-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJYoM2fAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGr9MH/izEAMri7rJ0QMc3ejt+WmD0
8pkZw3+MVn71z6cIEgpzk4QkEWJd5rfhkETCeCp7qQ9V6cDW1FDE9+0OmPjiphDt
nnzKs7t7skEBwH5Mq5xygmIfkv+Z0QGHZ20gfQWY3F56Uxo+ARF88OBHBLKhqx3v
98C7YbMFLKBslKClA78NUEIdx0UfBaRqerlERx0Lfl9aoOrbBS6WI3iuREiylpih
9o7HTrwaGKkU4Kd6NdgJP2EyWPsd1LGalxBBjeDSpm5uokX6ALTdNXDZqcQscHjE
RmTqJTGRdhSThXOpNnvUJvk9L442yuNRrVme/IqLpxMdHPyjaXR3FGSIDb2SfjY=
=VMy8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v4.10-rc8' into drm-next
Linux 4.10-rc8
Backmerge Linus rc8 to fix some conflicts, but also
to avoid pulling it in via a fixes pull from someone.
If we fail to dma-map the object, the most common cause is lack of space
inside the SW-IOTLB due to fragmentation. If we recreate the_sg_table
using segments of PAGE_SIZE (and single page allocations), we may succeed
in remapping the scatterlist.
First became a significant problem for the mock selftests after commit
5584f1b1d7 ("drm/i915: fix i915 running as dom0 under Xen") increased
the max_order.
Fixes: 920cf41949 ("drm/i915: Introduce an internal allocator for disposable private objects")
Fixes: 5584f1b1d7 ("drm/i915: fix i915 running as dom0 under Xen")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170202132721.12711-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10
(cherry picked from commit bb96dcf583)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Commit 920cf41949 ("drm/i915: Introduce an internal allocator for
disposable private objects") introduced a regression for the kernel
running as Xen dom0: when switching to graphics mode a GPU HANG
occurred.
Reason seems to be a missing adaption similar to that done in
commit 7453c549f5 ("swiotlb: Export swiotlb_max_segment to users")
to i915_gem_object_get_pages_internal().
So limit the maximum page order to be used according to the maximum
swiotlb segment size instead to the complete swiotlb size.
Fixes: 920cf41949 ("drm/i915: Introduce an internal allocator for disposable private objects")
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170202094711.939-1-jgross@suse.com
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
(cherry picked from commit 5584f1b1d7)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The internal object is a collection of struct pages and so is
intrinsically linked to the available physical memory on the machine,
and not an arbitrary type from the uabi. Use phys_addr_t so the link
between size and memory consumption is clear, and then double check that
we don't overflow the maximum object size.
v2: Also assert that size is not zero - a mistake I made a few times
while writing selftests.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170112130431.1844-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Where it is more appropriate and also to be consistent with
the direction of the driver.
v2: Leave out object alloc/free inlining. (Joonas Lahtinen)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Commit 1bec9b0bda ("drm/i915/shrinker: Only shmemfs objects
are backed by swap") stopped considering the userptr objects
in shrinker callbacks.
Restore that so idle userptr objects can be discarded in order
to free up memory.
One change further to what was introduced in 1bec9b0bda is
to start considering userptr objects in oom but that should
also be a correct thing to do.
v2: Introduce I915_GEM_OBJECT_IS_SHRINKABLE. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 1bec9b0bda ("drm/i915/shrinker: Only shmemfs objects are backed by swap")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478011450-6634-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
The plan is to move obj->pages out from under the struct_mutex into its
own per-object lock. We need to prune any assumption of the struct_mutex
from the get_pages/put_pages backends, and to make it easier we pass
around the sg_table to operate on rather than indirectly via the obj.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-13-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The plan is to make obtaining the backing storage for the object avoid
struct_mutex (i.e. use its own locking). The first step is to update the
API so that normal users only call pin/unpin whilst working on the
backing storage.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Quite a few of our objects used for internal hardware programming do not
benefit from being swappable or from being zero initialised. As such
they do not benefit from using a shmemfs backing storage and since they
are internal and never directly exposed to the user, we do not need to
worry about providing a filp. For these we can use an
drm_i915_gem_object wrapper around a sg_table of plain struct page. They
are not swap backed and not automatically pinned. If they are reaped
by the shrinker, the pages are released and the contents discarded. For
the internal use case, this is fine as for example, ringbuffers are
pinned from being written by a request to be read by the hardware. Once
they are idle, they can be discarded entirely. As such they are a good
match for execlist ringbuffers and a small variety of other internal
objects.
In the first iteration, this is limited to the scratch batch buffers we
use (for command parsing and state initialisation).
v2: Allocate physically contiguous pages, where possible.
v3: Reduce maximum order on subsequent requests following an allocation
failure.
v4: Fix up mismatch between swiotlb segment size and page count (it
counts in 2k units, not 4k pages)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Dave Airlie