DMA controller present on S700 SoC is compatible with the one on S900
(as most of registers are same), but it has different DMA descriptor
structure where registers "fcnt" and "ctrlb" uses different encoding.
For instance, on S900 "fcnt" starts at offset 0x0c and uses upper 12
bits whereas on S700, it starts at offset 0x1c and uses lower 12 bits.
This commit adds support for DMA controller present on S700.
Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595180527-11320-4-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
At the moment, Driver uses bit fields to describe registers of the DMA
descriptor structure that makes it less portable and maintainable, and
Andre suugested(and even sketched important bits for it) to make use of
array to describe this DMA descriptors instead. It gives the flexibility
while extending support for other platform such as Actions S700.
This commit removes the "owl_dma_lli_hw" (that includes bit-fields) and
uses array to describe DMA descriptor.
Suggested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595180527-11320-3-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
When the kernel is built with lockdep support and the owl-dma driver is
used, the following message is shown:
[ 2.496939] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[ 2.501889] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[ 2.507357] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 2.512834] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.6.3+ #15
[ 2.519084] Hardware name: Generic DT based system
[ 2.523878] Workqueue: events_freezable mmc_rescan
[ 2.528681] [<801127f0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010da58>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 2.536420] [<8010da58>] (show_stack) from [<8080fbe8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xe0)
[ 2.543645] [<8080fbe8>] (dump_stack) from [<8017efa4>] (register_lock_class+0x6f0/0x718)
[ 2.551816] [<8017efa4>] (register_lock_class) from [<8017b7d0>] (__lock_acquire+0x78/0x25f0)
[ 2.560330] [<8017b7d0>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8017e5e4>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x1f4)
[ 2.568159] [<8017e5e4>] (lock_acquire) from [<80831fb0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3c/0x50)
[ 2.576589] [<80831fb0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<8051b5fc>] (owl_dma_issue_pending+0xbc/0x120)
[ 2.585884] [<8051b5fc>] (owl_dma_issue_pending) from [<80668cbc>] (owl_mmc_request+0x1b0/0x390)
[ 2.594655] [<80668cbc>] (owl_mmc_request) from [<80650ce0>] (mmc_start_request+0x94/0xbc)
[ 2.602906] [<80650ce0>] (mmc_start_request) from [<80650ec0>] (mmc_wait_for_req+0x64/0xd0)
[ 2.611245] [<80650ec0>] (mmc_wait_for_req) from [<8065aa10>] (mmc_app_send_scr+0x10c/0x144)
[ 2.619669] [<8065aa10>] (mmc_app_send_scr) from [<80659b3c>] (mmc_sd_setup_card+0x4c/0x318)
[ 2.628092] [<80659b3c>] (mmc_sd_setup_card) from [<80659f0c>] (mmc_sd_init_card+0x104/0x430)
[ 2.636601] [<80659f0c>] (mmc_sd_init_card) from [<8065a3e0>] (mmc_attach_sd+0xcc/0x16c)
[ 2.644678] [<8065a3e0>] (mmc_attach_sd) from [<8065301c>] (mmc_rescan+0x3ac/0x40c)
[ 2.652332] [<8065301c>] (mmc_rescan) from [<80143244>] (process_one_work+0x2d8/0x780)
[ 2.660239] [<80143244>] (process_one_work) from [<80143730>] (worker_thread+0x44/0x598)
[ 2.668323] [<80143730>] (worker_thread) from [<8014b5f8>] (kthread+0x148/0x150)
[ 2.675708] [<8014b5f8>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
[ 2.682912] Exception stack(0xee8fdfb0 to 0xee8fdff8)
[ 2.687954] dfa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 2.696118] dfc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 2.704277] dfe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
The obvious fix would be to use 'spin_lock_init()' on 'pchan->lock'
before attempting to call 'spin_lock_irqsave()' in 'owl_dma_get_pchan()'.
However, according to Manivannan Sadhasivam, 'pchan->lock' was supposed
to only protect 'pchan->vchan' while 'od->lock' does a similar job in
'owl_dma_terminate_pchan()'.
Therefore, this patch substitutes 'pchan->lock' with 'od->lock' and
removes the 'lock' attribute in 'owl_dma_pchan' struct.
Fixes: 47e20577c2 ("dmaengine: Add Actions Semi Owl family S900 DMA driver")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c6e6cdaca252b5364bd294093673951036488cf0.1588439073.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Originally freeing descriptors was split into a locked and an unlocked
part. The locked part in vchan_get_all_descriptors() collected all
descriptors on a separate list_head. This was done to allow iterating
over that new list in vchan_dma_desc_free_list() without a lock held.
This became broken in 13bb26ae88 ("dmaengine: virt-dma: don't always
free descriptor upon completion"). With this commit
vchan_dma_desc_free_list() no longer exclusively operates on the
separate list, but starts to put descriptors which can be reused back on
&vc->desc_allocated. This list operation should have been locked, but
wasn't.
In the mean time drivers started to call vchan_dma_desc_free_list() with
their lock held so that we now have the situation that
vchan_dma_desc_free_list() is called locked from some drivers and
unlocked from others.
To clean this up we have to do two things:
1. Add missing locking in vchan_dma_desc_free_list()
2. Make sure drivers call vchan_dma_desc_free_list() unlocked
This needs to be done atomically, so in this patch the locking is added
and all drivers are fixed.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Tested-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com>
Tested-by: Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191216105328.15198-3-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Simplify this function implementation by using a known wrapper function.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d36b6a6c-2e3d-8d68-6ddc-969a377ca3b2@web.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Following warnings are generated when compiled with W=1,
drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:170: warning: Function parameter or member 'cyclic'
not described in 'owl_dma_txd'
drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:198: warning: Function parameter or member 'cfg' not
described in 'owl_dma_vchan'
drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:198: warning: Function parameter or member 'drq' not
described in 'owl_dma_vchan'
drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:225: warning: Function parameter or member 'irq' not
described in 'owl_dma'
Fix this by adding comments for relevant struct members to appear in
kernel-doc.
Fixes: d64e1b3f5c ("dmaengine: owl: Add Slave and Cyclic mode support for
Actions Semi Owl S900 SoC")
Reported-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Add Slave and Cyclic mode support for Actions Semi Owl S900 SoC. The slave
mode supports bus width of 4 bytes common for all peripherals and 1 byte
specific for UART.
The cyclic mode supports only block mode transfer.
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Amit Singh Tomar