Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation this program is
distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general
public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org
licenses
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 503 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190602204653.811534538@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Since those were introduced in:
c8ce48f065 ("asm-generic: Make time32 syscall numbers optional")
But when the asm-generic/unistd.h was sync'ed with tools/ in:
1a787fc5ba ("tools headers uapi: Sync copy of asm-generic/unistd.h with the kernel sources")
I forgot to copy the files for the architectures that define
__ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS, so the perf build was breaking there, as
reported by Vineet Gupta for the ARC architecture.
After updating my ARC container to use the glibc based toolchain + cross
building libnuma, zlib and elfutils, I finally managed to reproduce the
problem and verify that this now is fixed and will not regress as will
be tested before each pull req sent upstream.
Reported-by: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
CC: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190426193531.GC28586@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The BPF library is not built on 64-bit RISC-V, as the BPF feature is
not detected. Looking more in details, feature/test-bpf.c fails to build
with the following error:
| In file included from /tmp/linux-4.19.12/tools/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h:17,
| from /tmp/linux-4.19.12/tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:2,
| from /usr/include/riscv64-linux-gnu/asm/unistd.h:1,
| from test-bpf.c:2:
| /tmp/linux-4.19.12/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:14:2: error: #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
| #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
| ^~~~~
The UAPI from the tools directory is missing RISC-V support, therefore
bitsperlong.h from asm-generic is used, defaulting to 32 bits.
Fix that by adding tools/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h as
a copy of arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h and by updating
tools/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h.
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Thomas Gleixner