Commit Graph

1141 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jerome Brunet b2354e4009
ASoC: core: ensure component names are unique
Make sure each ASoC component is registered with a unique name.
The component is derived from the device name. If a device registers more
than one component, the component names will be the same.

This usually brings up a warning about the debugfs directory creation of
the component since directory already exists.

In such case, start numbering the component of the device so the names
don't collide anymore.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214134704.342501-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-02-14 17:15:57 +00:00
Jerome Brunet 1dfa5a5ab3
ASoC: core: allow a dt node to provide several components
At the moment, querying the dai_name will stop of the first component
matching the dt node. This does not allow a device (single dt node) to
provide several ASoC components which could then be used through DT.

This change let the search go on if the xlate function of the component
returns an error, giving the possibility to another component to match
and return the dai_name.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213155159.3235792-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-02-13 20:57:19 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto d8e2e0d249
ASoC: soc-core: remove null_snd_soc_ops
All rtd->dai_link callback functions are controlled by soc_rtd_xxxx(),
and checking rtd->dai_link->ops.
We don't need to have null_snd_soc_ops anymore.
This patch removes it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zhegl3oz.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-23 12:20:06 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 250a15cf57
ASoC: soc-core: remove bus_control
Now, snd_soc_dai_driver::bus_control is used for how to resume.
But, no driver which has bus_control has DAI driver suspend/resume
support.
This patch removes pointless bus_control from ALSA SoC.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pnffx7i4.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-21 17:07:08 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 450312b640
ASoC: soc-core: remove DAI suspend/resume
Historically, CPU and Codec were implemented different, but now it is
merged as Component.
ALSA SoC is supporting suspend/resume at DAI and Component level.
The method is like below.

	1) Suspend/Resume all CPU DAI if bus-control was 0
	2) Suspend/Resume all Component
	3) Suspend/Resume all CPU DAI if bus-control was 1

Historically 2) was Codec special operation.
Because CPU and Codec were merged into Component,
CPU   suspend/resume has 3 chance to suspend(= 1/2/3), but
Codec suspend/resume has 1 chance (= 2).

Here, DAI side suspend/resume is caring bus-control, but no driver
which is supporting suspend/resume is setting bus-control.
This means 3) was never used.

Here, used parameter for suspend/resume component->dev and dai->dev are
same pointer.
For that reason, we can merge DAI and Component suspend/resume.
One note is that we should use 2), because it is caring BIAS level.

This patch removes 1) and 3).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r1zvx7i8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-21 17:06:41 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 83f94a2e29
ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_close_delayed_work()
We need to setup rtd->close_delayed_work_func.
It will be set at snd_soc_dai_compress_new() or soc_new_pcm().
But these setups close_delayed_work() which is same name /
same implemantaion, but different local code.
To reduce duplicate code, this patch moves it as
snd_soc_close_delayed_work() and share same code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-By: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736cot4v2.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-10 13:33:27 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 76c39e867c
ASoC: soc-core: do pinctrl_pm_select_xxx() as component
ALSA SoC need to care pinctrl_pm_select_xxx().
It is called at soc-core and soc-pcm.
soc-pcm  is controlling it for activate DAI.
soc-core is controlling it for whole system
(= suspend/resume/probe/poweroff).

If we focus to soc-core side, it need to care about BIAS level.
Then, snd_soc_suspend() only is controlling it by Component base (a).
Other functions are DAI base (b).

(a)	pinctrl_pm_select_xxx(component->dev, xxx);
(b)	pinctrl_pm_select_xxx(dai->dev, xxx);

Because of these unbalance, the code is confusable.
Here, dai->dev and component->dev are same pointer.
Thus, we can replace it component base.

One note here is that it cared DAI (= CPU/Codec) pin before this patch,
after this patch, it cares Component (= CPU/Codec/Platform) pin.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-By: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874kx4t4v6.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-10 13:33:08 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto d7a8cb4931
ASoC: soc-core: remove duplicate pinctrl operation when suspend
snd_soc_suspend() are doing below for pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state()

	int snd_soc_suspend(struct device *dev)
	{
		...
		for_each_card_components(card, component) {
			...
(1)			pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(component->dev);
		}

		for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd) {
			...
(2)			pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(cpu_dai->dev);
		}
	}

(1) is called for all component (CPU/Codec/Platform), and
(2) is called for CPU DAIs.
Here, component->dev is same as dai->dev.
This means, it is called in duplicate on CPU case.
This patch removes (2).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-By: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zhkt4vc.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-10 13:32:50 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 1272063a7e
ASoC: soc-core: care .ignore_suspend for Component suspend
Card dai_link has .ignore_suspend, and ALSA SoC cares it when suspend.
For example, like this

	for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd) {
		if (rtd->dai_link->ignore_suspend)
			continue;
		...
	}

But in snd_soc_suspend(), it doesn't care about
it when suspending Component. This patch cares it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e20t4vh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-10 13:32:31 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 12b052327d
ASoC: soc-core: rename snd_soc_rtdcom_add() to snd_soc_rtd_add_component()
We don't have snd_soc_rtdcom_list anymore.
Let's rename snd_soc_rtdcom_add() to more understandable
snd_soc_rtd_add_component()

Reported-by: Sridharan, Ranjani <ranjani.sridharan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878smgt4vp.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-10 13:32:13 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 613fb50059
ASoC: soc-core: remove snd_soc_rtdcom_list
Current ALSA SoC is using struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list to
connecting component to rtd by using list_head.

	struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list {
		struct snd_soc_component *component;
		struct list_head list; /* rtd::component_list */
	};

	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime {
		...
		struct list_head component_list; /* list of connected components */
		...
	};

The CPU/Codec/Platform component which will be connected to rtd (a)
is indicated via dai_link at snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime()

	int snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime(...)
	{
		...
		/* Find CPU from registered CPUs */
		rtd->cpu_dai = snd_soc_find_dai(dai_link->cpus);
		...
(a)		snd_soc_rtdcom_add(rtd, rtd->cpu_dai->component);
		...

