Between btrfs_allocerved_file_extent() and
btrfs_add_delayed_qgroup_reserve(), there is a window that delayed_refs
are run and delayed ref head maybe freed before
btrfs_add_delayed_qgroup_reserve().
This will cause btrfs_dad_delayed_qgroup_reserve() to return -ENOENT,
and cause transaction to be aborted.
This patch will record qgroup reserve space info into delayed_ref_head
at btrfs_add_delayed_ref(), to eliminate the race window.
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Similar to the 'limit' filter, we can enhance the 'usage' filter to
accept a range. The change is backward compatible, the range is applied
only in connection with the BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE flag.
We don't have a usecase yet, the current syntax has been sufficient. The
enhancement should provide parity with other range-like filters.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Balance block groups which have the given number of stripes, defined by
a range min..max. This is useful to selectively rebalance only chunks
that do not span enough devices, applies to RAID0/10/5/6.
Signed-off-by: Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson <gabriel@system.is>
[ renamed bargs members, added to the UAPI, wrote the changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The 'limit' filter is underdesigned, it should have been a range for
[min,max], with some relaxed semantics when one of the bounds is
missing. Besides that, using a full u64 for a single value is a waste of
bytes.
Let's fix both by extending the use of the u64 bytes for the [min,max]
range. This can be done in a backward compatible way, the range will be
interpreted only if the appropriate flag is set
(BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE).
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
In the kernel 4.2 merge window we had a big changes to the implementation
of delayed references and qgroups which made the no_quota field of delayed
references not used anymore. More specifically the no_quota field is not
used anymore as of:
commit 0ed4792af0 ("btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented qgroup mechanism.")
Leaving the no_quota field actually prevents delayed references from
getting merged, which in turn cause the following BUG_ON(), at
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c, to be hit when qgroups are enabled:
static int run_delayed_tree_ref(...)
{
(...)
BUG_ON(node->ref_mod != 1);
(...)
}
This happens on a scenario like the following:
1) Ref1 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 1, added.
2) Ref2 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 0, added.
It's not merged with Ref1 because Ref1->no_quota != Ref2->no_quota.
3) Ref3 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 1, added.
It's not merged with the reference at the tail of the list of refs
for bytenr X because the reference at the tail, Ref2 is incompatible
due to Ref2->no_quota != Ref3->no_quota.
4) Ref4 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 0, added.
It's not merged with the reference at the tail of the list of refs
for bytenr X because the reference at the tail, Ref3 is incompatible
due to Ref3->no_quota != Ref4->no_quota.
5) We run delayed references, trigger merging of delayed references,
through __btrfs_run_delayed_refs() -> btrfs_merge_delayed_refs().
6) Ref1 and Ref3 are merged as Ref1->no_quota = Ref3->no_quota and
all other conditions are satisfied too. So Ref1 gets a ref_mod
value of 2.
7) Ref2 and Ref4 are merged as Ref2->no_quota = Ref4->no_quota and
all other conditions are satisfied too. So Ref2 gets a ref_mod
value of 2.
8) Ref1 and Ref2 aren't merged, because they have different values
for their no_quota field.
9) Delayed reference Ref1 is picked for running (select_delayed_ref()
always prefers references with an action == BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF).
So run_delayed_tree_ref() is called for Ref1 which triggers the
BUG_ON because Ref1->red_mod != 1 (equals 2).
So fix this by removing the no_quota field, as it's not used anymore as
of commit 0ed4792af0 ("btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented
qgroup mechanism.").
The use of no_quota was also buggy in at least two places:
1) At delayed-refs.c:btrfs_add_delayed_tree_ref() - we were setting
no_quota to 0 instead of 1 when the following condition was true:
is_fstree(ref_root) || !fs_info->quota_enabled
2) At extent-tree.c:__btrfs_inc_extent_ref() - we were attempting to
reset a node's no_quota when the condition "!is_fstree(root_objectid)
|| !root->fs_info->quota_enabled" was true but we did it only in
an unused local stack variable, that is, we never reset the no_quota
value in the node itself.
This fixes the remainder of problems several people have been having when
running delayed references, mostly while a balance is running in parallel,
on a 4.2+ kernel.
