Commit Graph

1060332 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Qu Wenruo 966d879baf btrfs: defrag: allow defrag_one_cluster() to skip large extent which is not a target
In the rework of btrfs_defrag_file(), we always call
defrag_one_cluster() and increase the offset by cluster size, which is
only 256K.

But there are cases where we have a large extent (e.g. 128M) which
doesn't need to be defragged at all.

Before the refactor, we can directly skip the range, but now we have to
scan that extent map again and again until the cluster moves after the
non-target extent.

Fix the problem by allow defrag_one_cluster() to increase
btrfs_defrag_ctrl::last_scanned to the end of an extent, if and only if
the last extent of the cluster is not a target.

The test script looks like this:

	mkfs.btrfs -f $dev > /dev/null

	mount $dev $mnt

	# As btrfs ioctl uses 32M as extent_threshold
	xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64M" $mnt/file1
	sync
	# Some fragemented range to defrag
	xfs_io -s -c "pwrite 65548k 4k" \
		  -c "pwrite 65544k 4k" \
		  -c "pwrite 65540k 4k" \
		  -c "pwrite 65536k 4k" \
		  $mnt/file1
	sync

	echo "=== before ==="
	xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $mnt/file1
	echo "=== after ==="
	btrfs fi defrag $mnt/file1
	sync
	xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $mnt/file1
	umount $mnt

With extra ftrace put into defrag_one_cluster(), before the patch it
would result tons of loops:

(As defrag_one_cluster() is inlined, the function name is its caller)

  btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816026: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=0 len=262144
  btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816027: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=262144 len=262144
  btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=524288 len=262144
  btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=786432 len=262144
  btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=1048576 len=262144
  ...
  btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816043: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=67108864 len=262144

But with this patch there will be just one loop, then directly to the
end of the extent:

  btrfs-130471  [014] .....  5434.029558: defrag_one_cluster: r/i=5/257 start=0 len=262144
  btrfs-130471  [014] .....  5434.029559: defrag_one_cluster: r/i=5/257 start=67108864 len=16384

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-02-15 19:59:30 +01:00
Dāvis Mosāns 741b23a970 btrfs: prevent copying too big compressed lzo segment
Compressed length can be corrupted to be a lot larger than memory
we have allocated for buffer.
This will cause memcpy in copy_compressed_segment to write outside
of allocated memory.

This mostly results in stuck read syscall but sometimes when using
btrfs send can get #GP

  kernel: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x841551d5c1000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
  kernel: CPU: 17 PID: 264 Comm: kworker/u256:7 Tainted: P           OE     5.17.0-rc2-1 #12
  kernel: Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
  kernel: RIP: 0010:lzo_decompress_bio (./include/linux/fortify-string.h:225 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:322 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:394) btrfs
  Code starting with the faulting instruction
  ===========================================
     0:*  48 8b 06                mov    (%rsi),%rax              <-- trapping instruction
     3:   48 8d 79 08             lea    0x8(%rcx),%rdi
     7:   48 83 e7 f8             and    $0xfffffffffffffff8,%rdi
     b:   48 89 01                mov    %rax,(%rcx)
     e:   44 89 f0                mov    %r14d,%eax
    11:   48 8b 54 06 f8          mov    -0x8(%rsi,%rax,1),%rdx
  kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb110812efd50 EFLAGS: 00010212
  kernel: RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: 000000009ca264c8 RCX: ffff98996e6d8ff8
  kernel: RDX: 0000000000000064 RSI: 000841551d5c1000 RDI: ffffffff9500435d
  kernel: RBP: ffff989a3be856c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff98996e6d8000
  kernel: R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 000841551d5c1000
  kernel: FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98a09d640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  kernel: CR2: 00001e9f984d9ea8 CR3: 000000014971a000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
  kernel: Call Trace:
  kernel:  <TASK>
  kernel: end_compressed_bio_read (fs/btrfs/compression.c:104 fs/btrfs/compression.c:1363 fs/btrfs/compression.c:323) btrfs
  kernel: end_workqueue_fn (fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1923) btrfs
  kernel: btrfs_work_helper (fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:326) btrfs
  kernel: process_one_work (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 ./include/linux/jump_label.h:212 ./include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2312)
  kernel: worker_thread (./include/linux/list.h:292 kernel/workqueue.c:2455)
  kernel: ? process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2397)
  kernel: kthread (kernel/kthread.c:377)
  kernel: ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:332)
  kernel: ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:301)
  kernel:  </TASK>

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Signed-off-by: Dāvis Mosāns <davispuh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-02-15 19:59:09 +01:00
Dāvis Mosāns 2e7be9db12 btrfs: send: in case of IO error log it
Currently if we get IO error while doing send then we abort without
logging information about which file caused issue.  So log it to help
with debugging.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Signed-off-by: Dāvis Mosāns <davispuh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-02-09 18:53:26 +01:00
Filipe Manana a0f0cf8341 btrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction
commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():

  $ cat fs/fs-writeback.c:
  (...)
  static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ...
  {
        (...)
        WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
        (...)
  }
  (...)

The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:

  [947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3
  [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif
  [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186
  [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3
  [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...)
  [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50
  [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000
  [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488
  [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460
  [947.553621] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [947.560537] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0
  [947.571072] Call Trace:
  [947.572354]  <TASK>
  [947.573266]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998
  [947.576785]  ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e
  [947.579867]  ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd
  [947.582716]  transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156
  [947.585721]  ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407
  [947.590104]  kthread+0x131/0x139
  [947.592168]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32
  [947.595174]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  [947.597561]  </TASK>
  [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---

This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc
when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to
avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made
by commit ce8ea7cc6e ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots
in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning,
and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too
often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any
problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability.

We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling
writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with
filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem()
is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can
trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also
trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could
also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.

To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of
writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount
and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it.
This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount
are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those
cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which
calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't
take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered
elsewhere.

An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a
number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number
of delalloc bytes we currently have, in which case we would end up
starting all delalloc with filemap_fdatawrite_wbc() and not with an
async flush via filemap_flush() - that is only possible after the rather
recent commit e076ab2a2c ("btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of
full inodes"). However that creates a whole new can of worms due to new
lock dependencies, which lockdep complains, like for example:

[ 8948.247280] ======================================================
[ 8948.247823] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 8948.248353] 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1 Not tainted
[ 8948.248786] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 8948.249320] kworker/u16:18/933570 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 8948.249812] ffff9b3de1591690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.250638]
               but task is already holding lock:
[ 8948.251140] ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.252018]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[ 8948.252710]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 8948.253343]
               -> #2 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8948.253950]        __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900
[ 8948.254354]        start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.254859]        btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.255408]        btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 8948.255942]        btrfs_mksubvol+0x380/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 8948.256406]        btrfs_mksnapshot+0x81/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.256870]        __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x17f/0x190 [btrfs]
[ 8948.257413]        btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 8948.257961]        btrfs_ioctl+0x1196/0x3630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.258418]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 8948.258793]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 8948.259146]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 8948.259709]
               -> #1 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8948.260330]        __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900
[ 8948.260692]        btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.261234]        btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 8948.261766]        btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0x38/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 8948.262379]        btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x119/0x180 [btrfs]
[ 8948.262909]        open_ctree+0x1511/0x171e [btrfs]
[ 8948.263359]        btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs]
[ 8948.263863]        legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 8948.264242]        vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 8948.264594]        vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
[ 8948.265017]        btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.265462]        legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 8948.265851]        vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 8948.266203]        path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0
[ 8948.266554]        __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140
[ 8948.266940]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 8948.267300]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 8948.267790]
               -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 8948.268322]        __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260
[ 8948.268733]        lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 8948.269092]        start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.269591]        find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.270087]        btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 8948.270588]        cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 8948.271051]        btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.271586]        writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 8948.272071]        __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.272579]        extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs]
[ 8948.273113]        extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs]
[ 8948.273573]        do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 8948.273942]        filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90
[ 8948.274371]        start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.274876]        btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.275417]        flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.275863]        btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.276438]        process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0
[ 8948.276829]        worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
[ 8948.277189]        kthread+0xf2/0x120
[ 8948.277506]        ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 8948.277868]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[ 8948.278548] Chain exists of:
                 sb_internal#2 --> &fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex --> &root->delalloc_mutex

