[ Upstream commit 399ced9594dfab51b782798efe60a2376cd5b724 ]
When RCU-TASKS-TRACE pre-gp takes a snapshot of the current task running
on all online CPUs, no explicit ordering synchronizes properly with a
context switch. This lack of ordering can permit the new task to miss
pre-grace-period update-side accesses. The following diagram, courtesy
of Paul, shows the possible bad scenario:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
// Pre-GP update side access
WRITE_ONCE(*X, 1);
smp_mb();
r0 = rq->curr;
RCU_INIT_POINTER(rq->curr, TASK_B)
spin_unlock(rq)
rcu_read_lock_trace()
r1 = X;
/* ignore TASK_B */
Either r0==TASK_B or r1==1 is needed but neither is guaranteed.
One possible solution to solve this is to wait for an RCU grace period
at the beginning of the RCU-tasks-trace grace period before taking the
current tasks snaphot. However this would introduce large additional
latencies to RCU-tasks-trace grace periods.
Another solution is to lock the target runqueue while taking the current
task snapshot. This ensures that the update side sees the latest context
switch and subsequent context switches will see the pre-grace-period
update side accesses.
This commit therefore adds runqueue locking to cpu_curr_snapshot().
Fixes: e386b67257 ("rcu-tasks: Eliminate RCU Tasks Trace IPIs to online CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit ddae0ca2a8fe12d0e24ab10ba759c3fbd755ada8 upstream.
It was reported that in moving to 6.1, a larger then 10%
regression was seen in the performance of
clock_gettime(CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID,...).
Using a simple reproducer, I found:
5.10:
100000000 calls in 24345994193 ns => 243.460 ns per call
100000000 calls in 24288172050 ns => 242.882 ns per call
100000000 calls in 24289135225 ns => 242.891 ns per call
6.1:
100000000 calls in 28248646742 ns => 282.486 ns per call
100000000 calls in 28227055067 ns => 282.271 ns per call
100000000 calls in 28177471287 ns => 281.775 ns per call
The cause of this was finally narrowed down to the addition of
psi_account_irqtime() in update_rq_clock_task(), in commit
52b1364ba0 ("sched/psi: Add PSI_IRQ to track IRQ/SOFTIRQ
pressure").
In my initial attempt to resolve this, I leaned towards moving
all accounting work out of the clock_gettime() call path, but it
wasn't very pretty, so it will have to wait for a later deeper
rework. Instead, Peter shared this approach:
Rework psi_account_irqtime() to use its own psi_irq_time base
for accounting, and move it out of the hotpath, calling it
instead from sched_tick() and __schedule().
In testing this, we found the importance of ensuring
psi_account_irqtime() is run under the rq_lock, which Johannes
Weiner helpfully explained, so also add some lockdep annotations
to make that requirement clear.
With this change the performance is back in-line with 5.10:
6.1+fix:
100000000 calls in 24297324597 ns => 242.973 ns per call
100000000 calls in 24318869234 ns => 243.189 ns per call
100000000 calls in 24291564588 ns => 242.916 ns per call
Reported-by: Jimmy Shiu <jimmyshiu@google.com>
Originally-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240618215909.4099720-1-jstultz@google.com
Fixes: 52b1364ba0 ("sched/psi: Add PSI_IRQ to track IRQ/SOFTIRQ pressure")
[jstultz: Fixed up minor collisions w/ 6.6-stable]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2feab2492deb2f14f9675dd6388e9e2bf669c27a upstream.
This reverts commit b0defa7ae0.
b0defa7ae0 changed the load balancing logic to ignore env.max_loop if
all tasks examined to that point were pinned. The goal of the patch was
to make it more likely to be able to detach a task buried in a long list
of pinned tasks. However, this has the unfortunate side effect of
creating an O(n) iteration in detach_tasks(), as we now must fully
iterate every task on a cpu if all or most are pinned. Since this load
balance code is done with rq lock held, and often in softirq context, it
is very easy to trigger hard lockups. We observed such hard lockups with
a user who affined O(10k) threads to a single cpu.
When I discussed this with Vincent he initially suggested that we keep
the limit on the number of tasks to detach, but increase the number of
tasks we can search. However, after some back and forth on the mailing
list, he recommended we instead revert the original patch, as it seems
likely no one was actually getting hit by the original issue.
Fixes: b0defa7ae0 ("sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task")
Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620214450.316280-1-joshdon@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 49217ea147df7647cb89161b805c797487783fc0 ]
In the cgroup v2 CPU subsystem, assuming we have a
cgroup named 'test', and we set cpu.max and cpu.max.burst:
# echo 1000000 > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpu.max
# echo 1000000 > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpu.max.burst
then we check cpu.max and cpu.max.burst:
# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpu.max
1000000 100000
# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpu.max.burst
1000000
Next we set cpu.max again and check cpu.max and
cpu.max.burst:
# echo 2000000 > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpu.max
# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpu.max
2000000 100000
# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpu.max.burst
1000
... we find that the cpu.max.burst value changed unexpectedly.
In cpu_max_write(), the unit of the burst value returned
by tg_get_cfs_burst() is microseconds, while in cpu_max_write(),
the burst unit used for calculation should be nanoseconds,
which leads to the bug.
To fix it, get the burst value directly from tg->cfs_bandwidth.burst.
Fixes: f4183717b3 ("sched/fair: Introduce the burstable CFS controller")
Reported-by: Qixin Liao <liaoqixin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Cheng Yu <serein.chengyu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240424132438.514720-1-serein.chengyu@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a1fd0b9d751f840df23ef0e75b691fc00cfd4743 ]
Change relax_domain_level checks so that it would be possible
to include or exclude all domains from newidle balancing.
