Replace xprt_create_proto/rpc_create_client with new rpc_create()
interface in the Network Lock Manager.
Note that the semantics of NLM transports is now "hard" instead of "soft"
to provide a better guarantee that lock requests will get to the server.
Test plan:
Repeated runs of Connectathon locking suite. Check network trace to ensure
NLM requests are working correctly.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Remove some unused macros related to accessing an RPC peer address
Test plan:
Compile kernel with CONFIG_NFS option enabled.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Hide the details of how the RPC client stores remote peer addresses from
the Network Lock Manager.
Test plan:
Destructive testing (unplugging the network temporarily). Connectathon
with UDP and TCP.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
nlm_traverse_files() is not allowed to hold the nlm_file_mutex while calling
nlm_inspect file, since it may end up calling nlm_release_file() when
releaseing the blocks.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
(cherry picked from e558d3cde986e04f68afe8c790ad68ef4b94587a commit)
We never actually set the b_done field any more; it's always zero.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
(cherry picked from af8412d4283ef91356e65e0ed9b025b376aebded commit)
Use FL_ACCESS flag to test and/or wait for local locks before we try
requesting a lock from the server
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Use the new behaviour of {flock,posix}_file_lock(F_UNLCK) to determine if
we held a lock, and only send the RPC request to the server if this was the
case.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Currently it is possible for a task to remove its locks at the same time as
the NLM recovery thread is trying to recover them. This quickly leads to an
Oops.
Protect the locks using an rw semaphore while they are being recovered.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Semaphore to mutex conversion.
The conversion was generated via scripts, and the result was validated
automatically via a script as well.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@ericvh.myip.org>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* git://git.linux-nfs.org/pub/linux/nfs-2.6: (103 commits)
SUNRPC,RPCSEC_GSS: spkm3--fix config dependencies
SUNRPC,RPCSEC_GSS: spkm3: import contexts using NID_cast5_cbc
LOCKD: Make nlmsvc_traverse_shares return void
LOCKD: nlmsvc_traverse_blocks return is unused
SUNRPC,RPCSEC_GSS: fix krb5 sequence numbers.
NFSv4: Dont list system.nfs4_acl for filesystems that don't support it.
SUNRPC,RPCSEC_GSS: remove unnecessary kmalloc of a checksum
SUNRPC: Ensure rpc_call_async() always calls tk_ops->rpc_release()
SUNRPC: Fix memory barriers for req->rq_received
NFS: Fix a race in nfs_sync_inode()
NFS: Clean up nfs_flush_list()
NFS: Fix a race with PG_private and nfs_release_page()
NFSv4: Ensure the callback daemon flushes signals
SUNRPC: Fix a 'Busy inodes' error in rpc_pipefs
NFS, NLM: Allow blocking locks to respect signals
NFS: Make nfs_fhget() return appropriate error values
NFSv4: Fix an oops in nfs4_fill_super
lockd: blocks should hold a reference to the nlm_file
NFSv4: SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM should handle NFS4ERR_DELAY/NFS4ERR_RESOURCE
NFSv4: Send the delegation stateid for SETATTR calls
...
Use ARRAY_SIZE macro instead of sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]) and remove a
duplicate of ARRAY_SIZE. Some trailing whitespaces are also deleted.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@nuerscht.ch>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The nlmsvc_traverse_shares return value is always zero, hence useless.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Note that we never return non-zero.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
The struct file_lock does not carry a properly initialised lock,
so don't copy it as if it were.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
The patch "stop abusing file_lock_list introduces a couple of bugs since
the locks may be copied and need to be removed from the lists when they are
destroyed.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Currently lockd directly access the file_lock_list from fs/locks.c.
It does so to mark locks granted or reclaimable. This is very
suboptimal, because a) lockd needs to poke into locks.c internals, and
b) it needs to iterate over all locks in the system for marking locks
granted or reclaimable.
This patch adds lists for granted and reclaimable locks to the nlm_host
structure instead, and adds locks to those.
nlmclnt_lock:
now adds the lock to h_granted instead of setting the
NFS_LCK_GRANTED, still O(1)
nlmclnt_mark_reclaim:
goes away completely, replaced by a list_splice_init.
Complexity reduced from O(locks in the system) to O(1)
reclaimer:
iterates over h_reclaim now, complexity reduced from
O(locks in the system) to O(locks per nlm_host)
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
When doing NLM_GRANTED requests, lockd may end up blocking if we use
rpc_create_client() due to the synchronous call to rpc_ping(). Instead, use
rpc_new_client().
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Currently it uses nlmclnt_lookup_host(), which puts the resulting host
structure on a different list.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Currently lockd identifies its own locks using the FL_LOCKD flag. This
doesn't scale well to multiple lock managers--if we did this in nfsv4 too,
for example, we'd be left with only one free flag bit.
Instead, we just check whether the file manager ops (fl_lmops) set on this
lock are our own.
The only use for this is in nlm_traverse_locks, which uses it to find locks
that need cleaning up when freeing a host or a file.
In the long run it might be nice to do reference counting instead of
traversing all the locks like this....