[ 8948.279601]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[ 8948.280102]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 8948.280508]        ----                    ----
[ 8948.280915]   lock(&root->delalloc_mutex);
[ 8948.281271]                                lock(&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex);
[ 8948.281915]                                lock(&root->delalloc_mutex);
[ 8948.282487]   lock(sb_internal#2);
[ 8948.282800]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[ 8948.283333] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:18/933570:
[ 8948.283750]  #0: ffff9b3dc00a9d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0
[ 8948.284609]  #1: ffffa90349dafe70 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0
[ 8948.285637]  #2: ffff9b3e14db5040 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.286674]  #3: ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.287596]
              stack backtrace:
[ 8948.287975] CPU: 3 PID: 933570 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1
[ 8948.288677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 8948.289649] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
[ 8948.290298] Call Trace:
[ 8948.290517]  <TASK>
[ 8948.290700]  dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73
[ 8948.291026]  check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 8948.291375]  ? start_transaction+0x228/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.291826]  __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260
[ 8948.292241]  lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 8948.292714]  ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.293241]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xea/0x140
[ 8948.293601]  start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294055]  ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294518]  find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294957]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 8948.295312]  ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x124/0x290 [btrfs]
[ 8948.295813]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 8948.296270]  cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 8948.296691]  btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.297175]  ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x247/0x270 [btrfs]
[ 8948.297678]  writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 8948.298123]  __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.298570]  extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs]
[ 8948.299061]  extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs]
[ 8948.299495]  do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 8948.299817]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x110
[ 8948.300160]  ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[ 8948.300494]  filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90
[ 8948.300874]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
[ 8948.301243]  start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.301706]  ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[ 8948.302055]  btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.302564]  flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.302970]  btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.303510]  process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0
[ 8948.303860]  ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 8948.304221]  worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
[ 8948.304543]  ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 8948.304904]  kthread+0xf2/0x120
[ 8948.305184]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 8948.305598]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 8948.305921]  </TASK>

It all comes from the fact that btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() takes the
delalloc_root_mutex, in the transaction commit path we are holding a
read lock on one of the superblock's freeze semaphores (via
sb_start_intwrite()), the async reclaim task can also do a call to
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), which ends up triggering writeback with
calls to filemap_fdatawrite_wbc(), resulting in extent allocation which
in turn can call btrfs_start_transaction(), which will result in taking
the freeze semaphore via sb_start_intwrite(), forming a nasty dependency
on all those locks which can be taken in different orders by different
code paths.

So just adopt the simple approach of calling try_to_writeback_inodes_sb()
at btrfs_start_delalloc_flush().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220130005258.GA7465@cuci.nl/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/43acc426-d683-d1b6-729d-c6bc4a2fff4d@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6833930a-08d7-6fbc-0141-eb9cdfd6bb4d@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190322041731.GF16651@hungrycats.org/
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[ add more link reports ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-02-09 18:53:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 0d1ffa2228 btrfs: defrag: don't try to defrag extents which are under writeback
Once we start writeback (have called btrfs_run_delalloc_range()), we
allocate an extent, create an extent map point to that extent, with a
generation of (u64)-1, created the ordered extent and then clear the
DELALLOC bit from the range in the inode's io tree.

Such extent map can pass the first call of defrag_collect_targets(), as
its generation is (u64)-1, meets any possible minimal generation check.
And the range will not have DELALLOC bit, also passing the DELALLOC bit
check.

It will only be re-checked in the second call of
defrag_collect_targets(), which will wait for writeback.

But at that stage we have already spent our time waiting for some IO we
may or may not want to defrag.

Let's reject such extents early so we won't waste our time.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-02-09 18:53:24 +01:00
Qu Wenruo ea0eba69a2 btrfs: don't hold CPU for too long when defragging a file
There is a user report about "btrfs filesystem defrag" causing 120s
timeout problem.

For btrfs_defrag_file() it will iterate all file extents if called from
defrag ioctl, thus it can take a long time.

There is no reason not to release the CPU during such a long operation.

Add cond_resched() after defragged one cluster.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/10e51417-2203-f0a4-2021-86c8511cc367@gmx.com
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-02-09 18:50:56 +01:00
Filipe Manana 40cdc50987 btrfs: skip reserved bytes warning on unmount after log cleanup failure
After the recent changes made by commit c2e3930529 ("btrfs: clear
extent buffer uptodate when we fail to write it") and its followup fix,
commit 651740a502 ("btrfs: check WRITE_ERR when trying to read an
extent buffer"), we can now end up not cleaning up space reservations of
log tree extent buffers after a transaction abort happens, as well as not
cleaning up still dirty extent buffers.

This happens because if writeback for a log tree extent buffer failed,
then we have cleared the bit EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE from the extent buffer
and we have also set the bit EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR on it. Later on,
when trying to free the log tree with free_log_tree(), which iterates
over the tree, we can end up getting an -EIO error when trying to read
a node or a leaf, since read_extent_buffer_pages() returns -EIO if an
extent buffer does not have EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE set and has the
EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR bit set. Getting that -EIO means that we return
immediately as we can not iterate over the entire tree.

In that case we never update the reserved space for an extent buffer in
the respective block group and space_info object.

When this happens we get the following traces when unmounting the fs:

[174957.284509] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in cleanup_transaction:1913: errno=-5 IO failure
[174957.286497] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in free_log_tree:3420: errno=-5 IO failure
[174957.399379] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[174957.402497] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:127 btrfs_put_block_group+0x77/0xb0 [btrfs]
[174957.407523] Modules linked in: btrfs overlay dm_zero (...)
[174957.424917] CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W         5.16.0-rc5-btrfs-next-109 #1
[174957.426689] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[174957.428716] RIP: 0010:btrfs_put_block_group+0x77/0xb0 [btrfs]
[174957.429717] Code: 21 48 8b bd (...)
[174957.432867] RSP: 0018:ffffb70d41cffdd0 EFLAGS: 00010206
[174957.433632] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8b09c3848000 RCX: ffff8b0758edd1c8
[174957.434689] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffc0b467e7 RDI: ffff8b0758edd000
[174957.436068] RBP: ffff8b0758edd000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[174957.437114] R10: 0000000000000246 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8b09c3848148
[174957.438140] R13: ffff8b09c3848198 R14: ffff8b0758edd188 R15: dead000000000100
[174957.439317] FS:  00007f328fb82800(0000) GS:ffff8b0a2d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[174957.440402] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[174957.441164] CR2: 00007fff13563e98 CR3: 0000000404f4e005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[174957.442117] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[174957.443076] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[174957.443948] Call Trace:
[174957.444264]  <TASK>
[174957.444538]  btrfs_free_block_groups+0x255/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[174957.445238]  close_ctree+0x301/0x357 [btrfs]
[174957.445803]  ? call_rcu+0x16c/0x290
[174957.446250]  generic_shutdown_super+0x74/0x120
[174957.446832]  kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
[174957.447305]  btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
[174957.447890]  deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0xa0
[174957.448440]  cleanup_mnt+0x147/0x1c0
[174957.448888]  task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
[174957.449336]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e5/0x1f0
[174957.449934]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40
[174957.450512]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0
[174957.450980]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[174957.451605] RIP: 0033:0x7f328fdc4a97
[174957.452059] Code: 03 0c 00 f7 (...)
[174957.454320] RSP: 002b:00007fff13564ec8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[174957.455262] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f328feea264 RCX: 00007f328fdc4a97
[174957.456131] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000560b8ae51dd0
[174957.457118] RBP: 0000560b8ae51ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff13563c40
[174957.458005] R10: 00007f328fe49fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[174957.459113] R13: 0000560b8ae51dd0 R14: 0000560b8ae51cb0 R15: 0000000000000000
[174957.460193]  </TASK>
[174957.460534] irq event stamp: 0
[174957.461003] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[174957.461947] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040
[174957.463147] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040
[174957.465116] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[174957.466323] ---[ end trace bc7ee0c490bce3af ]---
[174957.467282] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[174957.468184] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3976 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x330/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[174957.470066] Modules linked in: btrfs overlay dm_zero (...)
[174957.483137] CPU: 2 PID: 3206883 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W         5.16.0-rc5-btrfs-next-109 #1
[174957.484691] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[174957.486853] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x330/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[174957.488050] Code: 00 00 00 ad de (...)
[174957.491479] RSP: 0018:ffffb70d41cffde0 EFLAGS: 00010206
[174957.492520] RAX: ffff8b08d79310b0 RBX: ffff8b09c3848000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[174957.493868] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: fffff443055ee600 RDI: ffffffffb1131846
[174957.495183] RBP: ffff8b08d79310b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[174957.496580] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8b08d7931000
[174957.498027] R13: ffff8b09c38492b0 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100
[174957.499438] FS:  00007f328fb82800(0000) GS:ffff8b0a2d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[174957.500990] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[174957.502117] CR2: 00007fff13563e98 CR3: 0000000404f4e005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[174957.503513] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[174957.504864] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[174957.506167] Call Trace:
[174957.506654]  <TASK>
[174957.507047]  close_ctree+0x301/0x357 [btrfs]
[174957.507867]  ? call_rcu+0x16c/0x290
[174957.508567]  generic_shutdown_super+0x74/0x120
[174957.509447]  kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
[174957.510194]  btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
[174957.511123]  deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0xa0
[174957.511976]  cleanup_mnt+0x147/0x1c0
[174957.512610]  task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
[174957.513309]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e5/0x1f0
[174957.514231]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40
[174957.515069]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0
[174957.515718]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[174957.516688] RIP: 0033:0x7f328fdc4a97
[174957.517413] Code: 03 0c 00 f7 d8 (...)
[174957.521052] RSP: 002b:00007fff13564ec8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[174957.522514] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f328feea264 RCX: 00007f328fdc4a97
[174957.523950] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000560b8ae51dd0
[174957.525375] RBP: 0000560b8ae51ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff13563c40
[174957.526763] R10: 00007f328fe49fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[174957.528058] R13: 0000560b8ae51dd0 R14: 0000560b8ae51cb0 R15: 0000000000000000
[174957.529404]  </TASK>
[174957.529843] irq event stamp: 0
[174957.530256] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[174957.531061] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040
[174957.532075] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0e94214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040
[174957.533083] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[174957.533865] ---[ end trace bc7ee0c490bce3b0 ]---
[174957.534452] BTRFS info (device dm-0): space_info 4 has 1070841856 free, is not full
[174957.535404] BTRFS info (device dm-0): space_info total=1073741824, used=2785280, pinned=0, reserved=49152, may_use=0, readonly=65536 zone_unusable=0
[174957.537029] BTRFS info (device dm-0): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
[174957.537859] BTRFS info (device dm-0): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
[174957.538697] BTRFS info (device dm-0): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
[174957.539552] BTRFS info (device dm-0): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
[174957.540403] BTRFS info (device dm-0): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0