		/* Find CODEC from registered CODECs */
(b)		for_each_link_codecs(dai_link, i, codec) {
			rtd->codec_dais[i] = snd_soc_find_dai(codec);
			...
(a)			snd_soc_rtdcom_add(rtd, rtd->codec_dais[i]->component);
		}
		...

		/* Find PLATFORM from registered PLATFORMs */
(b)		for_each_link_platforms(dai_link, i, platform) {
			for_each_component(component) {
				...
(a)				snd_soc_rtdcom_add(rtd, component);
			}
		}

	}

It shows, it is possible to know how many components will be
connected to rtd by using

	dai_link->num_cpus
	dai_link->num_codecs
	dai_link->num_platforms

If so, we can use component pointer array instead of list_head,
in such case, code can be more simple.
This patch removes struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list that is only
of temporary value, and convert to pointer array.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-By: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a76wt4wm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-01-10 13:31:22 +00:00
Mark Brown a82cf72f94
Merge branch 'for-5.5' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into asoc-5.6 2019-12-25 17:51:43 +00:00
Takashi Iwai 07d22a9bb6
ASoC: core: Fix access to uninitialized list heads
The error path of soc_new_pcm_runtime() invokes soc_free_pcm_runtime()
that may cause a few problems.  First off, it calls list_del() for
rtd->list that may not be initialized.  Similarly,
snd_soc_pcm_component_free() traverses over the component list that
may not be initialized, either.  Such access to the uninitialized list
head would lead to either a BUG_ON() or a memory corruption.

This patch fixes the access to uninitialized list heads by
initializing the list heads properly at the beginning before those
error paths.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204151454.21643-1-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-24 23:56:15 +00:00
Daniel Baluta 218fe9b7ec
ASoC: soc-core: Set dpcm_playback / dpcm_capture
When converting a normal link to a DPCM link we need
to set dpcm_playback / dpcm_capture otherwise playback/capture
streams will not be created resulting in errors like this:

[   36.039111]  sai1-wm8960-hifi: ASoC: no backend playback stream

Fixes: a655de808c ("ASoC: core: Allow topology to override machine driver FE DAI link config")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204151333.26625-1-daniel.baluta@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-24 23:56:14 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto ee8f537fd8
ASoC: soc-core: remove legacy style of codec_conf
Now all driver is using snd_soc_dai_link_component for codec_conf.
Let's remove legacy style

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/871rt959ic.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-16 12:02:56 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto c13493a246
ASoC: soc-core: support snd_soc_dai_link_component for codec_conf
To find codec_conf component, it is using dev_name, of_node.
But, we already has this kind of finding component method by
snd_soc_dai_link_component, and snd_soc_is_matching_component().
We shouldn't have duplicate implementation to do same things.
This patch adds snd_soc_dai_link_component support to find
codec_conf component.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfrh59kj.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-16 12:01:32 +00:00
Takashi Iwai 01fec8cce7
ASoC: Drop snd_soc_pcm_lib_ioctl()
Now all snd_soc_pcm_lib_ioctl() calls were dropped, and it became
superfluous.  Let's kill it.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191210145406.21419-24-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-11 16:51:43 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto a4072cdfa9
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
soc-core.c has 2 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, but we can merge these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87d0cvbhyj.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-11 16:43:17 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 8a6a6a38f8
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for CONFIG_DMI
soc-core.c has 2 #ifdef CONFIG_DMI, but we can merge these.
OTOH, soc.h has dmi_longname, but it is needed if CONFIG_DMI was defined.
In other words, It is not needed if CONFIG_DMI was not defined.
This patch tidyup these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87eexbbhyy.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-11 16:43:16 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 29d9fc7aca
ASoC: soc-core: merge soc_set_name_prefix() and soc_set_of_name_prefix()
soc_set_name_prefix() is calling soc_set_of_name_prefix().
We don't need to separate these operation.
This patch merges these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87fthrbhzo.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-11 16:43:16 +00:00
Mark Brown 2acf6ce2c2
Merge branch 'for-5.5' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into asoc-5.6 2019-12-10 13:27:14 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto aec3ff99ce
ASoC: soc-core: soc_set_name_prefix(): get component device_node at out of loop
Component device_node is not related to codec_conf loop at
soc_set_name_prefix().
This patch moves it to out of loop.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v9qpxbkj.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:19:01 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 4702f99148
ASoC: soc-core: soc_set_name_prefix(): tidyup loop condition
Current soc_set_name_prefix() for loop is checking both codec_conf
pointer and its number

	for (...; i < card->num_configs && card->codec_conf; ...)

But, if card->num_configs exists but card->codec_conf was NULL,
it is just bug.
This patch cleanups for loop condition.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87wob5xbkn.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:18:42 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto eaffeefbd0
ASoC: soc-core: rename soc_link_init() to soc_init_pcm_runtime()
soc-core is using soc_link_init().
It sounds like dai_link function, but it is for pcm_runtime.
This patch renames soc_link_init() to soc_init_pcm_runtime().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2vlxbkr.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:18:24 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 626c2e57a3
ASoC: soc-core: add missing return value check for soc_link_init()
soc_link_init() returns error code, but snd_soc_bind_card()
is not cheking it.
This patch adds missing return value check for it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zhg1xbkv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:18:05 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 46496acbe1
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_link_init()
This patch moves soc_link_init() to upper side.
This is prepare for its cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/871rtdyq5g.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:17:46 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto bfa0dd8953
ASoC: soc-core: rename soc_link_dai_pcm_new() to soc_dai_pcm_new()
soc_link_dai_pcm_new() sounds like dai_link function,
but it is not related to it.
This patch rename soc_link_dai_pcm_new() to soc_dai_pcm_new().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736dtyq5j.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:17:28 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 9e9c70a5dd
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_link_dai_pcm_new()
This patch moves soc_link_dai_pcm_new() to upper side.
This is prepare for its cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874ky9yq5o.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:17:09 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 50cd9b5317
ASoC: soc-core: rename snd_soc_remove_dai_link() to snd_soc_remove_pcm_runtime()
Now soc-core and soc-topology is using snd_soc_remove_dai_link().
It removes pcm_runtime (= rtd) and disconnect it from card.
The purpose is removing pcm_runtime, not dai_link.
This patch renames function name.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zipyq5s.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:16:42 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 0c04800424
ASoC: soc-core: rename snd_soc_add_dai_link() to snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime()
Now soc-core and soc-topology is using snd_soc_add_dai_link().
The abstract of this function is "create pcm_runtime from
dai_link information and connect it to card".
Thus, "add dai_link" is wrong/confusable naming.
This patch renames function name.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e35yq5w.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:16:15 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto d6f31e0e6d
ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_find_dai_link()
snd_soc_find_dai_link() is soc-topology specific function.
We don't need to have it at soc-core.
This patch moves it to soc-topology.c