Very special thanks to Stéphane Lesimple for helping debugging this issue
and testing this fix on his multi terabyte filesystem (which took more
than one day to balance alone, plus fsck, etc).
Also, this fixes deadlock issue when using the clone ioctl with qgroups
enabled, as reported by Elias Probst in the mailing list. The deadlock
happens because after calling btrfs_insert_empty_item we have our path
holding a write lock on a leaf of the fs/subvol tree and then before
releasing the path we called check_ref() which did backref walking, when
qgroups are enabled, and tried to read lock the same leaf. The trace for
this case is the following:
INFO: task systemd-nspawn:6095 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
(...)
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff86999201>] schedule+0x74/0x83
[<ffffffff863ef64c>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xc0/0xea
[<ffffffff86137ed7>] ? wait_woken+0x74/0x74
[<ffffffff8639f0a7>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x51a/0x810
[<ffffffff863a129b>] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0xdf/0x3ce
[<ffffffff86413a00>] ? ulist_add_merge+0x1b/0x127
[<ffffffff86411688>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x62a/0x667
[<ffffffff863ef546>] ? btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw+0x78/0xbe
[<ffffffff864122d3>] find_parent_nodes+0xaf3/0xfc6
[<ffffffff86412838>] __btrfs_find_all_roots+0x92/0xf0
[<ffffffff864128f2>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x45/0x65
[<ffffffff8639a75b>] ? btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq+0x2b/0x88
[<ffffffff863e852e>] check_ref+0x64/0xc4
[<ffffffff863e9e01>] btrfs_clone+0x66e/0xb5d
[<ffffffff863ea77f>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x48f/0x5bb
[<ffffffff86048a68>] ? native_sched_clock+0x28/0x77
[<ffffffff863ed9b0>] btrfs_ioctl+0xabc/0x25cb
(...)
The problem goes away by eleminating check_ref(), which no longer is
needed as its purpose was to get a value for the no_quota field of
a delayed reference (this patch removes the no_quota field as mentioned
earlier).
Reported-by: Stéphane Lesimple <stephane_btrfs@lesimple.fr>
Tested-by: Stéphane Lesimple <stephane_btrfs@lesimple.fr>
Reported-by: Elias Probst <mail@eliasprobst.eu>
Reported-by: Peter Becker <floyd.net@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Malte Schröder <malte@tnxip.de>
Reported-by: Derek Dongray <derek@valedon.co.uk>
Reported-by: Erkki Seppala <flux-btrfs@inside.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.2+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
If we are extremely fragmented then we won't be able to create a free_cluster.
So if this happens set last_ptr->fragmented so that all future allcations will
give up trying to create a cluster. When we unpin extents we will unset
->fragmented if we free up a sufficient amount of space in a block group.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When we are heavily fragmented we can induce a lot of latency trying to make an
allocation happen that is simply not going to happen. Thankfully we keep track
of our max_extent_size when going through the allocator, so if we get to the
point where we are exiting find_free_extent with ENOSPC then set our
space_info->max_extent_size so we can keep future allocations from having to pay
this cost. We reset the max_extent_size whenever we release pinned bytes back
into this space info so we can redo all the work. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
In tracking down these weird bitmap problems it was helpful to artificially
create an extremely fragmented file system. These mount options let us either
fragment data or metadata or both. With these options I could reproduce all
sorts of weird latencies and hangs that occur under extreme fragmentation and
get them fixed. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
In clear_bit_hook, qgroup reserved data is already handled quite well,
either released by finish_ordered_io or invalidatepage.
So calling btrfs_qgroup_free_data() here is completely meaningless, and
since btrfs_qgroup_free_data() will lock io_tree, so it can't be called
with io_tree lock hold.
This patch will add a new function
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota() for clear_bit_hook() to cease
the lockdep warning.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cleanup the old facilities which use old btrfs_qgroup_reserve() function
call, replace them with the newer version, and remove the "__" prefix in
them.
Also, make btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free() functions private, as they are
now only used inside qgroup codes.
Now, the whole btrfs qgroup is swithed to use the new reserve facilities.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Add new version of btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() and
btrfs_delalloc_release_space() functions, which supports accurate qgroup
reserve.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Add new functions __btrfs_check_data_free_space() and
__btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() to work with new accurate qgroup
reserved space framework.
