Commit Graph

194 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yang Li 4f5bf12732 fs: fix jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() kernel-doc comment
Add the description of @folio and remove @page in function kernel-doc
comment to remove warnings found by running scripts/kernel-doc, which
is caused by using 'make W=1'.

fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2149: warning: Function parameter or member
'folio' not described in 'jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers'
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2149: warning: Excess function parameter 'page'
description in 'jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers'

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512075432.31763-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2022-06-16 10:36:09 -04:00
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 68189fef88 fs: Change try_to_free_buffers() to take a folio
All but two of the callers already have a folio; pass a folio into
try_to_free_buffers().  This removes the last user of cancel_dirty_page()
so remove that wrapper function too.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-09 23:12:34 -04:00
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) c56a6eb03d jbd2: Convert jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers to take a folio
Also convert it to return a bool since it's called from release_folio().

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-09 23:12:33 -04:00
Linus Torvalds 6b1f86f8e9 Filesystem folio changes for 5.18
Primarily this series converts some of the address_space operations
 to take a folio instead of a page.
 
 ->is_partially_uptodate() takes a folio instead of a page and changes the
 type of the 'from' and 'count' arguments to make it obvious they're bytes.
 ->invalidatepage() becomes ->invalidate_folio() and has a similar type change.
 ->launder_page() becomes ->launder_folio()
 ->set_page_dirty() becomes ->dirty_folio() and adds the address_space as
 an argument.
 
 There are a couple of other misc changes up front that weren't worth
 separating into their own pull request.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEejHryeLBw/spnjHrDpNsjXcpgj4FAmI4hqMACgkQDpNsjXcp
 gj7r7Af/fVJ7m8kKqjP/IayX3HiJRuIDQw+vM++BlRNXdjz+IyED6whdmFGxJeOY
 BMyT+8ApOAz7ErS4G+7fAv4ScJK/aEgFUsnSeAiCp0PliiEJ5NNJzElp6sVmQ7H5
 SX7+Ek444FZUGsQuy0qL7/ELpR3ditnD7x+5U2g0p5TeaHGUQn84crRyfR4xuhNG
 EBD9D71BOb7OxUcOHe93pTkK51QsQ0aCrcIsB1tkK5KR0BAthn1HqF7ehL90Rvrr
 omx5M7aDWGY4oj7IKrhlAs+55Ah2WaOzrZBp0FXNbr4UENDBKWKyUxErwa4xPkf6
 Gm1iQG/CspOHnxN3YWsd5WjtlL3A+A==
 =cOiq
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'folio-5.18b' of git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache

Pull filesystem folio updates from Matthew Wilcox:
 "Primarily this series converts some of the address_space operations to
  take a folio instead of a page.

  Notably:

   - a_ops->is_partially_uptodate() takes a folio instead of a page and
     changes the type of the 'from' and 'count' arguments to make it
     obvious they're bytes.

   - a_ops->invalidatepage() becomes ->invalidate_folio() and has a
     similar type change.

   - a_ops->launder_page() becomes ->launder_folio()

   - a_ops->set_page_dirty() becomes ->dirty_folio() and adds the
     address_space as an argument.

  There are a couple of other misc changes up front that weren't worth
  separating into their own pull request"

* tag 'folio-5.18b' of git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache: (53 commits)
  fs: Remove aops ->set_page_dirty
  fb_defio: Use noop_dirty_folio()
  fs: Convert __set_page_dirty_no_writeback to noop_dirty_folio
  fs: Convert __set_page_dirty_buffers to block_dirty_folio
  nilfs: Convert nilfs_set_page_dirty() to nilfs_dirty_folio()
  mm: Convert swap_set_page_dirty() to swap_dirty_folio()
  ubifs: Convert ubifs_set_page_dirty to ubifs_dirty_folio
  f2fs: Convert f2fs_set_node_page_dirty to f2fs_dirty_node_folio
  f2fs: Convert f2fs_set_data_page_dirty to f2fs_dirty_data_folio
  f2fs: Convert f2fs_set_meta_page_dirty to f2fs_dirty_meta_folio
  afs: Convert afs_dir_set_page_dirty() to afs_dir_dirty_folio()
  btrfs: Convert extent_range_redirty_for_io() to use folios
  fs: Convert trivial uses of __set_page_dirty_nobuffers to filemap_dirty_folio
  btrfs: Convert from set_page_dirty to dirty_folio
  fscache: Convert fscache_set_page_dirty() to fscache_dirty_folio()
  fs: Add aops->dirty_folio
  fs: Remove aops->launder_page
  orangefs: Convert launder_page to launder_folio
  nfs: Convert from launder_page to launder_folio
  fuse: Convert from launder_page to launder_folio
  ...
2022-03-22 18:26:56 -07:00
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) ccd16945db ext4: Convert invalidatepage to invalidate_folio
Extensive changes, but fairly mechanical.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> # orangefs
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> # afs
2022-03-15 08:23:30 -04:00
Ritesh Harjani 2d44292058 jbd2: remove CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG to update t_max_wait
CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG and jbd2_journal_enable_debug knobs were added in
update_t_max_wait(), since earlier it used to take a spinlock for
updating t_max_wait, which could cause a bottleneck while starting a
txn (start_this_handle()).