This also means that in case we have log tree extent buffers that are
still dirty, we can end up not cleaning them up in case we find an
extent buffer with EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR set on it, as in that case
we have no way for iterating over the rest of the tree.

This issue is very often triggered with test cases generic/475 and
generic/648 from fstests.

The issue could almost be fixed by iterating over the io tree attached to
each log root which keeps tracks of the range of allocated extent buffers,
log_root->dirty_log_pages, however that does not work and has some
inconveniences:

1) After we sync the log, we clear the range of the extent buffers from
   the io tree, so we can't find them after writeback. We could keep the
   ranges in the io tree, with a separate bit to signal they represent
   extent buffers already written, but that means we need to hold into
   more memory until the transaction commits.

   How much more memory is used depends a lot on whether we are able to
   allocate contiguous extent buffers on disk (and how often) for a log
   tree - if we are able to, then a single extent state record can
   represent multiple extent buffers, otherwise we need multiple extent
   state record structures to track each extent buffer.
   In fact, my earlier approach did that:

   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/3aae7c6728257c7ce2279d6660ee2797e5e34bbd.1641300250.git.fdmanana@suse.com/

   However that can cause a very significant negative impact on
   performance, not only due to the extra memory usage but also because
   we get a larger and deeper dirty_log_pages io tree.
   We got a report that, on beefy machines at least, we can get such
   performance drop with fsmark for example:

   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220117082426.GE32491@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/

2) We would be doing it only to deal with an unexpected and exceptional
   case, which is basically failure to read an extent buffer from disk
   due to IO failures. On a healthy system we don't expect transaction
   aborts to happen after all;

3) Instead of relying on iterating the log tree or tracking the ranges
   of extent buffers in the dirty_log_pages io tree, using the radix
   tree that tracks extent buffers (fs_info->buffer_radix) to find all
   log tree extent buffers is not reliable either, because after writeback
   of an extent buffer it can be evicted from memory by the release page
   callback of the btree inode (btree_releasepage()).

Since there's no way to be able to properly cleanup a log tree without
being able to read its extent buffers from disk and without using more
memory to track the logical ranges of the allocated extent buffers do
the following:

1) When we fail to cleanup a log tree, setup a flag that indicates that
   failure;

2) Trigger writeback of all log tree extent buffers that are still dirty,
   and wait for the writeback to complete. This is just to cleanup their
   state, page states, page leaks, etc;

3) When unmounting the fs, ignore if the number of bytes reserved in a
   block group and in a space_info is not 0 if, and only if, we failed to
   cleanup a log tree. Also ignore only for metadata block groups and the
   metadata space_info object.

This is far from a perfect solution, but it serves to silence test
failures such as those from generic/475 and generic/648. However having
a non-zero value for the reserved bytes counters on unmount after a
transaction abort, is not such a terrible thing and it's completely
harmless, it does not affect the filesystem integrity in any way.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31 16:06:50 +01:00
Tom Rix 37b4599547 btrfs: fix use of uninitialized variable at rm device ioctl
Clang static analysis reports this problem
ioctl.c:3333:8: warning: 3rd function call argument is an
  uninitialized value
    ret = exclop_start_or_cancel_reloc(fs_info,

cancel is only set in one branch of an if-check and is always used.  So
initialize to false.

Fixes: 1a15eb724a ("btrfs: use btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path in dev removal ioctls")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31 16:06:21 +01:00
Filipe Manana 28b21c558a btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and
then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that
we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump
to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can
result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:

1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's
   list of pending snapshots;

2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first
   call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().
   In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our
   transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending
   snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the
   transaction's list;

3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at
   all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer
   to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task
   has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.

This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the
following warning:

  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list

So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the
pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending
snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()
we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error
returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which
case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can
access it anymore.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31 16:06:09 +01:00
Su Yue ea1d1ca402 btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size for dev_item
Check item size before accessing the device item to avoid out of bound
access, similar to inode_item check.

Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31 16:06:04 +01:00
Su Yue 0c982944af btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size for inode_item
while mounting the crafted image, out-of-bounds access happens:

  [350.429619] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/btrfs/struct-funcs.c:161:1
  [350.429636] index 1048096 is out of range for type 'page *[16]'
  [350.429650] CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4 #1
  [350.429652] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
  [350.429653] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
  [350.429772] Call Trace:
  [350.429774]  <TASK>
  [350.429776]  dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x5c
  [350.429780]  ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x50
  [350.429786]  __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x66/0x70
  [350.429791]  btrfs_get_16+0xfd/0x120 [btrfs]
  [350.429832]  check_leaf+0x754/0x1a40 [btrfs]
  [350.429874]  ? filemap_read+0x34a/0x390
  [350.429878]  ? load_balance+0x175/0xfc0
  [350.429881]  validate_extent_buffer+0x244/0x310 [btrfs]
  [350.429911]  btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer+0xf8/0x100 [btrfs]
  [350.429935]  end_bio_extent_readpage+0x3af/0x850 [btrfs]
  [350.429969]  ? newidle_balance+0x259/0x480
  [350.429972]  end_workqueue_fn+0x29/0x40 [btrfs]
  [350.429995]  btrfs_work_helper+0x71/0x330 [btrfs]
  [350.430030]  ? __schedule+0x2fb/0xa40
  [350.430033]  process_one_work+0x1f6/0x400
  [350.430035]  ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400
  [350.430036]  worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0
  [350.430037]  ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400
  [350.430038]  kthread+0x165/0x190
  [350.430041]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
  [350.430043]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  [350.430047]  </TASK>
  [350.430077] BTRFS warning (device loop0): bad eb member start: ptr 0xffe20f4e start 20975616 member offset 4293005178 size 2