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878snlyq61.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:15:48 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 4468189ff3
ASoC: soc-core: find rtd via dai_link pointer at snd_soc_get_pcm_runtime()
Current snd_soc_get_pcm_runtime() is finding rtd by checking dai_link
name. But, it is strange and waste of CPU power, because its user want
to get from rtd from dai_link, not from dai_link name.
This patch find rtd via dai_link pointer instead of its name.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a781yq67.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:15:21 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 94def8ea66
ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_get_pcm_runtime()
This patch moves snd_soc_get_pcm_runtime() next to
snd_soc_get_dai_substream().
This is prepare for snd_soc_get_pcm_runtime() cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87blshyq6e.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:15:02 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 8babfb7030
ASoC: soc-core: remove snd_soc_get_dai_substream()
No driver is using snd_soc_get_dai_substream(),
and snd_soc_get_pcm_runtime() is enough for such purpose.
We can revival it if it was needed in the future.
Let's remove unused function.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87d0cxyq6k.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:14:35 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto b553bd238d
ASoC: soc-core: remove snd_soc_disconnect_sync()
Sound card disconnecting operation was needed when "sound driver" was
unbinded without unbinding "sound card".
In such case, sound driver should be stopped even though it was
playbacking/capturing. Otherwise clock open/close counter mismatch happen.

One headache was that we can't skip unbind in error case because unbind
operation doesn't check return value from each drivers.
snd_soc_disconnect_sync() was added for these purpose, and Renesas
sound card only is used it.

But now, ALSA SoC automatically disconnect sound card when sound driver
was unbinded. Thus, snd_soc_disconnect_sync() is no longer needed.
This patch removes it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87eexdyq6p.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:14:16 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto cc73390008
ASoC: soc-core: remove dai_link_list
ASoC is using many lists.
Now, used dai_link is listed to card as dai_link_list.

	[card]->[dai_link]->[dai_link]->...

BTW, this "dai_link" is used to create "rtd".
And this rtd is listed to card as rtd_list.

	[card]->[rtd]->[rtd]->...

Here, each rtd has dai_link. This means, we can track all dai_link via
rtd list. This patch removes card dai_link_list, and uses rtd_list
instead of it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87fthtyq6z.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 13:13:47 +00:00
Randy Dunlap bc9a665581
ASoC: fix soc-core.c kernel-doc warning
Fix a kernel-doc warning in soc-core.c by adding notation for
@legacy_dai_naming.

../sound/soc/soc-core.c:2509: warning: Function parameter or member 'legacy_dai_naming' not described in 'snd_soc_register_dai'

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2215ee04-e870-5eea-a00c-9a5caf06faae@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-09 18:36:15 +00:00
Curtis Malainey 9c9b652034
ASoC: core: only flush inited work during free
There are many paths to soc_free_pcm_runtime which can both have and
have not yet inited the workqueue yet. When we flush the queue when we
have not yet inited the queue we cause warnings to be printed.

An example is soc_cleanup_card_resources which is called by
snd_soc_bind_card which has multiple failure points before and after
soc_link_init -> soc_new_pcm which is where the queue is inited.

Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191128011358.39234-1-cujomalainey@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-09 10:55:42 +00:00
Curtis Malainey 4bf2e385aa
ASoC: core: Init pcm runtime work early to avoid warnings
There are cases where we fail before we reach soc_new_pcm which would
init the workqueue. When we fail we attempt to flush the queue which
generates warnings from the workqueue subsystem when we have not inited
the queue. Solution is to use a proxy function to get around this issue.

Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191203173007.46504-1-cujomalainey@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-12-04 11:15:30 +00:00
Jaroslav Kysela 39870b0dec
ASoC: DMI long name - avoid to add board name if matches with product name
Current code:

  LENOVO-20QE000VMC-ThinkPadX1Carbon7th-20QE000VMC

With the patch:

  LENOVO-20QE000VMC-ThinkPadX1Carbon7th

Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191120174435.30920-2-perex@perex.cz
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-22 19:54:50 +00:00
Jaroslav Kysela 4e01e5dbba
ASoC: improve the DMI long card code in asoc-core
Add append_dmi_string() function and make the code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191120174435.30920-1-perex@perex.cz
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-22 19:54:46 +00:00
Jaroslav Kysela dc73d73aa7
ASoC: add control components management
This ASCII string can carry additional information about
soundcard components or configuration. Add the possibility
to set this string via the ASoC card.

Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191119174933.25526-1-perex@perex.cz
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-20 17:07:19 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 0ced7b0502
ASoC: soc-pcm: remove soc_pcm_private_free()
soc-topology adds extra dai_link by using snd_soc_add_dai_link(),
and removes it by snd_soc_romove_dai_link().

This snd_soc_add/remove_dai_link() and/or its related
functions are unbalanced before, and now, these are balance-uped.
But, it finds the random operation issue, and it is reported by
Pierre-Louis.

When card was released, topology will call snd_soc_remove_dai_link()
via (A).

	static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
	{
		struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link;

		/* This should be called before snd_card_free() */
	(A)	soc_remove_link_components(card);

		/* free the ALSA card at first; this syncs with pending operations */
		if (card->snd_card) {
	(B)		snd_card_free(card->snd_card);
			card->snd_card = NULL;
		}

		/* remove and free each DAI */
	(X)	soc_remove_link_dais(card);

		for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link)
	(C)		snd_soc_remove_dai_link(card, link);

		...
	}

At (A), topology calls snd_soc_remove_dai_link().
Then topology rtd, and its related all data are freed.

