The doorbell reset initially appears to work correctly,
the controller resets, comes up, some i/o can even be
done, but on at least some Smart Arrays in some servers,
it eventually causes a subsequent controller lockup due
to some kind of PCIe error, and kdump can end up leaving
the root filesystem in an unbootable state. For this
reason, until the problem is fixed, or at least isolated
to certain hardware enough to be avoided, the doorbell
reset should not be used at all.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Some controllers might try to tell us they support 0 commands
in performant mode. This is a lie told by buggy firmware.
We have to be wary of this lest we try to allocate a negative
number of command blocks, which will be treated as unsigned,
and get an out of memory condition.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
There are things which need to be done in the intx
interrupt handler which do not need to be done in
the msi/msix interrupt handler, like checking that
the interrupt is actually for us, and checking that the
interrupt pending bit on the hardware is set (which we
weren't previously doing at all, which means old controllers
wouldn't work), so it makes sense to separate these into
two functions.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
The 6402/6404 are two PCI devices -- two Smart Array controllers
-- that fit into one slot. It is possible to reset them independently,
however, they share a battery backed cache module. One of the pair
controls the cache and the 2nd one access the cache through the first
one. If you reset the one controlling the cache, the other one will
not be a happy camper. So we just forbid resetting this conjoined
mess.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Smart Array controllers newer than the P600 do not honor the
PCI power state method of resetting the controllers. Instead,
in these cases we can get them to reset via the "doorbell" register.
This escaped notice until we began using "performant" mode because
the fact that the controllers did not reset did not normally
impede subsequent operation, and so things generally appeared to
"work". Once the performant mode code was added, if the controller
does not reset, it remains in performant mode. The code immediately
after the reset presumes the controller is in "simple" mode
(which previously, it had remained in simple mode the whole time).
If the controller remains in performant mode any code which presumes
it is in simple mode will not work. So the reset needs to be fixed.
Unfortunately there are some controllers which cannot be reset by
either method. (eg. p800). We detect these cases by noticing that
the controller seems to remain in performant mode even after a
reset has been attempted. In those case, we proceed anyway,
as if the reset has happened (and skip the step of waiting for
the controller to become ready -- which is expecting it to be in
"simple" mode.) To sum up, we try to do a better job of resetting
the controller if "reset_devices" is set, and if it doesn't work,
we print a message and try to continue anyway.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Rationale for this is that I will also need to use this code
in fixing kdump host reset code prior to having the hba structure.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Rationale for this is that in order to fix the hard reset code used
by kdump, we need to use this function before we even have the per
HBA structure.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
We were previously only accepting HP boards.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Add 5 CCISSE smart array controllers
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
We have 32 (MAXSGENTRIES) scatter gather elements embedded
in the command. With all these, the total command size is
about 576 bytes. However, the last entry in the block fetch table
is 35. (the block fetch table contains the number of 16-byte chunks
the firmware needs to fetch for a given number of scatter gather
elements.) 35 * 16 = 560 bytes, which isn't enough. It needs to be
36. (36 * 16 == 576) or, MAXSGENTRIES + 4. (plus 4 because there's a
bunch of stuff at the front of the command before the first scatter
gather element that takes up 4 * 16 bytes.) Without this fix, the
controller may have to perform two DMA operations to fetch the
command since the first one may not get the whole thing.
Signed-off-by: Don Brace <brace@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
before trying to enter simple mode transport method.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
This patch removes unnecessary #define's from hpsa. The SCSI midlayer
handles all this for us.
Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mike.miller@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
This uses the scatter-gather chaining feature of Smart Array
controllers. 32 scatter-gather elements are embedded in the
"command list", and the last element in the list may be marked
as a "chain pointer", and point to an additional block of
scatter gather elements. The precise number of scatter gather
elements supported is dependent on the particular kind of
Smart Array, and is determined at runtime by querying the
hardware.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
The intent of the scan thread was to allow a UNIT ATTENTION/LUN
DATA CHANGED condition encountered in the interrupt handler
to trigger a rescan of devices, which can't be done in interrupt
context. However, we weren't able to get this to work, due to
multiple such UNIT ATTENTION conditions arriving during the rescan,
during updating of the SCSI mid layer, etc. There's no way to tell
the devices, "stand still while I scan you!" Since it doesn't work,
there's no point in having the thread, as the rescan triggered via
ioctl or sysfs can be done without such a thread.
Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
The SCSI status does not need to be shifted.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
The use of the big kernel lock here appears
to be ancient cruft that is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
fix bug in adjust_hpsa_scsi_table which caused devices which have
changed size, etc. to do the wrong thing.
The problem was as follows:
The driver maintains its current idea of what devices are present
in the h->dev[] array. When it updates this array, it scans the
hardware, and produces a new list of devices, call it sd[], for
scsi devices.
Then, it compares each item in h->dev[] vs. sd[], and any items which
are not present sd it removes from h->dev[], and any items present
in sd[], but different, it modifies in h->dev[].
Then, it looks for items in sd[] which are not present in h->dev[],
and adds those items into h->dev[]. All the while, it keeps track
of what items were added and removed to/from h->dev[].
Finally, it updates the SCSI mid-layer by removing and adding
the same devices it removed and added to/from h->dev[]. (modified
devices count as a remove then add.)
originally, when a "changed" device was discovered, it was
removed then added to h->dev[]. The item was added to the *end*
of h->dev[]. And, the item was removed from sd[] as well
(nulled out). As it processed h->dev[], these newly added items
at the end of the list were encountered, and sd[] was searched,
but those items were nulled out. So they ended up getting removed
immediately after they were added.
The solution is to have a way to replace items in the h->dev[]
array instead of doing a remove + add. Then the "changed" items.
are not encountered a second time, and removed.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
use scan_start and scan_finished entry points for scanning and route
the CCISS_REGNEWD ioctl and sysfs triggering of same functionality
through hpsa_scan_start.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Stephen M. Cameron