check_leaf() is checking the leaf:

  corrupt leaf: root=4 block=29396992 slot=1, bad key order, prev (16140901064495857664 1 0) current (1 204 12582912)
  leaf 29396992 items 6 free space 3565 generation 6 owner DEV_TREE
  leaf 29396992 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
  fs uuid a62e00e8-e94e-4200-8217-12444de93c2e
  chunk uuid cecbd0f7-9ca0-441e-ae9f-f782f9732bd8
	  item 0 key (16140901064495857664 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 3955 itemsize 40
		  generation 0 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 17592186044416
		  block group 0 mode 52667 links 33 uid 0 gid 2104132511 rdev 94223634821136
		  sequence 100305 flags 0x2409000(none)
		  atime 0.0 (1970-01-01 08:00:00)
		  ctime 2973280098083405823.4294967295 (-269783007-01-01 21:37:03)
		  mtime 18446744071572723616.4026825121 (1902-04-16 12:40:00)
		  otime 9249929404488876031.4294967295 (622322949-04-16 04:25:58)
	  item 1 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 12582912) itemoff 3907 itemsize 48
		  dev extent chunk_tree 3
		  chunk_objectid 256 chunk_offset 12582912 length 8388608
		  chunk_tree_uuid cecbd0f7-9ca0-441e-ae9f-f782f9732bd8

The corrupted leaf of device tree has an inode item. The leaf passed
checksum and others checks in validate_extent_buffer until check_leaf_item().
Because of the key type BTRFS_INODE_ITEM, check_inode_item() is called even we
are in the device tree. Since the
item offset + sizeof(struct btrfs_inode_item) > eb->len, out-of-bounds access
is triggered.

The item end vs leaf boundary check has been done before
check_leaf_item(), so fix it by checking item size in check_inode_item()
before access of the inode item in extent buffer.

Other check functions except check_dev_item() in check_leaf_item()
have their item size checks.
The commit for check_dev_item() is followed.

No regression observed during running fstests.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215299
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
CC: Wenqing Liu <wenqingliu0120@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31 16:05:54 +01:00
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki e804861bd4 btrfs: fix deadlock between quota disable and qgroup rescan worker
Quota disable ioctl starts a transaction before waiting for the qgroup
rescan worker completes. However, this wait can be infinite and results
in deadlock because of circular dependency among the quota disable
ioctl, the qgroup rescan worker and the other task with transaction such
as block group relocation task.

The deadlock happens with the steps following:

1) Task A calls ioctl to disable quota. It starts a transaction and
   waits for qgroup rescan worker completes.
2) Task B such as block group relocation task starts a transaction and
   joins to the transaction that task A started. Then task B commits to
   the transaction. In this commit, task B waits for a commit by task A.
3) Task C as the qgroup rescan worker starts its job and starts a
   transaction. In this transaction start, task C waits for completion
   of the transaction that task A started and task B committed.

This deadlock was found with fstests test case btrfs/115 and a zoned
null_blk device. The test case enables and disables quota, and the
block group reclaim was triggered during the quota disable by chance.
The deadlock was also observed by running quota enable and disable in
parallel with 'btrfs balance' command on regular null_blk devices.

An example report of the deadlock:

