_clean_event()
is unnecessary, because the chance one stripe gets written twice in the mean
time is rare. We can always do a bitmap_startwrite when a write request is
added to a stripe and bitmap_endwrite after write request is done.  Delete the
optimization. With it, we can delete some cases of device_lock.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-19 16:01:31 +10:00
Shaohua Li e7836bd6f6 raid5: lockless access raid5 overrided bi_phys_segments
Raid5 overrides bio->bi_phys_segments, accessing it is with device_lock hold,
which is unnecessary, We can make it lockless actually.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-19 16:01:31 +10:00
Shaohua Li 4eb788df67 raid5: reduce chance release_stripe() taking device_lock
release_stripe() is a place conf->device_lock is heavily contended. We take the
lock even stripe count isn't 1, which isn't required.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-19 16:01:31 +10:00
NeilBrown b357f04a67 md: fix up plugging (again).
The value returned by "mddev_check_plug" is only valid until the
next 'schedule' as that will unplug things.  This could happen at any
call to mempool_alloc.
So just calling mddev_check_plug at the start doesn't really make
sense.

So call it just before, or just after, queuing things for the thread.
As the action that happens at unplug is to wake the thread, this makes
lots of sense.
If we cannot add a plug (which requires a small GFP_ATOMIC alloc) we
wake thread immediately.

RAID5 is a bit different.  Requests are queued for the thread and the
thread is woken by release_stripe.  So we don't need to wake the
thread on failure.
However the thread doesn't perform certain actions when there is any
active plug, so it is important to install a plug before waking the
thread.  So for RAID5 we install the plug *before* queuing the request
and waking the thread.

Without this patch it is possible for raid1 or raid10 to queue a
request without then waking the thread, resulting in the array locking
up.

Also change raid10 to only flush_pending_write when there are not
active plugs, just like raid1.

This patch is suitable for 3.0 or later.  I plan to submit it to
-stable, but I'll like to let it spend a few weeks in mainline
first to be sure it is completely safe.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 17:45:31 +10:00
Shaohua Li fab363b5ff raid5: delayed stripe fix
There isn't locking setting STRIPE_DELAYED and STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE bits, but
the two bits have relationship. A delayed stripe can be moved to hold list only
when preread active stripe count is below IO_THRESHOLD. If a stripe has both
the bits set, such stripe will be in delayed list and preread count not 0,
which will make such stripe never leave delayed list.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 15:57:19 +10:00
majianpeng 2e8ac30312 md/raid456: When read error cannot be recovered, record bad block
We may not be able to fix a bad block if:
 - the array is degraded
 - the over-write fails.

In these cases we currently eject the device, but we should
record a bad block if possible.

Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 15:57:02 +10:00
NeilBrown 0232605d98 md: make 'name' arg to md_register_thread non-optional.
Having the 'name' arg optional and defaulting to the current
personality name is no necessary and leads to errors, as when
changing the level of an array we can end up using the
name of the old level instead of the new one.

So make it non-optional and always explicitly pass the name
of the level that the array will be.

Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 15:56:52 +10:00
NeilBrown 5f066c632f md/raid5: fix refcount problem when blocked_rdev is set.
commit 43220aa0f2
    md/raid5: fix a hang on device failure.

fixed a hang, but introduced a refcounting in-balance so
that if the presence of bad-blocks ever caused an rdev to
be 'blocked' we would increment the refcount on the rdev and
never decrement it.

So added the needed rdev_dec_pending when md_wait_for_blocked_rdev
is not called.

Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 12:13:29 +10:00
majianpeng 1850753d2e md/raid5: In ops_run_io, inc nr_pending before calling md_wait_for_blocked_rdev
In ops_run_io(), the call to md_wait_for_blocked_rdev will decrement
nr_pending so we lose the reference we hold on the rdev.
So atomic_inc it first to maintain the reference.

