PH1-LD4 and PH1-sLD8 SoCs have pins that support pin configuration
(pin biasing, drive strength control), but not pin-muxing.
Allow to fill the mux value table with -1 for those pins; pins with
mux value -1 will be skipped in the pin-mux set function. The mux
value type should be changed from "unsigned" to "int" in order to
accommodate -1 as a special case.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Upcoming new pinctrl drivers for PH1-LD11 and PH-LD20 support input
signal gating for each pin. (While, existing ones only support it
per pin-group.) This commit updates the core part for that.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Unfortunately, the pin number of the new SoC, PH1-LD11, is not
contiguous. The base frame work must be adjusted to support the new
SoC pinctrl driver. The pin_desc_get() exploits radix-tree for pin
look-up, so it works more efficiently with sparse pin space.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The new ARMv8 SoC, PH1-LD20, supports more fine-grained drive
strength control. Drive strength of some pins are controlled by
3-bit width registers (8-level granularity).
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The new ARMv8 SoC, PH1-LD20, supports more fine-grained drive
strength control. Some of the configuration registers on it have
3-bit width.
The feature will be supported in the next commit, but a problem is
that macro names are getting longer and longer in the current naming
scheme.
Before moving forward, this commit renames macros as follows:
UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_4_8 -> UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_1BIT
UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_8_12_16_20 -> UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_2BIT
UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_FIXED_4 -> UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_FIXED4
UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_FIXED_5 -> UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_FIXED5
UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_FIXED_8 -> UNIPHIER_PIN_DRV_FIXED8
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Currently, every SoC driver defines struct pinctrl_desc statically,
i.e. it consumes memory footprint even if it is not probed.
In multi-platform, many pinctrl drivers are linked (generally as
built-in objects), although only one of them is actually used.
So, it is reasonable to allocate memory dynamically where possible.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Every SoC driver sets the same name for struct pinctrl_desc and
platform_driver. The common probe function can set desc->name
instead of duplicating strings in each SoC driver.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The owner of the struct pinctrl_desc matches that of platform_driver.
Set it in the common probe function.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Use devm_pinctrl_register() for pin control registration and remove
need of .remove callback.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to pinctrl_utils_free_map, since
it does not depend on device tree despite the current name. This
will enforce a consistent naming in pinctr-utils.c and will make
it clear it can be called from outside device tree (e.g. from
ACPI handling code).
Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
While IECTRL is disabled, input signals are pulled-down internally.
If pin-muxing is set up first, glitch signals (Low to High transition)
might be input to hardware blocks.
Bad case scenario:
[1] The hardware block is already running before pinctrl is handled.
(the reset is de-asserted by default or by a firmware, for example)
[2] The pin-muxing is set up. The input signals to hardware block
are pulled-down by the chip-internal biasing.
[3] The pins are input-enabled. The signals from the board reach the
hardware block.
Actually, one invalid character is input to the UART blocks for such
SoCs as PH1-LD4, PH1-sLD8, where UART devices start to run at the
power on reset.
To avoid such problems, pins should be input-enabled before muxing.
Fixes: 6e90889202 ("pinctrl: UniPhier: add UniPhier pinctrl core support")
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reported-by: Dai Okamura <okamura.dai@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The core support for the pinctrl drivers for all the UniPhier SoCs.
Changes in v2:
- drop vogus THIS_MODULE because this file is always built-in
- drop vogus "include <linux/module.h> because this file is
always built-in
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Masahiro Yamada