  [372.469894] INFO: task kworker/u16:6:103 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
  [372.479944]       Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7
  [372.485067] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [372.493898] task:kworker/u16:6   state:D stack:    0 pid:  103 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
  [372.503285] Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
  [372.510782] Call Trace:
  [372.514092]  <TASK>
  [372.521684]  __schedule+0xb56/0x4850
  [372.530104]  ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190
  [372.538842]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100
  [372.547092]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60
  [372.555591]  schedule+0xe0/0x270
  [372.561894]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x18bb/0x2610 [btrfs]
  [372.570506]  ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x50/0x50 [btrfs]
  [372.578875]  ? free_unref_page+0x3f2/0x650
  [372.585484]  ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270
  [372.591594]  ? release_extent_buffer+0x224/0x420 [btrfs]
  [372.599264]  btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0xc13/0x10c0 [btrfs]
  [372.607157]  ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0
  [372.613054]  ? btrfs_qgroup_account_extent+0xda0/0xda0 [btrfs]
  [372.620960]  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x250
  [372.627137]  ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
  [372.633215]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140
  [372.639404]  btrfs_work_helper+0x1ae/0xa90 [btrfs]
  [372.646268]  process_one_work+0x7e9/0x1320
  [372.652321]  ? lock_release+0x6d0/0x6d0
  [372.658081]  ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230
  [372.664513]  ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
  [372.670529]  worker_thread+0x59e/0xf90
  [372.676172]  ? process_one_work+0x1320/0x1320
  [372.682440]  kthread+0x3b9/0x490
  [372.687550]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
  [372.693811]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100
  [372.700052]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  [372.705517]  </TASK>
  [372.709747] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:2347 blocked for more than 123 seconds.
  [372.729827]       Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7
  [372.745907] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [372.767106] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack:    0 pid: 2347 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
  [372.787776] Call Trace:
  [372.801652]  <TASK>
  [372.812961]  __schedule+0xb56/0x4850
  [372.830011]  ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190
  [372.852547]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100
  [372.871761]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60
  [372.886792]  schedule+0xe0/0x270
  [372.901685]  wait_current_trans+0x22c/0x310 [btrfs]
  [372.919743]  ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x3d0/0x3d0 [btrfs]
  [372.938923]  ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270
  [372.959085]  ? join_transaction+0xc75/0xe30 [btrfs]
  [372.977706]  start_transaction+0x938/0x10a0 [btrfs]
  [372.997168]  transaction_kthread+0x19d/0x3c0 [btrfs]
  [373.013021]  ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0xfc0/0xfc0 [btrfs]
  [373.031678]  kthread+0x3b9/0x490
  [373.047420]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
  [373.064645]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100
  [373.078571]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  [373.091197]  </TASK>
  [373.105611] INFO: task btrfs:3145 blocked for more than 123 seconds.
  [373.114147]       Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7
  [373.120401] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [373.130393] task:btrfs           state:D stack:    0 pid: 3145 ppid:  3141 flags:0x00004000
  [373.140998] Call Trace:
  [373.145501]  <TASK>
  [373.149654]  __schedule+0xb56/0x4850
  [373.155306]  ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190
  [373.161965]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100
  [373.168469]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60
  [373.175468]  schedule+0xe0/0x270
  [373.180814]  wait_for_commit+0x104/0x150 [btrfs]
  [373.187643]  ? test_and_set_bit+0x20/0x20 [btrfs]
  [373.194772]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x124/0x550
  [373.201191]  ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x69/0x3d0 [btrfs]
  [373.208738]  ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270
  [373.214704]  ? __btrfs_end_transaction+0x347/0x7b0 [btrfs]
  [373.222342]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x44d/0x2610 [btrfs]
  [373.230233]  ? join_transaction+0x255/0xe30 [btrfs]
  [373.237334]  ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs]
  [373.245251]  ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x50/0x50 [btrfs]
  [373.253296]  relocate_block_group+0x105/0xc20 [btrfs]
  [373.260533]  ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1270/0x1270
  [373.267516]  ? btrfs_wait_nocow_writers+0x85/0x180 [btrfs]
  [373.275155]  ? merge_reloc_roots+0x710/0x710 [btrfs]
  [373.283602]  ? btrfs_wait_ordered_extents+0xd30/0xd30 [btrfs]
  [373.291934]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x124/0x550
  [373.298180]  btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x35c/0x930 [btrfs]
  [373.306047]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x85/0x210 [btrfs]
  [373.313229]  btrfs_balance+0x12f4/0x2d20 [btrfs]
  [373.320227]  ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0
  [373.326206]  ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x210/0x210 [btrfs]
  [373.333591]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140
  [373.340031]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
  [373.346910]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x548/0x700 [btrfs]
  [373.354207]  btrfs_ioctl+0x7f2/0x71b0 [btrfs]
  [373.360774]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410
  [373.367957]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410
  [373.375327]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x20/0x20 [btrfs]
  [373.383841]  ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
  [373.389993]  ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0
  [373.395828]  ? mntput_no_expire+0xf7/0xad0
  [373.402083]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140
  [373.408249]  ? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9f0/0x9f0
  [373.414486]  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x349/0x4e0
  [373.420938]  ? trace_raw_output_lock+0xb4/0xe0
  [373.427442]  ? selinux_inode_getsecctx+0x80/0x80
  [373.434224]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100
  [373.440660]  ? force_qs_rnp+0x2a0/0x6b0
  [373.446534]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x140
  [373.452763]  ? __blkcg_punt_bio_submit+0x1b0/0x1b0
  [373.459732]  ? security_file_ioctl+0x50/0x90
  [373.466089]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x190
  [373.472022]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
  [373.477513]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
  [373.484823] RIP: 0033:0x7f8f4af7e2bb
  [373.490493] RSP: 002b:00007ffcbf936178 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [373.500197] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f8f4af7e2bb
  [373.509451] RDX: 00007ffcbf936220 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003
  [373.518659] RBP: 00007ffcbf93774a R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 00007f8f4b02d4e0
  [373.527872] R10: 00007f8f4ae87740 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
  [373.537222] R13: 00007ffcbf936220 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002
  [373.546506]  </TASK>
  [373.550878] INFO: task btrfs:3146 blocked for more than 123 seconds.
  [373.559383]       Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7
  [373.565748] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [373.575748] task:btrfs           state:D stack:    0 pid: 3146 ppid:  2168 flags:0x00000000
  [373.586314] Call Trace:
  [373.590846]  <TASK>
  [373.595121]  __schedule+0xb56/0x4850
  [373.600901]  ? __lock_acquire+0x23db/0x5030
  [373.607176]  ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190
  [373.613954]  schedule+0xe0/0x270
  [373.619157]  schedule_timeout+0x168/0x220
  [373.625170]  ? usleep_range_state+0x150/0x150
  [373.631653]  ? mark_held_locks+0x9e/0xe0
  [373.637767]  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x250
  [373.643993]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x17b/0x410
  [373.651267]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
  [373.657677]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100
  [373.664103]  wait_for_completion+0x163/0x250
  [373.670437]  ? bit_wait_timeout+0x160/0x160
  [373.676585]  btrfs_quota_disable+0x176/0x9a0 [btrfs]
  [373.683979]  ? btrfs_quota_enable+0x12f0/0x12f0 [btrfs]
  [373.691340]  ? down_write+0xd0/0x130
  [373.696880]  ? down_write_killable+0x150/0x150
  [373.703352]  btrfs_ioctl+0x3945/0x71b0 [btrfs]
  [373.710061]  ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
  [373.716192]  ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0
  [373.722047]  ? __handle_mm_fault+0x23cd/0x3050
  [373.728486]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x20/0x20 [btrfs]
  [373.737032]  ? set_pte+0x6a/0x90
  [373.742271]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x1f0
  [373.748506]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140
  [373.754792]  ? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9f0/0x9f0
  [373.761083]  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x349/0x4e0
  [373.767521]  ? selinux_inode_getsecctx+0x80/0x80
  [373.774247]  ? __up_read+0x182/0x6e0
  [373.780026]  ? count_memcg_events.constprop.0+0x46/0x60
  [373.787281]  ? up_write+0x460/0x460
  [373.792932]  ? security_file_ioctl+0x50/0x90
  [373.799232]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x190
  [373.805237]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
  [373.810947]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
  [373.818102] RIP: 0033:0x7f1383ea02bb
  [373.823847] RSP: 002b:00007fffeb4d71f8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [373.833641] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1383ea02bb
  [373.842961] RDX: 00007fffeb4d7210 RSI: 00000000c0109428 RDI: 0000000000000003
  [373.852179] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000078
  [373.861408] R10: 00007f1383daec78 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fffeb4d874a
  [373.870647] R13: 0000000000493099 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
  [373.879838]  </TASK>
  [373.884018]
               Showing all locks held in the system:
  [373.894250] 3 locks held by kworker/4:1/58:
  [373.900356] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/63:
  [373.906333]  #0: ffffffff8945ff60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x53/0x260
  [373.917307] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:6/103:
  [373.923938]  #0: ffff888127b4f138 ((wq_completion)btrfs-qgroup-rescan){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x712/0x1320
  [373.936555]  #1: ffff88810b817dd8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x73f/0x1320
  [373.951109]  #2: ffff888102dd4650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x1f6/0x10c0 [btrfs]
  [373.964027] 2 locks held by less/1803:
  [373.969982]  #0: ffff88813ed56098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at: tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x24/0x80
  [373.981295]  #1: ffffc90000b3b2e8 (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: n_tty_read+0x9e2/0x1060
  [373.992969] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/2347:
  [373.999893]  #0: ffff88813d4887a8 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0xe3/0x3c0 [btrfs]
  [374.015872] 3 locks held by btrfs/3145:
  [374.022298]  #0: ffff888102dd4460 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xc3/0x700 [btrfs]
  [374.034456]  #1: ffff88813d48a0a0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0xfe5/0x2d20 [btrfs]
  [374.047646]  #2: ffff88813d488838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x354/0x930 [btrfs]
  [374.063295] 4 locks held by btrfs/3146:
  [374.069647]  #0: ffff888102dd4460 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x38b1/0x71b0 [btrfs]
  [374.081601]  #1: ffff88813d488bb8 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x38fd/0x71b0 [btrfs]
  [374.094283]  #2: ffff888102dd4650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_quota_disable+0xc8/0x9a0 [btrfs]
  [374.106885]  #3: ffff88813d489800 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_disable+0xd5/0x9a0 [btrfs]

  [374.126780] =============================================

To avoid the deadlock, wait for the qgroup rescan worker to complete
before starting the transaction for the quota disable ioctl. Clear
BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag before the wait and the transaction to
request the worker to complete. On transaction start failure, set the
BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag again. These BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag
changes can be done safely since the function btrfs_quota_disable is not
called concurrently because of fs_info->subvol_sem.

Also check the BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag in qgroup_rescan_init to avoid
another qgroup rescan worker to start after the previous qgroup worker
completed.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31 16:05:44 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 2d192fc4c1 btrfs: don't start transaction for scrub if the fs is mounted read-only
[BUG]
The following super simple script would crash btrfs at unmount time, if
CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT() is set.

 mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
 mount $dev $mnt
 xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 4k" $mnt/file
 umount $mnt
 mount -r ro $dev $mnt
 btrfs scrub start -Br $mnt
 umount $mnt

This will trigger the following ASSERT() introduced by commit
0a31daa4b6 ("btrfs: add assertion for empty list of transactions at
late stage of umount").

That patch is definitely not the cause, it just makes enough noise for
developers.

[CAUSE]
We will start transaction for the following call chain during scrub:

  scrub_enumerate_chunks()
  |- btrfs_inc_block_group_ro()
     |- btrfs_join_transaction()

However for RO mount, there is no running transaction at all, thus
btrfs_join_transaction() will start a new transaction.

Furthermore, since it's read-only mount, btrfs_sync_fs() will not call
btrfs_commit_super() to commit the new but empty transaction.

And leads to the ASSERT().

The bug has been there for a long time. Only the new ASSERT() makes it
noisy enough to be noticed.

[FIX]
For read-only scrub on read-only mount, there is no need to start a
transaction nor to allocate new chunks in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro().

Just do extra read-only mount check in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), and
if it's read-only, skip all chunk allocation and go inc_block_group_ro()
directly.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31 16:05:16 +01:00
Filipe Manana 27cdfde181 btrfs: update writeback index when starting defrag
When starting a defrag, we should update the writeback index of the
inode's mapping in case it currently has a value beyond the start of the
range we are defragging. This can help performance and often result in
getting less extents after writeback - for e.g., if the current value
of the writeback index sits somewhere in the middle of a range that
gets dirty by the defrag, then after writeback we can get two smaller
extents instead of a single, larger extent.

We used to have this before the refactoring in 5.16, but it was removed
without any reason to do so. Originally it was added in kernel 3.1, by
commit 2a0f7f5769 ("Btrfs: fix recursive auto-defrag"), in order to
fix a loop with autodefrag resulting in dirtying and writing pages over
and over, but some testing on current code did not show that happening,
at least with the test described in that commit.

So add back the behaviour, as at the very least it is a nice to have
optimization.

Fixes: 7b508037d4 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-24 18:16:28 +01:00
Filipe Manana 3c9d31c715 btrfs: add back missing dirty page rate limiting to defrag
A defrag operation can dirty a lot of pages, specially if operating on
the entire file or a large file range. Any task dirtying pages should
periodically call balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(), as stated in that
function's comments, otherwise they can leave too many dirty pages in
the system. This is what we did before the refactoring in 5.16, and
it should have remained, just like in the buffered write path and
relocation. So restore that behaviour.