Next, (B) is called, and then, pcm->private_free = soc_pcm_private_free()
is called.

	static void soc_pcm_private_free(struct snd_pcm *pcm)
	{
		struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = pcm->private_data;

		/* need to sync the delayed work before releasing resources */
		flush_delayed_work(&rtd->delayed_work);
		snd_soc_pcm_component_free(rtd);
	}

Here, it gets rtd via pcm->private_data.
But, topology related rtd are already freed at (A).
Normal sound card has no damage, becase it frees rtd at (C).

These are finalizing rtd related data.
Thus, these should be called when rtd was freed, not sound card
was freed. It is very natural and understandable.

In other words, pcm->private_free = soc_pcm_private_free()
is no longer needed.

Extra issue is that there is zero chance to call
soc_remove_dai() for topology related dai at (X).
Because (A) removes rtd connection from card too, and,
(X) is based on card connected rtd.

This means, (X) need to be called before (C) (= for normal sound)
and (A) (= for topology).

Now, I want to focus this patch which is the reason why
snd_card_free() = (B) is located there.

	commit 4efda5f213
	("ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration")

Original snd_card_free() was called last of this function.
But moved to top to avoid use-after-free issue.
The issue was happen at soc_pcm_free() which was pcm->private_free,
today it is updated/renamed to soc_pcm_private_free().

In other words, (B) need to be called before (C) (= for normal sound)
and (A) (= for topology), because it needs (not yet freed) rtd.
But, (A) need to be called before (B),
because it needs card->snd_card pointer.

If we call flush_delayed_work() and snd_soc_pcm_component_free()
(= same as soc_pcm_private_free()) when rtd was freed (= (C), (A)),
there is no reason to call snd_card_free() at top of this function.
It can be called end of this function, again.

But, in such case, it will likely break unbind again, as Takashi-san
reported. When unbind is performed in a busy state, the code may
release still-in-use resources.
At least we need to call snd_card_disconnect_sync() at the first place.

The final code will be...

	static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
	{
		struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link;

		if (card->snd_card)
	(Z)		snd_card_disconnect_sync(card->snd_card);

	(X)	soc_remove_link_dais(card);
	(A)	soc_remove_link_components(card);

		for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link)
	(C)		snd_soc_remove_dai_link(card, link);

		...
		if (card->snd_card) {
	(B)		snd_card_free(card->snd_card);
			card->snd_card = NULL;
		}
	}

To avoid release still-in-use resources,
call snd_card_disconnect_sync() at (Z).

(X) is needed for both non-topology and topology.

    topology removes rtd via (A), and
non topology removes rtd via (C).

snd_card_free() is no longer related to use-after-free issue.
Thus, locating (B) is no problem.

Fixes: df95a16d2a ("ASoC: soc-core: fix RIP warning on card removal")
Fixes: bc7a9091e5 ("ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_dai_link()")
Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8xax88g.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-19 18:23:06 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto ce21401c9d
ASoC: soc-core: care card_probed at soc_cleanup_card_resources()
soc_cleanup_card_resources() will call card->remove(), but it should be
called if card->probe() or card->late_probe() are called.
snd_soc_bind_card() might be error before calling
card->probe() / card->late_probe().
In that time, card->remove() will be called.
This patch adds card_probed parameter to judge it.

Fixes: bfce78a559 ("ASoC: soc-core: tidyup soc_init_dai_link()")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8xg4ltr.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-15 12:02:39 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 2cc1afcfc6
ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_unbind_card() next to snd_soc_bind_card()
To makes code readable, this patch moves snd_soc_unbind_card() next
to snd_soc_bind_card().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pnhw4lu5.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-15 12:02:21 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 2a6f0892bd
ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at soc_cleanup_card_resources()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

snd_soc_bind_card() is calling snd_soc_dapm_init() for both
card and component.
Let's call paired snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at paired
soc_cleanup_card_resources().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r22c4lub.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-15 12:02:02 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 74bd3f92d0
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup soc_probe_aux_devices()
snd_soc_bind_card() is calling many initialize functions
for each card / link / dai / aux etc, etc, etc...
When error happen, the message is indicated at snd_soc_bind_card(),
not at each functions.
But, only soc_probe_aux_devices() case is indicating error at functions,
not at snd_soc_bind_card().
It is not an issue, but unbalanced.

This patch moves error message to snd_soc_bind_card().
Also avoids deep-nested code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfsthkw9.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-12 18:42:03 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto ed90c013a7
ASoC: soc-core: merge snd_soc_bind_card() and snd_soc_instantiate_card()
having both soc_bind_card() and snd_soc_instantiate_card() is
very confusable. Let's merge these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87mud9hkwj.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-12 18:28:59 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto c6619b7298
ASoC: soc-core: merge soc_remove_component() and soc_cleanup_component()
having both soc_remove_component() and soc_cleanup_component() is
very confusable. Let's merge these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8xphkwt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-12 18:28:02 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto da704f26ba
ASoC: soc-core: merge snd_soc_remove_dai_link() and soc_unbind_dai_link()
We don't need to separete snd_soc_remove_dai_link() and
soc_unbind_dai_link() anymore. Let's merge these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pni5hkx1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-12 18:27:43 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 63dc47da1f
ASoC: soc-core: merge snd_soc_add_dai_link() and soc_bind_dai_link()
We don't need to separete snd_soc_add_dai_link() and
soc_bind_dai_link() anymore. Let's merge these.

One note is that before this patch, it adds list (A)
eventhough if it had dai_link->ignore (1), or already bounded dai_link (2).
But I guess it is wrong. This patch also solve this issue.

