The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Needed due to some important regression fixes at RC core.
* commit 'v3.18-rc4': (587 commits)
Linux 3.18-rc4
ARM: dts: zynq: Enable PL clocks for Parallella
tiny: rename ENABLE_DEV_COREDUMP to ALLOW_DEV_COREDUMP
tiny: reverse logic for DISABLE_DEV_COREDUMP
i2c: core: Dispose OF IRQ mapping at client removal time
i2c: at91: don't account as iowait
i2c: remove FSF address
USB: Update default usb-storage delay_use value in kernel-parameters.txt
sysfs: driver core: Fix glue dir race condition by gdp_mutex
MIPS: Fix build with binutils 2.24.51+
xfs: track bulkstat progress by agino
xfs: bulkstat error handling is broken
xfs: bulkstat main loop logic is a mess
xfs: bulkstat chunk-formatter has issues
xfs: bulkstat chunk formatting cursor is broken
xfs: bulkstat btree walk doesn't terminate
mm: Fix comment before truncate_setsize()
USB: cdc-acm: add quirk for control-line state requests
tty: Fix pty master poll() after slave closes v2
MIPS: R3000: Fix debug output for Virtual page number
...
Conflicts:
drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/sp2.c:269:5: sparse: symbol 'sp2_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/sp2.c:351:5: sparse: symbol 'sp2_exit' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Incorrect struct used in the SP2 driver.
Reported-by: Max Nibble <nibble.max@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Olli Salonen <olli.salonen@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Driver for the CIMaX SP2 common interface chip. It is very much based on
the existing cimax2 driver for cx23885, but should be more reusable. The
product has been sold with name Atmel T90FJR as well and the data sheets
for that chip seem to be publicly available.
It seems that the USB device that I have and the cx23885 based devices will
need to interact differently with the chip for the CAM operations. Thus
there is one callback function that is passed on to the sp2 driver
(see function sp2_ci_op_cam for that one).
IRQ functionality is not included currently (not needed by USB devices
and I don't have a PCIe device for development).
Signed-off-by: Olli Salonen <olli.salonen@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Markus Elfring