-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=qTt8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-5.8-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
"Highlights:
- speedup dead root detection during orphan cleanup, eg. when there
are many deleted subvolumes waiting to be cleaned, the trees are
now looked up in radix tree instead of a O(N^2) search
- snapshot creation with inherited qgroup will mark the qgroup
inconsistent, requires a rescan
- send will emit file capabilities after chown, this produces a
stream that does not need postprocessing to set the capabilities
again
- direct io ported to iomap infrastructure, cleaned up and simplified
code, notably removing last use of struct buffer_head in btrfs code
Core changes:
- factor out backreference iteration, to be used by ordinary
backreferences and relocation code
- improved global block reserve utilization
* better logic to serialize requests
* increased maximum available for unlink
* improved handling on large pages (64K)
- direct io cleanups and fixes
* simplify layering, where cloned bios were unnecessarily created
for some cases
* error handling fixes (submit, endio)
* remove repair worker thread, used to avoid deadlocks during
repair
- refactored block group reading code, preparatory work for new type
of block group storage that should improve mount time on large
filesystems
Cleanups:
- cleaned up (and slightly sped up) set/get helpers for metadata data
structure members
- root bit REF_COWS got renamed to SHAREABLE to reflect the that the
blocks of the tree get shared either among subvolumes or with the
relocation trees
Fixes:
- when subvolume deletion fails due to ENOSPC, the filesystem is not
turned read-only
- device scan deals with devices from other filesystems that changed
ownership due to overwrite (mkfs)
- fix a race between scrub and block group removal/allocation
- fix long standing bug of a runaway balance operation, printing the
same line to the syslog, caused by a stale status bit on a reloc
tree that prevented progress
- fix corrupt log due to concurrent fsync of inodes with shared
extents
- fix space underflow for NODATACOW and buffered writes when it for
some reason needs to fallback to COW mode"
* tag 'for-5.8-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (133 commits)
btrfs: fix space_info bytes_may_use underflow during space cache writeout
btrfs: fix space_info bytes_may_use underflow after nocow buffered write
btrfs: fix wrong file range cleanup after an error filling dealloc range
btrfs: remove redundant local variable in read_block_for_search
btrfs: open code key_search
btrfs: split btrfs_direct_IO to read and write part
btrfs: remove BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK
fs: remove dio_end_io()
btrfs: switch to iomap_dio_rw() for dio
iomap: remove lockdep_assert_held()
iomap: add a filesystem hook for direct I/O bio submission
fs: export generic_file_buffered_read()
btrfs: turn space cache writeout failure messages into debug messages
btrfs: include error on messages about failure to write space/inode caches
btrfs: remove useless 'fail_unlock' label from btrfs_csum_file_blocks()
btrfs: do not ignore error from btrfs_next_leaf() when inserting checksums
btrfs: make checksum item extension more efficient
btrfs: fix corrupt log due to concurrent fsync of inodes with shared extents
btrfs: unexport btrfs_compress_set_level()
btrfs: simplify iget helpers
...
The inode lookup starting at btrfs_iget takes the full location key,
while only the objectid is used to match the inode, because the lookup
happens inside the given root thus the inode number is unique.
The entire location key is properly set up in btrfs_init_locked_inode.
Simplify the helpers and pass only inode number, renaming it to 'ino'
instead of 'objectid'. This allows to remove temporary variables key,
saving some stack space.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The main function to lookup a root by its id btrfs_get_fs_root takes the
whole key, while only using the objectid. The value of offset is preset
to (u64)-1 but not actually used until btrfs_find_root that does the
actual search.
Switch btrfs_get_fs_root to use only objectid and remove all local
variables that existed just for the lookup. The actual key for search is
set up in btrfs_get_fs_root, reusing another key variable.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Whenever a chown is executed, all capabilities of the file being touched
are lost. When doing incremental send with a file with capabilities,
there is a situation where the capability can be lost on the receiving
side. The sequence of actions bellow shows the problem:
$ mount /dev/sda fs1
$ mount /dev/sdb fs2
$ touch fs1/foo.bar
$ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_init
$ btrfs send fs1/snap_init | btrfs receive fs2
$ chgrp adm fs1/foo.bar
$ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_complete
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_incremental
$ btrfs send fs1/snap_complete | btrfs receive fs2
$ btrfs send -p fs1/snap_init fs1/snap_incremental | btrfs receive fs2
At this point, only a chown was emitted by "btrfs send" since only the
group was changed. This makes the cap_sys_nice capability to be dropped
from fs2/snap_incremental/foo.bar
To fix that, only emit capabilities after chown is emitted. The current
code first checks for xattrs that are new/changed, emits them, and later
emit the chown. Now, __process_new_xattr skips capabilities, letting
only finish_inode_if_needed to emit them, if they exist, for the inode
being processed.
This behavior was being worked around in "btrfs receive" side by caching
the capability and only applying it after chown. Now, xattrs are only
emmited _after_ chown, making that workaround not needed anymore.
Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/202
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that we have proper root ref counting everywhere we can kill the
subvol_srcu.
* removal of fs_info::subvol_srcu reduces size of fs_info by 1176 bytes
* the refcount_t used for the references checks for accidental 0->1
in cases where the root lifetime would not be properly protected
* there's a leak detector for roots to catch unfreed roots at umount
time
* SRCU served us well over the years but is was not a proper
synchronization mechanism for some cases
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Getting the end offset for a file extent item requires a bit of code since
the extent can be either inline or regular/prealloc. There are some places
all over the code base that open code this logic and in another patch
later in this series it will be needed again. Therefore encapsulate this
logic in a helper function and use it.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We are now using these for all roots, rename them to btrfs_put_root()
and btrfs_grab_root();
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that all callers of btrfs_get_fs_root are subsequently calling
btrfs_grab_fs_root and handling dropping the ref when they are done
appropriately, go ahead and push btrfs_grab_fs_root up into
btrfs_get_fs_root.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We lookup all the clone roots and the parent root for send, so we need
to hold refs on all of these roots while we're processing them.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All this does is call btrfs_get_fs_root() with check_ref == true. Just
use btrfs_get_fs_root() so we don't have a bunch of different helpers
that do the same thing.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send and a file has extents shared with itself
at different file offsets, it's possible for send to emit clone operations
that will fail at the destination because the source range goes beyond the
file's current size. This happens when the file size has increased in the
send snapshot, there is a hole between the shared extents and both shared
extents are at file offsets which are greater the file's size in the
parent snapshot.
Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xf1 0 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/sdb/base
# Create a 320K extent at file offset 512K.
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 512K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 576K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xef 640K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 704K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 768K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
# Clone part of that 320K extent into a lower file offset (192K).
# This file offset is greater than the file's size in the parent
# snapshot (64K). Also the clone range is a bit behind the offset of
# the 320K extent so that we leave a hole between the shared extents.
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/foobar 448K 192K 192K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/sdb/base -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/sdb/incr
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc
$ btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/sdc
$ btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/sdc
ERROR: failed to clone extents to foobar: Invalid argument
The problem is that after processing the extent at file offset 256K, which
refers to the first 128K of the 320K extent created by the buffered write
operations, we have 'cur_inode_next_write_offset' set to 384K, which
corresponds to the end offset of the partially shared extent (256K + 128K)
and to the current file size in the receiver. Then when we process the
extent at offset 512K, we do extent backreference iteration to figure out
if we can clone the extent from some other inode or from the same inode,
and we consider the extent at offset 256K of the same inode as a valid
source for a clone operation, which is not correct because at that point
the current file size in the receiver is 384K, which corresponds to the
end of last processed extent (at file offset 256K), so using a clone
source range from 256K to 256K + 320K is invalid because that goes past
the current size of the file (384K) - this makes the receiver get an
-EINVAL error when attempting the clone operation.
So fix this by excluding clone sources that have a range that goes beyond
the current file size in the receiver when iterating extent backreferences.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Fixes: 11f2069c11 ("Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We log warning if root::orphan_cleanup_state is not set to
ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE in btrfs_ioctl_send(). However if the filesystem is
mounted as readonly we skip the orphan item cleanup during the lookup
and root::orphan_cleanup_state remains at the init state 0 instead of
ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE (2). So during send in btrfs_ioctl_send() we hit the
warning as below.
WARN_ON(send_root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE);
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2616 at /Volumes/ws/btrfs-devel/fs/btrfs/send.c:7090 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xb2f/0x18c0 [btrfs]
::
RIP: 0010:btrfs_ioctl_send+0xb2f/0x18c0 [btrfs]
::
Call Trace:
::
_btrfs_ioctl_send+0x7b/0x110 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x150a/0x2b00 [btrfs]
::
do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x620
? __fget+0xac/0xe0
ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x49/0x130
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Reproducer:
mkfs.btrfs -fq /dev/sdb
mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
btrfs subvolume create /btrfs/sv1
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /btrfs/sv1 /btrfs/ss1
umount /btrfs
mount -o ro /dev/sdb /btrfs
btrfs send /btrfs/ss1 -f /tmp/f
The warning exists because having orphan inodes could confuse send and
cause it to fail or produce incorrect streams. The two cases that would
cause such send failures, which are already fixed are:
1) Inodes that were unlinked - these are orphanized and remain with a
link count of 0. These caused send operations to fail because it
expected to always find at least one path for an inode. However this
is no longer a problem since send is now able to deal with such
inodes since commit 46b2f4590a ("Btrfs: fix send failure when root
has deleted files still open") and treats them as having been
completely removed (the state after an orphan cleanup is performed).
2) Inodes that were in the process of being truncated. These resulted in
send not knowing about the truncation and potentially issue write
operations full of zeroes for the range from the new file size to the
old file size. This is no longer a problem because we no longer
create orphan items for truncation since commit f7e9e8fc79 ("Btrfs:
stop creating orphan items for truncate").
As such before these commits, the WARN_ON here provided a clue in case
something went wrong. Instead of being a warning against the
root::orphan_cleanup_state value, it could have been more accurate by
checking if there were actually any orphan items, and then issue a
warning only if any exists, but that would be more expensive to check.
Since orphanized inodes no longer cause problems for send, just remove
the warning.
Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/21cb5e8d059f6e1496a903fa7bfc0a297e2f5370.camel@scientia.net/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Backreference walking, which is used by send to figure if it can issue
clone operations instead of write operations, can be very slow and use
too much memory when extents have many references. This change simply
skips backreference walking when an extent has more than 64 references,
in which case we fallback to a write operation instead of a clone
operation. This limit is conservative and in practice I observed no
signicant slowdown with up to 100 references and still low memory usage
up to that limit.
This is a temporary workaround until there are speedups in the backref
walking code, and as such it does not attempt to add extra interfaces or
knobs to tweak the threshold.
Reported-by: Atemu <atemu.main@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAE4GHgkvqVADtS4AzcQJxo0Q1jKQgKaW3JGp3SGdoinVo=C9eQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#me55dc0987f9cc2acaa54372ce0492c65782be3fa
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For send we currently skip clone operations when the source and
destination files are the same. This is so because clone didn't support
this case in its early days, but support for it was added back in May
2013 by commit a96fbc7288 ("Btrfs: allow file data clone within a
file"). This change adds support for it.
Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 64K 0 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdd/foobar 0 64K 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdd /mnt/sdd/snap
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde
$ mount /dev/sde /mnt/sde
$ btrfs send /mnt/sdd/snap | btrfs receive /mnt/sde
Without this change file foobar at the destination has a single 128Kb
extent:
$ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 31: 0.. 31: 32: last,unknown_loc,delalloc,eof
/mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 1 extent found
With this we get a single 64Kb extent that is shared at file offsets 0
and 64K, just like in the source filesystem:
$ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 15: 3328.. 3343: 16: shared
1: 16.. 31: 3328.. 3343: 16: 3344: last,shared,eof
/mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 2 extents found
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The parameter is now always set to NULL and could be dropped. The last
user was get_default_root but that got reworked in 05dbe6837b ("Btrfs:
unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting") and the parameter became unused.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
GCC throws warning message as below:
‘clone_src_i_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
#define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0)
^
fs/btrfs/send.c:5088:6: note: ‘clone_src_i_size’ was declared here
u64 clone_src_i_size;
^
The clone_src_i_size is only used as call-by-reference
in a call to get_inode_info().
Silence the warning by initializing clone_src_i_size to 0.
Note that the warning is a false positive and reported by older versions
of GCC (eg. 7.x) but not eg 9.x. As there have been numerous people, the
patch is applied. Setting clone_src_i_size to 0 does not otherwise make
sense and would not do any action in case the code changes in the future.
Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austindh.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing any form of incremental send the parent and the child trees
need to be compared via btrfs_compare_trees. This can result in long
loop chains without ever relinquishing the CPU. This causes softlockup
detector to trigger when comparing trees with a lot of items. Example
report:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 24s! [snapperd:16153]
CPU: 0 PID: 16153 Comm: snapperd Not tainted 5.2.9-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased)
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20
lr : btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages+0xe0/0x1e8 [btrfs]
sp : ffff00001273b7e0
Call trace:
__ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20
release_extent_buffer+0xdc/0x120 [btrfs]
free_extent_buffer.part.0+0xb0/0x118 [btrfs]
free_extent_buffer+0x24/0x30 [btrfs]
btrfs_release_path+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_free_path.part.0+0x20/0x40 [btrfs]
btrfs_free_path+0x24/0x30 [btrfs]
get_inode_info+0xa8/0xf8 [btrfs]
finish_inode_if_needed+0xe0/0x6d8 [btrfs]
changed_cb+0x9c/0x410 [btrfs]
btrfs_compare_trees+0x284/0x648 [btrfs]
send_subvol+0x33c/0x520 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_send+0x8a0/0xaf0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x199c/0x2288 [btrfs]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x4b0/0x820
ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x188
el0_svc_handler+0x34/0x90
el0_svc+0x8/0xc
Fix this by adding a call to cond_resched at the beginning of the main
loop in btrfs_compare_trees.
Fixes: 7069830a9e ("Btrfs: add btrfs_compare_trees function")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Send is the only user of tree_compare, we can move it there along with
the other helpers and definitions.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send operation we can fail if we previously did
deduplication operations against a file that exists in both snapshots. In
that case we will fail the send operation with -EIO and print a message
to dmesg/syslog like the following:
BTRFS error (device sdc): Send: inconsistent snapshot, found updated \
extent for inode 257 without updated inode item, send root is 258, \
parent root is 257
This requires that we deduplicate to the same file in both snapshots for
the same amount of times on each snapshot. The issue happens because a
deduplication only updates the iversion of an inode and does not update
any other field of the inode, therefore if we deduplicate the file on
each snapshot for the same amount of time, the inode will have the same
iversion value (stored as the "sequence" field on the inode item) on both
snapshots, therefore it will be seen as unchanged between in the send
snapshot while there are new/updated/deleted extent items when comparing
to the parent snapshot. This makes the send operation return -EIO and
print an error message.
Example reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
# Create our first file. The first half of the file has several 64Kb
# extents while the second half as a single 512Kb extent.
$ xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 -b 64K 0 512K" /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 512K 512K" /mnt/foo
# Create the base snapshot and the parent send stream from it.
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/mysnap1
# Create our second file, that has exactly the same data as the first
# file.
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 0 1M" /mnt/bar
# Create the second snapshot, used for the incremental send, before
# doing the file deduplication.
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
# Now before creating the incremental send stream:
#
# 1) Deduplicate into a subrange of file foo in snapshot mysnap1. This
# will drop several extent items and add a new one, also updating
# the inode's iversion (sequence field in inode item) by 1, but not
# any other field of the inode;
#
# 2) Deduplicate into a different subrange of file foo in snapshot
# mysnap2. This will replace an extent item with a new one, also
# updating the inode's iversion by 1 but not any other field of the
# inode.
#
# After these two deduplication operations, the inode items, for file
# foo, are identical in both snapshots, but we have different extent
# items for this inode in both snapshots. We want to check this doesn't
# cause send to fail with an error or produce an incorrect stream.
$ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 0 0 512K" /mnt/mysnap1/foo
$ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 512K 512K 512K" /mnt/mysnap2/foo
# Create the incremental send stream.
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/mysnap2
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error
This issue started happening back in 2015 when deduplication was updated
to not update the inode's ctime and mtime and update only the iversion.
Back then we would hit a BUG_ON() in send, but later in 2016 send was
updated to return -EIO and print the error message instead of doing the
BUG_ON().
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203933
Fixes: 1c919a5e13 ("btrfs: don't update mtime/ctime on deduped inodes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Send always operates on read-only trees and always expected that while it
is in progress, nothing changes in those trees. Due to that expectation
and the fact that send is a read-only operation, it operates on commit
roots and does not hold transaction handles. However relocation can COW
nodes and leafs from read-only trees, which can cause unexpected failures
and crashes (hitting BUG_ONs). while send using a node/leaf, it gets
COWed, the transaction used to COW it is committed, a new transaction
starts, the extent previously used for that node/leaf gets allocated,
possibly for another tree, and the respective extent buffer' content
changes while send is still using it. When this happens send normally
fails with EIO being returned to user space and messages like the
following are found in dmesg/syslog:
[ 3408.699121] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 58703872 wanted 250 found 253
[ 3441.523123] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63211, offset=0, disk_byte=5222825984 found extent=5222825984
Other times, less often, we hit a BUG_ON() because an extent buffer that
send is using used to be a node, and while send is still using it, it
got COWed and got reused as a leaf while send is still using, producing
the following trace:
[ 3478.466280] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 3478.466282] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806!
[ 3478.466965] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[ 3478.467635] CPU: 0 PID: 2165 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.0.0-btrfs-next-46 #1
[ 3478.468311] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 3478.469681] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3478.471758] RSP: 0018:ffffa437826bfaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 3478.472457] RAX: ffff961416ed7000 RBX: 000000000000003d RCX: 0000000000000002
[ 3478.473151] RDX: 000000000000003d RSI: ffff96141e387408 RDI: ffff961599b30000
[ 3478.473837] RBP: ffffa437826bfb8e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffa437826bfb8e
[ 3478.474515] R10: ffffa437826bfa70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9614385c8708
[ 3478.475186] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 3478.475840] FS: 00007f8e0e9cc8c0(0000) GS:ffff9615b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 3478.476489] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 3478.477127] CR2: 00007f98b67a056e CR3: 0000000005df6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0
[ 3478.477762] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 3478.478385] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 3478.479003] Call Trace:
[ 3478.479600] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
[ 3478.480202] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[ 3478.480810] btrfs_compare_trees+0x30c/0x690 [btrfs]
[ 3478.481388] ? process_extent+0x1280/0x1280 [btrfs]
[ 3478.481954] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs]
[ 3478.482510] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 3478.483062] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs]
[ 3478.483581] ? rq_clock_task+0x2e/0x60
[ 3478.484086] ? wake_up_new_task+0x1f3/0x370
[ 3478.484582] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
[ 3478.485075] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[ 3478.485552] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
[ 3478.486016] ? __fget+0x113/0x200
[ 3478.486467] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[ 3478.486911] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[ 3478.487337] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0
[ 3478.487751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 3478.488159] RIP: 0033:0x7f8e0d7d4dd7
(...)
[ 3478.489349] RSP: 002b:00007ffcf6fb4908 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[ 3478.489742] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f8e0d7d4dd7
[ 3478.490142] RDX: 00007ffcf6fb4990 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000005
[ 3478.490548] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 00007f8e0d6f3700 R09: 00007f8e0d6f3700
[ 3478.490953] R10: 00007f8e0d6f39d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005
[ 3478.491343] R13: 00005624e0780020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
(...)
[ 3478.493352] ---[ end trace d5f537302be4f8c8 ]---
Another possibility, much less likely to happen, is that send will not
fail but the contents of the stream it produces may not be correct.
To avoid this, do not allow send and relocation (balance) to run in
parallel. In the long term the goal is to allow for both to be able to
run concurrently without any problems, but that will take a significant
effort in development and testing.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 9678c54388 ("btrfs: Remove custom crc32c init code") removed
the btrfs_crc32c() function, because it was a duplicate of the crc32c()
library function we already have in the kernel.
Resurrect it as a shim wrapper over crc32c() to make following
transformations of the checksumming code in btrfs easier.
Also provide a btrfs_crc32_final() to ease following transformations.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send we can now issue clone operations with a
source range that ends at the source's file eof and with a destination
range that ends at an offset smaller then the destination's file eof.
If the eof of the source file is not aligned to the sector size of the
filesystem, the receiver will get a -EINVAL error when trying to do the
operation or, on older kernels, silently corrupt the destination file.
The corruption happens on kernels without commit ac765f83f1
("Btrfs: fix data corruption due to cloning of eof block"), while the
failure to clone happens on kernels with that commit.
Example reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb1 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/foo
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xc7 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/bar
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x4d 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/baz
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xe2 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/zoo
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/base.send /mnt/sdb/base
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/bar 1560K 500K 100K" /mnt/sdb/bar
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/bar 1560K 0 100K" /mnt/sdb/zoo
$ xfs_io -c "truncate 550K" /mnt/sdb/bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/incr.send -p /mnt/sdb/base /mnt/sdb/incr
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc
$ btrfs receive -f /tmp/base.send /mnt/sdc
$ btrfs receive -vv -f /tmp/incr.send /mnt/sdc
(...)
truncate bar size=563200
utimes bar
clone zoo - source=bar source offset=512000 offset=0 length=51200
ERROR: failed to clone extents to zoo
Invalid argument
The failure happens because the clone source range ends at the eof of file
bar, 563200, which is not aligned to the filesystems sector size (4Kb in
this case), and the destination range ends at offset 0 + 51200, which is
less then the size of the file zoo (2Mb).
So fix this by detecting such case and instead of issuing a clone
operation for the whole range, do a clone operation for smaller range
that is sector size aligned followed by a write operation for the block
containing the eof. Here we will always be pessimistic and assume the
destination filesystem of the send stream has the largest possible sector
size (64Kb), since we have no way of determining it.
This fixes a recent regression introduced in kernel 5.2-rc1.
Fixes: 040ee6120c ("Btrfs: send, improve clone range")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When using the no-holes feature, if we have a file with prealloc extents
with a start offset beyond the file's eof, doing an incremental send can
cause corruption of the file due to incorrect hole detection. Such case
requires that the prealloc extent(s) exist in both the parent and send
snapshots, and that a hole is punched into the file that covers all its
extents that do not cross the eof boundary.
