acpi_get_override_irq() was added because there was a problem with
buggy BIOSes passing wrong IRQ() resource for the RTC IRQ. The
commit that added the workaround was 61fd47e0c8 (ACPI: fix two
IRQ8 issues in IOAPIC mode).
With ACPI 5 enumerated devices there are typically one or more
extended IRQ resources per device (and these IRQs can be shared).
However, the acpi_get_override_irq() workaround forces all IRQs in
range 0 - 15 (the legacy ISA IRQs) to be edge triggered, active high
as can be seen from the dmesg below:
ACPI: IRQ 6 override to edge, high
ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high
ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high
ACPI: IRQ 13 override to edge, high
Also /proc/interrupts for the I2C controllers (INT33C2 and INT33C3) shows
the same thing:
7: 4 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge INT33C2:00, INT33C3:00
The _CSR method for INT33C2 (and INT33C3) device returns following
resource:
Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Shared,,, )
{
0x00000007,
}
which states that this is supposed to be level triggered, active low,
shared IRQ instead.
Fix this by making sure that acpi_get_override_irq() gets only called
when we are dealing with legacy IRQ() or IRQNoFlags() descriptors.
While we are there, correct pr_warning() to print the right triggering
value.
This change turns out to be necessary to make DMA work correctly on
systems based on the Intel Lynxpoint PCH (Platform Controller Hub).
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no need to initialize the node before appending it to the list.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently acpi_dev_process_resource() returns AE_ABORT_METHOD
to terminate the acpi_walk_resources() it is called from if
the .preproc() routine provided by the caller of
acpi_dev_get_resources() initiating the resources walk returns
an error code. It is better to use AE_CTRL_TERMINATE for this
purpose, however, so do that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call
acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS
method for the given device and create filters passed to that
routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally
is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may
be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because
the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent
way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core
should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on
various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly
together.
For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(),
that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource
objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by
_CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine
to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource
format.
Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use
acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing
acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much
more straightforward and easier to follow.
In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet
the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in
the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Move some code used for parsing ACPI device resources from the PNP
subsystem to the ACPI core, so that other bus types (platform, SPI,
I2C) can use the same routines for parsing resources in a consistent
way, without duplicating code.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Mika Westerberg