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
posix_test_lock() returns a pointer to a struct file_lock which is unprotected
and can be removed while in use by the caller. Move the conflicting lock from
the return to a parameter, and copy the conflicting lock.
In most cases the caller ends up putting the copy of the conflicting lock on
the stack. On i386, sizeof(struct file_lock) appears to be about 100 bytes.
We're assuming that's reasonable.
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Reorganize nlmsvc_lock() to make full use of posix_lock_file(), which does
eveything nlmsvc_lock() needs - no need to call posix_test_lock(),
posix_locks_deadlock(), or posix_block_lock() separately.
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Reorganize nlmsvc_grant_blocked() to make full use of posix_lock_file(). Note
that there's no need for separate calls to posix_test_lock(),
posix_locks_deadlock(), or posix_block_lock().
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Slightly more consistent dprintk error reporting, consolidate some up()'s.
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Clean-up: replace rpc_call() helper with direct call to rpc_call_sync.
This makes NFSv2 and NFSv3 synchronous calls more computationally
efficient, and reduces stack consumption in functions that used to
invoke rpc_call more than once.
Test plan:
Compile kernel with CONFIG_NFS enabled. Connectathon on NFS version 2,
version 3, and version 4 mount points.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Add fields to the rpc_procinfo struct that allow the display of a
human-readable name for each procedure in the rpc_iostats output.
Also fix it so that the NFSv4 stats are broken up correctly by
sub-procedure number. NFSv4 uses only two real RPC procedures:
NULL, and COMPOUND.
Test plan:
Mount with NFSv2, NFSv3, and NFSv4, and do "cat /proc/self/mountstats".
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Currently, nlm_alloc_call tests for a signal before it even tries to
allocate memory.
Fix it so that it tries at least once.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
In theory, NLM specs assure us that the server will only reply LCK_GRANTED or
LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD to our NLM_UNLOCK request.
In practice, we should not assume this to be the case, and the code will
currently Oops if we do.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
If 2 threads attached to the same process are blocking on different locks on
different files (maybe even on different servers) but have the same lock
arguments (i.e. same offset+length - actually quite common, since most
processes try to lock the entire file) then the first GRANTED call that wakes
one up will also wake the other.
Currently when the NLM_GRANTED callback comes in, lockd walks the list of
blocked locks in search of a match to the lock that the NLM server has
granted. Although it checks the lock pid, start and end, it fails to check
the filehandle and the server address.
By checking the filehandle and server IP address, we ensure that this only
happens if the locks truly are referencing the same file.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
If the server returns NLM_LCK_DENIED_NOLOCKS, we currently retry the
entire NLM_CANCEL request. This may end up looping forever unless the
server changes its mind (why would it do that, though?).
Ensure that we limit the number of retries (to 3).
See bug# 5957 in bugzilla.kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
The OpenGroup docs state that the arguments "block", "exclusive" and
"alock" must exactly match the arguments for the lock call that we are
trying to cancel.
Currently, "block" is always set to false, which is wrong.
See bug# 5956 on bugzilla.kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Remove the "inline" keyword from a bunch of big functions in the kernel with
the goal of shrinking it by 30kb to 40kb
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Clean up: Every ULP that uses the in-kernel RPC client, except the NLM
client, sets cl_chatty. There's no reason why NLM shouldn't set it, so
just get rid of cl_chatty and always be verbose.
Test-plan:
Compile with CONFIG_NFS enabled.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
We'd like to hide fields in rpc_xprt and rpc_clnt from upper layer protocols.
Start by creating an API to force RPC rebind, replacing logic that simply
sets cl_port to zero.
Test-plan:
Destructive testing (unplugging the network temporarily). Connectathon
with UDP and TCP. NFSv2/3 and NFSv4 mounting should be carefully checked.
Probably need to rig a server where certain services aren't running, or
that returns an error for some typical operation.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
The procedure that decodes statd sm_notify call seems to be skipping a
few arguments. How did this ever work?
>From folks at Polyserve.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
If the server receives an NLM cancel call and finds no waiting lock to
cancel, then chances are the lock has already been applied, and the client
just hadn't yet processed the NLM granted callback before it sent the
cancel.
The Open Group text, for example, perimts a server to return either success
(LCK_GRANTED) or failure (LCK_DENIED) in this case. But returning an error
seems more helpful; the client may be able to use it to recognize that a
race has occurred and to recover from the race.
So, modify the relevant functions to return an error in this case.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
The fl_next check here is superfluous (and possibly a layering violation).
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Currently when lockd gets an NLM_CANCEL request, it also does an unlock for
the same range. This is incorrect.
The Open Group documentation says that "This procedure cancels an
*outstanding* blocked lock request." (Emphasis mine.)
Also, consider a client that holds a lock on the first byte of a file, and
requests a lock on the entire file. If the client cancels that request
(perhaps because the requesting process is signalled), the server shouldn't
apply perform an unlock on the entire file, since that will also remove the
previous lock that the client was already granted.
Or consider a lock request that actually *downgraded* an exclusive lock to
a shared lock.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Chuck Lever