Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2022-02-03
We've added 6 non-merge commits during the last 10 day(s) which contain
a total of 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 236 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Fix BPF ringbuf to allocate its area with VM_MAP instead of VM_ALLOC
flag which otherwise trips over KASAN, from Hou Tao.
2) Fix unresolved symbol warning in resolve_btfids due to LSM callback
rename, from Alexei Starovoitov.
3) Fix a possible race in inc_misses_counter() when IRQ would trigger
during counter update, from He Fengqing.
4) Fix tooling infra for cross-building with clang upon probing whether
gcc provides the standard libraries, from Jean-Philippe Brucker.
5) Fix silent mode build for resolve_btfids, from Nathan Chancellor.
6) Drop unneeded and outdated lirc.h header copy from tooling infra as
BPF does not require it anymore, from Sean Young.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf:
tools/resolve_btfids: Do not print any commands when building silently
bpf: Use VM_MAP instead of VM_ALLOC for ringbuf
tools: Ignore errors from `which' when searching a GCC toolchain
tools headers UAPI: remove stale lirc.h
bpf: Fix possible race in inc_misses_counter
bpf: Fix renaming task_getsecid_subj->current_getsecid_subj.
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220203155815.25689-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
After commit 2fd3fb0be1d1 ("kasan, vmalloc: unpoison VM_ALLOC pages
after mapping"), non-VM_ALLOC mappings will be marked as accessible
in __get_vm_area_node() when KASAN is enabled. But now the flag for
ringbuf area is VM_ALLOC, so KASAN will complain out-of-bound access
after vmap() returns. Because the ringbuf area is created by mapping
allocated pages, so use VM_MAP instead.
After the change, info in /proc/vmallocinfo also changes from
[start]-[end] 24576 ringbuf_map_alloc+0x171/0x290 vmalloc user
to
[start]-[end] 24576 ringbuf_map_alloc+0x171/0x290 vmap user
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: syzbot+5ad567a418794b9b5983@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220202060158.6260-1-houtao1@huawei.com
It seems inc_misses_counter() suffers from same issue fixed in
the commit d979617aa8 ("bpf: Fixes possible race in update_prog_stats()
for 32bit arches"):
As it can run while interrupts are enabled, it could
be re-entered and the u64_stats syncp could be mangled.
Fixes: 9ed9e9ba23 ("bpf: Count the number of times recursion was prevented")
Signed-off-by: He Fengqing <hefengqing@huawei.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220122102936.1219518-1-hefengqing@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
- A series of bpf fixes, including an oops fix and some codegen fixes.
- Fix a regression in syscall_get_arch() for compat processes.
- Fix boot failure on some 32-bit systems with KASAN enabled.
- A couple of other build/minor fixes.
Thanks to: Athira Rajeev, Christophe Leroy, Dmitry V. Levin, Jiri Olsa, Johan Almbladh,
Maxime Bizon, Naveen N. Rao, Nicholas Piggin.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=KjWT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'powerpc-5.17-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux
Pull powerpc fixes from Michael Ellerman:
- A series of bpf fixes, including an oops fix and some codegen fixes.
- Fix a regression in syscall_get_arch() for compat processes.
- Fix boot failure on some 32-bit systems with KASAN enabled.
- A couple of other build/minor fixes.
Thanks to Athira Rajeev, Christophe Leroy, Dmitry V. Levin, Jiri Olsa,
Johan Almbladh, Maxime Bizon, Naveen N. Rao, and Nicholas Piggin.
* tag 'powerpc-5.17-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux:
powerpc/64s: Mask SRR0 before checking against the masked NIP
powerpc/perf: Only define power_pmu_wants_prompt_pmi() for CONFIG_PPC64
powerpc/32s: Fix kasan_init_region() for KASAN
powerpc/time: Fix build failure due to do_hard_irq_enable() on PPC32
powerpc/audit: Fix syscall_get_arch()
powerpc64/bpf: Limit 'ldbrx' to processors compliant with ISA v2.06
tools/bpf: Rename 'struct event' to avoid naming conflict
powerpc/bpf: Update ldimm64 instructions during extra pass
powerpc32/bpf: Fix codegen for bpf-to-bpf calls
bpf: Guard against accessing NULL pt_regs in bpf_get_task_stack()
The bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument, and thus both expect
the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL.