Since in previous patch, we have killed t_handle_lock completely, we
could get rid of this debug config and knob to let t_max_wait be
updated by default again.

Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ad7319a601fd501079310747ce87d908e0944763.1644992076.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2022-02-25 21:28:58 -05:00
Ritesh Harjani f7f497cb70 jbd2: kill t_handle_lock transaction spinlock
This patch kills t_handle_lock transaction spinlock completely from
jbd2.

To explain the reasoning, currently there were three sites at which
this spinlock was used.

1. jbd2_journal_wait_updates()
   a. Based on careful code review it can be seen that, we don't need this
      lock here. This is since we wait for any currently ongoing updates
      based on a atomic variable t_updates. And we anyway don't take any
      t_handle_lock while in stop_this_handle().
      i.e.

	write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock()
	jbd2_journal_wait_updates() 			stop_this_handle()
		while (atomic_read(txn->t_updates) { 		|
		DEFINE_WAIT(wait); 				|
		prepare_to_wait(); 				|
		if (atomic_read(txn->t_updates) 		if (atomic_dec_and_test(txn->t_updates))
			write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
			schedule();					wake_up()
			write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
		finish_wait();
	   }
	txn->t_state = T_COMMIT
	write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);

   b.  Also note that between atomic_inc(&txn->t_updates) in
       start_this_handle() and jbd2_journal_wait_updates(), the
       synchronization happens via read_lock(journal->j_state_lock) in
       start_this_handle();

2. jbd2_journal_extend()
   a. jbd2_journal_extend() is called with the handle of each process from
      task_struct. So no lock required in updating member fields of handle_t

   b. For member fields of h_transaction, all updates happens only via
      atomic APIs (which is also within read_lock()).
      So, no need of this transaction spinlock.

3. update_t_max_wait()
   Based on Jan suggestion, this can be carefully removed using atomic
   cmpxchg API.
   Note that there can be several processes which are waiting for a new
   transaction to be allocated and started. For doing this only one
   process will succeed in taking write_lock() and allocating a new txn.
   After that all of the process will be updating the t_max_wait (max
   transaction wait time). This can be done via below method w/o taking
   any locks using atomic cmpxchg.
   For more details refer [1]

	   new = get_new_val();
	   old = READ_ONCE(ptr->max_val);
	   while (old < new)
		old = cmpxchg(&ptr->max_val, old, new);

[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/849237/

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d89e599658b4a1f3893a48c6feded200073037fc.1644992076.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2022-02-25 21:28:13 -05:00
Ritesh Harjani cc16eecae6 jbd2: fix use-after-free of transaction_t race
jbd2_journal_wait_updates() is called with j_state_lock held. But if
there is a commit in progress, then this transaction might get committed
and freed via jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() ->
jbd2_journal_free_transaction(), when we release j_state_lock.
So check for journal->j_running_transaction everytime we release and
acquire j_state_lock to avoid use-after-free issue.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/948c2fed518ae739db6a8f7f83f1d58b504f87d0.1644497105.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
Fixes: 4f98186848 ("jbd2: refactor wait logic for transaction updates into a common function")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+afa2ca5171d93e44b348@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2022-02-25 21:28:10 -05:00
Ritesh Harjani 4f98186848 jbd2: refactor wait logic for transaction updates into a common function
No functionality change as such in this patch. This only refactors the
common piece of code which waits for t_updates to finish into a common
function named as jbd2_journal_wait_updates(journal_t *)

Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c564f70f4b2591171677a2a74fccb22a7b6c3a4.1642416995.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2022-02-03 10:57:44 -05:00
Jan Kara 188c299e2a ext4: Support for checksumming from journal triggers
JBD2 layer support triggers which are called when journaling layer moves
buffer to a certain state. We can use the frozen trigger, which gets
called when buffer data is frozen and about to be written out to the
journal, to compute block checksums for some buffer types (similarly as
does ocfs2). This avoids unnecessary repeated recomputation of the
checksum (at the cost of larger window where memory corruption won't be
caught by checksumming) and is even necessary when there are
unsynchronized updaters of the checksummed data.