This matches the behavior described in the documentation:
-1 no request. use system default or follow request of others.
0 no search.
1 search siblings (hyperthreads in a core).
"2" enables levels 0 and 1, level_max excludes the last (level_max)
level, and level_max+1 includes all levels.
Fixes: 1d3504fcf5 ("sched, cpuset: customize sched domains, core")
Signed-off-by: Vitalii Bursov <vitaly@bursov.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bd6de28e80073c79466ec6401cdeae78f0d4423d.1714488502.git.vitaly@bursov.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit be3a51e68f2f1b17250ce40d8872c7645b7a2991 ]
root_domain::overutilized is only used for EAS(energy aware scheduler)
to decide whether to do load balance or not. It is not used if EAS
not possible.
Currently enqueue_task_fair and task_tick_fair accesses, sometime updates
this field. In update_sd_lb_stats it is updated often. This causes cache
contention due to true sharing and burns a lot of cycles. ::overload and
::overutilized are part of the same cacheline. Updating it often invalidates
the cacheline. That causes access to ::overload to slow down due to
false sharing. Hence add EAS check before accessing/updating this field.
EAS check is optimized at compile time or it is a static branch.
Hence it shouldn't cost much.
With the patch, both enqueue_task_fair and newidle_balance don't show
up as hot routines in perf profile.
6.8-rc4:
7.18% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] enqueue_task_fair
6.78% s [kernel.vmlinux] [k] newidle_balance
+patch:
0.14% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] enqueue_task_fair
0.00% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] newidle_balance
While at it: trace_sched_overutilized_tp expect that second argument to
be bool. So do a int to bool conversion for that.
Fixes: 2802bf3cd9 ("sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator")
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240307085725.444486-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 257bf89d84121280904800acd25cc2c444c717ae ]
housekeeping_setup() checks cpumask_intersects(present, online) to ensure
that the kernel will have at least one housekeeping CPU after smp_init(),
but this doesn't work if the maxcpus= kernel parameter limits the number of
processors available after bootup.
For example, a kernel with "maxcpus=2 nohz_full=0-2" parameters crashes at
boot time on a virtual machine with 4 CPUs.
Change housekeeping_setup() to use cpumask_first_and() and check that the
returned CPU number is valid and less than setup_max_cpus.
Another corner case is "nohz_full=0" on a machine with a single CPU or with
the maxcpus=1 kernel argument. In this case non_housekeeping_mask is empty
and tick_nohz_full_setup() makes no sense. And indeed, the kernel hits the
WARN_ON(tick_nohz_full_running) in tick_sched_do_timer().
And how should the kernel interpret the "nohz_full=" parameter? It should
be silently ignored, but currently cpulist_parse() happily returns the
empty cpumask and this leads to the same problem.
Change housekeeping_setup() to check cpumask_empty(non_housekeeping_mask)
and do nothing in this case.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240413141746.GA10008@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1560d1f6eb6b398bddd80c16676776c0325fe5fe ]
It was possible to have pick_eevdf() return NULL, which then causes a
NULL-deref. This turned out to be due to entity_eligible() returning
falsely negative because of a s64 multiplcation overflow.
Specifically, reweight_eevdf() computes the vlag without considering
the limit placed upon vlag as update_entity_lag() does, and then the
scaling multiplication (remember that weight is 20bit fixed point) can
overflow. This then leads to the new vruntime being weird which then
causes the above entity_eligible() to go side-ways and claim nothing
is eligible.
Thus limit the range of vlag accordingly.
All this was quite rare, but fatal when it does happen.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZhuYyrh3mweP_Kd8@nz.home/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+9S74ih+45M_2TPUY_mPPVDhNvyYfy1J1ftSix+KjiTVxg8nw@mail.gmail.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202401301012.2ed95df0-oliver.sang@intel.com/
Fixes: eab03c23c2a1 ("sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight")
Reported-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Igor Raits <igor@gooddata.com>
Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422082238.5784-1-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit afae8002b4fd3560c8f5f1567f3c3202c30a70fa ]
reweight_eevdf() only keeps V unchanged inside itself. When se !=
cfs_rq->curr, it would be dequeued from rb tree first. So that V is
changed and the result is wrong. Pass the original V to reweight_eevdf()
to fix this issue.
Fixes: eab03c23c2a1 ("sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight")
Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
[peterz: flip if() condition for clarity]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306022133.81008-3-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 11b1b8bc2b98e21ddf47e08b56c21502c685b2c3 ]
reweight_eevdf() needs the latest V to do accurate calculation for new
ve and vd. So update V unconditionally when se is runnable.
Fixes: eab03c23c2a1 ("sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight")
Suggested-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240306022133.81008-2-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit fe90f3967bdb3e13f133e5f44025e15f943a99c5 upstream.
Many architectures' switch_mm() (e.g. arm64) do not have an smp_mb()
which the core scheduler code has depended upon since commit:
commit 223baf9d17 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
If switch_mm() doesn't call smp_mb(), sched_mm_cid_remote_clear() can
unset the actively used cid when it fails to observe active task after it
sets lazy_put.
There *is* a memory barrier between storing to rq->curr and _return to
userspace_ (as required by membarrier), but the rseq mm_cid has stricter
requirements: the barrier needs to be issued between store to rq->curr
and switch_mm_cid(), which happens earlier than:
- spin_unlock(),
- switch_to().
So it's fine when the architecture switch_mm() happens to have that
barrier already, but less so when the architecture only provides the
full barrier in switch_to() or spin_unlock().
