Both request_submit and request_unsubmit deal with transferring the
request from the client's timeline onto the execution timeline and back
again. As both functions deal with a pair of timeline's, using a
shorthand for just one of them is slightly confusing, especially as the
different functions use the shorthand for the alternate timeline.
Instead, use the full version of each timeline so it should be easier to
keep track of the transfer between the request/client and the engine.
v2: Refactor the common lock+list_move
v3: Be clear we require the other timeline list to be locked as well.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322131034.6036-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We pre-increment the timeline->seqno when handing it to the request,
make sure the GEM_TRACE takes this into account. Otherwise, it appears
that we go backwards over a preemption point:
1d..1 157681077us : __i915_request_unsubmit: vcs0 fence 75e:3 <- global_seqno 17
0d.s1 157681113us : __i915_request_submit: vcs0 fence 75e:3 -> global_seqno 16
Fixes: d9b13c4dde ("drm/i915: Trace GEM steps between submit and wedging")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322110059.4467-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Not all callers want the GPU error to handled in the same way, so expose
a control parameter. In the first instance, some callers do not want the
heavyweight error capture so add a bit to request the state to be
captured and saved.
v2: Pass msg down to i915_reset/i915_reset_engine so that we include the
reason for the reset in the dev_notice(), superseding the earlier option
to not print that notice.
v3: Stash the reason inside the i915->gpu_error to handover to the direct
reset from the blocking waiter.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180320100449.1360-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We still have an odd race with wedging/unwedging as shown by igt/gem_eio
that defies expectations. Add some more trace_printks to try and
visualize the flow over the precipice.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180315131451.4060-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
There is some redundancy between dma_fence->ops->enable_signaling (via
i915_fence_enable_signaling) and our backend,
intel_engine_enable_signaling() in that both levels recheck the fence
status multiple times. If we convert intel_engine_enable_signaling() to
return the information desired by dma_fence->ops->enable_signaling, we
can reduce i915_fence_enable_signaling to a simple stub and avoid
trying to reinterpret the same information.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180308140732.25090-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we
need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling
engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the
queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that
point, it will be lost.
Fixes: af7a8ffad9 ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
When wedged, we do not update the ring->tail as we submit the requests
causing us to leak the ring->space upon cleaning up the wedged driver.
We can just use the value stored in rq->tail, and keep the submission
backend details away from set-wedge.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Previously, we would spin waiting for all waiters to wake up and notice
their request had completed before we would reset the seqno upon
wraparound. However, we can mark their waits as complete and wake them
up directly using the existing machinery for handling the flushing of
missed wakeups when idling.
Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306130143.13312-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since commit fd10e2ce99 ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted
signalers"), we cancel the signaler when retiring the request and so
upon wraparound, where we wait for all requests to be retired, we no
longer need to spin waiting for the signaling thread to release its
references to the in-flight requests, and so we can assert that the
signaler is idle.
References: fd10e2ce99 ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306130143.13312-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Mostly doc/print messages that were not updated after commit e61e0f51ba
("drm/i915: Rename drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request").
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180222172405.11386-1-michel.thierry@intel.com
We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency,
execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from
drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM
user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for
tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since
they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.)
In short, the spatch:
@@
@@
- struct drm_i915_gem_request
+ struct i915_request
A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using
'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and
repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members,
'request' is still much preferred for its clarity.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221095636.6649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Chris Wilson