The new function will replace old btrfs_check_data_free_space() and
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() respectively, but until all the change
is done, let's just use the new name.
Also, export internal use function btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand(), as
now qgroup reserve requires precious bytes, some operation can't get the
accurate number in advance(like fallocate).
But data space info check and data chunk allocate doesn't need to be
that accurate, and can be called at the beginning.
So export it for later operations.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Due to the missing variants there are messages that lack the information
printed by btrfs_info etc helpers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing
and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together.
And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely
named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other
is to log the error, so don't closely name them.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The code using 'ordered_extent_flush_mutex' mutex has removed by below
commit.
- 8d875f95da
btrfs: disable strict file flushes for renames and truncates
But the mutex still lives in struct 'btrfs_fs_info'.
So, this patch removes the mutex from struct 'btrfs_fs_info' and its
initialization code.
Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup
and make kernel stack happy.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
More than one code call set_block_group_ro() and restore rw in fail.
Old code use bool bit to save blockgroup's ro state, it can not
support parallel case(it is confirmd exist in my debug log).
This patch use ref count to store ro state, and rename
set_block_group_ro/set_block_group_rw
to
inc_block_group_ro/dec_block_group_ro.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When we clear the dirty bits in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs for extents
in the empty block group, it results in btrfs_finish_extent_commit being
unable to discard the freed extents.
The block group removal patch added an alternate path to forget extents
other than btrfs_finish_extent_commit. As a result, any extents that
would be freed when the block group is removed aren't discarded. In my
test run, with a large copy of mixed sized files followed by removal, it
left nearly 2/3 of extents undiscarded.
To clean up the block groups, we add the removed block group onto a list
that will be discarded after transaction commit.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
lockdep report following warning in test:
[25176.843958] =================================
[25176.844519] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[25176.845047] 4.1.0-rc3 #22 Tainted: G W
[25176.845591] ---------------------------------
[25176.846153] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
[25176.846713] fsstress/26661 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[25176.847246] (&wr_ctx->wr_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa04cdc6d>] scrub_free_ctx+0x2d/0xf0 [btrfs]
[25176.847838] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[25176.848396] [<ffffffff810bf460>] __lock_acquire+0x6a0/0xe10
[25176.848955] [<ffffffff810bfd1e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0
[25176.849491] [<ffffffff816489af>] mutex_lock_nested+0x7f/0x410
[25176.850029] [<ffffffffa04d04ff>] scrub_stripe+0x4df/0x1080 [btrfs]
[25176.850575] [<ffffffffa04d11b1>] scrub_chunk.isra.19+0x111/0x130 [btrfs]
[25176.851110] [<ffffffffa04d144c>] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x27c/0x510 [btrfs]
[25176.851660] [<ffffffffa04d3b87>] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x1c7/0x6c0 [btrfs]
[25176.852189] [<ffffffffa04e918e>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x36e/0x450 [btrfs]
[25176.852771] [<ffffffffa04a98e0>] btrfs_ioctl+0x1e10/0x2d20 [btrfs]
[25176.853315] [<ffffffff8121c5b8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x318/0x570
[25176.853868] [<ffffffff8121c851>] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x80
[25176.854406] [<ffffffff8164da17>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[25176.854935] irq event stamp: 51506
[25176.855511] hardirqs last enabled at (51506): [<ffffffff810d4ce5>] vprintk_emit+0x225/0x5e0
[25176.856059] hardirqs last disabled at (51505): [<ffffffff810d4b77>] vprintk_emit+0xb7/0x5e0
[25176.856642] softirqs last enabled at (50886): [<ffffffff81067a23>] __do_softirq+0x363/0x640
[25176.857184] softirqs last disabled at (50949): [<ffffffff8106804d>] irq_exit+0x10d/0x120
[25176.857746]
other info that might help us debug this:
[25176.858845] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[25176.859981] CPU0
[25176.860537] ----
[25176.861059] lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
[25176.861705] <Interrupt>
[25176.862272] lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
[25176.862881]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Reason:
Above warning is caused by:
Interrupt
-> bio_endio()
-> ...
