Always keep valid data in reserved_size.
It did not cause problems, but the reservation code was unoptimal
when centralized summary was active or the size of the erase block
was very small.
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The goal of summary is to speed up the mount time. Erase block summary (EBS)
stores summary information at the end of every (closed) erase block. It is
no longer necessary to scan all nodes separetly (and read all pages of them)
just read this "small" summary, where every information is stored which is
needed at mount time.
This summary information is stored in a JFFS2_FEATURE_RWCOMPAT_DELETE. During
the mount process if there is no summary info the orignal scan process will
be executed. EBS works with NAND and NOR flashes, too.
There is a user space tool called sumtool to generate this summary
information for a JFFS2 image.
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Various simplifiactions. printk format corrections.
Convert more code to use the new debug functions.
Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Move debug functions into a seperate source file
Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fix fairly sad NOR-specific bug - during FS building ic->scan_dents
isn't zero, but jffs2_mark_node_obsolete() migt be called it tries to
finde the ic corresponding to ref - this requires ic->scan_dents = 0.
Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Don't remove inocache for inodes which are in read_inode() or
clear_inode() until they're done.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
avoid segfault when nextblock was refiled because of a write failure
- avoid filing blocks on the clean list when they have wasted
space
Signed-off-by: Estelle Hammache <estelle.hammache@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Ferenc Havasi