It is a bug in the rseq switch_mm_cid() implementation. All architectures
that don't have memory barriers in switch_mm(), but rather have the full
barrier either in finish_lock_switch() or switch_to() have them too late
for the needs of switch_mm_cid().
Introduce a new smp_mb__after_switch_mm(), defined as smp_mb() in the
generic barrier.h header, and use it in switch_mm_cid() for scheduler
transitions where switch_mm() is expected to provide a memory barrier.
Architectures can override smp_mb__after_switch_mm() if their
switch_mm() implementation provides an implicit memory barrier.
Override it with a no-op on x86 which implicitly provide this memory
barrier by writing to CR3.
Fixes: 223baf9d17 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
Reported-by: levi.yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> # for arm64
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> # for x86
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.4.x
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240415152114.59122-2-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 23d04d8c6b8ec339057264659b7834027f3e6a63 ]
When picking a CPU on task wakeup, select_idle_core() has to take
into account the scheduling domain where the function looks for the CPU.
This is because the "isolcpus" kernel command line option can remove CPUs
from the domain to isolate them from other SMT siblings.
This change replaces the set of CPUs allowed to run the task from
p->cpus_ptr by the intersection of p->cpus_ptr and sched_domain_span(sd)
which is stored in the 'cpus' argument provided by select_idle_cpu().
Fixes: 9fe1f127b9 ("sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()")
Signed-off-by: Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240110131707.437301-2-keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8aeaffef8c6eceab0e1498486fdd4f3dc3b7066c ]
When picking a CPU on task wakeup, select_idle_smt() has to take
into account the scheduling domain of @target. This is because the
"isolcpus" kernel command line option can remove CPUs from the domain to
isolate them from other SMT siblings.
This fix checks if the candidate CPU is in the target scheduling domain.
Commit:
df3cb4ea1f ("sched/fair: Fix wrong cpu selecting from isolated domain")
... originally introduced this fix by adding the check of the scheduling
domain in the loop.
However, commit:
3e6efe87cd ("sched/fair: Remove redundant check in select_idle_smt()")
... accidentally removed the check. Bring it back.
Fixes: 3e6efe87cd ("sched/fair: Remove redundant check in select_idle_smt()")
Signed-off-by: Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240110131707.437301-1-keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 079be8fc630943d9fc70a97807feb73d169ee3fc upstream.
The validation of the value written to sched_rt_period_us was broken
because:
- the sysclt_sched_rt_period is declared as unsigned int
- parsed by proc_do_intvec()
- the range is asserted after the value parsed by proc_do_intvec()
Because of this negative values written to the file were written into a
unsigned integer that were later on interpreted as large positive
integers which did passed the check:
if (sysclt_sched_rt_period <= 0)
return EINVAL;
This commit fixes the parsing by setting explicit range for both
perid_us and runtime_us into the sched_rt_sysctls table and processes
the values with proc_dointvec_minmax() instead.
Alternatively if we wanted to use full range of unsigned int for the
period value we would have to split the proc_handler and use
proc_douintvec() for it however even the
Documentation/scheduller/sched-rt-group.rst describes the range as 1 to
INT_MAX.
As far as I can tell the only problem this causes is that the sysctl
file allows writing negative values which when read back may confuse
userspace.
There is also a LTP test being submitted for these sysctl files at:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230901144433.2526-1-chrubis@suse.cz/
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115553.3007-2-chrubis@suse.cz
Cc: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 944d5fe50f3f03daacfea16300e656a1691c4a23 upstream.
On some systems, sys_membarrier can be very expensive, causing overall
slowdowns for everything. So put a lock on the path in order to
serialize the accesses to prevent the ability for this to be called at
too high of a frequency and saturate the machine.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Fixes: 22e4ebb975 ("membarrier: Provide expedited private command")
Fixes: c5f58bd58f ("membarrier: Provide GLOBAL_EXPEDITED command")
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 5068d84054b766efe7c6202fc71b2350d1c326f1 ]
Since reweight_entity() may have chance to change the weight of
cfs_rq->curr entity, we should also update_min_vruntime() if
this is the case
Fixes: eab03c23c2a1 ("sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight")
Signed-off-by: Yiwei Lin <s921975628@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231117080106.12890-1-s921975628@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6d7e4782bcf549221b4ccfffec2cf4d1a473f1a3 ]
should_we_balance is called for the decision to do load-balancing.
When sched ticks invoke this function, only one CPU should return
true. However, in the current code, two CPUs can return true. The
following situation, where b means busy and i means idle, is an
example, because CPU 0 and CPU 2 return true.
[0, 1] [2, 3]
b b i b
This fix checks if there exists an idle CPU with busy sibling(s)
after looking for a CPU on an idle core. If some idle CPUs with busy
siblings are found, just the first one should do load-balancing.
Fixes: b1bfeab9b0 ("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance")
Signed-off-by: Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231031133821.1570861-1-keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit eab03c23c2a162085b13200d7942fc5a00b5ccc8 ]
vruntime of the (on_rq && !0-lag) entity needs to be adjusted when
it gets re-weighted, and the calculations can be simplified based
on the fact that re-weight won't change the w-average of all the
entities. Please check the proofs in comments.
But adjusting vruntime can also cause position change in RB-tree
hence require re-queue to fix up which might be costly. This might
be avoided by deferring adjustment to the time the entity actually
leaves tree (dequeue/pick), but that will negatively affect task
selection and probably not good enough either.
Fixes: 147f3efaa2 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy")
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231107090510.71322-2-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 5ebde09d91707a4a9bec1e3d213e3c12ffde348f upstream.
Igor Raits and Bagas Sanjaya report a RQCF_ACT_SKIP leak warning.