Example reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 500K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 1200K 800K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/base.snap /mnt/sdb/base
$ xfs_io -c "fpunch 0 500K" /mnt/sdb/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/sdb/base -f /tmp/incr.snap /mnt/sdb/incr
$ md5sum /mnt/sdb/incr/foobar
816df6f64deba63b029ca19d880ee10a /mnt/sdb/incr/foobar
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc
$ btrfs receive -f /tmp/base.snap /mnt/sdc
$ btrfs receive -f /tmp/incr.snap /mnt/sdc
$ md5sum /mnt/sdc/incr/foobar
cf2ef71f4a9e90c2f6013ba3b2257ed2 /mnt/sdc/incr/foobar
--> Different checksum, because the prealloc extent beyond the
file's eof confused the hole detection code and it assumed
a hole starting at offset 0 and ending at the offset of the
prealloc extent (1200Kb) instead of ending at the offset
500Kb (the file's size).
Fix this by ensuring we never cross the file's size when issuing the
write operations for a hole.
Fixes: 16e7549f04 ("Btrfs: incompatible format change to remove hole extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Send operates on read only trees and expects them to never change while it
is using them. This is part of its initial design, and this expection is
due to two different reasons:
1) When it was introduced, no operations were allowed to modifiy read-only
subvolumes/snapshots (including defrag for example).
2) It keeps send from having an impact on other filesystem operations.
Namely send does not need to keep locks on the trees nor needs to hold on
to transaction handles and delay transaction commits. This ends up being
a consequence of the former reason.
However the deduplication feature was introduced later (on September 2013,
while send was introduced in July 2012) and it allowed for deduplication
with destination files that belong to read-only trees (subvolumes and
snapshots).
That means that having a send operation (either full or incremental) running
in parallel with a deduplication that has the destination inode in one of
the trees used by the send operation, can result in tree nodes and leaves
getting freed and reused while send is using them. This problem is similar
to the problem solved for the root nodes getting freed and reused when a
snapshot is made against one tree that is currenly being used by a send
operation, fixed in commits [1] and [2]. These commits explain in detail
how the problem happens and the explanation is valid for any node or leaf
that is not the root of a tree as well. This problem was also discussed
and explained recently in a thread [3].
The problem is very easy to reproduce when using send with large trees
(snapshots) and just a few concurrent deduplication operations that target
files in the trees used by send. A stress test case is being sent for
fstests that triggers the issue easily. The most common error to hit is
the send ioctl return -EIO with the following messages in dmesg/syslog:
[1631617.204075] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63292, offset=0, disk_byte=5228134400 found extent=5228134400
[1631633.251754] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 32243712 wanted 24 found 27
The first one is very easy to hit while the second one happens much less
frequently, except for very large trees (in that test case, snapshots
with 100000 files having large xattrs to get deep and wide trees).
Less frequently, at least one BUG_ON can be hit:
[1631742.130080] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[1631742.130625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806!
[1631742.131188] invalid opcode: 0000 [#6] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[1631742.131726] CPU: 1 PID: 13394 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G B D W 5.0.0-rc8-btrfs-next-45 #1
[1631742.132265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[1631742.133399] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs]
(...)
[1631742.135061] RSP: 0018:ffffb530021ebaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[1631742.135615] RAX: ffff93ac8912e000 RBX: 000000000000009d RCX: 0000000000000002
[1631742.136173] RDX: 000000000000009d RSI: ffff93ac564b0d08 RDI: ffff93ad5b48c000
[1631742.136759] RBP: ffffb530021ebb7d R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffb530021ebb7d
[1631742.137324] R10: ffffb530021eba70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff93ac87d0a708
[1631742.137900] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
[1631742.138455] FS: 00007f4cdb1528c0(0000) GS:ffff93ad76a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[1631742.139010] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[1631742.139568] CR2: 00007f5acb3d0420 CR3: 000000012be3e006 CR4: 00000000003606e0
[1631742.140131] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[1631742.140719] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[1631742.141272] Call Trace:
[1631742.141826] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
[1631742.142390] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[1631742.142948] btrfs_compare_trees+0x268/0x690 [btrfs]
[1631742.143533] ? process_extent+0x1070/0x1070 [btrfs]
[1631742.144088] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs]
[1631742.144645] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs]
[1631742.145161] ? trace_sched_stick_numa+0xe0/0xe0
[1631742.145685] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs]
[1631742.146179] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xd3/0x100
[1631742.146662] ? reweight_entity+0x154/0x1a0
[1631742.147135] ? update_curr+0x20/0x2a0
[1631742.147593] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x103/0x250
[1631742.148053] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
[1631742.148510] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[1631742.148942] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
[1631742.149361] ? __fget+0x113/0x200
[1631742.149767] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[1631742.150159] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[1631742.150543] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0
[1631742.150931] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[1631742.151326] RIP: 0033:0x7f4cd9f5add7
(...)
[1631742.152509] RSP: 002b:00007ffe91017708 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[1631742.152892] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f4cd9f5add7
[1631742.153268] RDX: 00007ffe91017790 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000007
[1631742.153633] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 00007f4cd9e79700 R09: 00007f4cd9e79700
[1631742.153999] R10: 00007f4cd9e799d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003
[1631742.154365] R13: 0000555dfae53020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
(...)
[1631742.156696] ---[ end trace 5dac9f96dcc3fd6b ]---
That BUG_ON happens because while send is using a node, that node is COWed
by a concurrent deduplication, gets freed and gets reused as a leaf (because
a transaction commit happened in between), so when it attempts to read a
slot from the extent buffer, at ctree.c:read_node_slot(), the extent buffer
contents were wiped out and it now matches a leaf (which can even belong to
some other tree now), hitting the BUG_ON(level == 0).
Fix this concurrency issue by not allowing send and deduplication to run
in parallel if both operate on the same readonly trees, returning EAGAIN
to user space and logging an exlicit warning in dmesg/syslog.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=be6821f82c3cc36e026f5afd10249988852b35ea
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6f2f0b394b54e2b159ef969a0b5274e9bbf82ff2
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7iqSEEyFaEtpRZw3cp613y+4k2Q8b4W7mweR3tZA05bQ@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When we set a subvolume to read-only mode we do not flush dellaloc for any
of its inodes (except if the filesystem is mounted with -o flushoncommit),
since it does not affect correctness for any subsequent operations - except
for a future send operation. The send operation will not be able to see the
delalloc data since the respective file extent items, inode item updates,
backreferences, etc, have not hit yet the subvolume and extent trees.
Effectively this means data loss, since the send stream will not contain
any data from existing delalloc. Another problem from this is that if the
writeback starts and finishes while the send operation is in progress, we
have the subvolume tree being being modified concurrently which can result
in send failing unexpectedly with EIO or hitting runtime errors, assertion
failures or hitting BUG_ONs, etc.
Simple reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 108K" /mnt/sv/foo
$ btrfs property set /mnt/sv ro true
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt/sv
$ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo
0000000 ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea
*
0110592
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
$ btrfs receive -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt
$ echo $?
0
$ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo
0000000
# ---> empty file
Since this a problem that affects send only, fix it in send by flushing
dellaloc for all the roots used by the send operation before send starts
to process the commit roots.
This is a problem that affects send since it was introduced (commit
31db9f7c23 ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive"))
but backporting it to older kernels has some dependencies:
- For kernels between 3.19 and 4.20, it depends on commit 3cd24c6980
("btrfs: use tagged writepage to mitigate livelock of snapshot") because
the function btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() does not exist before that
commit. So one has to either pick that commit or replace the calls to
btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() in this patch with calls to
btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes().
- For kernels older than 3.19 it also requires commit e5fa8f865b
("Btrfs: ensure send always works on roots without orphans") because
it depends on the function ensure_commit_roots_uptodate() which that
commits introduced.
- No dependencies for 5.0+ kernels.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Improve clone_range in two scenarios.
1. Remove the limit of inode size when find clone inodes We can do
partial clone, so there is no need to limit the size of the candidate
inode. When clone a range, we clone the legal range only by bytenr,
offset, len, inode size.
2. In the scenarios of rewrite or clone_range, data_offset rarely
matches exactly, so the chance of a clone is missed.
e.g.
1. Write a 1M file
dd if=/dev/zero of=1M bs=1M count=1
2. Clone 1M file
cp --reflink 1M clone
3. Rewrite 4k on the clone file
dd if=/dev/zero of=clone bs=4k count=1 conv=notrunc
The disk layout is as follows:
item 16 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15353 itemsize 53
extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576
extent data offset 0 nr 1048576 ram 1048576
extent compression(none)
...
item 22 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 14959 itemsize 53
extent data disk byte 1104150528 nr 4096
extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096
extent compression(none)
item 23 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 14906 itemsize 53
extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576
extent data offset 4096 nr 1044480 ram 1048576
extent compression(none)
When send, inode 258 file offset 4096~1048576 (item 23) has a chance to
clone_range, but because data_offset does not match inode 257 (item 16),
it causes missed clone and can only transfer actual data.
Improve the problem by judging whether the current data_offset has
overlap with the file extent item, and if so, adjusting offset and
extent_len so that we can clone correctly.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument
of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the
old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand.
It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect
bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any
user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these
days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact.
A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range
checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to
move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at
the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's
just get this done once and for all.
This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for
the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form.
There were a couple of notable cases:
- csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias.
- the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual
values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing
really used it)
- microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout
but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch.
I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for
access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed
something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The typos accumulate over time so once in a while time they get fixed in
a large patch.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Constructs like 'var & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)' or 'var & ~PAGE_MASK' can denote an
offset into a page.
So replace them by the offset_in_page() macro instead of open-coding it if
they're not used as an alignment check.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move
(rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at
apply_children_dir_moves().
An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where
directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes.
Parent snapshot:
.
|--- 261/
|--- 271/
|--- 266/
|--- 259/
|--- 260/
| |--- 267
|
|--- 264/
| |--- 258/
| |--- 257/
|
|--- 265/
|--- 268/
|--- 269/
| |--- 262/
|
|--- 270/
|--- 272/
| |--- 263/
| |--- 275/
|
|--- 274/
|--- 273/
Send snapshot:
.
|-- 275/
|-- 274/
|-- 273/
|-- 262/
|-- 269/
|-- 258/
|-- 271/
|-- 268/
|-- 267/
|-- 270/
|-- 259/
| |-- 265/
|
|-- 272/
|-- 257/
|-- 260/
|-- 264/
|-- 263/
|-- 261/
|-- 266/
When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its
new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then
when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode
because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay
the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is
its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved.
When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations
that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in
the following iterations:
1) We issue the move operation for inode 274;
2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was
delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the
move operation for inode 262;
3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by
inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot);
4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262);
5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272);
6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272);
7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269);
8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257);
9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258);
10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264);
11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271);
12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was
delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for
inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is
moved;
13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263);
14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was
delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for
inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is
moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12);
15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268);
16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was
delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for
inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is
moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added
again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14;
17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode
266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in
the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay
inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding
the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16.
The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack
(the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then
again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in
an infinite loop.