So add superblock and journal trigger type arguments to
ext4_journal_get_write_access() and ext4_journal_get_create_access() so
that frozen triggers can be set accordingly. Also add inode argument to
ext4_walk_page_buffers() and all the callbacks used with that function
for the same purpose. This patch is mostly only a change of prototype of
the above mentioned functions and a few small helpers. Real checksumming
will come later.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210816095713.16537-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2021-08-30 23:36:50 -04:00
Theodore Ts'o b33d9f5909 jbd2: add sparse annotations for add_transaction_credits()
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2021-08-30 23:36:50 -04:00
Zhang Yi 235d68069c jbd2: don't abort the journal when freeing buffers
Now that we can be sure the journal is aborted once a buffer has failed
to be written back to disk, we can remove the journal abort logic in
jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() which was introduced in
commit c044f3d836 ("jbd2: abort journal if free a async write error
metadata buffer"), because it may cost and propably is not safe.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-4-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2021-06-24 10:33:50 -04:00
Jan Kara 83fe6b18b8 ext4: annotate data race in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
Assertion checks in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() are known to be racy
but we don't want to be grabbing locks just for them.  We thus recheck
them under b_state_lock only if it looks like they would fail. Annotate
the checks with data_race().

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210406161804.20150-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2021-04-09 21:19:33 -04:00
Jan Kara 3b1833e92b ext4: annotate data race in start_this_handle()
Access to journal->j_running_transaction is not protected by appropriate
lock and thus is racy. We are well aware of that and the code handles
the race properly. Just add a comment and data_race() annotation.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+30774a6acf6a2cf6d535@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210406161804.20150-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2021-04-09 21:19:32 -04:00
Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2bf31d9442 jbd2: fix kernel-doc markups
Kernel-doc markup should use this format:
        identifier - description

They should not have any type before that, as otherwise
the parser won't do the right thing.

Also, some identifiers have different names between their
prototypes and the kernel-doc markup.

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/72f5c6628f5f278d67625f60893ffbc2ca28d46e.1605521731.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-11-19 22:38:29 -05:00
Theodore Ts'o 05d5233df8 jbd2: fix up sparse warnings in checkpoint code
Add missing __acquires() and __releases() annotations.  Also, in an
"this should never happen" WARN_ON check, if it *does* actually
happen, we need to release j_state_lock since this function is always
supposed to release that lock.  Otherwise, things will quickly grind
to a halt after the WARN_ON trips.

Fixes: 96f1e09745 ("jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock...")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-11-07 00:09:08 -05:00
zhangyi (F) 529a781ee0 jbd2: remove unused parameter in jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers()
Parameter gfp_mask in jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() is no longer
used after commit <536fc240e7147> ("jbd2: clean up
jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers()"), so just remove it.

Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200620025427.1756360-6-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-08-07 14:12:35 -04:00
zhangyi (F) c044f3d836 jbd2: abort journal if free a async write error metadata buffer
If we free a metadata buffer which has been failed to async write out
in the background, the jbd2 checkpoint procedure will not detect this
failure in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(), so it may lead to filesystem
inconsistency after cleanup journal tail. This patch abort the journal
if free a buffer has write_io_error flag to prevent potential further
inconsistency.

Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200620025427.1756360-5-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-08-07 14:12:34 -04:00
Lukas Czerner 24dc986491 jbd2: make sure jh have b_transaction set in refile/unfile_buffer
Callers of __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and
__jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() assume that the b_transaction is set. In
fact if it's not, we can end up with journal_head refcounting errors
leading to crash much later that might be very hard to track down. Add
asserts to make sure that is the case.

We also make sure that b_next_transaction is NULL in
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() since the callers expect that as well and
we should not get into that stage in this state anyway, leading to
problems later on if we do.

Tested with fstests.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200617092549.6712-1-lczerner@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-08-06 00:11:15 -04:00
Jan Kara 14ff628630 jbd2: avoid leaking transaction credits when unreserving handle
When reserved transaction handle is unused, we subtract its reserved
credits in __jbd2_journal_unreserve_handle() called from
jbd2_journal_stop(). However this function forgets to remove reserved
credits from transaction->t_outstanding_credits and thus the transaction
space that was reserved remains effectively leaked. The leaked
transaction space can be quite significant in some cases and leads to
unnecessarily small transactions and thus reducing throughput of the
journalling machinery. E.g. fsmark workload creating lots of 4k files
was observed to have about 20% lower throughput due to this when ext4 is
mounted with dioread_nolock mount option.