-> scrub_put_ctx()
-> scrub_free_ctx() *1
-> ...
-> mutex_lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
scrub_put_ctx() is allowed to be called in end_bio interrupt, but
in code design, it will never call scrub_free_ctx(sctx) in interrupe
context(above *1), because btrfs_scrub_dev() get one additional
reference of sctx->refs, which makes scrub_free_ctx() only called
withine btrfs_scrub_dev().
Now the code runs out of our wish, because free sequence in
scrub_pending_bio_dec() have a gap.
Current code:
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
scrub_pending_bio_dec() | btrfs_scrub_dev
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
wake_up(&sctx->list_wait); |
| scrub_put_ctx()
| -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
scrub_put_ctx(sctx); |
-> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
-> scrub_free_ctx() |
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
We expected:
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
scrub_pending_bio_dec() | btrfs_scrub_dev
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
wake_up(&sctx->list_wait); |
scrub_put_ctx(sctx); |
-> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
| scrub_put_ctx()
| -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
| -> scrub_free_ctx()
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Fix:
Move scrub_pending_bio_dec() to a workqueue, to avoid this function run
in interrupt context.
Tested by check tracelog in debug.
Changelog v1->v2:
Use workqueue instead of adjust function call sequence in v1,
because v1 will introduce a bug pointed out by:
Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When allocating a new chunk or removing one we need to update num_devs
device items and insert or remove a chunk item in the chunk tree, so
in the worst case the space needed in the chunk space_info is:
btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(chunk_root, num_devs) +
btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(chunk_root, 1)
That is, in the worst case we need to cow num_devs paths and cow 1 other
path that can result in splitting every node and leaf, and each path
consisting of BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 nodes and 1 leaf. We were requiring
some additional chunk_root->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * num_devs bytes,
which were unnecessary since updating the existing device items does
not result in splitting the nodes and leaf since after updating them
they remain with the same size.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Unlike when attempting to allocate a new block group, where we check
that we have enough space in the system space_info to update the device
items and insert a new chunk item in the chunk tree, we were not checking
if the system space_info had enough space for updating the device items
and deleting the chunk item in the chunk tree. This often lead to -ENOSPC
error when attempting to allocate blocks for the chunk tree (during btree
node/leaf COW operations) while updating the device items or deleting the
chunk item, which resulted in the current transaction being aborted and
turning the filesystem into read-only mode.
While running fstests generic/038, which stresses allocation of block
groups and removal of unused block groups, with a large scratch device
(750Gb) this happened often, despite more than enough unallocated space,
and resulted in the following trace:
[68663.586604] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1521 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
[68663.600407] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[68663.730829] Call Trace:
[68663.732585] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[68663.734334] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[68663.739980] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[68663.757153] [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[68663.760925] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[68663.762854] [<ffffffffa03b159d>] ? btrfs_update_device+0x15a/0x16c [btrfs]
[68663.764073] [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[68663.765130] [<ffffffffa03b3638>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0x597/0x5ee [btrfs]
[68663.765998] [<ffffffffa0384663>] ? btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x245/0x296 [btrfs]
[68663.767068] [<ffffffffa0384676>] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x258/0x296 [btrfs]
[68663.768227] [<ffffffff8143527f>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x4c
[68663.769081] [<ffffffffa038b109>] cleaner_kthread+0x13d/0x16c [btrfs]
[68663.799485] [<ffffffffa038afcc>] ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x28/0x28 [btrfs]
[68663.809208] [<ffffffff8105f367>] kthread+0xef/0xf7
[68663.828795] [<ffffffff810e603f>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
[68663.844942] [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
[68663.846486] [<ffffffff81435a88>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[68663.847760] [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
[68663.849503] ---[ end trace 798477c6d6dbaad6 ]---
[68663.850525] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in btrfs_remove_chunk:2652: errno=-28 No space left
So fix this by verifying that enough space exists in system space_info,
and reserving the space in the chunk block reserve, before attempting to
delete the block group and allocate a new system chunk if we don't have
enough space to perform the necessary updates and delete in the chunk
tree. Like for the block group creation case, we don't error our if we
fail to allocate a new system chunk, since we might end up not needing
it (no node/leaf splits happen during the COW operations and/or we end
up not needing to COW any btree nodes or leafs because they were already
COWed in the current transaction and their writeback didn't start yet).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
While creating a block group, we often end up getting ENOSPC while updating
the chunk tree, which leads to a transaction abortion that produces a trace
like the following:
[30670.116368] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 20735 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]()
[30670.117777] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[30670.163567] Call Trace:
[30670.163906] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[30670.164522] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[30670.165171] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[30670.166323] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.167213] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[30670.167862] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.169116] [<ffffffffa03743d7>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs]
[30670.170593] [<ffffffffa038426a>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
[30670.171960] [<ffffffffa038455c>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[30670.174649] [<ffffffffa036eb6b>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
[30670.176092] [<ffffffffa039450d>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c8/0xb96 [btrfs]
[30670.177218] [<ffffffff812459f2>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[30670.178622] [<ffffffff81152447>] vfs_fallocate+0x14c/0x1de
[30670.179642] [<ffffffff8116b915>] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x4f
[30670.180692] [<ffffffff81152863>] SyS_fallocate+0x47/0x62
[30670.186737] [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[30670.187792] ---[ end trace 0373e6b491c4a8cc ]---
This is because we don't do proper space reservation for the chunk block
reserve when we have multiple tasks allocating chunks in parallel.
