Conditionally compile kprobes test cases for ARMv5 instructions to avoid
compilation errors with ARMv4 targets like:
/tmp/cc7Tx8ST.s:16740: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `clz r0,r0'
Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
ARM data processing instructions which have a register specified shift
are defined as UNPREDICTABLE if PC is used for any register, not just
the shift value as the code was previous assuming. This issue manifests
on A15 devices as either test case failures or undefined instructions
aborts.
Reported-by: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
The kprobes test will build certain instructions incorrectly if building
big endian as .word output gets endian-swapped by the linker. Change to
using <asm/opcodes.h> and __inst_arm() to produce instructions.
Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
[taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org: fixed unsupported coprocessor instructions]
Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org>
Make sure includes in ARM kprobes sources are done explicitly. Do not
rely on includes from other includes.
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
The mls instruction is not available in ARMv6K or below, so we
should make the test conditional on at least ARMv7. ldrexd/strexd
are available in ARMv6K or ARMv7, which we can test by checking
the CONFIG_CPU_32v6K symbol.
/tmp/ccuMTZ8D.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccuMTZ8D.s:22188: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `mls r0,r1,r2,r3'
/tmp/ccuMTZ8D.s:22222: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `mlshi r7,r8,r9,r10'
/tmp/ccuMTZ8D.s:22252: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `mls lr,r1,r2,r13'
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@yxit.co.uk>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
'sub pc, pc, #1b-2b+8-2' results in address<1:0> == '10'.
sub pc, pc, #const (== ADR pc, #const) performs an interworking branch
(BXWritePC()) on ARMv7+ and a simple branch (BranchWritePC()) on earlier
versions.
In ARM state, BXWritePC() is UNPREDICTABLE when address<1:0> == '10'.
In ARM state on ARMv6+, BranchWritePC() ignores address<1:0>. Before
ARMv6, BranchWritePC() is UNPREDICTABLE if address<1:0> != '00'
So the instruction is UNPREDICTABLE both before and after v6.
Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@yxit.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
The SWP instruction is deprecated on ARMv6 and with ARMv7 it will be
UNDEFINED when CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE is selected. In this case, probing a
SWP instruction will cause an oops when the kprobes emulation code
executes an undefined instruction.
As the SWP instruction should be rare or non-existent in kernels for
ARMv6 and later, we can simply avoid these problems by not allowing
probing of these.
Reported-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
Tested-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@yxit.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
There is a kprobes testcase for the instruction "strd r2, [r3], r4".
This has unpredictable behaviour as it uses r3 for register writeback
addressing and also stores it to memory.
On a cortex A9, this testcase would fail because the instruction writes
the updated value of r3 to memory, whereas the kprobes emulation code
writes the original value.
Fix this by changing testcase to used r5 instead of r3.
Reported-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
Tested-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@yxit.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Jon Medhurst