During the recent upheaval to uc, the parameters to huc_ucode_xfer
were changed, but the kerneldoc left behind.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'huc_fw' not described in 'huc_ucode_xfer'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'vma' not described in 'huc_ucode_xfer'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c:128: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev_priv' description in 'huc_ucode_xfer'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214104040.4532-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Remove the kerneldoc markup applied to non-kerneldoc comments and
convert the multiline comments to the canonical style.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:313: warning: Function parameter or member 'encoder' not described in 'intel_enable_lvds'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:313: warning: Function parameter or member 'pipe_config' not described in 'intel_enable_lvds'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:313: warning: Function parameter or member 'conn_state' not described in 'intel_enable_lvds'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:453: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_lvds_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:453: warning: Function parameter or member 'force' not described in 'intel_lvds_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:471: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_lvds_get_modes'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:932: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev_priv' not described in 'intel_lvds_init'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:932: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'intel_lvds_init'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214092909.27040-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Remove the kerneldoc markup applied to non-kerneldoc comments and
convert the multiline comments to the canonical style.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c:303: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_dvo_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c:303: warning: Function parameter or member 'force' not described in 'intel_dvo_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c:382: warning: Function parameter or member 'encoder' not described in 'intel_dvo_get_current_mode'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214092909.27040-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Regular comments where being marked up for kerneldoc, but were not
formatted properly. Remove the markup to remove the warnings.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ivch.c:192: warning: Function parameter or member 'dvo' not described in 'ivch_read'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ivch.c:192: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not described in 'ivch_read'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ivch.c:192: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'ivch_read'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214092909.27040-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The code describes what it is doing quite well; and that is now much
more complex than what the old comment would let you believe.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:486: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_crt_detect_hotplug'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214092909.27040-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:409: warning: Function parameter or member 'source_min' not described in 'scale'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:409: warning: Function parameter or member 'source_max' not described in 'scale'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:409: warning: Function parameter or member 'target_min' not described in 'scale'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:409: warning: Function parameter or member 'target_max' not described in 'scale'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214091747.12753-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214091747.12753-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Drop the kerneldoc markup from the non-kerneldoc comments and convert
the multi-line comments to the canonical format.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:223: warning: Function parameter or member 'intel_sdvo' not described in 'intel_sdvo_write_sdvox'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:223: warning: Function parameter or member 'val' not described in 'intel_sdvo_write_sdvox'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:653: warning: Function parameter or member 'intel_sdvo' not described in 'intel_sdvo_get_trained_inputs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:653: warning: Function parameter or member 'input_1' not described in 'intel_sdvo_get_trained_inputs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:653: warning: Function parameter or member 'input_2' not described in 'intel_sdvo_get_trained_inputs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:2311: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev_priv' not described in 'intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:2311: warning: Function parameter or member 'sdvo' not described in 'intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214090905.4747-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The ages old kerneldoc-esque comments still refer to the original stubs
and not the more complete functions. As they were only describing the
external entry points (or at least thought themselves to be, they had
drifted!), they don't provide any commentary for the code flow.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:379: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const struct tv_mode tv_modes[] = '
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1133: warning: bad line:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1140: warning: Function parameter or member 'intel_tv' not described in 'intel_tv_detect_type'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1140: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_tv_detect_type'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1272: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_tv_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1272: warning: Function parameter or member 'ctx' not described in 'intel_tv_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1272: warning: Function parameter or member 'force' not described in 'intel_tv_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1351: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_tv_get_modes'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214085814.2565-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
So far models of the Dell Venue 8 Pro, with a panel with MIPI panel
index = 3, one of which has been kindly provided to me by Jan Brummer,
where not working with the i915 driver, giving a black screen on the
first modeset.
The problem with at least these Dells is that their VBT defines a MIPI
ASSERT sequence, but not a DEASSERT sequence. Instead they DEASSERT the
reset in their INIT_OTP sequence, but the deassert must be done before
calling intel_dsi_device_ready(), so that is too late.
Simply doing the INIT_OTP sequence earlier is not enough to fix this,
because the INIT_OTP sequence also sends various MIPI packets to the
panel, which can only happen after calling intel_dsi_device_ready().
This commit fixes this by splitting the INIT_OTP sequence into everything
before the first DSI packet and everything else, including the first DSI
packet. The first part (everything before the first DSI packet) is then
used as deassert sequence.
Changed in v2:
-Split the init OTP sequence into a deassert reset and the actual init
OTP sequence, instead of calling it earlier and then having the first
mipi_exec_send_packet() call call intel_dsi_device_ready().
Changes in v3:
-Move the whole shebang to intel_bios.c
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101205
Cc: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>
Reported-by: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214082151.25015-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
Add an intel_bios_cleanup() function to act as counterpart of
intel_bios_init() and move the cleanup of vbt related resources there,
putting it in the same file as the allocation.