This bug was introduced by commit  73e92e51b7
    md/raid5.  Don't write to known bad block on doubtful devices.

which appeared in 3.0, so patch is suitable for stable kernels since
then.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 12:11:54 +10:00
majianpeng 6c0544e255 md/raid5: Do not add data_offset before call to is_badblock
In chunk_aligned_read() we are adding data_offset before calling
is_badblock.  But is_badblock also adds data_offset, so that is bad.

So move the addition of data_offset to after the call to
is_badblock.

This bug was introduced by commit 31c176ecdf
     md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks.
which first appeared in 3.0.  So that patch is suitable for any
-stable kernel from 3.0.y onwards.  However it will need minor
revision for most of those (as the comment didn't appear until
recently).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 12:09:57 +10:00
NeilBrown 5cfb22a1f8 md/raid5: prefer replacing failed devices over want-replacement devices.
If a RAID5 has both a failed device and a device marked as
'WantReplacement', then we should preferentially replace the failed
device.
However the current code replaces whichever is found first.
So split into 2 loops, check fail failed/missing first, and only check
for WantReplacement if nothing is failed or missing.

Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 11:46:53 +10:00
NeilBrown da7613b8b0 md/raid5: improve removal of extra devices after reshape.
After a reshape which reduced the number of devices we need
to disconnect the extra devices.
The code for this doesn't currently handle 'replacement' devices.
It is very unlikely that such devices will be present, but it is
safest to handle them anyway.

So simplify the handling.  Just clear In_sync and leave it
to remove_and_add_spaces (which will be called soon) to do
the real works.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:33 +10:00
NeilBrown 30b67645fa md/raid5: Allow reshape while a bitmap is present.
We always should have allowed this.  A raid5 reshape doesn't change
the size of the bitmap, so not need to restrict it.

Also add a test to make sure we don't try to start a reshape on a
failed array.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:28 +10:00
NeilBrown a4a6125a07 md: allow array to be resized while bitmap is present.
Now that bitmaps can be resized, we can allow an array to be resized
while the bitmap is present.

This only covers resizing that involves changing the effective size
of member devices, not resizing that changes the number of devices.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:27 +10:00
Shaohua Li bc0934f047 raid5: support sync request
REQ_SYNC is ignored in current raid5 code. Block layer does use it to do
policy,
for example ioscheduler. This patch adds it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:05 +10:00
Shaohua Li cceeca43b5 raid5: remove unused variables
The two variables are useless.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:04 +10:00
NeilBrown b5254dd5fd md/raid5: allow for change in data_offset while managing a reshape.
The important issue here is incorporating the different in data_offset
into calculations concerning when we might need to over-write data
that is still thought to be valid.

To this end we find the minimum offset difference across all devices
and add that where appropriate.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-21 09:27:01 +10:00
NeilBrown 05616be5e1 md/raid5: Use correct data_offset for all IO.
As there can now be two different data_offsets - an 'old' and
a 'new' - we need to carefully choose between them.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-21 09:27:00 +10:00
NeilBrown c6563a8c38 md: add possibility to change data-offset for devices.
When reshaping we can avoid costly intermediate backup by
changing the 'start' address of the array on the device
(if there is enough room).

So as a first step, allow such a change to be requested
through sysfs, and recorded in v1.x metadata.

(As we didn't previous check that all 'pad' fields were zero,
 we need a new FEATURE flag for this.
 A (belatedly) check that all remaining 'pad' fields are
 zero to avoid a repeat of this)

The new data offset must be requested separately for each device.
This allows each to have a different change in the data offset.
This is not likely to be used often but as data_offset can be
set per-device, new_data_offset should be too.

This patch also removes the 'acknowledged' arg to rdev_set_badblocks as
it is never used and never will be.  At the same time we add a new
arg ('in_new') which is currently always zero but will be used more
soon.