While the non-NULL memory from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() can be passed to other
helpers, the two sinks (bpf_ringbuf_submit(), bpf_ringbuf_discard()) right now
only enforce a register type of PTR_TO_MEM.
This can lead to potential type confusion since it would allow other PTR_TO_MEM
memory to be passed into the two sinks which did not come from bpf_ringbuf_reserve().
Add a new MEM_ALLOC composable type attribute for PTR_TO_MEM, and enforce that:
- bpf_ringbuf_reserve() returns NULL or PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC
- bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() only take PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC
but not plain PTR_TO_MEM arguments via ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
- however, other helpers might treat PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC as plain PTR_TO_MEM
to populate the memory area when they use ARG_PTR_TO_{UNINIT_,}MEM in their
func proto description
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Both bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument. They both expect
the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL.
Meaning, after a NULL check in the code, the verifier will promote the register
type in the non-NULL branch to a PTR_TO_MEM and in the NULL branch to a known
zero scalar. Generally, pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_MEM is allowed, so the
latter could have an offset.
The ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM expects a PTR_TO_MEM register type. However, the non-
zero result from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() must be fed into either bpf_ringbuf_submit()
or bpf_ringbuf_discard() but with the original offset given it will then read
out the struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr mapping.
The verifier missed to enforce a zero offset, so that out of bounds access
can be triggered which could be used to escalate privileges if unprivileged
BPF was enabled (disabled by default in kernel).
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: <tr3e.wang@gmail.com> (SecCoder Security Lab)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Right now the assertion on check_ptr_off_reg() is only enforced for register
types PTR_TO_CTX (and open coded also for PTR_TO_BTF_ID), however, this is
insufficient since many other PTR_TO_* register types such as PTR_TO_FUNC do
not handle/expect register offsets when passed to helper functions.
Given this can slip-through easily when adding new types, make this an explicit
allow-list and reject all other current and future types by default if this is
encountered.
Also, extend check_ptr_off_reg() to handle PTR_TO_BTF_ID as well instead of
duplicating it. For PTR_TO_BTF_ID, reg->off is used for BTF to match expected
BTF ids if struct offset is used. This part still needs to be allowed, but the
dynamic off from the tnum must be rejected.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similar as with other pointer types where we use ldimm64, clear the register
content to zero first, and then populate the PTR_TO_FUNC type and subprogno
number. Currently this is not done, and leads to reuse of stale register
tracking data.
Given for special ldimm64 cases we always clear the register offset, make it
common for all cases, so it won't be forgotten in future.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Generalize the check_ctx_reg() helper function into a more generic named one
so that it can be reused for other register types as well to check whether
their offset is non-zero. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
task_pt_regs() can return NULL on powerpc for kernel threads. This is
then used in __bpf_get_stack() to check for user mode, resulting in a
kernel oops. Guard against this by checking return value of
task_pt_regs() before trying to obtain the call chain.
Fixes: fa28dcb82a ("bpf: Introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d5ef83c361cc255494afd15ff1b4fb02a36e1dcf.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
env->scratched_stack_slots is a 64-bit value, we should use ULL
instead of UL literal values.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220108005854.658596-1-christylee@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We noticed our tc ebpf tools can't start after we upgrade our in-house kernel
version from 4.19 to 5.10. That is because of the behaviour change in bpffs
caused by commit d2935de7e4 ("vfs: Convert bpf to use the new mount API").
In our tc ebpf tools, we do strict environment check. If the environment is
not matched, we won't allow to start the ebpf progs. One of the check is whether
bpffs is properly mounted. The mount information of bpffs in kernel-4.19 and
kernel-5.10 are as follows:
- kernel 4.19
$ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf
$ mount -t bpf
bpffs on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime)
- kernel 5.10
$ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf
$ mount -t bpf
none on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime)
The device name in kernel-5.10 is displayed as none instead of bpffs, then our
environment check fails. Currently we modify the tools to adopt to the kernel
behaviour change, but I think we'd better change the kernel code to keep the
behavior consistent.