Changed in v2:
-While touching the code anyways, remove the unnecessary:
if (dev_priv->vbt.child_dev) done before kfree(dev_priv->vbt.child_dev)
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214082151.25015-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
We can implement limited RC6 counter wrap-around protection under the
assumption that clients will be reading this value more frequently than
the wrap period on a given platform.
With the typical wrap-around period being ~90 minutes, even with the
exception of Baytrail which wraps every 13 seconds, this sounds like a
reasonable assumption.
Implementation works by storing a 64-bit software copy of a hardware RC6
counter, along with the previous HW counter snapshot. This enables it to
detect wrap is polled frequently enough and keep the software copy
monotonically incrementing.
v2:
* Missed GEN6_GT_GFX_RC6_LOCKED when considering slot sizing and
indexing.
* Fixed off-by-one in wrap-around handling. (Chris Wilson)
v3:
* Simplify index checking by using unsigned int. (Chris Wilson)
* Expand the comment to explain why indexing works.
v4:
* Use __int128 if supported.
v5:
* Use mul_u64_u32_div. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94852
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v3
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208160036.29919-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Header uses I915_NUM_ENGINES so needs to include i915.gem.h, and also
it uses requests so we can forward declare struct drm_i915_gem_request.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180213141833.17012-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Simplify intel_virt_detect_pch() by making it return a PCH id rather
than returning the PCH type and setting PCH id for some PCHs. Map the
PCH id to PCH type using the shared routine. This gives us sanity check
on the supported combinations also in the virtualized setting.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/197cf635261a1c628371ffaaee90e8647493af4d.1517851783.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
This patch program default values of MBus credit during pipe enable.
Changes Since V1:
- Add WARN_ON (Paulo)
- Remove TODO comment
- Program 0 during pipe disable
- Rebase
Changes since V2:
- We don't need to do anything when disabling the pipe
Changes since V3 (from Paulo):
- Remove WARN() that we'll never be able to trigger (Ville).
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180205172131.20255-1-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
This patch initializes MBus during display initialization.
Changes since V2 (from Paulo):
- Don't forget to remove the WARN_ON(1) call.
Changes since V1:
- Rebase to use function like Macros
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180205154046.11485-6-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
ICL has 2 slices of DBuf, enable both the slices during display init.
Ideally we should only enable the second slice when needed in order to
save power, but while we're not there yet, adopt the simpler solution
to keep us bug-free.
v2 (from Paulo):
- Add the TODO comment.
- Reorganize where things are defined.
- Fix indentation.
- Remove unnecessary POSTING_READ() calls.
- Improve the commit message.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180205154046.11485-5-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
This code is similar enough to the CNL code that I considered just
adding ICL support to the CNL function, but I think it's still
different enough, and having a function specific to ICL allows us to
more easily adapt code in case the spec changes more later.
We're still missing the power wells and the mbus code, so leave those
pieces with a FIXME comment while they're not here yet.
v2: Don't use _PICK, don't WARN_ON(1), don't forget the chicken bits.
v3: Use _MMIO_PORT() (Ville).
Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com> (v2)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180205154046.11485-4-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
This commit adds the basic CDCLK functions, but it's still missing
pieces of the display initialization sequence.
v2:
- Implement the voltage levels.
- Rebase.
v3:
- Adjust to the new "bypass" clock (Imre).
- Call intel_dump_cdclk_state() too.
- Rename a variable to avoid confusion.
- Simplify the DVFS part.
v4:
- Remove wrong bit definition (James).
- Also drive-by fix the coding style for the register definition we
touched.
v5:
- Comment style (checkpatch).
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180206193346.18272-1-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
On ICL we have two sets of registers: one for port A and another for
port B. The set of port A registers is the same as the CNL registers.
Since the procmon table on ICL is the same we want to reuse the CNL
function. To do that we add a port argument and make CNL always call
the function passing port A. This way, we'll be able to easily reuse
the function on ICL when we add icl_display_core_init().
v2: Don't use _PICK() when you can use a ternary operator.
v3: Don't use a ternary operation when you can use _MMIO_PORT (Ville).
Add an extra comment about why we're passing PORT_A (James).
Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180205154046.11485-2-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
While the comment singles out Port A or B, the code says Port A or *D*.
Looking at the history it seems that the comment was added after the code,
so it seems likely that the code is correct, not the comment.
CC: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
CC: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180209130755.11893-1-david.weinehall@linux.intel.com
When initialising the page directories, we set the GTT entries and the
tree to the scratch page. We have already replaced the DMA fill with
memset64(), but we can similarly use memset_p() to set the pointer array.
References: 4dd504f7d9 ("drm/i915: Use memset64() to prefill the GTT page")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180212133118.16443-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
On BXT/GLK GEN6_PCODE_READ_RC6VIDS fails with
MAILBOX_P24C_CC_ILLEGAL_CMD, so don't try to do the query on these
platforms. Do it only on SNB, IVB and HSW, where we use this command
anyway for RC6 enabling.