So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the
stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of
pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will
not return anything for the current parent inode.
A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Unify the error handling of directory item lookups using IS_ERR_OR_NULL.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's
objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid.
They are both set to the same value in __setup_root():
static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 objectid)
{
...
root->objectid = objectid;
...
root->root_key.objectid = objecitd;
...
}
and not changed to other value after initialization.
grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places:
$ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l
133
$ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l
55
(4.17, inc. some noise)
It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems
that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case.
Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove
'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send, if we have a file in the parent snapshot
that has prealloc extents beyond EOF and in the send snapshot it got a
hole punch that partially covers the prealloc extents, the send stream,
when replayed by a receiver, can result in a file that has a size bigger
than it should and filled with zeroes past the correct EOF.
For example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 4M" /mnt/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 1M" /mnt/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.send /mnt/snap1
$ xfs_io -c "fpunch 1M 2M" /mnt/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/2.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2
$ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar
1048576
$ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar
d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f /mnt/snap2/foobar
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
$ btrfs receive -f /mnt/1.snap /mnt
$ btrfs receive -f /mnt/2.snap /mnt
$ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar
3145728
# --> should be 1Mb and not 3Mb (which was the end offset of hole
# punch operation)
$ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar
117baf295297c2a995f92da725b0b651 /mnt/snap2/foobar
# --> should be d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f as in the original fs
This issue actually happens only since commit ffa7c4296e ("Btrfs: send,
do not issue unnecessary truncate operations"), but before that commit we
were issuing a write operation full of zeroes (to "punch" a hole) which
was extending the file size beyond the correct value and then immediately
issue a truncate operation to the correct size and undoing the previous
write operation. Since the send protocol does not support fallocate, for
extent preallocation and hole punching, fix this by not even attempting
to send a "hole" (regular write full of zeroes) if it starts at an offset
greater then or equals to the file's size. This approach, besides being
much more simple then making send issue the truncate operation, adds the
benefit of avoiding the useless pair of write of zeroes and truncate
operations, saving time and IO at the receiver and reducing the size of
the send stream.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Fixes: ffa7c4296e ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.17+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then
use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes
in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item)
since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other
less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count
of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error
because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose
of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no
inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for
a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot
into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a
file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file
descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send
operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then
fail with errno ENOENT.
Example using a full send with a subvolume:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1
$ touch /mnt/sv1/foo
$ touch /mnt/sv1/bar
# keep an open file descriptor on file bar
$ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar
$ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar
# Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while
# holding the open file descriptor.
$ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1
At subvol /mnt/sv1
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory
Example using an incremental send with snapshots:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1
$ touch /mnt/sv1/foo
$ touch /mnt/sv1/bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1
$ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2
# Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while
# holding an open file descriptor on it.
$ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false
$ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo
$ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo
# Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send.
$ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2
At subvol /mnt/snap2
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory
So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either
doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they
are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent
snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode
items, such as xattrs and extents).
A test case for fstests follows soon.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At send.c:full_send_tree() we were setting the 'key' variable in the loop
while never using it later. We were also using two btrfs_key variables
to store the initial key for search and the key found in every iteration
of the loop. So remove this useless key assignment and use the same
btrfs_key variable to store the initial search key and the key found in
each iteration. This was introduced in the initial send commit but was
never used (commit 31db9f7c23 ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for
btrfs send/receive").
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently when checking if a directory can be deleted, we always check
if all its children have been processed.
Example: A directory with 2,000,000 files was deleted
original: 1994m57.071s
patch: 1m38.554s
[FIX]
Instead of checking all children on all calls to can_rmdir(), we keep
track of the directory index offset of the child last checked in the
last call to can_rmdir(), and then use it as the starting point for
future calls to can_rmdir().
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Move the allocation after the search when it's clear that the new entry
will be added.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Trivial fix to spelling mistake of function name in btrfs_err message
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
An incremental send operation can miss a truncate operation when an inode
has an increased size in the send snapshot and a prealloc extent beyond
its size.
Consider the following scenario where a necessary truncate operation is
missing in the incremental send stream:
1) In the parent snapshot an inode has a size of 1282957 bytes and it has
no prealloc extents beyond its size;
2) In the the send snapshot it has a size of 5738496 bytes and has a new
extent at offsets 1884160 (length of 106496 bytes) and a prealloc
extent beyond eof at offset 6729728 (and a length of 339968 bytes);
3) When processing the prealloc extent, at offset 6729728, we end up at
send.c:send_write_or_clone() and set the @len variable to a value of
18446744073708560384 because @offset plus the original @len value is
larger then the inode's size (6729728 + 339968 > 5738496). We then
call send_extent_data(), with that @offset and @len, which in turn
calls send_write(), and then the later calls fill_read_buf(). Because
the offset passed to fill_read_buf() is greater then inode's i_size,
this function returns 0 immediately, which makes send_write() and
send_extent_data() do nothing and return immediately as well. When
we get back to send.c:send_write_or_clone() we adjust the value
of sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset to @offset plus @len, which
corresponds to 6729728 + 18446744073708560384 = 5738496, which is
precisely the the size of the inode in the send snapshot;
4) Later when at send.c:finish_inode_if_needed() we determine that
we don't need to issue a truncate operation because the value of
sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset corresponds to the inode's new
size, 5738496 bytes. This is wrong because the last write operation
that was issued started at offset 1884160 with a length of 106496
bytes, so the correct value for sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset
should be 1990656 (1884160 + 106496), so that a truncate operation
with a value of 5738496 bytes would have been sent to insert a
trailing hole at the destination.
So fix the issue by making send.c:send_write_or_clone() not attempt
to send write or clone operations for extents that start beyond the
inode's size, since such attempts do nothing but waste time by
calling helper functions and allocating path structures, and send
currently has no fallocate command in order to create prealloc extents
at the destination (either beyond a file's eof or not).
The issue was found running the test btrfs/007 from fstests using a seed
value of 1524346151 for fsstress.
Reported-by: Gu, Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Fixes: ffa7c4296e ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
According to tlv_put()'s prototype, data and attrlen needs to be
exchanged in the macro, but seems all callers are already aware of
this misorder and are therefore not affected.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it
always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did
not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most
common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size
(either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for
incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed
is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared
to the parent snapshot.
By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size
and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same
size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it
to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's
sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of
this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page
when truncating file to same size").
The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without
this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and
with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for
writeback to complete).
$ cat test_send.sh
#!/bin/bash
SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc
DST_DEV=/dev/sdd
SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc
DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd
mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null
mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null
mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT
mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT
echo "Creating source filesystem"
for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do
(
for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \
$SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null
done
) &
worker_pids[$t]=$!
done
wait ${worker_pids[@]}
echo "Creating and sending snapshot"
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null
/usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \
btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1
/usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \
btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT
umount $SRC_MNT
umount $DST_MNT
The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the
following:
* Without this change
average receive time was 26.49 seconds
standard deviation of 2.53 seconds
* Without this change and with the truncate fix
average receive time was 12.51 seconds
standard deviation of 0.32 seconds
* With this change and without the truncate fix
average receive time was 10.02 seconds
standard deviation of 1.11 seconds
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The __cold functions are placed to a special section, as they're
expected to be called rarely. This could help i-cache prefetches or help
compiler to decide which branches are more/less likely to be taken
without any other annotations needed.
Though we can't add more __exit annotations, it's still possible to add
__cold (that's also added with __exit). That way the following function
categories are tagged:
- printf wrappers, error messages
- exit helpers
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The custom crc32 init code was introduced in
14a958e678 ("Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in") to
enable using btrfs as a built-in. However, later as pointed out by
60efa5eb2e ("Btrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init") this
wasn't enough and finally btrfs was switched to late_initcall which
comes after the generic crc32c implementation is initiliased. The
latter commit superseeded the former. Now that we don't have to
maintain our own code let's just remove it and switch to using the
generic implementation.
Despite touching a lot of files the patch is really simple. Here is the gist of
the changes:
1. Select LIBCRC32C rather than the low-level modules.
2. s/btrfs_crc32c/crc32c/g
3. replace hash.h with linux/crc32c.h
4. Move the btrfs namehash funcs to ctree.h and change the tree accordingly.
I've tested this with btrfs being both a module and a built-in and xfstest
doesn't complain.
Does seem to fix the longstanding problem of not automatically selectiong
the crc32c module when btrfs is used. Possibly there is a workaround in
dracut.
The modinfo confirms that now all the module dependencies are there:
before:
depends: zstd_compress,zstd_decompress,raid6_pq,xor,zlib_deflate
after:
depends: libcrc32c,zstd_compress,zstd_decompress,raid6_pq,xor,zlib_deflate
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add more info to changelog from mails ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send of a filesystem with the no-holes feature
enabled, we end up issuing a write operation when using the no data mode
send flag, instead of issuing an update extent operation. Fix this by
issuing the update extent operation instead.
Trivial reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 32K" /mnt/sdc/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap1
$ xfs_io -c "fpunch 8K 8K" /mnt/sdc/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/sdc/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt/sdd
$ btrfs send --no-data -p /mnt/sdc/snap1 /mnt/sdc/snap2 \
| btrfs receive -vv /mnt/sdd
Before this change the output of the second receive command is:
receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-fc6755918447...
utimes
write foobar, offset 8192, len 8192
utimes foobar
BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-...
After this change it is:
receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...
utimes
update_extent foobar: offset=8192, len=8192
utimes foobar
BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since tree-checker has verified leaf when reading from disk, we don't
need the existing verify_dir_item() or btrfs_is_name_len_valid() checks.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong
paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links
and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send
snapshots. Consider the following example:
Parent snapshot
. (ino 256)
|---- a/ (ino 257)
| |---- b/ (ino 259)
| | |---- c/ (ino 260)
| | |---- f2 (ino 261)
| |
| |---- f2l1 (ino 261)
|
|---- d/ (ino 262)
|---- f1l1_2 (ino 258)
|---- f2l2 (ino 261)
|---- f1_2 (ino 258)
Send snapshot
. (ino 256)
|---- a/ (ino 257)
| |---- f2l1/ (ino 263)
| |---- b2/ (ino 259)
| |---- c/ (ino 260)
| | |---- d3 (ino 262)
| | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258)
| | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261)
| | |---- f1_2 (ino 258)
| |
| |---- f2 (ino 261)
| |---- f1l2 (ino 258)
|
|---- d (ino 261)
When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen:
1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames
inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of
"o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has
of its hard links with a path of "d" as well.
2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for
inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and
"o262-7-0/" respectively.
3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to
remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2",
at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore
to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of
inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the
receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink
operation.
The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed
to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent
snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before
issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The
detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the
first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links
(as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for
which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()"
follow all hard links of the input inode.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The LOGICAL_INO ioctl provides a backward mapping from extent bytenr and
offset (encoded as a single logical address) to a list of extent refs.
LOGICAL_INO complements TREE_SEARCH, which provides the forward mapping
(extent ref -> extent bytenr and offset, or logical address). These are
useful capabilities for programs that manipulate extents and extent
references from userspace (e.g. dedup and defrag utilities).
When the extents are uncompressed (and not encrypted and not other),
check_extent_in_eb performs filtering of the extent refs to remove any
extent refs which do not contain the same extent offset as the 'logical'
parameter's extent offset. This prevents LOGICAL_INO from returning
references to more than a single block.