So block group creation has 2 phases, and the first phase essentially
checks if there is enough space in the system space_info, allocating a
new system chunk if there isn't, while the second phase updates the
device, extent and chunk trees. However, because the updates to the
chunk tree happen in the second phase, if we have N tasks, each with
its own transaction handle, allocating new chunks in parallel and if
there is only enough space in the system space_info to allocate M chunks,
where M < N, none of the tasks ends up allocating a new system chunk in
the first phase and N - M tasks will get -ENOSPC when attempting to
update the chunk tree in phase 2 if they need to COW any nodes/leafs
from the chunk tree.
Fix this by doing proper reservation in the chunk block reserve.
The issue could be reproduced by running fstests generic/038 in a loop,
which eventually triggered the problem.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Old csum type check is wrong and can't catch csum_type 1(not supported).
Fix it to avoid hostile 0 division.
Reported-by: Lukas Lueg <lukas.lueg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The annotated functios will be placed into .text.unlikely section. The
annotation also hints compiler to move the code out of the hot paths,
and may implicitly mark if-statement leading to that block as unlikely.
This is a heuristic, the impact on the generated code is not
significant.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
WARN is called from a single location and all bugreports say that's in
super.c __btrfs_abort_transaction. This is slightly confusing as we'd
rather want to know the exact callsite. Whereas this information is
printed in the syslog below the stacktrace, this requires further look
and we usually see only the headline from WARNING.
Moving the WARN into the macro has to inline some code and increases
code by a few kilobytes:
text data bss dec hex filename
835481 20305 14120 869906 d4612 btrfs.ko.before
842883 20305 14120 877308 d62fc btrfs.ko.after
The delta is +7k (130+ calls), measured on 3.19 x86_64, distro config.
The increase is not small and could lead to worse icache use. The code
is on error/exit paths that can be recognized by compiler as cold and
moved out of the way so the impact is speculated to be low, if
measurable at all.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This patch will provide a framework and help to create attributes
from the structure btrfs_fs_devices which are available even before
fs_info is created. So by moving the parent kobject super_kobj from
fs_info to btrfs_fs_devices, it will help to create attributes
from the btrfs_fs_devices as well.
Patches on top of this patch now will be able to create the
sys/fs/btrfs/fsid kobject and attributes from btrfs_fs_devices
when devices are scanned and registered to the kernel.
Just to note, this does not change any of the existing btrfs sysfs
external kobject names and its attributes and not even the life
cycle of them. Changes are internal only. And to ensure the same,
this path has been tested with various device operations and,
checking and comparing the sysfs kobjects and attributes with
sysfs kobject and attributes with out this patch, and they remain
same.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Btrfs will create qgroup on subvolume creation if quota is enabled, but
qgroup uses the high bits(currently 16 bits) as level, to build the
inheritance.
However it is fully possible a subvolume can be created with a
subvolumeid larger than 1 << BTRFS_QGROUP_LEVEL_SHIFT, so it will be
considered as level 1 and can't be assigned to other qgroup in level 1.