/* BEFORE */
	int soc_bind_dai_link(...)
	{
		...
(1)		if (dai_link->ignore)
			return 0;

(2)		if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...))
			return 0;
		...
	}

	int snd_soc_add_dai_link(...)
	{
		...
=>		ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
=>		if (ret < 0)
=>			return ret;

(A)		list_add_tail(&dai_link->list, &card->dai_link_list);
		...
	}

/* AFTER */

	int snd_soc_add_dai_link(...)
	{
		...
(1)		if (dai_link->ignore)
			return 0;

(2)		if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...))
			return 0;
		...
(A)		list_add_tail(&dai_link->list, &card->dai_link_list);
		return 0;
	}

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r22lhkx8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-12 18:27:24 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto ffdbca0be6
ASoC: soc-core: merge snd_soc_unregister_dai() and soc_del_dai()
We don't need to separete snd_soc_unregister_dai() and
soc_del_dai() anymore. Let's merge these

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgn1hkxg.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-12 18:22:56 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 7ca24386a7
ASoC: soc-core: merge snd_soc_register_dai() and soc_add_dai()
We don't need to separete snd_soc_register_dai() and
soc_add_dai() anymore. Let's merge these

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tv7hhkxm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-12 18:22:37 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 0d18a7caa6
ASoC: soc-core: remove soc_is_dai_link_bound()
Because complex separeted "card pre-listed component" and
"topology added component" duplicated operation is now
becoming simple, we don't need to check already bound dai_link
which is not exist anymore.
This patch removes soc_is_dai_link_bound().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v9rxhkxw.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-12 18:22:18 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 18dd66ea84
ASoC: soc-core: fixup dead-lock at snd_soc_unregister_component()
snd_soc_unregister_component() is calling snd_soc_lookup_component()
under mutex_lock(). But, snd_soc_lookup_component() itself is using
mutex_lock(), thus it will be dead-lock.
This patch adds _nolocked version of it, and avoid dead-lock issue.

Fixes: ac6a4dd3e9f0("ASoC: soc-core: use snd_soc_lookup_component() at snd_soc_unregister_component()")
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>"
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87bltph4da.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-06 15:32:40 +00:00
Pierre-Louis Bossart df95a16d2a
ASoC: soc-core: fix RIP warning on card removal
SOF module load/unload tests show nasty recurring warnings:

WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1339 at sound/core/control.c:466
snd_ctl_remove+0xf0/0x100 [snd]
RIP: 0010:snd_ctl_remove+0xf0/0x100 [snd]

This regression was introduced by the removal of the call to
soc_remove_link_components() before soc_card_free() is invoked.

Go back to the initial order but only call
soc_remove_link_components() once.

Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Fixes: 5a4c9f054c ("ASoC: soc-core: snd_soc_unbind_card() cleanup")
GitHub issue: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/1424
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191106145801.9316-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-06 15:32:21 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 237d19080c
ASoC: soc-core: remove topology specific operation
soc-core has some API which is used from topology, but it is doing
topology specific operation at soc-core.
soc-core should care about core things, and topology should care
about topology things, otherwise, it is very confusable.

For example topology type is not related to soc-core,
it is topology side issue.

This patch removes meaningless check from soc-core.

This patch keeps extra initialization/destruction at
snd_soc_add_dai_link() / snd_soc_remove_dai_link()
which were for topology.
From this patch, non-topology card can use it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pni6251h.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:58 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 71cb85f5e9
ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_register_dai() from snd_soc_register_dais()
ALSA SoC has 2 functions.
snd_soc_register_dai()  is used from topology
snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component()

In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais()
with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar
but different implementation.
We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation.

This patch calls snd_soc_register_dai() from snd_soc_register_dais()

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r22m251l.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:54 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto e443c20593
ASoC: soc-core: don't call snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets() at snd_soc_register_dai()
ALSA SoC has 2 functions.
snd_soc_register_dai()  is used from topology
snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component()

In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais()
with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar
but different implementation.
We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation.

snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology.
But to reduce duplicated code, it should be used from _dais(), too.

Because of topology side specific reason,
it is calling snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets(),
but it is not needed _dais() side.

This patch factorizes snd_soc_register_dai() to
topology / _dais() common part, and topology specific part.
And do topology specific part at soc-topology.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgn2251p.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:49 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 5d07519703
ASoC: soc-core: have legacy_dai_naming at snd_soc_register_dai()
ALSA SoC has 2 functions.
snd_soc_register_dai()  is used from topology
snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component()

In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais()
with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar
but different implementation.
We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation.

snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology.
But to reduce duplicated code, it should be used from _dais(), too.
To prepare it, this patch adds missing parameter legacy_dai_naming
to snd_soc_register_dai().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tv7i251u.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:43 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto e11381f38f
ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_unregister_dai()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug.

This patch adds missing soc_del_dai() and snd_soc_unregister_dai().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v9ry251z.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:40 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 3f6674ae13
ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_unregister_dais()
This patch moves snd_soc_unregister_dais() next to
snd_soc_register_dais().
This is prepare for snd_soc_register_dais() cleanup

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87woce2524.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:35 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto daf7737335
ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_register_dai()
This patch moves snd_soc_register_dai() next to
snd_soc_register_dais().
This is prepare for snd_soc_register_dais() cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2wu2528.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:30 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto ac6a4dd3e9
ASoC: soc-core: use snd_soc_lookup_component() at snd_soc_unregister_component()
snd_soc_unregister_component() is now finding component manually,
but we already have snd_soc_lookup_component() to find component;
Let's use existing function.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zhha252c.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:26 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto b18768f561
ASoC: soc-core: remove snd_soc_component_add/del()
soc-core has
snd_soc_add_component(), snd_soc_component_add(),
snd_soc_del_component(), snd_soc_component_del().

These are very confusing naming.
snd_soc_component_xxx() are called from snd_soc_xxx_component(),
and these are very small.
Let's merge these into snd_soc_xxx_component(), and
remove snd_soc_component_xxx().

Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/871rum3jmy.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:22 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 486c7978ff
ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_del_component_unlocked()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug.

Now ALSA SoC has snd_soc_add_component(), but there is no paired
snd_soc_del_component(). Thus, snd_soc_unregister_component() is
calling cleanup function randomly. it is difficult to read.
This patch adds missing snd_soc_del_component_unlocked() and
balance up code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736f23jn4.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:18 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 5bd7e08b3c
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup snd_soc_lookup_component()
snd_soc_lookup_component() is using mix of continue and break
in the same loop. It is odd.
This patch cleanup it.

Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874kzi3jn8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:15 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto b813265799
ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_lookup_component()
This patch moves snd_soc_lookup_component() to upper side.
This is prepare for snd_soc_unregister_component()

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zjy3jnd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:11 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto bc7a9091e5
ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_dai_link()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

ALSA SoC has soc_bind_dai_link(), but its paired soc_unbind_dai_link()
is not implemented.
More confusable is that soc_remove_pcm_runtimes() which should be
soc_unbind_dai_link() is implemented without synchronised
to soc_bind_dai_link().

This patch cleanup this unbalance.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e4e3jni.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:07 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 6b1dff0266
ASoC: soc-core: call soc_bind_dai_link() under snd_soc_add_dai_link()
If we focus to soc_bind_dai_link() at snd_soc_instantiate_card(),
we will notice very complex operation.

static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...)
{
	...
	/*
	 * (1) Bind dai_link via card pre-linked dai_link
	 *
	 * Bind dai_link via card pre-linked.
	 * 1 dai_link will be 1 rtd, and connected to card.
	 * for_each_card_prelinks() is for card pre-linked dai_link.
	 *
	 * Image
	 *
	 * card
	 * - rtd(A)
	 * - rtd(A)
	 */
	for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) {
		ret = soc_bind_dai_link(card, dai_link);
		...
	}
	...
	/*
	 * (2) Connect card pre-linked dai_link to card list
	 *
	 * Connect all card pre-linked dai_link to *card list*.
	 * Here, (A) means from card pre-linked.
	 *
	 * Image
	 *
	 * card		card list
	 *  - rtd(A)	 - dai_link(A)
	 *  - rtd(A)	 - dai_link(A)
	 *  - ...	 - ...
	 */
	for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) {
		ret = snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link);
		...
	}
	...
	/*
	 * (3) Probe binded component
	 *
	 * Each rtd has many components.
	 * Here probes each rtd connected components.
	 * rtd(A) in Image is the probe target.
	 *
	 * During this component probe, topology may add new dai_link to
	 * *card list* by using snd_soc_add_dai_link() which is
	 * used at (2).
	 * Here, (B) means from topology
	 *
	 * Image
	 *
	 * card		card list
	 *  - rtd(A)	 - dai_link(A)
	 *  - rtd(A)	 - dai_link(A)
	 *  - ...	 - ...
	 *		 - dai_link(B)
	 *		 - dai_link(B)
	 */
	ret = soc_probe_link_components(card);
	...

	/*
	 * (4) Bind dai_link again
	 *
	 * Bind dai_link again for topology.
	 * Note, (1) used for_each_card_prelinks(),
	 * here is using  for_each_card_links()
	 *
	 * This means from card list.
	 * As Image indicating, it has dai_link(A) (from card pre-link)
	 * and dai_link(B) (from topology).
	 * main target here is dai_link(B).
	 * soc_bind_dai_link() ignores already used
	 * dai_link (= dai_link(A))
	 *
	 * Image
	 *
	 * card		card list
	 *  - rtd(A)	 - dai_link(A)
	 *  - rtd(A)	 - dai_link(A)
	 *  - ...	 - ...
	 *  - rtd(B)	 - dai_link(B)
	 *  - rtd(B)	 - dai_link(B)
	 */
	for_each_card_links(card, dai_link) {
		ret = soc_bind_dai_link(card, dai_link);
		...
	}
	...
}

As you see above, it is doing very complex method.
The problem is binding dai_link via "card pre-linked" (= (1)) and
"topology added dai_link" (= (3)) are separated.
The code can be simple if we can bind dai_link when dai_link
is connected to *card list*.
This patch do it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878sou3jnn.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:50:01 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 95b562e57f
ASoC: soc-core: remove duplicated soc_is_dai_link_bound()
soc_is_dai_link_bound() check will be called both
*before* soc_bind_dai_link() (A), and
*under*  soc_bind_dai_link() (B).
These are very verbose code. Let's remove one of them.

*	static int soc_bind_dai_link(...)
	{
		...
(B)		if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...)) {
			...
			return 0;
		}
		...
	}

	static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...)
	{
		...
		for_each_card_links(...) {
(A)			if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...))
				continue;

*			ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
			if (ret)
				goto probe_end;
		}
		...
	}

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a79a3jns.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:49:55 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto cd3c5ad7b2
ASoC: soc-core: typo fix at soc_dai_link_sanity_check()
Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87bltq3jo7.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:49:51 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto bfce78a559
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup soc_init_dai_link()
soc_init_dai_link() is needed to be called before soc_bind_dai_link().

	int snd_soc_instantiate_card()
	{
		for_each_card_prelinks(...) {
(1)			ret = soc_init_dai_link(...);
			...
		}
		...
		for_each_card_prelinks(...) {
(2)			ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
			...
		}
		...
		for_each_card_links(...) {
			...
(A)			ret = soc_init_dai_link(...);
			...
(B)			ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
		}
		...

(1) is for (2), and (A) is for (B)
(1) and (2) are for card prelink   dai_link.
(A) and (B) are for topology added dai_link.

soc_init_dai_link() is sanity check for dai_link, not initializing today.
Therefore, it is confusable naming. We can rename it as sanity_check.

And this check is for soc_bind_dai_link().
It can be more simple code if we can call it from soc_bind_dai_link().

This patch renames it to soc_dai_link_sanity_check(), and
call it from soc_bind_dai_link().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87d0e63joh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:49:44 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 36794902de
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_init_dai_link()
This patch moves soc_init_dai_link() next to soc_bind_dai_link().
This is prepare for soc_bind_dai_link() cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87eeym3joq.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-05 23:49:34 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto e9904ed5e7
ASoC: soc-core: remove unneeded snd_soc_tplg_component_remove()
snd_soc_tplg_component_remove() is pair of snd_soc_tplg_component_load(),
and it is topology related cleanup function.

