Returning a non-zero value in an i2c remove callback results in the i2c
core emitting a very generic error message ("remove failed (-ESOMETHING),
will be ignored") and as the message indicates not further error handling
is done.
Instead emit a more specific error message and then return zero in
.remove().
The long-term goal is to make the i2c remove prototype return void, making
all implementations return 0 is preparatory work for this change.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220214150710.312269-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The driver can match only via the DT table so the table should be always
used and the of_match_ptr does not have any sense (this also allows ACPI
matching via PRP0001, even though it is not relevant here). This fixes
compile warning (!CONFIG_OF on x86_64):
drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:542:34: warning: ‘stmfx_of_match’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
'ret' may be 0 so, dev_err_probe() should be called only when 'ret' is
an error code.
Fixes: 41c9c06c49 ("mfd: stmfx: Simplify with dev_err_probe()")
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
dev_err_probe(). Less code and also it prints the error value.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
When STMFX supply is stopped, spurious interrupt can occur. To avoid that,
disable the interrupt in suspend before disabling the regulator and
re-enable it at the end of resume.
Fixes: 06252ade91 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
In case the interrupt signal can't be configured, IRQ domain needs to be
removed.
Fixes: 06252ade91 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
STMFX supply is disabled during suspend. To avoid a too early access to
the STMFX firmware on resume, reset the chip and wait for its firmware to
be loaded.
Fixes: 06252ade91 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
It's not okay to cast a "u32 *" to "unsigned long *" when you are
doing a for_each_set_bit() loop because that will break on big
endian systems.
Fixes: 386145601b82 ("mfd: stmfx: Uninitialized variable in stmfx_irq_handler()")
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The problem is that on 64bit systems then we don't clear the higher
bits of the "pending" variable. So when we do:
ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
if (ack) {
the if (ack) condition relies on uninitialized data. The fix it that
I've changed "pending" from an unsigned long to a u32. I changed "n" as
well, because that's a number in the 0-10 range and it fits easily
inside an int. We do need to add a cast to "pending" when we use it in
the for_each_set_bit() loop, but that doesn't cause a problem, it's
fine.
Fixes: 06252ade91 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
- 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
- 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
STMFX functions are not used
- Main MCU IDD measurement
- Resistive touchscreen controller
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>