This warning may be triggered in the following situations:
CPU0 CPU1
__schedule()
*rq->clock_update_flags <<= 1;* unregister_fair_sched_group()
pick_next_task_fair+0x4a/0x410 destroy_cfs_bandwidth()
newidle_balance+0x115/0x3e0 for_each_possible_cpu(i) *i=0*
rq_unpin_lock(this_rq, rf) __cfsb_csd_unthrottle()
raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq)
rq_lock(*CPU0_rq*, &rf)
rq_clock_start_loop_update()
rq->clock_update_flags & RQCF_ACT_SKIP <--
raw_spin_rq_lock(this_rq)
The purpose of RQCF_ACT_SKIP is to skip the update rq clock,
but the update is very early in __schedule(), but we clear
RQCF_*_SKIP very late, causing it to span that gap above
and triggering this warning.
In __schedule() we can clear the RQCF_*_SKIP flag immediately
after update_rq_clock() to avoid this RQCF_ACT_SKIP leak warning.
And set rq->clock_update_flags to RQCF_UPDATED to avoid
rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP warning that may be triggered later.
Fixes: ebb83d84e4 ("sched/core: Avoid multiple calling update_rq_clock() in __cfsb_csd_unthrottle()")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230913082424.73252-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com
Reported-by: Igor Raits <igor.raits@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a5dd536d-041a-2ce9-f4b7-64d8d85c86dc@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit f0498d2a54e7966ce23cd7c7ff42c64fa0059b07 ]
Kuyo reported sporadic failures on a sched_setaffinity() vs CPU
hotplug stress-test -- notably affine_move_task() remains stuck in
wait_for_completion(), leading to a hung-task detector warning.
Specifically, it was reported that stop_one_cpu_nowait(.fn =
migration_cpu_stop) returns false -- this stopper is responsible for
the matching complete().
The race scenario is:
CPU0 CPU1
// doing _cpu_down()
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr()
task_rq_lock();
takedown_cpu()
stop_machine_cpuslocked(take_cpu_down..)
<PREEMPT: cpu_stopper_thread()
MULTI_STOP_PREPARE
...
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked()
affine_move_task()
task_rq_unlock();
<PREEMPT: cpu_stopper_thread()\>
ack_state()
MULTI_STOP_RUN
take_cpu_down()
__cpu_disable();
stop_machine_park();
stopper->enabled = false;
/>
/>
stop_one_cpu_nowait(.fn = migration_cpu_stop);
if (stopper->enabled) // false!!!
That is, by doing stop_one_cpu_nowait() after dropping rq-lock, the
stopper thread gets a chance to preempt and allows the cpu-down for
the target CPU to complete.
OTOH, since stop_one_cpu_nowait() / cpu_stop_queue_work() needs to
issue a wakeup, it must not be ran under the scheduler locks.
Solve this apparent contradiction by keeping preemption disabled over
the unlock + queue_stopper combination:
preempt_disable();
task_rq_unlock(...);
if (!stop_pending)
stop_one_cpu_nowait(...)
preempt_enable();
This respects the lock ordering contraints while still avoiding the
above race. That is, if we find the CPU is online under rq-lock, the
targeted stop_one_cpu_nowait() must succeed.
Apply this pattern to all similar stop_one_cpu_nowait() invocations.
Fixes: 6d337eab04 ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()")
Reported-by: "Kuyo Chang (張建文)" <Kuyo.Chang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: "Kuyo Chang (張建文)" <Kuyo.Chang@mediatek.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231010200442.GA16515@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 23c9519def98ee0fa97ea5871535e9b136f522fc ]
find_energy_efficient_cpu() bails out early if effective util of the
task is 0 as the delta at this point will be zero and there's nothing
for EAS to do. When uclamp is being used, this could lead to wrong
decisions when uclamp_max is set to 0. In this case the task is capped
to performance point 0, but it is actually running and consuming energy
and we can benefit from EAS energy calculations.
Rework the condition so that it bails out when both util and uclamp_min
are 0.
We can do that without needing to use uclamp_task_util(); remove it.
Fixes: d81304bc61 ("sched/uclamp: Cater for uclamp in find_energy_efficient_cpu()'s early exit condition")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230916232955.2099394-3-qyousef@layalina.io
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6b00a40147653c8ea748e8f4396510f252763364 ]
When uclamp_max is being used, the util of the task could be higher than
the spare capacity of the CPU, but due to uclamp_max value we force-fit
it there.
The way the condition for checking for max_spare_cap in
find_energy_efficient_cpu() was constructed; it ignored any CPU that has
its spare_cap less than or _equal_ to max_spare_cap. Since we initialize
max_spare_cap to 0; this lead to never setting max_spare_cap_cpu and
hence ending up never performing compute_energy() for this cluster and
missing an opportunity for a better energy efficient placement to honour
uclamp_max setting.
max_spare_cap = 0;
cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu) - cpu_util(p); // 0 if cpu_util(p) is high
...
util_fits_cpu(...); // will return true if uclamp_max forces it to fit
...
// this logic will fail to update max_spare_cap_cpu if cpu_cap is 0
if (cpu_cap > max_spare_cap) {
max_spare_cap = cpu_cap;
max_spare_cap_cpu = cpu;
}
prev_spare_cap suffers from a similar problem.
Fix the logic by converting the variables into long and treating -1
value as 'not populated' instead of 0 which is a viable and correct
spare capacity value. We need to be careful signed comparison is used
when comparing with cpu_cap in one of the conditions.
Fixes: 1d42509e47 ("sched/fair: Make EAS wakeup placement consider uclamp restrictions")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230916232955.2099394-2-qyousef@layalina.io
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c0490bc9bb62d9376f3dd4ec28e03ca0fef97152 ]
We don't need to maintain per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list on !SMP, since
it's used for cfs_rq load tracking & balancing on SMP.