The driver which called _load() needs to call _remove() by its responsibility.
Today, skl-pcm and topology are the user, and these are calling both
_load() and _remove().

soc-core doesn't need to call it.
This patch remove it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736fbdnwt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-30 12:55:45 +00:00
Kuninori Morimoto 2b544dd7b4
ASoC: soc-core: add for_each_rtd_components() and replace
ALSA SoC has for_each_rtdcom() which is link list for
rtd-component which is called as rtdcom. The relationship image is like below

			       rtdcom	   rtdcom      rtdcom
			       component   component   component
	rtd->component_list -> list	-> list	    -> list ...

Here, the pointer get via normal link list is rtdcom,
Thus, current for_each loop is like below, and need to get
component via rtdcom->component

	for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) {
		component = rtdcom->component;
		...
	}

but usually, user want to get pointer from for_each_xxx is component
directly, like below.

	for_each_rtd_component(rtd, rtdcom, component) {
		...
	}

This patch expands list_for_each_entry manually, and enable to get
component directly from for_each macro.
Because of it, the macro becoming difficult to read,
but macro itself becoming useful.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878spm64m4.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-23 17:44:24 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 5a4c9f054c
ASoC: soc-core: snd_soc_unbind_card() cleanup
soc_remove_link_components() will be called from
soc_cleanup_card_resources(). This patch removes duplicate call.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e5664lz.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-22 19:13:09 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 8ec241c495
ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_pcm_lib_ioctl()
add snd_soc_pcm_lib_ioctl() to bypass to snd_pcm_lib_ioctl()

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r23vaf39.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-08 13:40:48 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto d8145989ff
ASoC: soc-core: setup card->rtd_num at snd_soc_instantiate_card()
card->rtd_num is used to count rtd. Initialize it at
snd_soc_instantiate_card() is very natural and less confusion.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zhijafgk.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-03 14:37:01 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 50014499e6
ASoC: soc-core: use devm_xxx for component related resource
dai / component related resources are created when component is
registered, and it will be freed when component was unregistered.
These resources are not re-used after that.
This means, we can use devm_xxx for dai / component, without
thinking about kfree().
This patch uses devm_xxx for these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736gbbu1a.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-03 14:36:39 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 0f23f718ec
ASoC: soc-core: add soc_setup_card_name()
ALSA needs to setup shortname, longname, and driver.
These methods are very similar.
This patch adds new soc_setup_card_name() and setup these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874l0rbu1i.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-03 14:36:20 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 7ce6088f60
ASoC: soc-core: remove soc_remove_dai_links()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a) which is paired function of
snd_soc_instantiate_card() (A) is calling soc_remove_dai_links() (*)
to remove card related resources, but it is breaking
add/remove balance (B)(b)(C)(c)(D)(d), in other words
these should be called from soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a)
from balance point of view.

More headacke is that it is using original removing method for
dai_link even though we already have snd_soc_remove_dai_link()
which is the function for it (d).

This patch removes snd_soc_remove_dai_links() and balance up code.

	static void soc_remove_dai_links(...)
	{
		...
(b)		soc_remove_link_dais(card);
(c)		soc_remove_link_components(card);

		for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) {
			...
			/* it should use snd_soc_remove_dai_link() here */
(d)			list_del(&link->list);
		}
	}

(a)	static int soc_cleanup_card_resources(...)
	{
		...

		/* remove and free each DAI */
(*)		soc_remove_dai_links(card);
		...
	}

(A)	static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card)
	{
		...
		/* add predefined DAI links to the list */
		for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link)
(B)			snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link);
		...
		/* probe all components used by DAI links on this card */
(C)		ret = soc_probe_link_components(card);
		...
		/* probe all DAI links on this card */
(D)		ret = soc_probe_link_dais(card);
		...
	}

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zl7bu1r.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-03 14:36:01 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 4dc0e7df62
ASoC: soc-core: use devm_kzalloc() for rtd
Current rtd, rtd->dev, rtd->codec_dais are created by normal kzalloc(),
but we want to use devm_kzalloc() as much as possible.

Created rtd->dev is registered by device_register() at
soc_new_pcm_runtime(), and it will be freed at
soc_free_pcm_runtime() by device_unregister().

This means, if we can use devm_kzalloc(rtd->dev, xxx) for
rtd / rtd->codec_dais, all these are automatically freed
via soc_free_pcm_runtime().
This patch uses devm_kzalloc(rtd->dev, xxx) for rtd / rtd->codec_dais.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e5nbu1z.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-03 14:35:42 +01:00
Daniel Baluta 49f9c4f2e8
ASoC: core: Clarify usage of ignore_machine
For a sound card ignore_machine means that existing FEs links should be
ignored and existing BEs links should be overridden with some information
from the matching component driver.

Current code make some confusions about this so fix it!

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190925183358.11955-1-daniel.baluta@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:15:24 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 353e16bf60
ASoC: soc-core: remove snd_soc_rtdcom_del_all()
If we can use devm_kzalloc(rtd->dev, xxx) for rtdcom,
we don't need to call snd_soc_rtdcom_del_all() for kfree().
This patch uses devm_kzalloc(rtd->dev, xxx) for rtdcom,
and remove snd_soc_rtdcom_del_all().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zlyf7ln.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:13:37 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto d918a37610
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup soc_new_pcm_runtime() alloc order
This patch allocs dev first at soc_new_pcm_runtime().
This is prepare for rtd->dev, rtd->codec_dais alloc cleanup

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e6ef7m1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:13:19 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto b7c5bc45ee
ASoC: soc-core: merge soc_free_pcm_runtime() and soc_rtd_free()
"rtd"      is handled by soc_xxx_pcm_runtime(), and
"rtd->dev" is handled by soc_rtd_xxx().

There is no reason to separate these, and it makes code complex.
We can free these in the same time.

Here soc_rtd_free() (A) which frees rtd->dev is called from
soc_remove_link_dais() many times (1).
Then, it is using dev_registered flags to avoid multi kfree() (2).
This is no longer needed if we can merge these functions.

	static void soc_remove_link_dais(...)
	{
		...
(1)		for_each_comp_order(order) {
(1)			for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd) {

(A)				soc_rtd_free(rtd);
				...
			}
		}
	}

(A)	static void soc_rtd_free(...)
	{
(2)		if (rtd->dev_registered) {
			/* we don't need to call kfree() for rtd->dev */
			device_unregister(rtd->dev);
(2)			rtd->dev_registered = 0;
		}
	}

This patch merges soc_rtd_free() into soc_free_pcm_runtime().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878squf7oi.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:12:53 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 6e86434487
ASoC: soc-core: merge soc_new_pcm_runtime() and soc_rtd_init()
"rtd"      is handled by soc_xxx_pcm_runtime(), and
"rtd->dev" is handled by soc_rtd_xxx().

