The UM virtual PCI devices currently cannot be suspended properly
since the virtio driver already disables VQs well before the PCI
bus's suspend_noirq wants to complete the transition by writing to
PCI config space.
After trying around for a long time with moving the devices on the
DPM list, trying to create dependencies between them, etc. I gave
up and instead added UML specific cross-driver API that lets the
virt-pci code enable not suspending/resuming VQs for its devices.
This then allows the PCI bus suspend_noirq to still talk to the
device, and suspend/resume works properly.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This will be necessary in the userspace side to fix the
signal/interrupt handling in time-travel=ext mode, which
is the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Add a pseudo RTC that simply is able to send an alarm signal
waking up the system at a given time in the future.
Since apparently timerfd_create() FDs don't support SIGIO, we
use the sigio-creating helper thread, which just learned to do
suspend/resume properly in the previous patch.
For time-travel mode, OTOH, just add an event at the specified
time in the future, and that's already sufficient to wake up
the system at that point in time since suspend will just be in
an "endless wait".
For s2idle support also call pm_system_wakeup().
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the
controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little
tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens:
* we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket
* we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt
(this causes communication on the time socket)
* we ACK the original vhost-user message
* we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered
This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues
to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added.
So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually
wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and
config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the
messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler,
but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't
run while there's no time event.
To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in
the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation,
rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly:
Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware
driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler()
that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle
the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar
if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time
simulation.
This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new
timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts
are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the
message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message
before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus
allowing the simulation to progress properly.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
There really is no reason to pass the amount of time we should
sleep, especially since it's just hard-coded to one second.
Additionally, one second isn't really all that long, and as we
are expecting to be woken up by a signal, we can sleep longer
and avoid doing some work every second, so replace the current
clock_nanosleep() with just an empty select() that can _only_
be woken up by a signal.
We can also remove the deliver_alarm() since we don't need to
do that when we got e.g. SIGIO that woke us up, and if we got
SIGALRM the signal handler will actually (have) run, so it's
just unnecessary extra work.
Similarly, in time-travel mode, just program the wakeup event
from idle to be S64_MAX, which is basically the most you could
ever simulate to. Of course, you should already have an event
in the list that's earlier and will cause a wakeup, normally
that's the regular timer interrupt, though in suspend it may
(later) also be an RTC event. Since actually getting to this
point would be a bug and you can't ever get out again, panic()
on it in the time control code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Acked-By: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
In external or inf-cpu time-travel mode, ndelay/udelay currently
just waste CPU time since the simulation time doesn't advance.
Implement them properly in this case.
Note that the "if (time_travel_mode == ...)" parts compile out
if CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT isn't set, time_travel_mode is
defined to TT_MODE_OFF in that case.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This implements synchronized time-travel mode which - using a special
application on a unix socket - lets multiple machines take part in a
time-travelling simulation together.
The protocol for the unix domain socket is defined in the new file
include/uapi/linux/um_timetravel.h.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Instead of tracking all the various timer configurations,
modify the time-travel mode to have an event scheduler and
use a timer event on the scheduler to handle the different
timer configurations.
This doesn't change the function right now, but it prepares
the code for having different kinds of events in the future
(i.e. interrupts coming from other devices that are part of
co-simulation.)
While at it, also move time_travel_sleep() to time.c to
reduce the externally visible API surface.
Also, we really should mark time-travel as incompatible with
SMP, even if UML doesn't support SMP yet.
Finally, I noticed a bug while developing this - if we move
time forward due to consuming time while reading the clock,
we might move across the next event and that would cause us
to go backward in time when we then handle that event. Fix
that by invoking the whole event machine in this case, but
in order to simplify this, make reading the clock only cost
something when interrupts are not disabled. Otherwise, we'd
have to hook into the interrupt delivery machinery etc. and
that's somewhat intrusive.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This file isn't really shared, it's only used on the kernel side,
not on the user side. Remove the include from the user-side and
move the file to a better place.
While at it, rename it to time-internal.h, it's not really just
timers but all kinds of things related to timekeeping.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Johannes Berg