But sched debug interface uses it to print per-cfs_rq stats.
This patch fixes the !SMP version of cfs_rq_is_decayed(), so the
per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list is also maintained correctly on !SMP,
to fix the warning in assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq().
Fixes: 0a00a35464 ("sched/fair: Delete useless condition in tg_unthrottle_up()")
Reported-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZN87UsqkWcFLDxea@swlinux02/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913132031.2242151-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
The old pick_eevdf() could fail to find the actual earliest eligible
deadline when it descended to the right looking for min_deadline, but
it turned out that that min_deadline wasn't actually eligible. In that
case we need to go back and search through any left branches we
skipped looking for the actual best _eligible_ min_deadline.
This is more expensive, but still O(log n), and at worst should only
involve descending two branches of the rbtree.
I've run this through a userspace stress test (thank you
tools/lib/rbtree.c), so hopefully this implementation doesn't miss any
corner cases.
Fixes: 147f3efaa2 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy")
Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/xm261qego72d.fsf_-_@google.com
Marek and Biju reported instances of:
"EEVDF scheduling fail, picking leftmost"
which Mike correlated with cgroup scheduling and the min_deadline heap
getting corrupted; some trace output confirms:
> And yeah, min_deadline is hosed somehow:
>
> validate_cfs_rq: --- /
> __print_se: ffff88845cf48080 w: 1024 ve: -58857638 lag: 870381 vd: -55861854 vmd: -66302085 E (11372/tr)
> __print_se: ffff88810d165800 w: 25 ve: -80323686 lag: 22336429 vd: -41496434 vmd: -66302085 E (-1//autogroup-31)
> __print_se: ffff888108379000 w: 25 ve: 0 lag: -57987257 vd: 114632828 vmd: 114632828 N (-1//autogroup-33)
> validate_cfs_rq: min_deadline: -55861854 avg_vruntime: -62278313462 / 1074 = -57987256
Turns out that reweight_entity(), which tries really hard to be fast,
does not do the normal dequeue+update+enqueue pattern but *does* scale
the deadline.
However, it then fails to propagate the updated deadline value up the
heap.
Fixes: 147f3efaa2 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231006192445.GE743@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
When cpufreq's policy is 'single', there is a scenario that will
cause sg_policy's next_freq to be unable to update.
When the CPU's util is always max, the cpufreq will be max,
and then if we change the policy's scaling_max_freq to be a
lower freq, indeed, the sg_policy's next_freq need change to
be the lower freq, however, because the cpu_is_busy, the next_freq
would keep the max_freq.
For example:
The cpu7 is a single CPU:
unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy7 # while true;do done& [1] 4737
unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy7 # taskset -p 80 4737
pid 4737's current affinity mask: ff
pid 4737's new affinity mask: 80
unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy7 # cat scaling_max_freq
2301000
unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy7 # cat scaling_cur_freq
2301000
unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy7 # echo 2171000 > scaling_max_freq
unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy7 # cat scaling_max_freq
2171000
At this time, the sg_policy's next_freq would stay at 2301000, which
is wrong.
To fix this, add a check for the ->need_freq_update flag.
[ mingo: Clarified the changelog. ]
Co-developed-by: Guohua Yan <guohua.yan@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Guohua Yan <guohua.yan@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719130527.8074-1-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com
The expectation is that placing a task at avg_vruntime() makes it
eligible. Turns out there is a corner case where this is not the case.
Specifically, avg_vruntime() relies on the fact that integer division
is a flooring function (eg. it discards the remainder). By this
property the value returned is slightly left of the true average.
However! when the average is a negative (relative to min_vruntime) the
effect is flipped and it becomes a ceil, with the result that the
returned value is just right of the average and thus not eligible.
Fixes: af4cf40470 ("sched/fair: Add cfs_rq::avg_vruntime")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tasks that never consume their full slice would not update their slice value.
This means that tasks that are spawned before the sysctl scaling keep their
original (UP) slice length.
Fixes: 147f3efaa2 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230915124822.847197830@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
During RCU-boost testing with the TREE03 rcutorture config, I found that
after a few hours, the machine locks up.
On tracing, I found that there is a live lock happening between 2 CPUs.
One CPU has an RT task running, while another CPU is being offlined
which also has an RT task running. During this offlining, all threads
are migrated. The migration thread is repeatedly scheduled to migrate
actively running tasks on the CPU being offlined. This results in a live
lock because select_fallback_rq() keeps picking the CPU that an RT task
is already running on only to get pushed back to the CPU being offlined.
It is anyway pointless to pick CPUs for pushing tasks to if they are
being offlined only to get migrated away to somewhere else. This could
also add unwanted latency to this task.
Fix these issues by not selecting CPUs in RT if they are not 'active'
for scheduling, using the cpu_active_mask. Other parts in core.c already
use cpu_active_mask to prevent tasks from being put on CPUs going
offline.
With this fix I ran the tests for days and could not reproduce the
hang. Without the patch, I hit it in a few hours.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230923011409.3522762-1-joel@joelfernandes.org
Initial booting is setting the task flag to idle (PF_IDLE) by the call
path sched_init() -> init_idle(). Having the task idle and calling
call_rcu() in kernel/rcu/tiny.c means that TIF_NEED_RESCHED will be
set. Subsequent calls to any cond_resched() will enable IRQs,
potentially earlier than the IRQ setup has completed. Recent changes
have caused just this scenario and IRQs have been enabled early.
This causes a warning later in start_kernel() as interrupts are enabled
before they are fully set up.