After this change, the mount information will be displayed the same with the
behavior in kernel-4.19, for example:
$ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf
$ mount -t bpf
bpffs on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime)
Fixes: d2935de7e4 ("vfs: Convert bpf to use the new mount API")
Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220108134623.32467-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com
All map redirect functions except XSK maps convert xdp_buff to xdp_frame
before enqueueing it. So move this conversion of out the map functions
and into xdp_do_redirect(). This removes a bit of duplicated code, but more
importantly it makes it possible to support caller-allocated xdp_frame
structures, which will be added in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220103150812.87914-5-toke@redhat.com
Commit bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
added support for BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback to
the __check_func_call() function. The test in __check_func_call() is
flaweed because it can mis-interpret a regular BPF-to-BPF pseudo-call
as a BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback callback call.
Consider the conditional in the code:
if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) &&
insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback) {
The BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback has value 170. This means that if you
have a BPF program that contains a pseudo-call with an instruction delta
of 170, this conditional will be found to be true by the verifier, and
it will interpret the pseudo-call as a callback. This leads to a mess
with the verification of the program because it makes the wrong
assumptions about the nature of this call.
Solution: include an explicit check to ensure that insn->src_reg == 0.
This ensures that calls cannot be mis-interpreted as an async callback
call.
Fixes: bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220105210150.GH1559@oracle.com
If we ever get to a point again where we convert a bogus looking <ptr>_or_null
typed register containing a non-zero fixed or variable offset, then lets not
reset these bounds to zero since they are not and also don't promote the register
to a <ptr> type, but instead leave it as <ptr>_or_null. Converting to a unknown
register could be an avenue as well, but then if we run into this case it would
allow to leak a kernel pointer this way.
Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-12-30
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 20 day(s) which contain
a total of 223 files changed, 3510 insertions(+), 1591 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Automatic setrlimit in libbpf when bpf is memcg's in the kernel, from Andrii.
2) Beautify and de-verbose verifier logs, from Christy.
3) Composable verifier types, from Hao.
4) bpf_strncmp helper, from Hou.
5) bpf.h header dependency cleanup, from Jakub.
6) get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers, from Jiri.
7) Sleepable local storage, from KP.
8) Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument support, from Kumar.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add missing includes unmasked by the subsequent change.
Mostly network drivers missing an include for XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211230012742.770642-2-kuba@kernel.org
Other maps like hashmaps are already available to sleepable programs.
Sleepable BPF programs run under trace RCU. Allow task, sk and inode
storage to be used from sleepable programs. This allows sleepable and
non-sleepable programs to provide shareable annotations on kernel
objects.
Sleepable programs run in trace RCU where as non-sleepable programs run
in a normal RCU critical section i.e. __bpf_prog_enter{_sleepable}
and __bpf_prog_exit{_sleepable}) (rcu_read_lock or rcu_read_lock_trace).
In order to make the local storage maps accessible to both sleepable
and non-sleepable programs, one needs to call both
call_rcu_tasks_trace and call_rcu to wait for both trace and classical
RCU grace periods to expire before freeing memory.
Paul's work on call_rcu_tasks_trace allows us to have per CPU queueing
for call_rcu_tasks_trace. This behaviour can be achieved by setting
rcupdate.rcu_task_enqueue_lim=<num_cpus> boot parameter.
In light of these new performance changes and to keep the local storage
code simple, avoid adding a new flag for sleepable maps / local storage
to select the RCU synchronization (trace / classical).
Also, update the dereferencing of the pointers to use
rcu_derference_check (with either the trace or normal RCU locks held)
with a common bpf_rcu_lock_held helper method.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211224152916.1550677-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
Allow passing PTR_TO_CTX, if the kfunc expects a matching struct type,
and punt to PTR_TO_MEM block if reg->type does not fall in one of
PTR_TO_BTF_ID or PTR_TO_SOCK* types. This will be used by future commits
to get access to XDP and TC PTR_TO_CTX, and pass various data (flags,
l4proto, netns_id, etc.) encoded in opts struct passed as pointer to
kfunc.
For PTR_TO_MEM support, arguments are currently limited to pointer to
scalar, or pointer to struct composed of scalars. This is done so that
unsafe scenarios (like passing PTR_TO_MEM where PTR_TO_BTF_ID of
in-kernel valid structure is expected, which may have pointers) are
avoided. Since the argument checking happens basd on argument register
type, it is not easy to ascertain what the expected type is. In the
future, support for PTR_TO_MEM for kfunc can be extended to serve other
usecases. The struct type whose pointer is passed in may have maximum
nesting depth of 4, all recursively composed of scalars or struct with
scalars.