This patch will prevent such things so qgroup inheritance will not be
screwed up.
The downside is very clear, btrfs subvolume number limit will decrease
from (u64 max - 256(fisrt free objectid) - 256(last free objectid)) to
(u48 max -256(first free objectid)).
But we still have near u48(that's 15 digits in dec), so that should not
be a huge problem.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Although we have qgroup level check in btrfs-progs, it's not enough
since other programe may still call ioctl directly not using
btrfs-progs. For example, systemd.
But it's btrfs-progs to be blame since we don't provide a
full-function(like subvolume create things) btrfs library with enough
check, and only rely on kernel ioctl.
So Add level checks in kernel too.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
There are two problems in qgroup:
a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K,
qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup
is not available to user.
b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it,
it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup.
The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes
rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about
the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the
data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to
write and release it in transaction committed.
In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in
btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account
when the data is written in commit_transaction().
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Steps to reproduce:
while true; do
dd if=/dev/zero of=/btrfs_dir/file count=[fs_size * 75%]
rm /btrfs_dir/file
sync
done
And we'll see dd failed because btrfs return NO_SPACE.
Reason:
Normally, btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
in end to free fs space for next write, but sometimes it hadn't
done work on time, because btrfs-cleaner thread get delayed-iputs
from list before, but do iput() after next write.
This is log:
[ 2569.050776] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() begin
[ 2569.084280] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
[ 2569.085418] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() done btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
[ 2569.087554] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() end
[ 2569.191081] comm=dd begin
[ 2569.790112] comm=dd func=__btrfs_buffered_write() ret=-28
[ 2569.847479] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 0 + 32677888 = 32677888
[ 2569.849530] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 32677888 + 23834624 = 56512512
...
[ 2569.903893] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 943976448 + 21762048 = 965738496
[ 2569.908270] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() end
Fix:
Make btrfs_commit_transaction() wait current running btrfs-cleaner's
delayed-iputs() done in end.
Test:
Use script similar to above(more complex),
before patch:
7 failed in 100 * 20 loop.
after patch:
0 failed in 100 * 20 loop.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Near the end of close_ctree, we're calling btrfs_free_block_rsv
to free up the orphan rsv. The problem is this call updates the
space_info, which has already been freed.
This adds a new __ function that directly calls kfree instead of trying
to update the space infos.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write
the free space cache. In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do
this while no other writers are allowed in the commit.
If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long
stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs
trying to change the filesystem.
This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate
locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit. We'll still have to
redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work
out of the way without blocking the entire FS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Block group cache writeout is currently waiting on the pages for each
block group cache before moving on to writing the next one. This commit
switches things around to send down all the caches and then wait on them
in batches.
The end result is much faster, since we're keeping the disk pipeline
full.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We'll need to put the io_ctl into the block_group cache struct, so
name it struct btrfs_io_ctl and move it into ctree.h
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When truncate starts, it allocates some space in the block reserves so
that we'll have enough to update metadata along the way.
For very large files, we can easily go through all of that space as we
loop through the extents. This changes truncate to refill the space
reservation as it progresses through the file.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"Most of these are fixing extent reservation accounting, or corners
with tree writeback during commit.
Josef's set does add a test, which isn't strictly a fix, but it'll
keep us from making this same mistake again"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
Btrfs: fix outstanding_extents accounting in DIO
Btrfs: add sanity test for outstanding_extents accounting
Btrfs: just free dummy extent buffers
Btrfs: account merges/splits properly
Btrfs: prepare block group cache before writing
Btrfs: fix ASSERT(list_empty(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_list)
Btrfs: account for the correct number of extents for delalloc reservations
Btrfs: fix merge delalloc logic
Btrfs: fix comp_oper to get right order
Btrfs: catch transaction abortion after waiting for it
btrfs: fix sizeof format specifier in btrfs_check_super_valid()
I introduced a regression wrt outstanding_extents accounting. These are tricky
areas that aren't easily covered by xfstests as we could change MAX_EXTENT_SIZE
at any time. So add sanity tests to cover the various conditions that are
tricky in order to make sure we don't introduce regressions in the future.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Qu Wenruo