The following build warning is seen after commit 8bdaa43808 ("regulator:
dbx500: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions"):
drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c:144:1: warning: label 'exit_no_debugfs' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
Remove the unused label and its associated error message.
Fixes: 8bdaa43808 ("regulator: dbx500: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions")
Reported-by: Olof's autobuilder <build@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200821144823.13404-1-festevam@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200818133701.462958-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
There isn't any code present within the current kernel to
override this 'weak' function. Besides returning '0', which
is never checked anyway, the whole function appears to be
superfluous.
Consequently fixes W=1 warning:
drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c:113:27: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dbx500_regulator_testcase’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
113 | int __attribute__((weak)) dbx500_regulator_testcase(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200625163614.4001403-5-lee.jones@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
license terms gnu general public license v2
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 37 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528170027.724130665@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c:78:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ux500_regulator_suspend_debug' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c:87:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ux500_regulator_resume_debug' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, these functions are unused in
dbx500-prcmu.c, but should be removed.
So this patch removes the unused functions.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The seq_puts/seq_printf return value, because it's frequently misused,
will eventually be converted to void.
See: commit 1f33c41c03 ("seq_file: Rename seq_overflow() to
seq_has_overflowed() and make public")
Miscellanea:
o Remove unnecessary dev_err("seq_<foo> overflow\n") messages
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts()
instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch
warning.
WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Silences the following warning type:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
power_state_active_get is used only in this file. Make it static.
While at it also move this function definition inside the
CONFIG_REGULATOR_DEBUG macro as it is called only from within it.
This also avoids further build warning related to unused definition.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Building for the snowball board, I ran into this compile failure:
CC drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.o
arm-test.git/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c:119:11: error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared here (not in a function)
make[3]: *** [drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/regulator] Error 2
Commit 38e968380 "regulators/db8500: split off shared dbx500 code"
separated out the dbx500 code but did not copy over the required include
to linux/module.h.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit is no
longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer
needed.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
As we progress with DB5500 and future voltage domain regulators
based on very similar hardware as found in the DB8500 PRCMU,
it makes sense to split off the generic parts and introduce
some generic debug code for the DBx500 regulators. This patch
accoplish a basic abstraction of the DBx500 voltage domain
regulators.
Signed-off-by: Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Jinchao Wang