Fix this issue by setting the PF_IDLE flag later in the boot sequence.
Although the boot task was marked as idle since (at least) d80e4fda576d,
I am not sure that it is wrong to do so. The forced context-switch on
idle task was introduced in the tiny_rcu update, so I'm going to claim
this fixes 5f6130fa52.
Fixes: 5f6130fa52 ("tiny_rcu: Directly force QS when call_rcu_[bh|sched]() on idle_task")
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAMuHMdWpvpWoDa=Ox-do92czYRvkok6_x6pYUH+ZouMcJbXy+Q@mail.gmail.com/
For SMT4, any group with more than 2 tasks will be marked as
group_smt_balance. Retain the behaviour of group_has_spare by marking
the busiest group as the group which has the least number of idle_cpus.
Also, handle rounding effect of adding (ncores_local + ncores_busy) when
the local is fully idle and busy group imbalance is less than 2 tasks.
Local group should try to pull at least 1 task in this case so imbalance
should be set to 2 instead.
Fixes: fee1759e4f ("sched/fair: Determine active load balance for SMT sched groups")
Acked-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6cd1633036bb6b651af575c32c2a9608a106702c.camel@linux.intel.com
should_we_balance() is called in load_balance() to find out if the CPU that
is trying to do the load balance is the right one or not.
With commit:
b1bfeab9b002("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance")
the code tries to find an idle core to do the load balancing
and falls back on an idle sibling CPU if there is no idle core.
However, on larger SMT systems, it could be needlessly iterating to find a
idle by scanning all the CPUs in an non-idle core. If the core is not idle,
and first SMT sibling which is idle has been found, then its not needed to
check other SMT siblings for idleness
Lets say in SMT4, Core0 has 0,2,4,6 and CPU0 is BUSY and rest are IDLE.
balancing domain is MC/DIE. CPU2 will be set as the first idle_smt and
same process would be repeated for CPU4 and CPU6 but this is unnecessary.
Since calling is_core_idle loops through all CPU's in the SMT mask, effect
is multiplied by weight of smt_mask. For example,when say 1 CPU is busy,
we would skip loop for 2 CPU's and skip iterating over 8CPU's. That
effect would be more in DIE/NUMA domain where there are more cores.
Testing and performance evaluation
==================================
The test has been done on this system which has 12 cores, i.e 24 small
cores with SMT=4:
lscpu
Architecture: ppc64le
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 96
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-95
Model name: POWER10 (architected), altivec supported
Thread(s) per core: 8
Used funclatency bcc tool to evaluate the time taken by should_we_balance(). For
base tip/sched/core the time taken is collected by making the
should_we_balance() noinline. time is in nanoseconds. The values are
collected by running the funclatency tracer for 60 seconds. values are
average of 3 such runs. This represents the expected reduced time with
patch.
tip/sched/core was at commit:
2f88c8e802 ("sched/eevdf/doc: Modify the documented knob to base_slice_ns as well")
Results:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
workload tip/sched/core with_patch(%gain)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
idle system 809.3 695.0(16.45)
stress ng – 12 threads -l 100 1013.5 893.1(13.49)
stress ng – 24 threads -l 100 1073.5 980.0(9.54)
stress ng – 48 threads -l 100 683.0 641.0(6.55)
stress ng – 96 threads -l 100 2421.0 2300(5.26)
stress ng – 96 threads -l 15 375.5 377.5(-0.53)
stress ng – 96 threads -l 25 635.5 637.5(-0.31)
stress ng – 96 threads -l 35 934.0 891.0(4.83)
Ran schbench(old), hackbench and stress_ng to evaluate the workload
performance between tip/sched/core and with patch.
No modification to tip/sched/core
TL;DR:
Good improvement is seen with schbench. when hackbench and stress_ng
runs for longer good improvement is seen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
schbench(old) tip +patch(%gain)
10 iterations sched/core
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Threads
50.0th: 8.00 9.00(-12.50)
75.0th: 9.60 9.00(6.25)
90.0th: 11.80 10.20(13.56)
95.0th: 12.60 10.40(17.46)
99.0th: 13.60 11.90(12.50)
99.5th: 14.10 12.60(10.64)
99.9th: 15.90 14.60(8.18)
2 Threads
50.0th: 9.90 9.20(7.07)
75.0th: 12.60 10.10(19.84)
90.0th: 15.50 12.00(22.58)
95.0th: 17.70 14.00(20.90)
99.0th: 21.20 16.90(20.28)
99.5th: 22.60 17.50(22.57)
99.9th: 30.40 19.40(36.18)
4 Threads
50.0th: 12.50 10.60(15.20)
75.0th: 15.30 12.00(21.57)
90.0th: 18.60 14.10(24.19)
95.0th: 21.30 16.20(23.94)
99.0th: 26.00 20.70(20.38)
99.5th: 27.60 22.50(18.48)
99.9th: 33.90 31.40(7.37)
8 Threads
50.0th: 16.30 14.30(12.27)
75.0th: 20.20 17.40(13.86)
90.0th: 24.50 21.90(10.61)
95.0th: 27.30 24.70(9.52)
99.0th: 35.00 31.20(10.86)
99.5th: 46.40 33.30(28.23)
99.9th: 89.30 57.50(35.61)
16 Threads
50.0th: 22.70 20.70(8.81)
75.0th: 30.10 27.40(8.97)
90.0th: 36.00 32.80(8.89)
95.0th: 39.60 36.40(8.08)
99.0th: 49.20 44.10(10.37)
99.5th: 64.90 50.50(22.19)
99.9th: 143.50 100.60(29.90)
32 Threads
50.0th: 34.60 35.50(-2.60)
75.0th: 48.20 50.50(-4.77)
90.0th: 59.20 62.40(-5.41)
95.0th: 65.20 69.00(-5.83)
99.0th: 80.40 83.80(-4.23)
99.5th: 102.10 98.90(3.13)
99.9th: 727.10 506.80(30.30)
