When ndo_add|del_slave ops are used, they're taken from the respective
master device's netdev ops, so if the master device is a VRF only then
the VRF ops will get called thus no need to check the type of the
master.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We can simplify do_vrf_add_slave by moving vrf_insert_slave in the end
of the enslaving and thus eliminate an error goto label. It always
succeeds and isn't needed before that anyway.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The upper/lower functions already check for duplicate slaves so no need
to do it again.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
It's pointless to panic on cache create failure when that case is handled
and even more so since it's not a kernel-wide fatal problem so don't
panic.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently whenever a packet different from ETH_P_IP is sent through the
VRF device it is leaked so plug the leaks and properly drop these
packets.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We can drop the check because if vrf_ptr is present then we must have
the vrf device as a master and since we're running with rtnl it can't go
away.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
dstats and rth are always present because we fail the device registration
if they can't be allocated in vrf_init() (ndo_init) so drop the unnecessary
checks.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
slave_queue has a num_slaves member which is unused, drop it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
netdev_master_upper_dev_link/unlink already do a dev_hold/put on the
devices being linked, so no need to take another reference.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This driver borrows heavily from IPvlan and teaming drivers.
Routing domains (VRF-lite) are created by instantiating a VRF master
device with an associated table and enslaving all routed interfaces that
participate in the domain. As part of the enslavement, all connected
routes for the enslaved devices are moved to the table associated with
the VRF device. Outgoing sockets must bind to the VRF device to function.
Standard FIB rules bind the VRF device to tables and regular fib rule
processing is followed. Routed traffic through the box, is forwarded by
using the VRF device as the IIF and following the IIF rule to a table
that is mated with the VRF.
Example:
Create vrf 1:
ip link add vrf1 type vrf table 5
ip rule add iif vrf1 table 5
ip rule add oif vrf1 table 5
ip route add table 5 prohibit default
ip link set vrf1 up
Add interface to vrf 1:
ip link set eth1 master vrf1
Signed-off-by: Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Nikolay Aleksandrov