To find the set of extent references to an uncompressed extent from [a, b),
userspace has to run a loop like this pseudocode:
for (i = a; i < b; ++i)
extent_ref_set += LOGICAL_INO(i);
At each iteration of the loop (up to 32768 iterations for a 128M extent),
data we are interested in is collected in the kernel, then deleted by
the filter in check_extent_in_eb.
When the extents are compressed (or encrypted or other), the 'logical'
parameter must be an extent bytenr (the 'a' parameter in the loop).
No filtering by extent offset is done (or possible?) so the result is
the complete set of extent refs for the entire extent. This removes
the need for the loop, since we get all the extent refs in one call.
Add an 'ignore_offset' argument to iterate_inodes_from_logical,
[...several levels of function call graph...], and check_extent_in_eb, so
that we can disable the extent offset filtering for uncompressed extents.
This flag can be set by an improved version of the LOGICAL_INO ioctl to
get either behavior as desired.
There is no functional change in this patch. The new flag is always
false.
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ minor coding style fixes ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This code was first introduced in 31db9f7c23 ("Btrfs: introduce
BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive") and it was not functional, then
it got slightly refactored in e938c8ad54 ("Btrfs: code cleanups for
send/receive"), alas it was still dead. So let's remove it for good!
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We pass in a pointer in our send arg struct, this means the struct size
doesn't match with 32bit user space and 64bit kernel space. Fix this by
adding a compat mode and doing the appropriate conversion.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ move structure to the beginning, next to receive 32bit compat ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
By analyzing the perf on btrfs send, we found it take large amount of
cpu time on page_cache_sync_readahead. This effort can be reduced after
switching to asynchronous one. Overall performance gain on HDD and SSD
were 9 and 15 percent if simply send a large file.
Signed-off-by: Kuanling Huang <peterh@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_changed_cb_t represents the signature of the callback being passed
to btrfs_compare_trees. Currently there is only one such callback,
namely changed_cb in send.c. This function doesn't really uses the first
2 parameters, i.e. the roots. Since there are not other functions
implementing the btrfs_changed_cb_t let's remove the unused parameters
from the prototype and implementation.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
iterate_dir_item:found_key - introduced in 31db9f7c23 ("Btrfs:
introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive"), yet never used.
record_ref:num - ditto
This is a first pass with the low-hanging fruit. There are still quite a
few unsued parameters in some function which have to abide by a callback
interface.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"We've collected a bunch of isolated fixes, for crashes, user-visible
behaviour or missing bits from other subsystem cleanups from the past.
The overall number is not small but I was not able to make it
significantly smaller. Most of the patches are supposed to go to
stable"
* 'for-4.14-rc3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: log csums for all modified extents
Btrfs: fix unexpected result when dio reading corrupted blocks
btrfs: Report error on removing qgroup if del_qgroup_item fails
Btrfs: skip checksum when reading compressed data if some IO have failed
Btrfs: fix kernel oops while reading compressed data
Btrfs: use btrfs_op instead of bio_op in __btrfs_map_block
Btrfs: do not backup tree roots when fsync
btrfs: remove BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_DISABLING flag
btrfs: propagate error to btrfs_cmp_data_prepare caller
btrfs: prevent to set invalid default subvolid
Btrfs: send: fix error number for unknown inode types
btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference from free_reloc_roots()
btrfs: finish ordered extent cleaning if no progress is found
btrfs: clear ordered flag on cleaning up ordered extents
Btrfs: fix incorrect {node,sector}size endianness from BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO
Btrfs: do not reset bio->bi_ops while writing bio
Btrfs: use the new helper wbc_to_write_flags
ENOTSUPP should not be returned to the user program.
(cf. include/linux/errno.h)
Therefore, EOPNOTSUPP is used instead of ENOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull more set_fs removal from Al Viro:
"Christoph's 'use kernel_read and friends rather than open-coding
set_fs()' series"
* 'work.set_fs' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
fs: unexport vfs_readv and vfs_writev
fs: unexport vfs_read and vfs_write
fs: unexport __vfs_read/__vfs_write
lustre: switch to kernel_write
gadget/f_mass_storage: stop messing with the address limit
mconsole: switch to kernel_read
btrfs: switch write_buf to kernel_write
net/9p: switch p9_fd_read to kernel_write
mm/nommu: switch do_mmap_private to kernel_read
serial2002: switch serial2002_tty_write to kernel_{read/write}
fs: make the buf argument to __kernel_write a void pointer
fs: fix kernel_write prototype
fs: fix kernel_read prototype
fs: move kernel_read to fs/read_write.c
fs: move kernel_write to fs/read_write.c
autofs4: switch autofs4_write to __kernel_write
ashmem: switch to ->read_iter
Instead of playing with the addressing limits.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
When doing an incremental send it's possible that the computed send stream
contains clone operations that will fail on the receiver if the receiver
has compression enabled and the clone operations target a sector sized
extent that starts at a zero file offset, is not compressed on the source
filesystem but ends up being compressed and inlined at the destination
filesystem.
Example scenario:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt
# By doing a direct IO write, the data is not compressed.
$ xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 4K" /mnt/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/foobar 0 8K 4K" /mnt/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/mysnap1
$ btrfs send -f /tmp/2.snap -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount -o compress /dev/sdc /mnt
$ btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt
$ btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt
ERROR: failed to clone extents to foobar
Operation not supported
The same could be achieved by mounting the source filesystem without
compression and doing a buffered IO write instead of a direct IO one,
and mounting the destination filesystem with compression enabled.
So fix this by issuing regular write operations in the send stream
instead of clone operations when the source offset is zero and the
range has a length matching the sector size.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send, while processing an extent that changed
between the parent and send snapshots and that extent was an inline extent
in the parent snapshot, it's possible to access a memory region beyond
the end of leaf if the inline extent is very small and it is the first
item in a leaf.
An example scenario is described below.
The send snapshot has the following leaf:
leaf 33865728 items 33 free space 773 generation 46 owner 5
fs uuid ab7090d8-dafd-4fb9-9246-723b6d2e2fb7
chunk uuid 2d16478c-c704-4ab9-b574-68bff2281b1f
(...)
item 14 key (335 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 3052 itemsize 53
generation 36 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 12791808 nr 4096
extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096
extent compression 0 (none)
item 15 key (335 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 2999 itemsize 53
generation 36 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 138170368 nr 225280
extent data offset 0 nr 225280 ram 225280
extent compression 0 (none)
(...)
And the parent snapshot has the following leaf:
leaf 31272960 items 17 free space 17 generation 31 owner 5
fs uuid ab7090d8-dafd-4fb9-9246-723b6d2e2fb7
chunk uuid 2d16478c-c704-4ab9-b574-68bff2281b1f
item 0 key (335 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 3951 itemsize 44
generation 31 type 0 (inline)
inline extent data size 23 ram_bytes 613 compression 1 (zlib)
(...)
When computing the send stream, it is detected that the extent of inode
335, at file offset 0, and at fs/btrfs/send.c:is_extent_unchanged() we
grab the leaf from the parent snapshot and access the inline extent item.
However, before jumping to the 'out' label, we access the 'offset' and
'disk_bytenr' fields of the extent item, which should not be done for
inline extents since the inlined data starts at the offset of the
'disk_bytenr' field and can be very small. For example accessing the
'offset' field of the file extent item results in the following trace:
[ 599.705368] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 599.706296] Modules linked in: btrfs psmouse i2c_piix4 ppdev acpi_cpufreq serio_raw parport_pc i2c_core evdev tpm_tis tpm_tis_core sg pcspkr parport tpm button su$
[ 599.709340] CPU: 7 PID: 5283 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.10.0-rc8-btrfs-next-46+ #1
[ 599.709340] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 599.709340] task: ffff88023eedd040 task.stack: ffffc90006658000
[ 599.709340] RIP: 0010:read_extent_buffer+0xdb/0xf4 [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000665ba00 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 599.709340] RAX: db73880000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001
[ 599.709340] RDX: ffffc9000665ba60 RSI: db73880000000000 RDI: ffffc9000665ba5f
[ 599.709340] RBP: ffffc9000665ba30 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff88020dc5e098
[ 599.709340] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000160000000000 R12: 6db6db6db6db6db7
[ 599.709340] R13: ffff880000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88020dc5e088
[ 599.709340] FS: 00007f519555a8c0(0000) GS:ffff88023f3c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 599.709340] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 599.709340] CR2: 00007f1411afd000 CR3: 0000000235f8e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[ 599.709340] Call Trace:
[ 599.709340] btrfs_get_token_64+0x93/0xce [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] ? printk+0x48/0x50
[ 599.709340] btrfs_get_64+0xb/0xd [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] process_extent+0x3a1/0x1106 [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x5/0xef [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] changed_cb+0xb03/0xb3d [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] ? btrfs_get_token_32+0x7a/0xcc [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] btrfs_compare_trees+0x432/0x53d [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] ? process_extent+0x1106/0x1106 [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x960/0xe26 [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] btrfs_ioctl+0x181b/0x1fed [btrfs]
[ 599.709340] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x150/0x1ac
[ 599.709340] vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x38
[ 599.709340] ? vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x38
[ 599.709340] do_vfs_ioctl+0x611/0x645
[ 599.709340] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x5b/0x5d
[ 599.709340] ? __fget+0x6d/0x79
[ 599.709340] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x7b
[ 599.709340] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
[ 599.709340] RIP: 0033:0x7f51945eec47
[ 599.709340] RSP: 002b:00007ffc21c13e98 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[ 599.709340] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff81096459 RCX: 00007f51945eec47
[ 599.709340] RDX: 00007ffc21c13f20 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 599.709340] RBP: ffffc9000665bf98 R08: 00007f519450d700 R09: 00007f519450d700
[ 599.709340] R10: 00007f519450d9d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000046
[ 599.709340] R13: ffffc9000665bf78 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007f5195574040
[ 599.709340] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x43/0xb1
[ 599.709340] Code: 29 f0 49 39 d8 4c 0f 47 c3 49 03 81 58 01 00 00 44 89 c1 4c 01 c2 4c 29 c3 48 c1 f8 03 49 0f af c4 48 c1 e0 0c 4c 01 e8 48 01 c6 <f3> a4 31 f6 4$
[ 599.709340] RIP: read_extent_buffer+0xdb/0xf4 [btrfs] RSP: ffffc9000665ba00
[ 599.762057] ---[ end trace fe00d7af61b9f49e ]---
This is because the 'offset' field starts at an offset of 37 bytes
(offsetof(struct btrfs_file_extent_item, offset)), has a length of 8
bytes and therefore attemping to read it causes a 1 byte access beyond
the end of the leaf, as the first item's content in a leaf is located
at the tail of the leaf, the item size is 44 bytes and the offset of
that field plus its length (37 + 8 = 45) goes beyond the item's size
by 1 byte.
So fix this by accessing the 'offset' and 'disk_bytenr' fields after
jumping to the 'out' label if we are processing an inline extent. We
move the reading operation of the 'disk_bytenr' field too because we
have the same problem as for the 'offset' field explained above when
the inline data is less then 8 bytes. The access to the 'generation'
field is also moved but just for the sake of grouping access to all
the fields.