schbench does improve in general. There is some run to run variation with
schbench. Did a validation run to confirm that trend is similar.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hackbench tip +patch(%gain)
20 iterations, 50000 loops sched/core
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Process 10 groups : 11.74 11.70(0.34)
Process 20 groups : 22.73 22.69(0.18)
Process 30 groups : 33.39 33.40(-0.03)
Process 40 groups : 43.73 43.61(0.27)
Process 50 groups : 53.82 54.35(-0.98)
Process 60 groups : 64.16 65.29(-1.76)
thread 10 Time : 12.81 12.79(0.16)
thread 20 Time : 24.63 24.47(0.65)
Process(Pipe) 10 Time : 6.40 6.34(0.94)
Process(Pipe) 20 Time : 10.62 10.63(-0.09)
Process(Pipe) 30 Time : 15.09 14.84(1.66)
Process(Pipe) 40 Time : 19.42 19.01(2.11)
Process(Pipe) 50 Time : 24.04 23.34(2.91)
Process(Pipe) 60 Time : 28.94 27.51(4.94)
thread(Pipe) 10 Time : 6.96 6.87(1.29)
thread(Pipe) 20 Time : 11.74 11.73(0.09)
hackbench shows slight improvement with pipe. Slight degradation in process.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
stress_ng tip +patch(%gain)
10 iterations 100000 cpu_ops sched/core
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--cpu=96 -util=100 Time taken : 5.30, 5.01(5.47)
--cpu=48 -util=100 Time taken : 7.94, 6.73(15.24)
--cpu=24 -util=100 Time taken : 11.67, 8.75(25.02)
--cpu=12 -util=100 Time taken : 15.71, 15.02(4.39)
--cpu=96 -util=10 Time taken : 22.71, 22.19(2.29)
--cpu=96 -util=20 Time taken : 12.14, 12.37(-1.89)
--cpu=96 -util=30 Time taken : 8.76, 8.86(-1.14)
--cpu=96 -util=40 Time taken : 7.13, 7.14(-0.14)
--cpu=96 -util=50 Time taken : 6.10, 6.13(-0.49)
--cpu=96 -util=60 Time taken : 5.42, 5.41(0.18)
--cpu=96 -util=70 Time taken : 4.94, 4.94(0.00)
--cpu=96 -util=80 Time taken : 4.56, 4.53(0.66)
--cpu=96 -util=90 Time taken : 4.27, 4.26(0.23)
Good improvement seen with 24 CPUs. In this case only one CPU is busy,
and no core is idle. Decent improvement with 100% utilization case. no
difference in other utilization.
Fixes: b1bfeab9b0 ("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance")
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230902081204.232218-1-sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The following commit deserves special mention:
22dc02f81c Revert "sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to header"
This is in x86/cleanups, because the revert is a re-application of a
number of cleanups that got removed inadvertedly.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=kiAA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'x86-cleanups-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull misc x86 cleanups from Ingo Molnar:
"The following commit deserves special mention:
22dc02f81c Revert "sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to header"
This is in x86/cleanups, because the revert is a re-application of a
number of cleanups that got removed inadvertedly"
[ This also effectively undoes the amd_check_microcode() microcode
declaration change I had done in my microcode loader merge in commit
42a7f6e3ff ("Merge tag 'x86_microcode_for_v6.6_rc1' [...]").
I picked the declaration change by Arnd from this branch instead,
which put it in <asm/processor.h> instead of <asm/microcode.h> like I
had done in my merge resolution - Linus ]
* tag 'x86-cleanups-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/platform/uv: Refactor code using deprecated strncpy() interface to use strscpy()
x86/hpet: Refactor code using deprecated strncpy() interface to use strscpy()
x86/platform/uv: Refactor code using deprecated strcpy()/strncpy() interfaces to use strscpy()
x86/qspinlock-paravirt: Fix missing-prototype warning
x86/paravirt: Silence unused native_pv_lock_init() function warning
x86/alternative: Add a __alt_reloc_selftest() prototype
x86/purgatory: Include header for warn() declaration
x86/asm: Avoid unneeded __div64_32 function definition
Revert "sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to header"
x86/apic: Hide unused safe_smp_processor_id() on 32-bit UP
x86/cpu: Fix amd_check_microcode() declaration
- The biggest change is introduction of a new iteration of the
SCHED_FAIR interactivity code: the EEVDF ("Earliest Eligible Virtual
Deadline First") scheduler.
EEVDF too is a virtual-time scheduler, with two parameters (weight
and relative deadline), compared to CFS that had weight only.
It completely reworks the base scheduler: placement, preemption,
picking -- everything.
LWN.net, as usual, has a terrific writeup about EEVDF:
https://lwn.net/Articles/925371/
Preemption (both tick and wakeup) is driven by testing against
a fresh pick. Because the tree is now effectively an interval
tree, and the selection is no longer the 'leftmost' task,
over-scheduling is less of a problem. A lot of the CFS
heuristics are removed or replaced by more natural latency-space
parameters & constructs.
In terms of expected performance regressions: we'll and can fix
everything where a 'good' workload misbehaves with the new scheduler,
but EEVDF inevitably changes workload scheduling in a binary fashion,
hopefully for the better in the overwhelming majority of cases,
but in some cases it won't, especially in adversarial loads that
got lucky with the previous code, such as some variants of hackbench.
