We need to set shared_count even if we already have a fence to wait for.
v2: init i to -1 as well
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180122200003.6665-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
The amdgpu issue to also need signaled fences in the reservation objects should
be fixed by now.
Optimize the handling by replacing a signaled fence when adding a new
shared one.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114142436.1360-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
The amdgpu issue to also need signaled fences in the reservation objects
should be fixed by now.
Optimize the list by keeping only the not signaled yet fences around.
v2: temporary put the signaled fences at the end of the new container
v3: put the old fence at the end of the new container as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114142436.1360-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
Use rcu_assign_pointer() when setting an rcu protected pointer.
This gets rid of another sparse warning.
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171102200336.23347-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>.
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
With hardware resets in mind it is possible that all shared fences are
signaled, but the exlusive isn't. Fix waiting for everything in this situation.
v2: make sure we always wait for the exclusive fence
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1502384509-10465-3-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
Reverts commit fb8b7d2b9d
("reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)")
Otherwise signaling might never be activated on the fences. This can
result in infinite waiting with hardware which has unreliable interrupts.
v2: still return one when the timeout is zero and we don't have any fences.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
[sumits: fix checkpatch warnings]
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-4-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829070834.22296-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829070834.22296-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829070834.22296-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
- WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
- WARNING: line over 80 characters
- WARNING: please, no space before tabs
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
It was causing the return value of fence_is_signaled to be ignored, making
reservation objects signal too early.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0'
to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout.
v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0
v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu
Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
This adds some extra functions to deal with rcu.
reservation_object_get_fences_rcu() will obtain the list of shared
and exclusive fences without obtaining the ww_mutex.
reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() will wait on all fences of the
reservation_object, without obtaining the ww_mutex.
reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu() will test if all fences of the
reservation_object are signaled without using the ww_mutex.
reservation_object_get_excl and reservation_object_get_list require
the reservation object to be held, updating requires
write_seqcount_begin/end. If only the exclusive fence is needed,
rcu_dereference followed by fence_get_rcu can be used, if the shared
fences are needed it's recommended to use the supplied functions.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-By: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Move the list of shared fences to a struct, and return it in
reservation_object_get_list().
Add reservation_object_get_excl to get the exclusive fence.
Add reservation_object_reserve_shared(), which reserves space
in the reservation_object for 1 more shared fence.
reservation_object_add_shared_fence() and
reservation_object_add_excl_fence() are used to assign a new
fence to a reservation_object pointer, to complete a reservation.
Changes since v1:
- Add reservation_object_get_excl, reorder code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Christian König