Future commits will add negative tests that check whether these
restrictions imposed for kfunc arguments are duly rejected by BPF
verifier or not.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217015031.1278167-4-memxor@gmail.com
Some helper functions may modify its arguments, for example,
bpf_d_path, bpf_get_stack etc. Previously, their argument types
were marked as ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, which is compatible with read-only
mem types, such as PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF. Therefore it's legitimate,
but technically incorrect, to modify a read-only memory by passing
it into one of such helper functions.
This patch tags the bpf_args compatible with immutable memory with
MEM_RDONLY flag. The arguments that don't have this flag will be
only compatible with mutable memory types, preventing the helper
from modifying a read-only memory. The bpf_args that have
MEM_RDONLY are compatible with both mutable memory and immutable
memory.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-9-haoluo@google.com
Tag the return type of {per, this}_cpu_ptr with RDONLY_MEM. The
returned value of this pair of helpers is kernel object, which
can not be updated by bpf programs. Previously these two helpers
return PTR_OT_MEM for kernel objects of scalar type, which allows
one to directly modify the memory. Now with RDONLY_MEM tagging,
the verifier will reject programs that write into RDONLY_MEM.
Fixes: 63d9b80dcf ("bpf: Introducte bpf_this_cpu_ptr()")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Fixes: 4976b718c3 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-8-haoluo@google.com
This patch introduce a flag MEM_RDONLY to tag a reg value
pointing to read-only memory. It makes the following changes:
1. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF
2. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF | MEM_RDONLY
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-6-haoluo@google.com
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_reg composable, by
allocating bits in the type to represent flags.
One of the flags is PTR_MAYBE_NULL which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. This patch switches the qualified reg_types to
use this flag. The reg_types changed in this patch include:
1. PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
3. PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL
4. PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL
5. PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
6. PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL
7. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF_OR_NULL
8. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF_OR_NULL
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217003152.48334-5-haoluo@google.com
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_ret composable, by
reserving high bits to represent flags.
One of the flag is PTR_MAYBE_NULL, which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. When applying this flag to ret_types, it means
the returned value could be a NULL pointer. This patch
switches the qualified arg_types to use this flag.
The ret_types changed in this patch include:
1. RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
3. RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL
4. RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL
5. RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL
6. RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
7. RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
This patch doesn't eliminate the use of these names, instead
it makes them aliases to 'RET_PTR_TO_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-4-haoluo@google.com
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_arg composable, by
reserving high bits of bpf_arg to represent flags of a type.
One of the flags is PTR_MAYBE_NULL which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. When applying this flag to an arg_type, it means
the arg can take NULL pointer. This patch switches the
qualified arg_types to use this flag. The arg_types changed
in this patch include:
1. ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL
3. ARG_PTR_TO_CTX_OR_NULL
4. ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
5. ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL
6. ARG_PTR_TO_STACK_OR_NULL
This patch does not eliminate the use of these arg_types, instead
it makes them an alias to the 'ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-3-haoluo@google.com
Backtracking information is very verbose, don't print it in log
level 1 to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216213358.3374427-4-christylee@fb.com
We're about to break the cgroup-defs.h -> bpf-cgroup.h dependency,
make sure those who actually need more than the definition of
struct cgroup_bpf include bpf-cgroup.h explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216025538.1649516-3-kuba@kernel.org
Make the bounds propagation in __reg_assign_32_into_64() slightly more
robust and readable by aligning it similarly as we did back in the
__reg_combine_64_into_32() counterpart. Meaning, only propagate or
pessimize them as a smin/smax pair.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
For the case where both s32_{min,max}_value bounds are positive, the
__reg_assign_32_into_64() directly propagates them to their 64 bit
counterparts, otherwise it pessimises them into [0,u32_max] universe and
tries to refine them later on by learning through the tnum as per comment
in mentioned function. However, that does not always happen, for example,
in mov32 operation we call zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) which invokes the
__reg_assign_32_into_64() as is without subsequent bounds update as
elsewhere thus no refinement based on tnum takes place.