Fixes: e1cbfd7bf6 ("Btrfs: send, fix file hole not being preserved due to inline extent")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands
with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some
directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of
inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory
inode A.
Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens.
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|
|--- dir1/ (ino 257)
| |--- dir2/ (ino 258)
| |--- dir3/ (ino 259)
| |--- file1 (ino 261)
| |--- dir4/ (ino 262)
|
|--- dir5/ (ino 260)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|
|--- dir1/ (ino 257)
|--- dir2/ (ino 258)
| |--- dir3/ (ino 259)
| |--- dir4 (ino 261)
|
|--- dir6/ (ino 263)
|--- dir44/ (ino 262)
|--- file11 (ino 261)
|--- dir55/ (ino 260)
When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a
link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver
fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command:
receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...)
utimes
utimes dir1
utimes dir1/dir2/dir3
utimes
rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0
link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1
link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1
ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory
The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send
stream the lead to this issue:
1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location
collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the
second step below).
2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose
location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4".
3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which
has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new
hard link was computed before we started processing the new references
(hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is,
it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when
we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is
no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail.
So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we
ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Since iterate_dir_item checks name_len in its own way,
so use btrfs_is_name_len_valid not 'verify_dir_item' to make more strict
name_len check.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ switched ENAMETOOLONG to EIO ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
An incremental send can contain unlink operations with an invalid target
path when we rename some directory inode A, then rename some file inode B
to the old name of inode A and directory inode A is an ancestor of inode B
in the parent snapshot (but not anymore in the send snapshot).
Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens.
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|
|--- dir1/ (ino 257)
|--- dir2/ (ino 258)
| |--- file1 (ino 259)
| |--- file3 (ino 261)
|
|--- dir3/ (ino 262)
|--- file22 (ino 260)
|--- dir4/ (ino 263)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|
|--- dir1/ (ino 257)
|--- dir2/ (ino 258)
|--- dir3 (ino 260)
|--- file3/ (ino 262)
|--- dir4/ (ino 263)
|--- file11 (ino 269)
|--- file33 (ino 261)
When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, an
unlink operation contains an invalid path which makes the receiver fail.
The following is verbose output of the btrfs receive command:
receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=7d5450da-a573-e043-a451-ec85f4879f0f (...)
utimes
utimes dir1
utimes dir1/dir2
link dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/file1
unlink dir1/dir2/file1
utimes dir1/dir2
truncate dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 size=0
utimes dir1/dir3/dir4/file11
rename dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0
link dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0/file22
unlink dir1/dir3/file22
ERROR: unlink dir1/dir3/file22 failed. Not a directory
The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send
stream the lead to this issue:
1) Before we start processing the new and deleted references for inode
260, we compute the full path of the deleted reference
("dir1/dir3/file22") and cache it in the list of deleted references
for our inode.
2) We then start processing the new references for inode 260, for which
there is only one new, located at "dir1/dir3". When processing this
new reference, we check that inode 262, which was not yet processed,
collides with the new reference and because of that we orphanize
inode 262 so its new full path becomes "o262-7-0".
3) After the orphanization of inode 262, we create the new reference for
inode 260 by issuing a link command with a target path of "dir1/dir3"
and a source path of "o262-7-0/file22".
4) We then start processing the deleted references for inode 260, for
which there is only one with the base name of "file22", and issue
an unlink operation containing the target path computed at step 1,
which is wrong because that path no longer exists and should be
replaced with "o262-7-0/file22".
So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of deleted references if
when we processed the new references for an inode we ended up orphanizing
any other inode that is an ancestor of our inode in the parent snapshot.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[ adjusted after prev patch removed fs_path::dir_path and dir_path_len ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which
contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send
snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some
other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of
that file. Example:
Parent snapshot
. (ino 256)
|
|--- f1 (ino 257)
|--- f2 (ino 258)
|--- f3 (ino 259)
Send snapshot
. (ino 256)
|
|--- f2 (ino 257)
|--- f3 (ino 258)
|--- f4 (ino 259)
|--- f5 (ino 258)
The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream:
1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to
"o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the
new reference for inode 257;
2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references,
which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name
"f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to
"f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly,
issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name,
which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current
valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost
it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which
has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and
recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan
name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore
the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of
inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode
258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed.
This makes the receiver fail with the following error:
ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory
So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode
whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode
(inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless
that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing.
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We use a growing buffer for xattrs larger than a page size, at some
point vmalloc is unconditionally used for larger buffers. We can still
try to avoid it using the kvmalloc helper.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The logic of kmalloc and vmalloc fallback is opencoded in
several places, we can now use the existing helper.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason:
"This has fixes and cleanups Dave Sterba collected for the merge
window.
The biggest functional fixes are between btrfs raid5/6 and scrub, and
raid5/6 and device replacement. Some of our pending qgroup fixes are
included as well while I bash on the rest in testing.
We also have the usual set of cleanups, including one that makes
__btrfs_map_block() much more maintainable, and conversions from
atomic_t to refcount_t"
* 'for-linus-4.12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (71 commits)
btrfs: fix the gfp_mask for the reada_zones radix tree
Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks
Btrfs: send, fix file hole not being preserved due to inline extent
Btrfs: fix extent map leak during fallocate error path
Btrfs: fix incorrect space accounting after failure to insert inline extent
Btrfs: fix invalid attempt to free reserved space on failure to cow range
btrfs: Handle delalloc error correctly to avoid ordered extent hang
btrfs: Fix metadata underflow caused by btrfs_reloc_clone_csum error
btrfs: check if the device is flush capable
btrfs: delete unused member nobarriers
btrfs: scrub: Fix RAID56 recovery race condition
btrfs: scrub: Introduce full stripe lock for RAID56
btrfs: Use ktime_get_real_ts for root ctime
Btrfs: handle only applicable errors returned by btrfs_get_extent
btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup corruption caused by inode_cache mount option
btrfs: use q which is already obtained from bdev_get_queue
Btrfs: switch to div64_u64 if with a u64 divisor
Btrfs: update scrub_parity to use u64 stripe_len
Btrfs: enable repair during read for raid56 profile
btrfs: use clear_page where appropriate
...
There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper
instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are
usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g.
allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing
and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation. This sounds too
disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc.
On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the
memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction
attempts previously. There is no guarantee something like that happens
though.
This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because
they are more conservative.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs
Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph
Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4
Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com>
Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com>
Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Normally we don't have inline extents followed by regular extents, but
there's currently at least one harmless case where this happens. For
example, when the page size is 4Kb and compression is enabled:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 8K 4K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foobar
In this case we get a compressed inline extent, representing 4Kb of
data, followed by a hole extent and then a regular data extent. The
inline extent was not expanded/converted to a regular extent exactly
because it represents 4Kb of data. This does not cause any apparent
problem (such as the issue solved by commit e1699d2d7b
("btrfs: add missing memset while reading compressed inline extents"))
except trigger an unexpected case in the incremental send code path
that makes us issue an operation to write a hole when it's not needed,
resulting in more writes at the receiver and wasting space at the
receiver.
So teach the incremental send code to deal with this particular case.
The issue can be currently triggered by running fstests btrfs/137 with
compression enabled (MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o compress" ./check btrfs/137).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
This isn't super serious because you need CAP_ADMIN to run this code.
I added this integer overflow check last year but apparently I am
rubbish at writing integer overflow checks... There are two issues.
First, access_ok() works on unsigned long type and not u64 so on 32 bit
systems the access_ok() could be checking a truncated size. The other
issue is that we should be using a stricter limit so we don't overflow
the kzalloc() setting ctx->clone_roots later in the function after the
access_ok():
alloc_size = sizeof(struct clone_root) * (arg->clone_sources_count + 1);
sctx->clone_roots = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
Fixes: f5ecec3ce2 ("btrfs: send: silence an integer overflow warning")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ added comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When using the NO_HOLES feature, during an incremental send we often issue
write operations for holes when we should not, because that range is already
a hole in the destination snapshot. While that does not change the contents
of the file at the receiver, it avoids preservation of file holes, leading
to wasted disk space and extra IO during send/receive.
A couple examples where the holes are not preserved follows.
$ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 1028K 4K" /mnt/bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
# Now add one new extent to our first test file, increasing its size and
# leaving a 1Mb hole between the first extent and this new extent.
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 1028K 4K" /mnt/foo
# Now overwrite the last extent of our second test file.
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 1028K 4K" /mnt/bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/foo
/mnt/snap2/foo:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..7]: 25088..25095 8 0x2000
1: [8..2055]: hole 2048
2: [2056..2063]: 24576..24583 8 0x2001
$ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/bar
/mnt/snap2/bar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..7]: 25096..25103 8 0x2000
1: [8..2055]: hole 2048
2: [2056..2063]: 24584..24591 8 0x2001
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap
$ umount /mnt
# It's not relevant to enable no-holes in the new filesystem.
$ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
$ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap
$ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/foo
/mnt/snap2/foo:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..7]: 24576..24583 8 0x2000
1: [8..2063]: 25624..27679 2056 0x1
$ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/bar
/mnt/snap2/bar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..7]: 24584..24591 8 0x2000
1: [8..2063]: 27680..29735 2056 0x1
The holes do not exist in the second filesystem and they were replaced
with extents filled with the byte 0x00, making each file take 1032Kb of
space instead of 8Kb.
So fix this by not issuing the write operations consisting of buffers
filled with the byte 0x00 when the destination snapshot already has a
hole for the respective range.
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
When both the parent and send snapshots have a directory inode with the
same number but different generations (therefore they are different
inodes) and both have an entry with the same name, an incremental send
stream will contain an invalid rmdir operation that refers to the
orphanized name of the inode from the parent snapshot.
The following example scenario shows how this happens.
Parent snapshot:
.
|---- d259_old/ (ino 259, gen 9)
| |---- d1/ (ino 258, gen 9)
|
|---- f (ino 257, gen 9)
Send snapshot:
.
|---- d258/ (ino 258, gen 7)
|---- d259/ (ino 259, gen 7)
|---- d1/ (ino 257, gen 7)
When the kernel is processing inode 258 it notices that in both snapshots
there is an inode numbered 259 that is a parent of an inode 258. However
it ignores the fact that the inodes numbered 259 have different generations
in both snapshots, which means they are effectively different inodes.
Then it checks that both inodes 259 have a dentry named "d1" and because
of that it issues a rmdir operation with orphanized name of the inode 258
from the parent snapshot. This happens at send.c:process_record_refs(),
which calls send.c:did_overwrite_first_ref() that returns true and because
of that later on at process_recorded_refs() such rmdir operation is issued
because the inode being currently processed (258) is a directory and it
was deleted in the send snapshot (and replaced with another inode that has
the same number and is a directory too).
Fix this issue by comparing the generations of parent directory inodes
that have the same number and make send.c:did_overwrite_first_ref() when
the generations are different.
The following steps reproduce the problem.