Fixes: 7b508037d4 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-24 18:10:56 +01:00
Filipe Manana 0cb5950f3f btrfs: fix deadlock when reserving space during defrag
When defragging we can end up collecting a range for defrag that has
already pages under delalloc (dirty), as long as the respective extent
map for their range is not mapped to a hole, a prealloc extent or
the extent map is from an old generation.

Most of the time that is harmless from a functional perspective at
least, however it can result in a deadlock:

1) At defrag_collect_targets() we find an extent map that meets all
   requirements but there's delalloc for the range it covers, and we add
   its range to list of ranges to defrag;

2) The defrag_collect_targets() function is called at defrag_one_range(),
   after it locked a range that overlaps the range of the extent map;

3) At defrag_one_range(), while the range is still locked, we call
   defrag_one_locked_target() for the range associated to the extent
   map we collected at step 1);

4) Then finally at defrag_one_locked_target() we do a call to
   btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(), which will reserve data and metadata
   space. If the space reservations can not be satisfied right away, the
   flusher might be kicked in and start flushing delalloc and wait for
   the respective ordered extents to complete. If this happens we will
   deadlock, because both flushing delalloc and finishing an ordered
   extent, requires locking the range in the inode's io tree, which was
   already locked at defrag_collect_targets().

So fix this by skipping extent maps for which there's already delalloc.

Fixes: eb793cf857 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to collect target file extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-24 18:10:52 +01:00
Qu Wenruo c080b4144b btrfs: defrag: properly update range->start for autodefrag
[BUG]
After commit 7b508037d4 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to
implement btrfs_defrag_file()") autodefrag no longer properly re-defrag
the file from previously finished location.

[CAUSE]
The recent refactoring of defrag only focuses on defrag ioctl subpage
support, doesn't take autodefrag into consideration.

There are two problems involved which prevents autodefrag to restart its
scan:

- No range.start update
  Previously when one defrag target is found, range->start will be
  updated to indicate where next search should start from.

  But now btrfs_defrag_file() doesn't update it anymore, making all
  autodefrag to rescan from file offset 0.

  This would also make autodefrag to mark the same range dirty again and
  again, causing extra IO.

- No proper quick exit for defrag_one_cluster()
  Currently if we reached or exceed @max_sectors limit, we just exit
  defrag_one_cluster(), and let next defrag_one_cluster() call to do a
  quick exit.
  This makes @cur increase, thus no way to properly know which range is
  defragged and which range is skipped.

[FIX]
The fix involves two modifications:

- Update range->start to next cluster start
  This is a little different from the old behavior.
  Previously range->start is updated to the next defrag target.

  But in the end, the behavior should still be pretty much the same,
  as now we skip to next defrag target inside btrfs_defrag_file().

  Thus if auto-defrag determines to re-scan, then we still do the skip,
  just at a different timing.

- Make defrag_one_cluster() to return >0 to indicate a quick exit
  So that btrfs_defrag_file() can also do a quick exit, without
  increasing @cur to the range end, and re-use @cur to update
  @range->start.

- Add comment for btrfs_defrag_file() to mention the range->start update
  Currently only autodefrag utilize this behavior, as defrag ioctl won't
  set @max_to_defrag parameter, thus unless interrupted it will always
  try to defrag the whole range.

Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Fixes: 7b508037d4 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0a269612-e43f-da22-c5bc-b34b1b56ebe8@mailbox.org/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-19 18:25:56 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 484167da77 btrfs: defrag: fix wrong number of defragged sectors
[BUG]
There are users using autodefrag mount option reporting obvious increase
in IO:

> If I compare the write average (in total, I don't have it per process)
> when taking idle periods on the same machine:
>     Linux 5.16:
>         without autodefrag: ~ 10KiB/s
>         with autodefrag: between 1 and 2MiB/s.
>
>     Linux 5.15:
>         with autodefrag:~ 10KiB/s (around the same as without
> autodefrag on 5.16)

[CAUSE]
When autodefrag mount option is enabled, btrfs_defrag_file() will be
called with @max_sectors = BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH (1024) to limit how many
sectors we can defrag in one try.

And then use the number of sectors defragged to determine if we need to
re-defrag.

But commit b18c3ab234 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to defrag one
cluster") uses wrong unit to increase @sectors_defragged, which should
be in unit of sector, not byte.

This means, if we have defragged any sector, then @sectors_defragged
will be >= sectorsize (normally 4096), which is larger than
BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH.

This makes the @max_sectors check in defrag_one_cluster() to underflow,
rendering the whole @max_sectors check useless.

Thus causing way more IO for autodefrag mount options, as now there is
no limit on how many sectors can really be defragged.

[FIX]
Fix the problems by:

- Use sector as unit when increasing @sectors_defragged

- Include @sectors_defragged > @max_sectors case to break the loop

- Add extra comment on the return value of btrfs_defrag_file()

Reported-by: Anthony Ruhier <aruhier@mailbox.org>
Fixes: b18c3ab234 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to defrag one cluster")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0a269612-e43f-da22-c5bc-b34b1b56ebe8@mailbox.org/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-19 18:25:54 +01:00
Filipe Manana b767c2fc78 btrfs: allow defrag to be interruptible
During defrag, at btrfs_defrag_file(), we have this loop that iterates
over a file range in steps no larger than 256K subranges. If the range
is too long, there's no way to interrupt it. So make the loop check in
each iteration if there's signal pending, and if there is, break and
return -AGAIN to userspace.

Before kernel 5.16, we used to allow defrag to be cancelled through a
signal, but that was lost with commit 7b508037d4 ("btrfs: defrag:
use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()").

This change adds back the possibility to cancel a defrag with a signal
and keeps the same semantics, returning -EAGAIN to user space (and not
the usually more expected -EINTR).

This is also motivated by a recent bug on 5.16 where defragging a 1 byte
file resulted in iterating from file range 0 to (u64)-1, as hitting the
bug triggered a too long loop, basically requiring one to reboot the
machine, as it was not possible to cancel defrag.

Fixes: 7b508037d4 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-19 18:16:38 +01:00
Filipe Manana 6b34cd8e17 btrfs: fix too long loop when defragging a 1 byte file
When attempting to defrag a file with a single byte, we can end up in a
too long loop, which is nearly infinite because at btrfs_defrag_file()
we end up with the variable last_byte assigned with a value of
18446744073709551615 (which is (u64)-1). The problem comes from the fact
we end up doing:

    last_byte = round_up(last_byte, fs_info->sectorsize) - 1;

So if last_byte was assigned 0, which is i_size - 1, we underflow and
end up with the value 18446744073709551615.

This is trivial to reproduce and the following script triggers it:

  $ cat test.sh
  #!/bin/bash

  DEV=/dev/sdj
  MNT=/mnt/sdj

  mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
  mount $DEV $MNT

  echo -n "X" > $MNT/foobar

  btrfs filesystem defragment $MNT/foobar

  umount $MNT

So fix this by not decrementing last_byte by 1 before doing the sector
size round up. Also, to make it easier to follow, make the round up right
after computing last_byte.

Reported-by: Anthony Ruhier <aruhier@mailbox.org>
Fixes: 7b508037d4 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0a269612-e43f-da22-c5bc-b34b1b56ebe8@mailbox.org/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-19 18:16:34 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 36c86a9e1b btrfs: output more debug messages for uncommitted transaction
Print extra information about how many dirty bytes an uncommitted
has at the end of mount.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:27 +01:00
Filipe Manana c2f822635d btrfs: respect the max size in the header when activating swap file
If we extended the size of a swapfile after its header was created (by the
mkswap utility) and then try to activate it, we will map the entire file
when activating the swap file, instead of limiting to the max size defined
in the swap file's header.

Currently test case generic/643 from fstests fails because we do not
respect that size limit defined in the swap file's header.

So fix this by not mapping file ranges beyond the max size defined in the
swap header.

This is the same type of bug that iomap used to have, and was fixed in
commit 36ca7943ac ("mm/swap: consider max pages in
iomap_swapfile_add_extent").