When a reshape finishes we will need to update the data_offset
and rdev->sectors.  So provide an exported function to do that.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-21 09:27:00 +10:00
NeilBrown 2c810cddc4 md: allow a reshape operation to be reversed.
Currently a reshape operation always progresses from the start
of the array to the end unless the number of devices is being
reduced, in which case it progressed in the opposite direction.

To reverse a partial reshape which changes the number of devices
you can stop the array and re-assemble with the raid-disks numbers
reversed and it will undo.

However for a reshape that does not change the number of devices
it is not possible to reverse the reshape in the middle - you have to
wait until it completes.

So add a 'reshape_direction' attribute with is either 'forwards' or
'backwards' and can be explicitly set when delta_disks is zero.

This will become more important when we allow the data_offset to
change in a reshape.  Then the explicit statement of what direction is
being used will be more useful.

This can be enabled in raid5 trivially as it already supports
reverse reshape and just needs to use a different trigger to request it.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-21 09:27:00 +10:00
majianpeng c6d2e084c7 md/raid5: Fix a bug about judging if the operation is syncing or replacing
When create a raid5 using assume-clean and echo check or repair to
sync_action.Then component disks did not operated IO but the raid
check/resync faster than normal.
Because the judgement in function analyse_stripe():
		if (do_recovery ||
		    sh->sector >= conf->mddev->recovery_cp)
			s->syncing = 1;
		else
			s->replacing = 1;
When check or repair,the recovery_cp == MaxSectore,so syncing equal zero
not one.

This bug was introduced by commit 9a3e1101b8
    md/raid5:  detect and handle replacements during recovery.
so this patch is suitable for 3.3-stable.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-04-03 15:37:38 +10:00
NeilBrown 18b9837ea0 md/raid5: fix handling of bad blocks during recovery.
1/ We can only treat a known-bad-block like a read-error if we
   have the data that belongs in that block.  So fix that test.

2/ If we cannot recovery a stripe due to insufficient data,
   don't tell "md_done_sync" that the sync failed unless we really
   did fail something.  If we successfully record bad blocks,
   that is success.

Reported-by: "majianpeng" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-04-03 15:36:17 +10:00
NeilBrown dafb20fa34 md: tidy up rdev_for_each usage.
md.h has an 'rdev_for_each()' macro for iterating the rdevs in an
mddev.  However it uses the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry,
and so requires the extra variable, but doesn't include 'safe' in the
name, which is useful documentation.

Consequently some places use this safe version without needing it, and
many use an explicity list_for_each entry.

So:
 - rename rdev_for_each to rdev_for_each_safe
 - create a new rdev_for_each which uses the plain
   list_for_each_entry,
 - use the 'safe' version only where needed, and convert all other
   list_for_each_entry calls to use rdev_for_each.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-03-19 12:46:39 +11:00
NeilBrown dc10c643e8 md: allow re-add to failed arrays.
When an array is failed (some data inaccessible) then there is no
point attempting to add a spare as it could not possibly be recovered.

However that may be value in re-adding a recently removed device.
e.g. if there is a write-intent-bitmap and it is clear, then access
to the data could be restored by this action.

So don't reject a re-add to a failed array for RAID10 and RAID5 (the
only arrays  types that check for a failed array).

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-03-19 12:46:37 +11:00
majianpeng 41fe75f60b md/raid5: use atomic_dec_return() instead of atomic_dec() and atomic_read().
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-03-13 11:21:25 +11:00
NeilBrown 9d4c7d8799 md/raid5: removed unused 'added_devices' variable.
commit 908f4fbd26 removed the last user of this variable,
so we should discard it completely.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-03-13 11:21:21 +11:00
NeilBrown 1e3fa9bd50 md/raid5: make sure reshape_position is cleared on error path.
Leaving a valid reshape_position value in place could be confusing.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-03-13 11:21:18 +11:00
NeilBrown 3a6de2924a md/raid5: Mark device want_replacement when we see a write error.
Now that WantReplacement drives are replaced cleanly, mark a drive
as WantReplacement when we see a write error.  It might get failed soon so
the WantReplacement flag is irrelevant, but if the write error is recorded
in the bad block log, we still want to activate any spare that might
be available.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by:  NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:54 +11:00
NeilBrown 7bfec5f35c md/raid5: If there is a spare and a want_replacement device, start replacement.
When attempting to add a spare to a RAID[456] array, also consider
adding it as a replacement for a want_replacement device.