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ touch /mnt/f
$ mkdir /mnt/d1
$ mkdir /mnt/d259_old
$ mv /mnt/d1 /mnt/d259_old/d1
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/d1
$ mkdir /mnt/dir258
$ mkdir /mnt/dir259
$ mv /mnt/d1 /mnt/dir259/d1
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs receive /mnt/ -f /tmp/1.snap
# Take note that once the filesystem is created, its current
# generation has value 7 so the inodes from the second snapshot all have
# a generation value of 7. And after receiving the first snapshot
# the filesystem is at a generation value of 10, because the call to
# create the second snapshot bumps the generation to 8 (the snapshot
# creation ioctl does a transaction commit), the receive command calls
# the snapshot creation ioctl to create the first snapshot, which bumps
# the filesystem's generation to 9, and finally when the receive
# operation finishes it calls an ioctl to transition the first snapshot
# (snap1) from RW mode to RO mode, which does another transaction commit
# and bumps the filesystem's generation to 10. This means all the inodes
# in the first snapshot (snap1) have a generation value of 9.
$ rm -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs receive -vv /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap
receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=9c03962f-f620-0047-9f98-32e5a87116d9, ctransid=7 parent_uuid=d17a6e3f-14e5-df4f-be39-a7951a5399aa, parent_ctransid=9
utimes
unlink f
mkdir o257-7-0
mkdir o259-7-0
rename o257-7-0 -> o259-7-0/d1
chown o259-7-0/d1 - uid=0, gid=0
chmod o259-7-0/d1 - mode=0755
utimes o259-7-0/d1
rmdir o258-9-0
ERROR: rmdir o258-9-0 failed: No such file or directory
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Rewrote changelog to be more precise and clear]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
When we are checking if we need to delay the rename operation for an
inode we not checking if a parent inode that exists in the send and
parent snapshots is really the same inode or not, that is, we are not
comparing the generation number of the parent inode in the send and
parent snapshots. Not only this results in unnecessarily delaying a
rename operation but also can later on make us generate an incorrect
name for a new inode in the send snapshot that has the same number
as another inode in the parent snapshot but a different generation.
Here follows an example where this happens.
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256, gen 3)
|--- dir258/ (ino 258, gen 7)
| |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7)
|
|--- dir259/ (ino 259, gen 7)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256, gen 3)
|--- file258 (ino 258, gen 10)
|
|--- new_dir259/ (ino 259, gen 10)
|--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7)
The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream:
1) When processing inode 257, its new parent is created using its orphan
name (o257-21-0), and the rename operation for inode 257 is delayed
because its new parent (inode 259) was not yet processed - this
decision to delay the rename operation does not make much sense
because the inode 259 in the send snapshot is a new inode, it's not
the same as inode 259 in the parent snapshot.
2) When processing inode 258 we end up delaying its rmdir operation,
because inode 257 was not yet renamed (moved away from the directory
inode 258 represents). We also create the new inode 258 using its
orphan name "o258-10-0", then rename it to its final name of "file258"
and then issue a truncate operation for it. However this truncate
operation contains an incorrect name, which corresponds to the orphan
name and not to the final name, which makes the receiver fail. This
happens because when we attempt to compute the inode's current name
we verify that there's another inode with the same number (258) that
has its rmdir operation pending and because of that we generate an
orphan name for the new inode 258 (we do this in the function
get_cur_path()).
Fix this by not delayed the rename operation of an inode if it has parents
with the same number but different generations in both snapshots.
The following steps reproduce this example scenario.
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/dir257
$ mkdir /mnt/dir258
$ mkdir /mnt/dir259
$ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/dir258/dir257
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/dir258/dir257 /mnt/dir257
$ rmdir /mnt/dir258
$ rmdir /mnt/dir259
# Remount the filesystem so that the next created inodes will have the
# numbers 258 and 259. This is because when a filesystem is mounted,
# btrfs sets the subvolume's inode counter to a value corresponding to
# the highest inode number in the subvolume plus 1. This inode counter
# is used to assign a unique number to each new inode and it's
# incremented by 1 after very inode creation.
# Note: we unmount and then mount instead of doing a mount with
# "-o remount" because otherwise the inode counter remains at value 260.
$ umount /mnt
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ touch /mnt/file258
$ mkdir /mnt/new_dir259
$ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/new_dir259/dir257
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
$ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/1.snap
$ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/2.snap -vv
receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=e059b6d1-7f55-f140-8d7c-9a3039d23c97, ctransid=10 parent_uuid=77e98cb6-8762-814f-9e05-e8ba877fc0b0, parent_ctransid=7
utimes
mkdir o259-10-0
rename dir258 -> o258-7-0
utimes
mkfile o258-10-0
rename o258-10-0 -> file258
utimes
truncate o258-10-0 size=0
ERROR: truncate o258-10-0 failed: No such file or directory
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Under certain situations, an incremental send operation can fail due to a
premature attempt to create a new top level inode (a direct child of the
subvolume/snapshot root) whose name collides with another inode that was
removed from the send snapshot.
Consider the following example scenario.
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256, gen 8)
|---- a1/ (ino 257, gen 9)
|---- a2/ (ino 258, gen 9)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256, gen 3)
|---- a2/ (ino 257, gen 7)
In this scenario, when receiving the incremental send stream, the btrfs
receive command fails like this (ran in verbose mode, -vv argument):
rmdir a1
mkfile o257-7-0
rename o257-7-0 -> a2
ERROR: rename o257-7-0 -> a2 failed: Is a directory
What happens when computing the incremental send stream is:
1) An operation to remove the directory with inode number 257 and
generation 9 is issued.
2) An operation to create the inode with number 257 and generation 7 is
issued. This creates the inode with an orphanized name of "o257-7-0".
3) An operation rename the new inode 257 to its final name, "a2", is
issued. This is incorrect because inode 258, which has the same name
and it's a child of the same parent (root inode 256), was not yet
processed and therefore no rmdir operation for it was yet issued.
The rename operation is issued because we fail to detect that the
name of the new inode 257 collides with inode 258, because their
parent, a subvolume/snapshot root (inode 256) has a different
generation in both snapshots.
So fix this by ignoring the generation value of a parent directory that
matches a root inode (number 256) when we are checking if the name of the
inode currently being processed collides with the name of some other
inode that was not yet processed.
We can achieve this scenario of different inodes with the same number but
different generation values either by mounting a filesystem with the inode
cache option (-o inode_cache) or by creating and sending snapshots across
different filesystems, like in the following example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/a1
$ mkdir /mnt/a2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
$ touch /mnt/a2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap
# Take note that once the filesystem is created, its current
# generation has value 7 so the inode from the second snapshot has
# a generation value of 7. And after receiving the first snapshot
# the filesystem is at a generation value of 10, because the call to
# create the second snapshot bumps the generation to 8 (the snapshot
# creation ioctl does a transaction commit), the receive command calls
# the snapshot creation ioctl to create the first snapshot, which bumps
# the filesystem's generation to 9, and finally when the receive
# operation finishes it calls an ioctl to transition the first snapshot
# (snap1) from RW mode to RO mode, which does another transaction commit
# and bumps the filesystem's generation to 10.
$ rm -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ btrfs receive /mnt /tmp/1.snap
# Receive of snapshot snap2 used to fail.
$ btrfs receive /mnt /tmp/2.snap
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Rewrote changelog to be more precise and clear]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Now we only use the root parameter to print the root objectid in
a tracepoint. We can use the root parameter from the transaction
handle for that. It's also used to join the transaction with
async commits, so we remove the comment that it's just for checking.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are loads of functions in btrfs that accept a root parameter
but only use it to obtain an fs_info pointer. Let's convert those to
just accept an fs_info pointer directly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In routines where someptr->fs_info is referenced multiple times, we
introduce a convenience variable. This makes the code considerably
more readable.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We track the node sizes per-root, but they never vary from the values
in the superblock. This patch messes with the 80-column style a bit,
but subsequent patches to factor out root->fs_info into a convenience
variable fix it up again.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"My patch fixes the btrfs list_head abuse that we tracked down during
Dave Jones' memory corruption investigation. With both Jens and my
patches in place, I'm no longer able to trigger problems.
Filipe is fixing a difficult old bug between snapshots, balance and
send. Dave is cooking a few more for the next rc, but these are tested
and ready"
* 'for-linus-4.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
btrfs: fix races on root_log_ctx lists
btrfs: fix incremental send failure caused by balance
Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason:
"This is a big variety of fixes and cleanups.
Liu Bo continues to fixup fuzzer related problems, and some of Josef's
cleanups are prep for his bigger extent buffer changes (slated for
v4.10)"
* 'for-linus-4.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (39 commits)
Revert "btrfs: let btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() to clean relocated bgs"
Btrfs: remove unnecessary btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty in split_leaf
Btrfs: don't BUG() during drop snapshot
btrfs: fix btrfs_no_printk stub helper
Btrfs: memset to avoid stale content in btree leaf
btrfs: parent_start initialization cleanup
btrfs: Remove already completed TODO comment
btrfs: Do not reassign count in btrfs_run_delayed_refs
btrfs: fix a possible umount deadlock
Btrfs: fix memory leak in do_walk_down
btrfs: btrfs_debug should consume fs_info when DEBUG is not defined
btrfs: convert send's verbose_printk to btrfs_debug
btrfs: convert pr_* to btrfs_* where possible
btrfs: convert printk(KERN_* to use pr_* calls
btrfs: unsplit printed strings
btrfs: clean the old superblocks before freeing the device
Btrfs: kill BUG_ON in run_delayed_tree_ref
Btrfs: don't leak reloc root nodes on error
btrfs: squash lines for simple wrapper functions
Btrfs: improve check_node to avoid reading corrupted nodes
...
Remove the unnecessary typedefs and the zero-length a_entries array in
struct posix_acl_xattr_header.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This was basically an open-coded, less flexible dynamic printk. We can
just use btrfs_debug instead.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
CodingStyle chapter 2:
"[...] never break user-visible strings such as printk messages,
because that breaks the ability to grep for them."
This patch unsplits user-visible strings.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Suppose you have the following tree in snap1 on a file system mounted with -o
inode_cache so that inode numbers are recycled
└── [ 258] a
└── [ 257] b
and then you remove b, rename a to c, and then re-create b in c so you have the
following tree
└── [ 258] c
└── [ 257] b
and then you try to do an incremental send you will hit
ASSERT(pending_move == 0);
in process_all_refs(). This is because we assume that any recycling of inodes
will not have a pending change in our path, which isn't the case. This is the
case for the DELETE side, since we want to remove the old file using the old
path, but on the create side we could have a pending move and need to do the
normal pending rename dance. So remove this ASSERT() and put a comment about
why we ignore pending_move. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send, if we find a new/modified/deleted extent,
reference or xattr without having previously processed the corresponding
inode item we end up exexuting a BUG_ON(). This is because whenever an
extent, xattr or reference is added, modified or deleted, we always expect
to have the corresponding inode item updated. However there are situations
where this will not happen due to transient -ENOMEM or -ENOSPC errors when
doing delayed inode updates.
For example, when punching holes we can succeed in deleting and modifying
(shrinking) extents but later fail to do the delayed inode update. So after
such failure we close our transaction handle and right after a snapshot of
the fs/subvol tree can be made and used later for a send operation. The
same thing can happen during truncate, link, unlink, and xattr related
operations.
