ACPI is initialized very early on x86-64, before the DMI code is
initialized. This means it would often discover a 0 year and then turn
off ACPI because it thought the BIOS was too old. Some systems don't
boot without ACPI so this was a problem.
I have a full fix by adding new very early DMI detection, but it needs
more testing before it can be merged. For 2.6.16 let's just turn the
check off. It never made much sense anyways because there are no x86-64
systems older than 2002 or so and they generally all have working ACPI.
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This makes x86-64 use the common X86_PM_TIMER Kconfig entry in drivers/acpi
And since PM timer is needed for correct timing on a lot of systems
now (e.g. AMD dual cores) and we often get bug reports from people
who forgot to set it make it depend on CONFIG_EMBEDDED. x86-64 had
this change before and it's a good thing.
I also fixed the description slightly to make this more clear.
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This makes ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR be consistently defined when ACPI is
enabled, regardless of whether we're on x86 or not, and thus avoids
bogus -Wundef warnings on ia64.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Delete the ability to build an ACPI kernel that does
not include PCI support. When such a machine is created
and it requires a tuned kernel, send a patch.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1364
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Andi Kleen suggested it was unconventional for us to "default m"
on ACPI modules -- even though they are expected to be deployed
as modules. But as "default n" would likely result in some
users building nonsense kernels, we compromise to "default y".
Distros are expected to continue to use =m in their configs.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Distros are shipping modules we had marked EXPERIMENTAL,
so clearly it has lost some meaning.
Delete that dependency for shipping modules, retaining
it only for ACPI_HOTKEY and ACPI_CONTAINER to emphasize
that they lack testing on real hardware.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Build issues were mostly in the ACPI=n case -- don't do that.
Select ACPI from IA64_GENERIC.
Add some missing dependencies on ACPI.
Mark BLACKLIST_YEAR and some laptop-only ACPI drivers
as X86-only. Let me know when you get an IA64 Laptop.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
prevent:
HOTPLUG_CPU=y
ACPI_PROCESSOR=y
ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=n
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
For 2.6.12 behaviour, this (EXPERIMENTAL) driver
should not be built.
Update the driver source with latest from Luming.
Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
See Documentation/acpi-hotkey.txt
Use cmdline "acpi_specific_hotkey" to enable
legacy platform specific drivers.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3887
Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Keiichiro Tokunaga <tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Using CPU hotplug to support suspend/resume SMP. Both S3 and S4 use
disable/enable_nonboot_cpus API. The S4 part is based on Pavel's original S4
SMP patch.
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua<shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Fix 2.6.12 CONFIG_ACPI=n build regression.
CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT shall be set only if CONFIG_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Andi Kleen