Fixes: ed46ff3d42 ("Btrfs: support swap files")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:27 +01:00
Yang Li be8d1a2ab9 btrfs: fix argument list that the kdoc format and script verified
The warnings were found by running scripts/kernel-doc, which is
caused by using 'make W=1'.

fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Function parameter or member
'bio_ctrl' not described in 'btrfs_bio_add_page'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter 'bio'
description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter
'prev_bio_flags' description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Excess function parameter 'root'
description in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Function parameter or member
'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'

Note: this is fixing only the warnings regarding parameter list, the
first line is not strictly conforming to the kdoc format as the btrfs
codebase does not stick to that and keeps the first line more free form
(because it's only for internal use).

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:27 +01:00
Su Yue 4a9e803e5b btrfs: remove unnecessary parameter type from compression_decompress_bio
btrfs_decompress_bio, the only caller of compression_decompress_bio gets
type from @cb and passes it to compression_decompress_bio.
However, compression_decompress_bio can get compression type directly
from @cb.

So remove the parameter and access it through @cb.  No functional
change.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:27 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 856e47946c btrfs: selftests: dump extent io tree if extent-io-tree test failed
When code modifying extent-io-tree get modified and got that selftest
failed, it can take some time to pin down the cause.

To make it easier to expose the problem, dump the extent io tree if the
selftest failed.

This can save developers debug time, especially since the selftest we
can not use the trace events, thus have to manually add debug trace
points.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:27 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 2ae8ae3d3d btrfs: scrub: cleanup the argument list of scrub_stripe()
The argument list of btrfs_stripe() has similar problems of
scrub_chunk():

- Duplicated and ambiguous @base argument
  Can be fetched from btrfs_block_group::bg.

- Ambiguous argument @length
  It's again device extent length

- Ambiguous argument @num
  The instinctive guess would be mirror number, but in fact it's stripe
  index.

Fix it by:

- Remove @base parameter

- Rename @length to @dev_extent_len

- Rename @num to @stripe_index

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:27 +01:00
Qu Wenruo d04fbe19ae btrfs: scrub: cleanup the argument list of scrub_chunk()
The argument list of scrub_chunk() has the following problems:

- Duplicated @chunk_offset
  It is the same as btrfs_block_group::start.

- Confusing @length
  The most instinctive guess is chunk length, and one may want to delete
  it, but the truth is, it's the device extent length.

Fix this by:

- Remove @chunk_offset
  Use btrfs_block_group::start instead.

- Rename @length to @dev_extent_len
  Also rename the caller to remove the ambiguous naming.

- Rename @cache to @bg
  The "_cache" suffix for btrfs_block_group has been removed for a while.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo f26c923860 btrfs: remove reada infrastructure
Currently there is only one user for btrfs metadata readahead, and
that's scrub.

But even for the single user, it's not providing the correct
functionality it needs, as scrub needs reada for commit root, which
current readahead can't provide. (Although it's pretty easy to add such
feature).

Despite this, there are some extra problems related to metadata
readahead:

- Duplicated feature with btrfs_path::reada

- Partly duplicated feature of btrfs_fs_info::buffer_radix
  Btrfs already caches its metadata in buffer_radix, while readahead
  tries to read the tree block no matter if it's already cached.

- Poor layer separation
  Metadata readahead works kinda at device level.
  This is definitely not the correct layer it should be, since metadata
  is at btrfs logical address space, it should not bother device at all.

  This brings extra chance for bugs to sneak in, while brings
  unnecessary complexity.

- Dead code
  In the very beginning of scrub.c we have #undef DEBUG, rendering all
  the debug related code useless and unable to test.

Thus here I purpose to remove the metadata readahead mechanism
completely.

[BENCHMARK]
There is a full benchmark for the scrub performance difference using the
old btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_path::reada.

For the worst case (no dirty metadata, slow HDD), there could be a 5%
performance drop for scrub.
For other cases (even SATA SSD), there is no distinguishable performance
difference.

The number is reported scrub speed, in MiB/s.
The resolution is limited by the reported duration, which only has a
resolution of 1 second.

	Old		New		Diff
SSD	455.3		466.332		+2.42%
HDD	103.927 	98.012		-5.69%

Comprehensive test methodology is in the cover letter of the patch.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo dcf62b204c btrfs: scrub: use btrfs_path::reada for extent tree readahead
For scrub, we trigger two readaheads for two trees, extent tree to get
where to scrub, and csum tree to get the data checksum.

For csum tree we already trigger readahead in
btrfs_lookup_csums_range(), by setting path->reada.
But for extent tree we don't have any path based readahead.

Add the readahead for extent tree as well, so we can later remove the
btrfs_reada_add() based readahead.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 2522dbe86b btrfs: scrub: remove the unnecessary path parameter for scrub_raid56_parity()
In function scrub_stripe() we allocated two btrfs_path's, one @path for
extent tree search and another @ppath for full stripe extent tree search
for RAID56.

This is totally umncessary, as the @ppath usage is completely inside
scrub_raid56_parity(), thus we can move the path allocation into
scrub_raid56_parity() completely.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov c122799643 btrfs: refactor unlock_up
The purpose of this function is to unlock all nodes in a btrfs path
which are above 'lowest_unlock' and whose slot used is different than 0.
As such it used slightly awkward structure of 'if' as well as somewhat
cryptic "no_skip" control variable which denotes whether we should
check the current level of skipability or no.

This patch does the following (cosmetic) refactorings:

* Renames 'no_skip' to 'check_skip' and makes it a boolean. This
  variable controls whether we are below the lowest_unlock/skip_level
  levels.

* Consolidates the 2 conditions which warrant checking whether the
  current level should be skipped under 1 common if (check_skip) branch,
  this increase indentation level but is not critical.

* Consolidates the 'skip_level < i && i >= lowest_unlock' and
  'i >= lowest_unlock && i > skip_level' condition into a common branch
  since those are identical.

* Eliminates the local extent_buffer variable as in this case it doesn't
  bring anything to function readability.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Filipe Manana 1b58ae0e4d btrfs: skip transaction commit after failure to create subvolume
At ioctl.c:create_subvol(), when we fail to create a subvolume we always
commit the transaction. In most cases this is a no-op, since all the error
paths, except for one, abort the transaction - the only exception is when
we fail to insert the new root item into the root tree, in that case we
don't abort the transaction because we didn't do anything that is
irreversible - however we end up committing the transaction which although
is not a functional problem, it adds unnecessary rotation of the backup
roots in the superblock and unnecessary work.

So change that to commit a transaction only when no error happened,
otherwise just call btrfs_end_transaction() to release our reference on
the transaction.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Naohiro Aota 82187d2ecd btrfs: zoned: fix chunk allocation condition for zoned allocator
The ZNS specification defines a limit on the number of "active"
zones. That limit impose us to limit the number of block groups which
can be used for an allocation at the same time. Not to exceed the
limit, we reuse the existing active block groups as much as possible
when we can't activate any other zones without sacrificing an already
activated block group in commit a85f05e59b ("btrfs: zoned: avoid
chunk allocation if active block group has enough space").

However, the check is wrong in two ways. First, it checks the
condition for every raid index (ffe_ctl->index). Even if it reaches
the condition and "ffe_ctl->max_extent_size >=
ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size" is met, there can be other block groups
having enough space to hold ffe_ctl->num_bytes. (Actually, this won't
happen in the current zoned code as it only supports SINGLE
profile. But, it can happen once it enables other RAID types.)

Second, it checks the active zone availability depending on the
raid index. The raid index is just an index for
space_info->block_groups, so it has nothing to do with chunk allocation.

These mistakes are causing a faulty allocation in a certain
situation. Consider we are running zoned btrfs on a device whose
max_active_zone == 0 (no limit). And, suppose no block group have a
room to fit ffe_ctl->num_bytes but some room to meet
ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size (i.e. max_extent_size > num_bytes >=
min_alloc_size).

In this situation, the following occur:

- With SINGLE raid_index, it reaches the chunk allocation checking
  code
- The check returns true because we can activate a new zone (no limit)
- But, before allocating the chunk, it iterates to the next raid index
  (RAID5)
- Since there are no RAID5 block groups on zoned mode, it again
  reaches the check code
- The check returns false because of btrfs_can_activate_zone()'s "if
  (raid_index != BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE)" part
- That results in returning -ENOSPC without allocating a new chunk

As a result, we end up hitting -ENOSPC too early.