So instead of executing a BUG_ON, make send return an -EIO error and print
an informative error message do dmesg/syslog.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
The caller of send_utimes() is supposed to be sure that the inode number
it passes to this function does actually exists in the send snapshot.
However due to logic/algorithm bugs (such as the one fixed by the patch
titled "Btrfs: send, fix invalid leaf accesses due to incorrect utimes
operations"), this might not be the case and when that happens it makes
send_utimes() access use an unrelated leaf item as the target inode item
or access beyond a leaf's boundaries (when the leaf is full and
path->slots[0] matches the number of items in the leaf).
So if the call to btrfs_search_slot() done by send_utimes() does not find
the inode item, just make sure send_utimes() returns -ENOENT and does not
silently accesses unrelated leaf items or does invalid leaf accesses, also
allowing us to easialy and deterministically catch such algorithmic/logic
bugs.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
During an incremental send, if we have delayed rename operations for inodes
that were children of directories which were removed in the send snapshot,
we can end up accessing incorrect items in a leaf or accessing beyond the
last item of the leaf due to issuing utimes operations for the removed
inodes. Consider the following example:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- c/ (ino 262)
|
|--- b/ (ino 258)
| |--- d/ (ino 263)
|
|--- del/ (ino 261)
|--- x/ (ino 259)
|--- y/ (ino 260)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
|
|--- b/ (ino 258)
|
|--- c/ (ino 262)
| |--- y/ (ino 260)
|
|--- d/ (ino 263)
|--- x/ (ino 259)
1) When processing inodes 259 and 260, we end up delaying their rename
operations because their parents, inodes 263 and 262 respectively, were
not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed;
2) When processing inode 262, its rename operation is issued and right
after the rename operation for inode 260 is issued. However right after
issuing the rename operation for inode 260, at send.c:apply_dir_move(),
we issue utimes operations for all current and past parents of inode
260. This means we try to send a utimes operation for its old parent,
inode 261 (deleted in the send snapshot), which does not cause any
immediate and deterministic failure, because when the target inode is
not found in the send snapshot, the send.c:send_utimes() function
ignores it and uses the leaf region pointed to by path->slots[0],
which can be any unrelated item (belonging to other inode) or it can
be a region outside the leaf boundaries, if the leaf is full and
path->slots[0] matches the number of items in the leaf. So we end
up either successfully sending a utimes operation, which is fine
and irrelevant because the old parent (inode 261) will end up being
deleted later, or we end up doing an invalid memory access tha
crashes the kernel.
So fix this by making apply_dir_move() issue utimes operations only for
parents that still exist in the send snapshot. In a separate patch we
will make send_utimes() return an error (-ENOENT) if the given inode
does not exists in the send snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Rewrote change log to be more detailed and better organized]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Under certain situations, when doing an incremental send, we can end up
not freeing orphan_dir_info structures as soon as they are no longer
needed. Instead we end up freeing them only after finishing the send
stream, which causes a warning to be emitted:
[282735.229200] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[282735.229968] WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 10588 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6298 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe2f/0xe51 [btrfs]
[282735.231282] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
[282735.237130] CPU: 9 PID: 10588 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1
[282735.239309] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[282735.240160] 0000000000000000 ffff880224273ca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000
[282735.240160] 0000000000000000 ffff880224273ce8 ffffffff81052b14 0000189a24273ac8
[282735.240160] ffff8802210c9800 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[282735.240160] Call Trace:
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[282735.240160] [<ffffffffa03c99d5>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe2f/0xe51 [btrfs]
[282735.240160] [<ffffffffa0398358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs]
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81100c6b>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x9/0x14
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8108e87d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0xaa
[282735.256343] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f93 ]---
Consider the following example:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- c/ (ino 260)
|
|--- del/ (ino 259)
|--- tmp/ (ino 258)
|--- x/ (ino 261)
|--- y/ (ino 262)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- x/ (ino 261)
| |--- y/ (ino 262)
|
|--- c/ (ino 260)
|--- tmp/ (ino 258)
1) When processing inode 258, we end up delaying its rename operation
because it has an ancestor (in the send snapshot) that has a higher
inode number (inode 260) which was also renamed in the send snapshot,
therefore we delay the rename of inode 258 so that it happens after
inode 260 is renamed;
2) When processing inode 259, we end up delaying its deletion (rmdir
operation) because it has a child inode (258) that has its rename
operation delayed. At this point we allocate an orphan_dir_info
structure and tag inode 258 so that we later attempt to see if we
can delete (rmdir) inode 259 once inode 258 is renamed;
3) When we process inode 260, after renaming it we finally do the rename
operation for inode 258. Once we issue the rename operation for inode
258 we notice that this inode was tagged so that we attempt to see
if at this point we can delete (rmdir) inode 259. But at this point
we can not still delete inode 259 because it has 2 children, inodes
261 and 262, that were not yet processed and therefore not yet
moved (renamed) away from inode 259. We end up not freeing the
orphan_dir_info structure allocated in step 2;
4) We process inodes 261 and 262, and once we move/rename inode 262
we issue the rmdir operation for inode 260;
5) We finish the send stream and notice that red black tree that
contains orphan_dir_info structures is not empty, so we emit
a warning and then free any orphan_dir_structures left.
So fix this by freeing an orphan_dir_info structure once we try to
apply a pending rename operation if we can not delete yet the tagged
directory.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Modified changelog to be more detailed and easier to understand]
Under certain situations, an incremental send operation can contain
a rmdir operation that will make the receiving end fail when attempting
to execute it, because the target directory is not yet empty.
Consider the following example:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- c/ (ino 260)
|
|--- del/ (ino 259)
|--- tmp/ (ino 258)
|--- x/ (ino 261)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- x/ (ino 261)
|
|--- c/ (ino 260)
|--- tmp/ (ino 258)
1) When processing inode 258, we delay its rename operation because inode
260 is its new parent in the send snapshot and it was not yet renamed
(since 260 > 258, that is, beyond the current progress);
2) When processing inode 259, we realize we can not yet send an rmdir
operation (against inode 259) because inode 258 was still not yet
renamed/moved away from inode 259. Therefore we update data structures
so that after inode 258 is renamed, we try again to see if we can
finally send an rmdir operation for inode 259;
3) When we process inode 260, we send a rename operation for it followed
by a rename operation for inode 258. Once we send the rename operation
for inode 258 we then check if we can finally issue an rmdir for its
previous parent, inode 259, by calling the can_rmdir() function with
a value of sctx->cur_ino + 1 (260 + 1 = 261) for its "progress"
argument. This makes can_rmdir() return true (value 1) because even
though there's still a child inode of inode 259 that was not yet
renamed/moved, which is inode 261, the given value of progress (261)
is not lower then 261 (that is, not lower than the inode number of
some child of inode 259). So we end up sending a rmdir operation for
inode 259 before its child inode 261 is processed and renamed.
So fix this by passing the correct progress value to the call to
can_rmdir() from within apply_dir_move() (where we issue delayed rename
operations), which should match stcx->cur_ino (the number of the inode
currently being processed) and not sctx->cur_ino + 1.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Rewrote change log to be more detailed, clear and well formatted]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Example scenario:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 277)
|---- tmp/ (ino 278)
|---- pre/ (ino 280)
| |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281)
|
|---- desc/ (ino 282)
|---- ance/ (ino 283)
| |---- below_ance/ (ino 279)
|
|---- other_dir/ (ino 284)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 277)
|---- tmp/ (ino 278)
|---- other_dir/ (ino 284)
|---- below_ance/ (ino 279)
| |---- pre/ (ino 280)
|
|---- wait_dir/ (ino 281)
|---- desc/ (ino 282)
|---- ance/ (ino 283)
While computing the send stream the following steps happen:
1) While processing inode 279 we end up delaying its rename operation
because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 284, was not
yet processed and therefore not yet renamed;
2) Later when processing inode 280 we end up renaming it immediately to
"ance/below_once/pre" and not delay its rename operation because its
new parent (inode 279 in the send snapshot) has its rename operation
delayed and inode 280 is not an encestor of inode 279 (its parent in
the send snapshot) in the parent snapshot;
3) When processing inode 281 we end up delaying its rename operation
because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 284, was not yet
processed and therefore not yet renamed;
4) When processing inode 282 we do not delay its rename operation because
its parent in the send snapshot, inode 281, already has its own rename
operation delayed and our current inode (282) is not an ancestor of
inode 281 in the parent snapshot. Therefore inode 282 is renamed to
"ance/below_ance/pre/wait_dir";
5) When processing inode 283 we realize that we can rename it because one
of its ancestors in the send snapshot, inode 281, has its rename
operation delayed and inode 283 is not an ancestor of inode 281 in the
parent snapshot. So a rename operation to rename inode 283 to
"ance/below_ance/pre/wait_dir/desc/ance" is issued. This path is
invalid due to a missing path building loop that was undetected by
the incremental send implementation, as inode 283 ends up getting
included twice in the path (once with its path in the parent snapshot).
Therefore its rename operation must wait before the ancestor inode 284
is renamed.
Fix this by not terminating the rename dependency checks when we find an
ancestor, in the send snapshot, that has its rename operation delayed. So
that we continue doing the same checks if the current inode is not an
ancestor, in the parent snapshot, of an ancestor in the send snapshot we
are processing in the loop.
The problem and reproducer were reported by Robbie Ko, as part of a patch
titled "Btrfs: incremental send, avoid ancestor rename to descendant".
However the fix was unnecessarily complicated and can be addressed with
much less code and effort.
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
The function path_loop() can return a negative integer, signaling an
error, 0 if there's no path loop and 1 if there's a path loop. We were
treating any non zero values as meaning that a path loop exists. Fix
this by explicitly checking for errors and gracefully return them to
user space.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that
have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has
different child directories with the same name in the parent and send
snapshots.
For example, consider the following scenario:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|---- d/ (ino 257)
| |--- p1/ (ino 258)
|
|---- p1/ (ino 259)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- d/ (ino 257)
|--- p1/ (ino 259)
|--- p1/ (ino 258)
The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with
the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode
258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When
attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new
parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently
processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up
delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is
moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation
of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still
has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So
we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259
move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258
move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing
move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the
following warnings in syslog/dmesg:
[148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs]
[148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
[148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1
[148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000
[148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8
[148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[148402.988136] Call Trace:
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs]
[148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs]
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa
[148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]---
[148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs]
[148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
[148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1
[148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000
[148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8
[148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[148403.020104] Call Trace:
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs]
[148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs]
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa
[148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]---
There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the
directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with
the following example:
Parent snapshot:
.
|---- a/ (ino 262)
| |---- c/ (ino 268)
|
|---- d/ (ino 263)
|---- ance/ (ino 267)
|---- e/ (ino 264)
|---- f/ (ino 265)
|---- ance/ (ino 266)
Send snapshot:
.
|---- a/ (ino 262)
|---- c/ (ino 268)
| |---- ance/ (ino 267)
|
|---- d/ (ino 263)
| |---- ance/ (ino 266)
|
|---- f/ (ino 265)
|---- e/ (ino 264)
When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which
at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache.
Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a
name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has
the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent
directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we
are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is
generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect
because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267.
The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when
processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until
the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267.
This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error:
ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory
So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename
operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode
is orphanized.
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved
comments]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Linus Torvalds