The two loops in r852_write_buf() are designed to handle 4-byte-aligned
and then 1-byte-aligned portions, respectively. However, there are two
issues:
(1) The first loop will only terminate if 'len' is a multiple of 4
(2) The second loop will never terminate if it runs at least once
Rewrite these loops as they were probably intended. Compile tested only.
Issues pointed out by Coverity Scan.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Use this new function to make code more comprehensible, since we are
reinitialzing the completion, not initializing.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: linux-next resyncs]
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> (personally at LCE13)
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
These local symbols are used only in this file.
Fix the following sparse warnings:
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:232:6: warning: symbol 'r852_write_buf' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:264:6: warning: symbol 'r852_read_buf' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:315:6: warning: symbol 'r852_cmdctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:360:5: warning: symbol 'r852_wait' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:389:5: warning: symbol 'r852_ready' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:400:6: warning: symbol 'r852_ecc_hwctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:432:5: warning: symbol 'r852_ecc_calculate' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:464:5: warning: symbol 'r852_ecc_correct' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:532:6: warning: symbol 'r852_engine_enable' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:550:6: warning: symbol 'r852_engine_disable' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:560:6: warning: symbol 'r852_card_update_present' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:575:6: warning: symbol 'r852_update_card_detect' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:589:9: warning: symbol 'r852_media_type_show' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:600:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_media_type' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:604:6: warning: symbol 'r852_update_media_status' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:633:5: warning: symbol 'r852_register_nand_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:671:6: warning: symbol 'r852_unregister_nand_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:685:6: warning: symbol 'r852_card_detect_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:824:6: warning: symbol 'r852_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:964:6: warning: symbol 'r852_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:995:6: warning: symbol 'r852_shutdown' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Add CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to suspend/resume functions to fix the following
build warning when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not selected. This is because
sleep PM callbacks defined by SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS are only used when
the CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is enabled. Also, unnecessary NULL defines are
removed.
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:1006:12: warning: 'r852_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:1027:12: warning: 'r852_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Just as Artem suggested:
"Both UBI and JFFS2 are able to read verify what they wrote already.
There are also MTD tests which do this verification. So I think there
is no reason to keep this in the NAND layer, let alone wasting RAM in
the driver to support this feature. Besides, it does not work for sub-pages
and many drivers have it broken. It hurts more than it provides benefits."
So kill MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE entirely.
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
As of [mtd: nand: remove autoincrement 'sndcmd' code], the
NAND_CMD_READ0 command is issued unconditionally.
Thus, read_oob/read_oob_raw's 'sndcmd' argument is no longer needed, as
well as their return code.
Remove the 'sndcmd' parameter, and set the return code to 0.
Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This patch converts the drivers in drivers/mtd/* to use module_pci_driver()
macro which makes the code smaller and a bit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Flash device drivers initialize 'ecc_strength' in struct mtd_info, which is the
maximum number of bit errors that can be corrected in one writesize region.
Drivers using the nand interface intitialize 'strength' in struct nand_ecc_ctrl,
which is the maximum number of bit errors that can be corrected in one ecc step.
Nand infrastructure code translates this to 'ecc_strength'.
Also for nand drivers, the nand infrastructure code sets ecc.strength for ecc
modes NAND_ECC_SOFT, NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH, and NAND_ECC_NONE. It is set in the
driver for all other modes.
Signed-off-by: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In
fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy
trick.
It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version
it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version.
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It is not used outside this driver so no need to make the symbol global.
Also make r852_suspend and r852_resume static.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@intel.com>
There are two spellings in use for 'freeze' + 'able' - 'freezable' and
'freezeable'. The former is the more prominent one. The latter is
mostly used by workqueue and in a few other odd places. Unify the
spelling to 'freezable'.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
It turns out that pci core now handles these, so this code is redundant
and can even cause bugs
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This turns out to be the reason for DMA timeouts on resume,
if card was inserted while system was suspended
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
* Don't call complete on dma completion
* do a INIT_COMPLETE before using it each time
* Report DMA read error via ecc 'correct'
I finally managed to make my system do suspend to ram propertly, and I see that
if card was inserted during suspend (while system was off), I get dma timeouts
on resume. Simple card reinsert solves the issue.
This patch solves a crash that would happen otherwise
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Otherwise, if it fires right away, it might access
uninitialized spinlock
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Implicit slab.h inclusion via percpu.h is about to go away. Make sure
gfp.h or slab.h is included as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2GB xD card, and 4MB SmartMedia ROM card share same ID, so to make both work
split xD and smartmedia ID tables.
Hardware driver must be able to know which type it handles (and probably just one).
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
... instead of comparing with DMA_ERROR_CODE, which will only work on
powerpc/sparc/x86.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
r852 fails to build when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled since it uses
pci_*() calls and is a PCI driver, so it should depend on PCI
to prevent build errors.
It should also #include <linux/pci.h>.
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:1053: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_prepare_to_sleep'
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:1062: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_back_from_sleep'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Fix r852 build for the case of CONFIG_PM=n.
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:1039: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_prepare_to_sleep'
drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:1048: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_back_from_sleep'
This patch leaves r852_pm_ops untouched.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
First don't enable card detection logic to early. Second be very careful with
DMA engine, to be sure it doesn't write to kernel memory driver doesn't own.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
The PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5C852 was missed in the edited commit, and on
second thought I just open code it.
This fixes compile error.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
* Test results of few functions that were declared with __must_check
* Fix bogus gcc warning about uinitialized variable 'ret'
* Remove unused variable from mtdblock_remove_dev
* Don't use deprecated DMA_32BIT_MASK
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This adds a driver for Ricoh R5C852 xD card reader.
This reader is a part of larger mulifunction chip
and found at least in R5C832
Driver is complete, but bewere of the fact that some
(probably only type M) xD cards are 'fake' which means that
they have an on board CPU and expose emulated nand command set
These cards don't even store the oob area on the flash,
but generate it on the fly from something else.
Thus they demand to have proper values written in the oob area,
and therefore only useful with SmartMedia FTL.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Brian Norris