Subtract reserved credits from t_outstanding_credits as well.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8f7d89f368 ("jbd2: transaction reservation support")
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200520133119.1383-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-06-03 23:16:53 -04:00
Qian Cai 6c5d911249 jbd2: fix data races at struct journal_head
journal_head::b_transaction and journal_head::b_next_transaction could
be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,

 LTP: starting fsync04
 /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev
 EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem
 EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
 ==================================================================
 BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer [jbd2] / jbd2_write_access_granted [jbd2]

 write to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25721 on cpu 70:
  __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0xdd/0x210 [jbd2]
  __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2569
  jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x2d15/0x3f20 [jbd2]
  (inlined by) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction at fs/jbd2/commit.c:1034
  kjournald2+0x13b/0x450 [jbd2]
  kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0
  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 read to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25724 on cpu 68:
  jbd2_write_access_granted+0x1b2/0x250 [jbd2]
  jbd2_write_access_granted at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1155
  jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x60 [jbd2]
  __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x50/0x90 [ext4]
  ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x158/0x620 [ext4]
  ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x54f/0xca0 [ext4]
  ext4_ind_map_blocks+0xc79/0x1b40 [ext4]
  ext4_map_blocks+0x3b4/0x950 [ext4]
  _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4]
  ext4_get_block+0x3b/0x50 [ext4]
  __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0
  __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50
  ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4]
  generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290
  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
  ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
  new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
  __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
  vfs_write+0x103/0x260
  ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
  __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
  do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

 5 locks held by fsync04/25724:
  #0: ffff99f9911093f8 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x21c/0x260
  #1: ffff99f9db4c0348 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}, at: ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x65/0x210 [ext4]
  #2: ffff99f5e7dfcf58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2]
  #3: ffff99f9db4c0168 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++}, at: ext4_map_blocks+0x176/0x950 [ext4]
  #4: ffffffff99086b40 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x4e/0x250 [jbd2]
 irq event stamp: 1407125
 hardirqs last  enabled at (1407125): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790
 hardirqs last disabled at (1407124): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790
 softirqs last  enabled at (1405528): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c
 softirqs last disabled at (1405521): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0

 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
 CPU: 68 PID: 25724 Comm: fsync04 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7
 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019

The plain reads are outside of jh->b_state_lock critical section which result
in data races. Fix them by adding pairs of READ|WRITE_ONCE().

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043111.2227-1-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-02-29 13:40:02 -05:00
wangyan 8eedabfd66 jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when clearing block group bits
I found a NULL pointer dereference in ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits().
The running environment:
	kernel version: 4.19
	A cluster with two nodes, 5 luns mounted on two nodes, and do some
	file operations like dd/fallocate/truncate/rm on every lun with storage
	network disconnection.

The fallocate operation on dm-23-45 caused an null pointer dereference.

The information of NULL pointer dereference as follows:
	[577992.878282] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-23-45.
	[577992.878290] Aborting journal on device dm-23-45.
	...
	[577992.890778] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-24-46.
	[577992.890908] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890916] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_extend_trans:474 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890918] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890920] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_rotate_tree_right:2500 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890922] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890924] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_do_insert_extent:4382 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890928] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_insert_extent:4842 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890928] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890930] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree:4947 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890933] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890939] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890949] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000020
	[577992.890950] Mem abort info:
	[577992.890951]   ESR = 0x96000004
	[577992.890952]   Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
	[577992.890952]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
	[577992.890953]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
	[577992.890954] Data abort info:
	[577992.890955]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
	[577992.890956]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
	[577992.890958] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000f8da07a9
	[577992.890960] [0000000000000020] pgd=0000000000000000
	[577992.890964] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
	[577992.890965] Process fallocate (pid: 88392, stack limit = 0x00000000013db2fd)
	[577992.890968] CPU: 52 PID: 88392 Comm: fallocate Kdump: loaded Tainted: G        W  OE     4.19.36 #1
	[577992.890969] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDD, BIOS 0.98 08/25/2019
	[577992.890971] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
	[577992.891054] pc : _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x63c/0x968 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891082] lr : _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x618/0x968 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891084] sp : ffff0000c8e2b810
	[577992.891085] x29: ffff0000c8e2b820 x28: 0000000000000000
	[577992.891087] x27: 00000000000006f3 x26: ffffa07957b02e70
	[577992.891089] x25: ffff807c59d50000 x24: 00000000000006f2
	[577992.891091] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffff807bd39abc30
	[577992.891093] x21: ffff0000811d9000 x20: ffffa07535d6a000
	[577992.891097] x19: ffff000001681638 x18: ffffffffffffffff
	[577992.891098] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff000080a03df0
	[577992.891100] x15: ffff0000811d9708 x14: 203d207375746174
	[577992.891101] x13: 73203a524f525245 x12: 20373439343a6565
	[577992.891103] x11: 0000000000000038 x10: 0101010101010101
	[577992.891106] x9 : ffffa07c68a85d70 x8 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f
	[577992.891109] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000080
	[577992.891110] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000002
	[577992.891112] x3 : ffff000001713390 x2 : 2ff90f88b1c22f00
	[577992.891114] x1 : ffff807bd39abc30 x0 : 0000000000000000
	[577992.891116] Call trace:
	[577992.891139]  _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x63c/0x968 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891162]  _ocfs2_free_clusters+0x100/0x290 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891185]  ocfs2_free_clusters+0x50/0x68 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891206]  ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree+0x198/0x5e0 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891227]  ocfs2_add_inode_data+0x94/0xc8 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891248]  ocfs2_extend_allocation+0x1bc/0x7a8 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891269]  ocfs2_allocate_extents+0x14c/0x338 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891290]  __ocfs2_change_file_space+0x3f8/0x610 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891309]  ocfs2_fallocate+0xe4/0x128 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891316]  vfs_fallocate+0x11c/0x250
	[577992.891317]  ksys_fallocate+0x54/0x88
	[577992.891319]  __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x28/0x38
	[577992.891323]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
	[577992.891325]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
	[577992.891327]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