Based on my tests the command also succeeds on all LLC platforms, but
it's not clear if it's really supported on those (it returns 0 aka 245mv
for all RC6 states everywhere except on SNB). BSpec lists the command as
supported on SKL+ (see P24C_PCODE_MAILBOX_INTERFACE) but that's clearly
incorrect, since on SKL/KBL the same command ID is used for
SKL_PCODE_LOAD_HDCP_KEYS. Since the command fails on BXT/GLK, the BSpec
command list is also incorrect for those platforms (see
P_CR_P24C_PCODE_MAILBOX_INTERFACE_0_2_0_GTTMMADR).
I filed a request to update that info in Bspec, but for now let's
assume a minimal set of platforms where the command is supported.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103337
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208174102.10240-1-imre.deak@intel.com
When dumping the engine, we print out the current register values. This
requires the rpm wakeref. If the device is alseep, we can assume the
engine is asleep (and the register state is uninteresting) so skip and
only acquire the rpm wakeref if the device is already awake.
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180212102415.24246-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If the entire device is powered off, we can safely assume that the
engine is also asleep (and idle).
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: a091d4ee93 ("drm/i915: Hold a wakeref for probing the ring registers")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180212093928.6005-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we fail to reset the GPU (i915_reset()), we do one final
intel_gpu_reset() attempt as we mark the device wedged. The idea here is
even though the GPU has proven unreliable (and so we want to stop using
it for the time being), we don't want it spinning away in the background
whilst the driver idles so we try to reset it one more time. However, we
want to dump the i915_gem_set_wedged() debugging info before we do, so
that we can see the accurate state of the GPU when it failed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180209114056.9957-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Most of our ioctl functions have an _ioctl suffix in the name. I like
that idea since it makes it easy to figure out how the function is
going to get called. Rename the handful of exceptions to follow the
same pattern.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207164841.19431-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
FORCEWAKE_ACK is depricated by BSpec at least starting from BDW,
referring to the multi-threaded version of it instead. Accessing
FORCEWAKE_ACK triggers an unclaimed register access error - at
least on GLK - see the Reference: below.
The correct registers to use would be FORCEWAKE_MT_ACK on IVB+ and
FORCEWAKE_ACK_RENDER_GEN9 on SKL+ like it's done elsewhere in the
driver.
The forcewake check itself is inconsistent and redundant, since there
could be other forcewake requesters besides the kernel (being the
multithreaded version of the register) and the kernel's per-domain
forcewake counters are shown anyway at the end of the file. So let's
just remove the check.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103337
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Tested-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208112331.12986-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Since commit 4a118ecbe9 ("drm/i915: Filter out spurious execlists
context-switch interrupts") we probe execlists->active, and no longer
have to peek at the execlist interrupt to determine if the tasklet still
needs to be run to drain the ELSP.
References: 4a118ecbe9 ("drm/i915: Filter out spurious execlists context-switch interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208151224.16285-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
clang is confused by our if-else-chain that abruptly exits before a
final else:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:821:11: warning: variable 'status' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
else if (ret < 0)
^~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:826:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
return status;
^~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:821:7: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
else if (ret < 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:761:12: note: initialize the variable 'status' to silence this warning
int status, ret;
In this case, we can reduce the final else-if clause to an unconditional
else.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208163939.27030-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The unused-but-set warning enabled by W=1 catches out a lot of the
atomic helper iterator macros and drown us in their noise (or trip over
Werror and die). Path of least resistance is to ignore the warning.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208161639.27511-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_internal.c:183: warning: No description found for parameter 'i915'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_internal.c:183: warning: No description found for parameter 'size'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208114224.27271-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1983: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev_priv'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1983: warning: No description found for parameter 'file'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208113917.8439-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_syncmap.c:92: warning: No description found for parameter 'root'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_syncmap.c:155: warning: No description found for parameter 'root'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_syncmap.c:155: warning: No description found for parameter 'id'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_syncmap.c:155: warning: No description found for parameter 'seqno'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_syncmap.c:354: warning: No description found for parameter 'root'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_syncmap.c:354: warning: No description found for parameter 'id'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_syncmap.c:354: warning: No description found for parameter 'seqno'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_syncmap.c:396: warning: No description found for parameter 'root'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208105449.29880-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
The comment is very old and quite misleading now.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c:349: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev_priv'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c:349: warning: No description found for parameter 'file_priv'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208111559.32663-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c:761: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c:761: warning: No description found for parameter 'data'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c:761: warning: No description found for parameter 'file'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208111328.32422-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:179: warning: No description found for parameter 'req'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:741: warning: No description found for parameter 'req'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:741: warning: No description found for parameter 'cs'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208111220.32293-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c:1815: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev_priv'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c:1815: warning: No description found for parameter 'engine_mask'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c:1815: warning: No description found for parameter 'error_msg'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c:1815: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'i915_capture_error_state'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208111105.32149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Chris Wilson