There is no reason to separate these, and it makes code complex.
We can create these in the same time.

This patch merges soc_rtd_init() into soc_new_pcm_runtime().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a7baf7pz.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:12:34 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 929deb849b
ASoC: soc-core: create rtd->codec_dais first
soc_new_pcm_runtime() allocs rtd and rtd->codec_dais.
This patch allocs both first, and setup these after that.
This is prepare for soc_new_pcm_runtime() cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87blvqf7qz.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:12:15 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 753ace0a34
ASoC: soc-core: call list_del(&rtd->list) at soc_free_pcm_runtime()
Current ALSA SoC is calling list_del(&rtd->list) at (1)

	static void soc_remove_pcm_runtimes(...)
	{
		...
		for_each_card_rtds_safe(card, rtd, _rtd) {
(1)			list_del(&rtd->list);
(2)			soc_free_pcm_runtime(rtd);
		}
		...
	}

But, we will call soc_free_pcm_runtime() after that (2).
&rtd->list is         connected at soc_new_pcm_runtime(),
Thus, it should be disconnected at soc_free_pcm_runtime().

This patch calls list_del(&rtd->list) at soc_free_pcm_runtime().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87d0g6f7s5.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:11:57 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto a848125e32
ASoC: soc-core: merge soc_add_pcm_runtime() into soc_new_pcm_runtime()
We have soc_new_pcm_runtime() which allocs rtd and its related memory,
and     soc_add_pcm_runtime() which connects rtd to card.

But we don't need to separate these, we can alloc and connect rtd
in the same time.

Current implementation is just makes code complex.
This patch merges these into one.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ef0mf7sl.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:11:38 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 1c93a9e00e
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_free_pcm_runtime()
This patch moves soc_free_pcm_runtime() next to soc_new_pcm_runtime().
This is prepare for soc_xxx_pcm_runtime() cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ftl2f7sx.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-10-01 12:11:17 +01:00
Bard liao 7a5d9815cc
ASoC: core: use list_del_init and move it back to soc_cleanup_component
commit a0a4bf57a9 ("ASoC: core: delete component->card_list in soc_remove_component only")
was trying to fix a kernel oops when list_del was called twice without
re-init the list. Use list_del_init() can solve it, too. Besides, it
will be more readable if we cleanup all component related resource at
soc_cleanup_component().

Suggested-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190918133131.15045-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-20 12:05:46 +01:00
Bard Liao a0a4bf57a9
ASoC: core: delete component->card_list in soc_remove_component only
We add component->card_list in the end of soc_probe_component(). In
other words, component->card_list will not be added if there is an
error in the soc_probe_component() function. So we can't delete
component->card_list in the error handling of soc_probe_component().

Fixes: 22d1423187 ("ASoC: soc-core: add soc_cleanup_component()")
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190916210353.6318-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-17 16:56:38 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto e8fbd25052
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_unbind_aux_dev()
Current soc_unbind_aux_dev() implementation is very half,
thus it is very unreadable.

	for_each_comp_order(order) {
		for_each_card_auxs_safe(card, comp, _comp) {

(1)			if (comp->driver->remove_order == order) {
				...
=>				soc_unbind_aux_dev(comp);
			}
	}

soc_unbind_aux_dev() itself is not related to remove_order (1).
And, it is called from soc_remove_aux_devices(), even though
its paired function soc_bind_aux_dev() is called from
snd_soc_instantiate_card().
It is very unbalance, and very difficult to understand.

This patch do
1) update soc_bind_aux_dev() to self contained
2) call it from soc_cleanup_card_resources() to make up balance

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r24wor0z.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:04:15 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 4893a2eb34
ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_aux_dev()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc-core.c has soc_bind_aux_dev(), but, there is no its paired
soc_unbind_aux_dev().
This patch adds soc_unbind_aux_dev().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgpcor14.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:03:59 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto bee886f1ea
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_bind_aux_dev()
Current soc_bind_aux_dev() implementation is very half,
thus it is very unreadable.

	for_each_card_pre_auxs(xxx) {
=>		ret = soc_bind_aux_dev(xxx);
		...
	}

This patch does all for_each_xxx() under soc_bind_aux_dev(),
and makes it to self contained.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tv9sor1b.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:03:44 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto bc7c16c226
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_link_dais() next to soc_remove_link_dais()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

This patch moves soc_probe_link_dais() next to soc_remove_link_dais()
which is paired function.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v9u8or1g.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:03:28 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto c7e73774f2
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_probe_link_dais()
Current soc_probe_link_dais() implementation is very half,
thus it is very difficult to read.

	for_each_comp_order(xxx) {
		for_each_card_rtds(xxx)
=>			soc_probe_link_dais(xxx);
	}

This patch does all for_each_xxx() under soc_probe_link_dais(),
and makes it to self contained.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87woeoor1m.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:03:13 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto c4b4698291
ASoC: soc-core: add new soc_link_init()
Current soc_probe_link_dais() (1) is called under probe_order (2),
and it will initialize dai_link related settings at *Last* turn (3)(B).
It is very complex code.

	static int soc_probe_link_dais(..., order)
	{
(A)		/* probe DAIs here */
		...

(3)		if (order != SND_SOC_COMP_ORDER_LAST)
			return 0;

(B)		/* initialize dai_link related settings */
		...
	}

	static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...)
	{
		...
(2)		for_each_comp_order(order) {
			for_each_card_rtds(...) {
(1)				ret = soc_probe_link_dais(..., order);
			}
		}
	}

This patch separes soc_probe_link_dais() into "DAI probe" portion (A),
and dai_link settings portion (B).
The later is named as soc_link_init() by this patch.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2z4or1r.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:02:57 +01:00