During cpufreq driver's registration, if the ->init() callback for all
the CPUs fail then there is not much point in keeping the driver around
as it will only account for more of unnecessary noise, for example
cpufreq core will try to suspend/resume the driver which never got
registered properly.
The removal of such a driver is avoided if the driver carries the
CPUFREQ_STICKY flag. This was added way back [1] in 2004 and perhaps no
one should ever need it now. A lot of drivers do set this flag, probably
because they just copied it from other drivers.
This was added earlier for some platforms [2] because their cpufreq
drivers were getting registered before the CPUs were registered with
subsys framework. And hence they used to fail.
The same isn't true anymore though. The current code flow in the kernel
is:
start_kernel()
-> kernel_init()
-> kernel_init_freeable()
-> do_basic_setup()
-> driver_init()
-> cpu_dev_init()
-> subsys_system_register() //For CPUs
-> do_initcalls()
-> cpufreq_register_driver()
Clearly, the CPUs will always get registered with subsys framework
before any cpufreq driver can get probed. Remove the flag and update the
relevant drivers.
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/include/linux/cpufreq.h?id=7cc9f0d9a1ab04cedc60d64fd8dcf7df224a3b4d # [1]
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1100.c?id=f59d3bbe35f6268d729f51be82af8325d62f20f5 # [2]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch adds missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE definition which generates
correct modalias for automatic loading of this cpufreq driver when it is
compiled as an external module.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Fixes: 501c574f4e ("cpufreq: mediatek: Add support of cpufreq to MT2701/MT7623 SoC")
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Add the missing platform_driver_unregister() before return from
mtk_cpufreq_driver_init in the error handling case when failed
to register mtk-cpufreq platform device
Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The Energy Model framework supports not only CPU devices. Drop the CPU
specific interface with cpumask and add struct device. Add also a return
value, user might use it. This new interface provides easy way to create
a simple Energy Model, which then might be used by e.g. thermal subsystem.
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
For new mediatek chip mt8183,
cci and little cluster share the same buck,
so need to modify the attribute of regulator from exclusive to optional
Signed-off-by: Andrew-sh.Cheng <andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Add the compatible for MT8516 in order to take advantage of the
MediaTek CPUFreq driver for Mediatek's MT8516 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation this program is
distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
for more details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 655 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070034.575739538@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* pm-opp:
cpufreq: OMAP: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: imx6q: Register an Energy Model
opp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
cpufreq: mediatek: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: scmi: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: arm_big_little: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
Try and register an Energy Model from mediatek-cpufreq to allow
interested subsystems like the task scheduler to use the provided
information.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Use the CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.
This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from mediatek driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
With multi-platform build images, this shows a message on non mediatek
platforms, which is unnecessary. Convert pr_warn() to pr_debug() here.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* pm-cpufreq-thermal:
cpu_cooling: Remove static-power related documentation
cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff
cpu_cooling: Keep only one of_cpufreq*cooling_register() helper
cpu_cooling: Remove unused cpufreq_power_cooling_register()
cpu_cooling: Make of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() parse DT
Support mt2712 in mediatek-cpufreq.c
Signed-off-by: Andrew-sh Cheng <andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
of_cpufreq_cooling_register() isn't used by anyone and so can be
removed, but then we would be left with two routines:
cpufreq_cooling_register() and of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() that
would look odd.
Remove current implementation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and
rename of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() as
of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This simplifies lots of stuff.
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
All the callers of of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() have almost
identical code and it makes more sense to move that code into the helper
as its all about reading DT properties.
This got rid of lot of redundant code.
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This change resolves a new compile-time warning
when built as a loadable module:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.o
see include/linux/module.h for more information
This adds the license as "GPL v2", which matches the header of the file.
MODULE_DESCRIPTION and MODULE_AUTHOR are also added.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Chan <jc@linux.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
MT7622 is a 64-bit ARMv8 based dual-core SoC (2 * Cortex-A53) with a
single cluster. The hardware is also compatible with the current driver,
so add MT7622 as one of the compatible string list.
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since more MediaTek SoCs can be supported with the cpufreq driver and not
limited to MT8173, a couple of cleanups are done here with renaming those
functions and related structures with "mtk" instead of "mt8173".
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
MT2701/MT7623 is a 32-bit ARMv7 based quad-core (4 * Cortex-A7) with
single cluster and this hardware is also compatible with the existing
driver through enabling CPU frequency feature with operating-points-v2
bindings. Also, this driver actually supports all MediaTek SoCs, the
Kconfig menu entry and file name itself should be updated with more
generic name to drop "MT8173"
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Viresh Kumar