My analysis process as follows:
ocfs2_fallocate
  __ocfs2_change_file_space
    ocfs2_allocate_extents
      ocfs2_extend_allocation
        ocfs2_add_inode_data
          ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree
            ocfs2_insert_extent
              ocfs2_do_insert_extent
                ocfs2_rotate_tree_right
                  ocfs2_extend_rotate_transaction
                    ocfs2_extend_trans
                      jbd2_journal_restart
                        jbd2__journal_restart
                          /* handle->h_transaction is NULL,
                           * is_handle_aborted(handle) is true
                           */
                          handle->h_transaction = NULL;
                          start_this_handle
                            return -EROFS;
            ocfs2_free_clusters
              _ocfs2_free_clusters
                _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits
                  ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits
                    ocfs2_journal_access_gd
                      __ocfs2_journal_access
                        jbd2_journal_get_undo_access
                          /* I think jbd2_write_access_granted() will
                           * return true, because do_get_write_access()
                           * will return -EROFS.
                           */
                          if (jbd2_write_access_granted(...)) return 0;
                          do_get_write_access
                            /* handle->h_transaction is NULL, it will
                             * return -EROFS here, so do_get_write_access()
                             * was not called.
                             */
                            if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) return -EROFS;
                    /* bh2jh(group_bh) is NULL, caused NULL
                       pointer dereference */
                    undo_bg = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *)
                                bh2jh(group_bh)->b_committed_data;

If handle->h_transaction == NULL, then jbd2_write_access_granted()
does not really guarantee that journal_head will stay around,
not even speaking of its b_committed_data. The bh2jh(group_bh)
can be removed after ocfs2_journal_access_gd() and before call
"bh2jh(group_bh)->b_committed_data". So, we should move
is_handle_aborted() check from do_get_write_access() into
jbd2_journal_get_undo_access() and jbd2_journal_get_write_access()
before the call to jbd2_write_access_granted().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f72a623f-b3f1-381a-d91d-d22a1c83a336@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yan Wang <wangyan122@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
2020-02-21 19:32:07 -05:00
zhangyi (F) 6a66a7ded1 jbd2: move the clearing of b_modified flag to the journal_unmap_buffer()
There is no need to delay the clearing of b_modified flag to the
transaction committing time when unmapping the journalled buffer, so
just move it to the journal_unmap_buffer().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213063821.30455-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
2020-02-13 12:06:17 -05:00
Shijie Luo 8d6ce13679 ext4,jbd2: fix comment and code style
Fix comment and remove unneccessary blank.

Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200123064325.36358-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25 02:24:53 -05:00
wangyan 0c1cba6cca jbd2: delete the duplicated words in the comments
Delete the duplicated words "is" in the comments

Signed-off-by: Yan Wang <wangyan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/12087f77-ab4d-c7ba-53b4-893dbf0026f0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25 02:23:29 -05:00
Linus Torvalds 50b8b3f85a This merge window saw the the following new featuers added to ext4:
* Direct I/O via iomap (required the iomap-for-next branch from Darrick
    as a prereq).
  * Support for using dioread-nolock where the block size < page size.
  * Support for encryption for file systems where the block size < page size.
  * Rework of journal credits handling so a revoke-heavy workload will
    not cause the journal to run out of space.
  * Replace bit-spinlocks with spinlocks in jbd2
 
 Also included were some bug fixes and cleanups, mostly to clean up
 corner cases from fuzzed file systems and error path handling.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEK2m5VNv+CHkogTfJ8vlZVpUNgaMFAl3dHxoACgkQ8vlZVpUN
 gaMZswf5AbtQhTEJDXO7Pc1ull38GIGFgAv7uAth0TymLC3h1/FEYWW0crEPFsDr
 1Eei55UUVOYrMMUKQ4P7wlLX0cIh3XDPMWnRFuqBoV5/ZOsH/ZSbkY//TG2Xze/v
 9wXIH/RKQnzbRtXffJ1+DnvmXJk+HFm1R1gjl0nfyUXGrnlSfqJxhLSczyd6bJJq
 ehi/tso5UC/4EQsAIdWp7VWsAdaHcZ7ogHqDoy8dXpM1equ408iml7VlKr8R+Nr7
 5ANpCISXChSlLLYm0NYN5vhO8upF5uDxWLdCtxVPL5kFdM2m/ELjXw9h9C+78l7C
 EWJGlGlxvx07Px+e+bfStEsoixpWBg==
 =0eko
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4

Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
 "This merge window saw the the following new featuers added to ext4:

   - Direct I/O via iomap (required the iomap-for-next branch from
     Darrick as a prereq).

   - Support for using dioread-nolock where the block size < page size.

   - Support for encryption for file systems where the block size < page
     size.

   - Rework of journal credits handling so a revoke-heavy workload will
     not cause the journal to run out of space.

   - Replace bit-spinlocks with spinlocks in jbd2

  Also included were some bug fixes and cleanups, mostly to clean up
  corner cases from fuzzed file systems and error path handling"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (59 commits)
  ext4: work around deleting a file with i_nlink == 0 safely
  ext4: add more paranoia checking in ext4_expand_extra_isize handling
  jbd2: make jbd2_handle_buffer_credits() handle reserved handles
  ext4: fix a bug in ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit
  ext4: bio_alloc with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM never fails
  ext4: code cleanup for get_next_id
  ext4: fix leak of quota reservations
  ext4: remove unused variable warning in parse_options()
  ext4: Enable encryption for subpage-sized blocks
  fs/buffer.c: support fscrypt in block_read_full_page()
  ext4: Add error handling for io_end_vec struct allocation
  jbd2: Fine tune estimate of necessary descriptor blocks
  jbd2: Provide trace event for handle restarts
  ext4: Reserve revoke credits for freed blocks
  jbd2: Make credit checking more strict
  jbd2: Rename h_buffer_credits to h_total_credits
  jbd2: Reserve space for revoke descriptor blocks
  jbd2: Drop jbd2_space_needed()
  jbd2: Account descriptor blocks into t_outstanding_credits
  jbd2: Factor out common parts of stopping and restarting a handle
  ...
2019-11-30 10:53:02 -08:00
Theodore Ts'o a6d4040846 Merge branch 'jk/jbd2-revoke-overflow' 2019-11-05 16:02:20 -05:00
Jan Kara 19014d6971 jbd2: Fine tune estimate of necessary descriptor blocks
Currently we reserve j_max_transaction_buffers / 32 for transaction
descriptor blocks. Now that revoke descriptors are accounted for
separately this estimate is unnecessarily high and we can actually
compute much tighter estimate. In the common case of 32k journal blocks
and 4k blocksize this actually reduces the amount of reserved descriptor
blocks from 256 to ~25 which allows us to fit more real data into a
transaction.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-25-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:49 -05:00
Jan Kara 0094f981bb jbd2: Provide trace event for handle restarts
Provide trace event for handle restarts to ease debugging.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-24-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:49 -05:00
Jan Kara d090707eda jbd2: Make credit checking more strict
Make checking of available credits in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() more
strict. There should be always enough credits in the handle to write all
potential revoke descriptors. Also we warn in case there are not enough
credits since this is a bug in the filesystem.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-22-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:49 -05:00
Jan Kara 933f1c1e0b jbd2: Rename h_buffer_credits to h_total_credits
The credit counter now contains both buffer and revoke descriptor block
credits. Rename to counter to h_total_credits to reflect that. No
functional change.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-21-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:48 -05:00
Jan Kara fdc3ef882a jbd2: Reserve space for revoke descriptor blocks
Extend functions for starting, extending, and restarting transaction
handles to take number of revoke records handle must be able to
accommodate. These functions then make sure transaction has enough
credits to be able to store resulting revoke descriptor blocks. Also
revoke code tracks number of revoke records created by a handle to catch
situation where some place didn't reserve enough space for revoke
records. Similarly to standard transaction credits, space for unused
reserved revoke records is released when the handle is stopped.