Move the check to the right place in the can_allocate_chunk() hook,
and do the active zone check depending on the allocation flag, not on
the raid index.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Naohiro Aota 50475cd577 btrfs: add extent allocator hook to decide to allocate chunk or not
Introduce a new hook for an extent allocator policy. With the new
hook, a policy can decide to allocate a new block group or not. If
not, it will return -ENOSPC, so btrfs_reserve_extent() will cut the
allocation size in half and retry the allocation if min_alloc_size is
large enough.

The hook has a place holder and will be replaced with the real
implementation in the next patch.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Naohiro Aota 1ada69f61c btrfs: zoned: unset dedicated block group on allocation failure
Allocating an extent from a block group can fail for various reasons.
When an allocation from a dedicated block group (for tree-log or
relocation data) fails, we need to unregister it as a dedicated one so
that we can allocate a new block group for the dedicated one.

However, we are returning early when the block group in case it is
read-only, fully used, or not be able to activate the zone. As a result,
we keep the non-usable block group as a dedicated one, leading to
further allocation failure. With many block groups, the allocator will
iterate hopeless loop to find a free extent, results in a hung task.

Fix the issue by delaying the return and doing the proper cleanups.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Johannes Thumshirn 7367271000 btrfs: zoned: drop redundant check for REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND and btrfs_is_zoned
REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND can only work on zoned devices, so it is redundant to
check if the filesystem is zoned when REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND is set as the
bio's bio_op.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Johannes Thumshirn 554aed7da2 btrfs: zoned: sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone
Sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone() so we don't need to do it
in all callers.

Also as btrfs_repair_one_zone() doesn't return a sensible error, make it
a boolean function and return false in case it got called on a non-zoned
filesystem and true on a zoned filesystem.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:26 +01:00
Johannes Thumshirn 8fdf54fe69 btrfs: zoned: simplify btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer
btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer() will always be called with a NULL
'cache_ret' argument.

As there's no need to check if we have a valid block_group passed in
remove these checks.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Johannes Thumshirn 869f4cdc73 btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation
Encapsulate the inode lock needed for serializing the data relocation
writes on a zoned filesystem into a helper.

This streamlines the code reading flow and hides special casing for
zoned filesystems.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Anand Jain a26d60dedf btrfs: sysfs: add devinfo/fsid to retrieve actual fsid from the device
In the case of the seed device, the fsid can be different from the mounted
sprout fsid.  The userland has to read the device superblock to know the
fsid but, that idea fails if the device is missing. So add a sysfs
interface devinfo/<devid>/fsid to show the fsid of the device.

For example:
  $ cd /sys/fs/btrfs/b10b02a5-f9de-4276-b9e8-2bfd09a578a8

  $ cat devinfo/1/fsid
  c44d771f-639d-4df3-99ec-5bc7ad2af93b
  $ cat  devinfo/3/fsid
  b10b02a5-f9de-4276-b9e8-2bfd09a578a8

Though it's related to seeding, the name of the sysfs file is plain fsid as it
matches what blkid says.  A path to the device's fsid will aid scripting.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Josef Bacik c18e323564 btrfs: reserve extra space for the free space tree
Filipe reported a problem where sometimes he'd get an ENOSPC abort when
running delayed refs with generic/619 and the free space tree enabled.
This is partly because we do not reserve space for modifying the free
space tree, nor do we have a block rsv associated with that tree.

The delayed_refs_rsv tracks the amount of space required to run delayed
refs.  This means 1 modification means 1 change to the extent root.
With the free space tree this turns into 2 changes, because modifying 1
extent means updating the extent tree and potentially updating the free
space tree to either remove that entry or add the free space.  Thus if
we have the FST enabled, simply double the reservation size for our
modification.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Josef Bacik 9506f95382 btrfs: include the free space tree in the global rsv minimum calculation
Filipe reported a problem where generic/619 was failing with an ENOSPC
abort while running delayed refs, like the following

  BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
  WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 522920 at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1049 add_to_free_space_tree+0xe5/0x110 [btrfs]
  CPU: 3 PID: 522920 Comm: kworker/u16:19 Tainted: G        W         5.16.0-rc2-btrfs-next-106 #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs]
  RIP: 0010:add_to_free_space_tree+0xe5/0x110 [btrfs]
  RSP: 0000:ffffa65087fb7b20 EFLAGS: 00010282
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9131eeaa RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  RBP: ffff8d62e26481b8 R08: ffffffff9ad97ce0 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000ffffffe4
  R13: ffff8d61c25fe688 R14: ffff8d61ebd88800 R15: ffff8d61ebd88a90
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d64ed400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007fa46a8b1000 CR3: 0000000148d18003 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __btrfs_free_extent+0x516/0x950 [btrfs]
   __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs]
   btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs]
   flush_space+0x403/0x630 [btrfs]
   ? call_rcu_tasks_generic+0x50/0x80
   ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0
   ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0xb5/0x290 [btrfs]
   ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
   btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x139/0x320 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x24c/0x5b0
   worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
   ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0
   kthread+0x17c/0x1a0
   ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

There's a couple of reasons for this, but in generic/619's case the
largest reason is because it is a very small file system, ad we do not
reserve enough space for the global reserve.

With the free space tree we now have the free space tree that we need to
modify when running delayed refs.  This means we need the global reserve
to take this into account when it calculates the minimum size it needs
to be.  This is especially important for very small file systems.

Fix this by adjusting the minimum global block rsv size math to include
the size of the free space tree when calculating the size.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Qu Wenruo c9d328c0c4 btrfs: scrub: merge SCRUB_PAGES_PER_RD_BIO and SCRUB_PAGES_PER_WR_BIO
These two values were introduced in commit ff023aac31 ("Btrfs: add code
to scrub to copy read data to another disk") as an optimization.

But the truth is, block layer scheduler can do whatever it wants to
merge/split bios to improve performance.

Doing such "optimization" is not really going to affect much, especially
considering how good current block layer optimizations are doing.
Remove such old and immature optimization from our code.

Since we're here, also change BUG_ON()s using these two macros to use
ASSERT()s.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 0bb3acdc48 btrfs: update SCRUB_MAX_PAGES_PER_BLOCK
Use BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE and SZ_4K (minimal sectorsize) to
calculate this value.

And remove one stale comment on the value, in fact with recent subpage
support, BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE * PAGE_SIZE is already beyond
BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, just we don't use the full page.

Also since we're here, update the BUG_ON() related to
SCRUB_MAX_PAGES_PER_BLOCK to ASSERT().

As those ASSERT() are really only for developers to catch early obvious
bugs, not to let end users suffer.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Josef Bacik 8697b8f88e btrfs: do not check -EAGAIN when truncating inodes in the log root
We only throttle the btrfs_truncate_inode_items if the root is
SHAREABLE, which isn't set on the log root, which means this loop is
unnecessary.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Josef Bacik e48dac7f6f btrfs: make should_throttle loop local in btrfs_truncate_inode_items
We reset this bool on every loop through the truncate loop, make this
variable local to the loop.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Josef Bacik 0adbc6190c btrfs: combine extra if statements in btrfs_truncate_inode_items
We have

    if (del_item)
	    // do something
    else
	    // something else
    if (del_item)
	    // do yet another thing
    else
	    // something else entirely

back to back in btrfs_truncate_inode_items, collapse these two sets of
if statements into one.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Josef Bacik 376b91d570 btrfs: convert BUG() for pending_del_nr into an ASSERT
This is a logic correctness check, convert it into an ASSERT() instead
of a BUG().

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Josef Bacik 56e1edb0e3 btrfs: convert BUG_ON() in btrfs_truncate_inode_items to ASSERT
We have a correctness BUG_ON() in btrfs_truncate_inode_items to make
sure that we're always using min_type == BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY if
new_size is > 0.  Convert this to an ASSERT.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:25 +01:00
Josef Bacik 71d18b5354 btrfs: add inode to truncate control
In the future we're going to want to use btrfs_truncate_inode_items
without looking up the associated inode.  In order to accommodate this
add the inode to btrfs_truncate_control and handle the case where
control->inode is NULL appropriately.  This is fairly straightforward,
we simply need to add a helper for the trace points, as the file extent
map update is controlled by a flag on btrfs_truncate_control.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:24 +01:00