This requires that common md code attempt hot_add even when the array
is not formally degraded.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:53 +11:00
NeilBrown 17045f52ac md/raid5: recognise replacements when assembling array.
If a Replacement is seen, file it as such.

If we see two replacements (or two normal devices) for the one slot,
abort.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:53 +11:00
NeilBrown dd054fce88 md/raid5: handle activation of replacement device when recovery completes.
When recovery completes - as reported by a call to ->spare_active,
we clear In_sync on the original and set it on the replacement.

Then when the original gets removed we move the replacement from
'replacement' to 'rdev'.

This could race with other code that is looking at these pointers,
so we use memory barriers and careful ordering to ensure that
a reader might see one device twice, but never no devices.
Then the readers guard against using both devices, which could
only happen when writing.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:53 +11:00
NeilBrown 9a3e1101b8 md/raid5: detect and handle replacements during recovery.
During recovery we want to write to the replacement but not
the original.  So we have two new flags
 - R5_NeedReplace if this stripe has a replacement that needs to
   be written at some stage
 - R5_WantReplace if NeedReplace, and the data is available, and
   a 'sync' has been requested on this stripe.

We also distinguish between 'sync and replace' which need to read
all other devices, and 'replace' which only needs to read the
devices being replaced.

Note that during resync we always write to any replacement device.
It might not need to be written to, but as we don't read to compare,
we have to write to be sure.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:53 +11:00
NeilBrown 977df36255 md/raid5: writes should get directed to replacement as well as original.
When writing, we need to submit two writes, one to the original, and
one to the replacement - if there is a replacement.

If the write to the replacement results in a write error, we just fail
the device.  We only try to record write errors to the original.

When writing for recovery, we shouldn't write to the original.  This
will be addressed in a subsequent patch that generally addresses
recovery.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:53 +11:00
NeilBrown 657e3e4d88 md/raid5: allow removal for failed replacement devices.
Enhance raid5_remove_disk to be able to remove ->replacement
as well as ->rdev.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:52 +11:00
NeilBrown 14a75d3e07 md/raid5: preferentially read from replacement device if possible.
If a replacement device is present and has been recovered far enough,
then use it for reading into the stripe cache.

If we get an error we don't try to repair it, we just fail the device.
A replacement device that gives errors does not sound sensible.

This requires removing the setting of R5_ReadError when we get
a read error during a read that bypasses the cache.  It was probably
a bad idea anyway as we don't know that every block in the read
caused an error, and it could cause ReadError to be set for the
replacement device, which is bad.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:52 +11:00
NeilBrown 995c4275a7 md/raid5: remove redundant bio initialisations.
We current initialise some fields of a bio when preparing a
stripe_head, and again just before submitting the request.

Remove the duplication by only setting the fields that lower level
devices don't touch in raid5_build_block, and only set the changeable
fields in ops_run_io.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:52 +11:00
NeilBrown 671488cc25 md/raid5: allow each slot to have an extra replacement device
Just enhance data structures to record a second device per slot to be
used as a 'replacement' device, replacing the original.
We also have a second bio in each slot in each stripe_head.  This will
only be used when writing to the array - we need to write to both the
original and the replacement at the same time, so will need two bios.

For now, only try using the replacement drive for aligned-reads.
In this case, we prefer the replacement if it has been recovered far
enough, otherwise use the original.

This includes a small enhancement.  Previously we would only do
aligned reads if the target device was fully recovered.  Now we also
do them if it has recovered far enough.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2011-12-23 10:17:52 +11:00