On the ext4 side we currently take a simplistic approach of reserving
space for 1024 revoke records for any transaction. This grows amount of
credits reserved for each handle only by a few and is enough for any
normal workload so that we don't hit warnings in jbd2. We will refine
the logic in following commits.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-20-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:48 -05:00
Jan Kara 77444ac4f9 jbd2: Drop jbd2_space_needed()
The function is now just a trivial wrapper returning
journal->j_max_transaction_buffers. Drop it.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-19-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:48 -05:00
Jan Kara 9f356e5a4f jbd2: Account descriptor blocks into t_outstanding_credits
Currently, journal descriptor blocks were not accounted in
transaction->t_outstanding_credits and we were just leaving some slack
space in the journal for them (in jbd2_log_space_left() and
jbd2_space_needed()). This is making proper accounting (and reservation
we want to add) of descriptor blocks difficult so switch to accounting
descriptor blocks in transaction->t_outstanding_credits and just reserve
the same amount of credits in t_outstanding credits for journal
descriptor blocks when creating transaction.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-18-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:48 -05:00
Jan Kara ec8b6f600e jbd2: Factor out common parts of stopping and restarting a handle
jbd2__journal_restart() has quite some code that is common with
jbd2_journal_stop(). Factor this functionality into stop_this_handle()
helper and use it from both functions. Note that this also drops
t_handle_lock protection from jbd2__journal_restart() as
jbd2_journal_stop() does the same thing without it.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-17-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:48 -05:00
Jan Kara 5559b2d81b jbd2: Drop pointless wakeup from jbd2_journal_stop()
When we drop last handle from a transaction and journal->j_barrier_count
> 0, jbd2_journal_stop() wakes up journal->j_wait_transaction_locked
wait queue. This looks pointless - wait for outstanding handles always
happens on journal->j_wait_updates waitqueue.
journal->j_wait_transaction_locked is used to wait for transaction state
changes and by start_this_handle() for waiting until
journal->j_barrier_count drops to 0. The first case is clearly
irrelevant here since only jbd2 thread changes transaction state. The
second case looks related but jbd2_journal_unlock_updates() is
responsible for the wakeup in this case. So just drop the wakeup.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-16-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:48 -05:00
Jan Kara 150549ed2f jbd2: Drop pointless check from jbd2_journal_stop()
If a transaction is larger than journal->j_max_transaction_buffers, that
is a bug and not a trigger for transaction commit. Also the very next
attempt to start new handle will start transaction commit anyway. So
just remove the pointless check. Arguably, we could start transaction
commit whenever the transaction size is *close* to
journal->j_max_transaction_buffers. This has a potential to reduce
latency of the next jbd2_journal_start() at the cost of somewhat smaller
transactions. However for this to have any effect, it would mean that
there isn't someone already waiting in jbd2_journal_start() which means
metadata load for the fs is pretty light anyway so probably this
optimization is not worth it.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-15-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:48 -05:00
Jan Kara dfaf5ffda2 jbd2: Reorganize jbd2_journal_stop()
Move code in jbd2_journal_stop() around a bit. It removes some
unnecessary code duplication and will make factoring out parts common
with jbd2__journal_restart() easier.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-14-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05 16:00:48 -05:00
Thomas Gleixner 464170647b jbd2: Make state lock a spinlock
Bit-spinlocks are problematic on PREEMPT_RT if functions which might sleep
on RT, e.g. spin_lock(), alloc/free(), are invoked inside the lock held
region because bit spinlocks disable preemption even on RT.

A first attempt was to replace state lock with a spinlock placed in struct
buffer_head and make the locking conditional on PREEMPT_RT and
DEBUG_BIT_SPINLOCKS.

Jan pointed out that there is a 4 byte hole in struct journal_head where a
regular spinlock fits in and he would not object to convert the state lock
to a spinlock unconditionally.

Aside of solving the RT problem, this also gains lockdep coverage for the
journal head state lock (bit-spinlocks are not covered by lockdep as it's
hard to fit a lockdep map into a single bit).