We are trying hard to err on the side of fixing all performance
regressions, but we expect some inevitable post-release iterations
of that process.
- Improve load-balancing on hybrid x86 systems: enable cluster
scheduling (again).
- Improve & fix bandwidth-scheduling on nohz systems.
- Improve bandwidth-throttling.
- Use lock guards to simplify and de-goto-ify control flow.
- Misc improvements, cleanups and fixes.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=XtCD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'sched-core-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar:
- The biggest change is introduction of a new iteration of the
SCHED_FAIR interactivity code: the EEVDF ("Earliest Eligible Virtual
Deadline First") scheduler
EEVDF too is a virtual-time scheduler, with two parameters (weight
and relative deadline), compared to CFS that had weight only. It
completely reworks the base scheduler: placement, preemption, picking
-- everything
LWN.net, as usual, has a terrific writeup about EEVDF:
https://lwn.net/Articles/925371/
Preemption (both tick and wakeup) is driven by testing against a
fresh pick. Because the tree is now effectively an interval tree, and
the selection is no longer the 'leftmost' task, over-scheduling is
less of a problem. A lot of the CFS heuristics are removed or
replaced by more natural latency-space parameters & constructs
In terms of expected performance regressions: we will and can fix
everything where a 'good' workload misbehaves with the new scheduler,
but EEVDF inevitably changes workload scheduling in a binary fashion,
hopefully for the better in the overwhelming majority of cases, but
in some cases it won't, especially in adversarial loads that got
lucky with the previous code, such as some variants of hackbench. We
are trying hard to err on the side of fixing all performance
regressions, but we expect some inevitable post-release iterations of
that process
- Improve load-balancing on hybrid x86 systems: enable cluster
scheduling (again)
- Improve & fix bandwidth-scheduling on nohz systems
- Improve bandwidth-throttling
- Use lock guards to simplify and de-goto-ify control flow
- Misc improvements, cleanups and fixes
* tag 'sched-core-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (43 commits)
sched/eevdf/doc: Modify the documented knob to base_slice_ns as well
sched/eevdf: Curb wakeup-preemption
sched: Simplify sched_core_cpu_{starting,deactivate}()
sched: Simplify try_steal_cookie()
sched: Simplify sched_tick_remote()
sched: Simplify sched_exec()
sched: Simplify ttwu()
sched: Simplify wake_up_if_idle()
sched: Simplify: migrate_swap_stop()
sched: Simplify sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler()
sched: Simplify get_nohz_timer_target()
sched/rt: sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice show default timeslice after reset
sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value
sched/fair: Block nohz tick_stop when cfs bandwidth in use
sched, cgroup: Restore meaning to hierarchical_quota
MAINTAINERS: Add Peter explicitly to the psi section
sched/psi: Select KERNFS as needed
sched/topology: Align group flags when removing degenerate domain
sched/fair: remove util_est boosting
sched/fair: Propagate enqueue flags into place_entity()
...
Mike and others noticed that EEVDF does like to over-schedule quite a
bit -- which does hurt performance of a number of benchmarks /
workloads.
In particular, what seems to cause over-scheduling is that when lag is
of the same order (or larger) than the request / slice then placement
will not only cause the task to be placed left of current, but also
with a smaller deadline than current, which causes immediate
preemption.
[ notably, lag bounds are relative to HZ ]
Mike suggested we stick to picking 'current' for as long as it's
eligible to run, giving it uninterrupted runtime until it reaches
parity with the pack.
Augment Mike's suggestion by only allowing it to exhaust it's initial
request.
One random data point:
echo NO_RUN_TO_PARITY > /debug/sched/features
perf stat -a -e context-switches --repeat 10 -- perf bench sched messaging -g 20 -t -l 5000
3,723,554 context-switches ( +- 0.56% )
9.5136 +- 0.0394 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.41% )
echo RUN_TO_PARITY > /debug/sched/features
perf stat -a -e context-switches --repeat 10 -- perf bench sched messaging -g 20 -t -l 5000
2,556,535 context-switches ( +- 0.51% )
9.2427 +- 0.0302 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.33% )
Suggested-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230816134059.GC982867@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801211811.828443100@infradead.org
The sched_rr_timeslice can be reset to default by writing value that is
<= 0. However after reading from this file we always got the last value
written, which is not useful at all.
$ echo -1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms
-1
Fix this by setting the variable that holds the sysctl file value to the
jiffies_to_msecs(RR_TIMESLICE) in case that <= 0 value was written.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Tested-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802151906.25258-3-chrubis@suse.cz
There is a 10% rounding error in the intial value of the
sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice with CONFIG_HZ_300=y.
This was found with LTP test sched_rr_get_interval01:
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
What this test does is to compare the return value from the
sched_rr_get_interval() and the sched_rr_timeslice_ms sysctl file and
fails if they do not match.
The problem it found is the intial sysctl file value which was computed as:
static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
which works fine as long as MSEC_PER_SEC is multiple of HZ, however it
introduces 10% rounding error for CONFIG_HZ_300:
(MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (100 * HZ / 1000)
(1000 / 300) * (100 * 300 / 1000)
3 * 30 = 90
This can be easily fixed by reversing the order of the multiplication
and division. After this fix we get:
(MSEC_PER_SEC * (100 * HZ / 1000)) / HZ
(1000 * (100 * 300 / 1000)) / 300
(1000 * 30) / 300 = 100
Fixes: 975e155ed8 ("sched/rt: Show the 'sched_rr_timeslice' SCHED_RR timeslice tuning knob in milliseconds")
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Tested-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802151906.25258-2-chrubis@suse.cz
Frederic Weisbecker