The trivial change would have been to convert the jbd_*lock_bh_state()
inlines, but that comes with the downside that these functions take a
buffer head pointer which needs to be converted to a journal head pointer
which adds another level of indirection.

As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines
and write out spin_*lock() at all call sites.

Fixup all locking comments as well.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-7-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21 09:16:46 -04:00
Jan Kara 2e710ff03f jbd2: Don't call __bforget() unnecessarily
jbd2_journal_forget() jumps to 'not_jbd' branch which calls __bforget()
in cases where the buffer is clean which is pointless. In case of failed
assertion, it can be even argued that it is safer not to touch buffer's
dirty bits. Also logically it makes more sense to just jump to 'drop'
and that will make logic also simpler when we switch bh_state_lock to a
spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-6-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21 09:16:46 -04:00
Jan Kara 6d69843e5d jbd2: Drop unnecessary branch from jbd2_journal_forget()
We have cleared both dirty & jbddirty bits from the bh. So there's no
difference between bforget() and brelse(). Thus there's no point jumping
to no_jbd branch.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-5-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21 09:16:46 -04:00
Jan Kara 93108ebb84 jbd2: Move dropping of jh reference out of un/re-filing functions
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() drop
transaction's jh reference when they remove jh from a transaction. This
will be however inconvenient once we move state lock into journal_head
itself as we still need to unlock it and we'd need to grab jh reference
just for that. Move dropping of jh reference out of these functions into
the few callers.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21 09:16:46 -04:00
Thomas Gleixner d84560f74d jbd2: Simplify journal_unmap_buffer()
journal_unmap_buffer() checks first whether the buffer head is a journal.
If so it takes locks and then invokes jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head()
followed by another check whether this is journal head buffer.

The double checking is pointless.

Replace the initial check with jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head() which
alredy checks whether the buffer head is actually a journal.

Allows also early access to the journal head pointer for the upcoming
conversion of state lock to a regular spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21 09:16:45 -04:00
Qian Cai 5facae4f35 locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release()
Since the following commit:

  b4adfe8e05 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_release")

@nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so remove it from all
lock_release() calls and friends.

Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: duyuyang@gmail.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jack@suse.com
Cc: jlbec@evilplan.or
Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: jslaby@suse.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Cc: mark@fasheh.com
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: mripard@kernel.org
Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Cc: sean@poorly.run
Cc: st@kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568909380-32199-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-10-09 12:46:10 +02:00
Joseph Qi 963abb9aeb jbd2: remove jbd2_journal_inode_add_[write|wait]
Since ext4/ocfs2 are using jbd2_inode dirty range scoping APIs now,
jbd2_journal_inode_add_[write|wait] are not used any more, remove them.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562977611-8412-2-git-send-email-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Acked-by: Changwei Ge <chge@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-24 15:54:07 -07:00
Xiaoguang Wang 4c273352bb jbd2: add missing tracepoint for reserved handle
This issue was found when I use ebpf to trace every jbd2
handle's running info in dioread_nolock case.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-08-24 23:10:17 -04:00
Ross Zwisler 6ba0e7dc64 jbd2: introduce jbd2_inode dirty range scoping
Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space
of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry.  The
consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly
appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of
time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the
pages under writeback to be written out.

The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from
/dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem.  This can
cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of
the entire dd operation.

We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges
associated with a given transaction.  We do this via the jbd2_inode
structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it
follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure.

This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in
journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for
a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode
in question is still being appended to.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2019-06-20 17:24:56 -04:00
Chengguang Xu 0d52154bb0 jbd2: fix potential double free
When failing from creating cache jbd2_inode_cache, we will destroy the
previously created cache jbd2_handle_cache twice.  This patch fixes
this by moving each cache initialization/destruction to its own
separate, individual function.

Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
2019-05-10 21:15:47 -04:00
Liu Song 0df6f46995 jbd2: jbd2_get_transaction does not need to return a value
In jbd2_get_transaction, a new transaction is initialized,
and set to the j_running_transaction. No need for a return
value, so remove it.

Also, adjust some comments to match the actual operation
of this function.

Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liu.song11@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2019-03-01 00:36:57 -05:00
zhangyi (F) 01215d3edb jbd2: fix compile warning when using JBUFFER_TRACE
The jh pointer may be used uninitialized in the two cases below and the
compiler complain about it when enabling JBUFFER_TRACE macro, fix them.

In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_get_undo_access’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
                                      ^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1219:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
  struct journal_head *jh;
                       ^
In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
                                      ^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1332:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
  struct journal_head *jh;
                       ^

Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2019-02-21 11:24:09 -05:00