Thus, not calling into the __update_reg_bounds() / __reg_deduce_bounds() /
__reg_bound_offset() triplet as we do, for example, in case of ALU ops via
adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(), will lead to more pessimistic bounds when
dumping the full register state:
Before fix:
0: (b4) w0 = -1
1: R0_w=invP4294967295
(id=0,imm=ffffffff,
smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)
1: (bc) w0 = w0
2: R0_w=invP4294967295
(id=0,imm=ffffffff,
smin_value=0,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)
Technically, the smin_value=0 and smax_value=4294967295 bounds are not
incorrect, but given the register is still a constant, they break assumptions
about const scalars that smin_value == smax_value and umin_value == umax_value.
After fix:
0: (b4) w0 = -1
1: R0_w=invP4294967295
(id=0,imm=ffffffff,
smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)
1: (bc) w0 = w0
2: R0_w=invP4294967295
(id=0,imm=ffffffff,
smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)
Without the smin_value == smax_value and umin_value == umax_value invariant
being intact for const scalars, it is possible to leak out kernel pointers
from unprivileged user space if the latter is enabled. For example, when such
registers are involved in pointer arithmtics, then adjust_ptr_min_max_vals()
will taint the destination register into an unknown scalar, and the latter
can be exported and stored e.g. into a BPF map value.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The implementation of BPF_CMPXCHG on a high level has the following parameters:
.-[old-val] .-[new-val]
BPF_R0 = cmpxchg{32,64}(DST_REG + insn->off, BPF_R0, SRC_REG)
`-[mem-loc] `-[old-val]
Given a BPF insn can only have two registers (dst, src), the R0 is fixed and
used as an auxilliary register for input (old value) as well as output (returning
old value from memory location). While the verifier performs a number of safety
checks, it misses to reject unprivileged programs where R0 contains a pointer as
old value.
Through brute-forcing it takes about ~16sec on my machine to leak a kernel pointer
with BPF_CMPXCHG. The PoC is basically probing for kernel addresses by storing the
guessed address into the map slot as a scalar, and using the map value pointer as
R0 while SRC_REG has a canary value to detect a matching address.
Fix it by checking R0 for pointers, and reject if that's the case for unprivileged
programs.
Fixes: 5ffa25502b ("bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg")
Reported-by: Ryota Shiga (Flatt Security)
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The change in commit 37086bfdc7 ("bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers
in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH") around check_mem_access() handling is buggy since
this would allow for unprivileged users to leak kernel pointers. For example,
an atomic fetch/and with -1 on a stack destination which holds a spilled
pointer will migrate the spilled register type into a scalar, which can then
be exported out of the program (since scalar != pointer) by dumping it into
a map value.
The original implementation of XADD was preventing this situation by using
a double call to check_mem_access() one with BPF_READ and a subsequent one
with BPF_WRITE, in both cases passing -1 as a placeholder value instead of
register as per XADD semantics since it didn't contain a value fetch. The
BPF_READ also included a check in check_stack_read_fixed_off() which rejects
the program if the stack slot is of __is_pointer_value() if dst_regno < 0.
The latter is to distinguish whether we're dealing with a regular stack spill/
fill or some arithmetical operation which is disallowed on non-scalars, see
also 6e7e63cbb0 ("bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged
users") for more context on check_mem_access() and its handling of placeholder
value -1.
One minimally intrusive option to fix the leak is for the BPF_FETCH case to
initially check the BPF_READ case via check_mem_access() with -1 as register,
followed by the actual load case with non-negative load_reg to propagate
stack bounds to registers.
Fixes: 37086bfdc7 ("bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH")
Reported-by: <n4ke4mry@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In non trivial scenarios, the action id alone is not sufficient to
identify the program causing the warning. Before the previous patch,
the generated stack-trace pointed out at least the involved device
driver.
Let's additionally include the program name and id, and the relevant
device name.
If the user needs additional infos, he can fetch them via a kernel
probe, leveraging the arguments added here.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ddb96bb975cbfddb1546cf5da60e77d5100b533c.1638189075.git.pabeni@redhat.com
Adding following helpers for tracing programs:
Get n-th argument of the traced function:
long bpf_get_func_arg(void *ctx, u32 n, u64 *value)
Get return value of the traced function:
long bpf_get_func_ret(void *ctx, u64 *value)
Get arguments count of the traced function:
long bpf_get_func_arg_cnt(void *ctx)
The trampoline now stores number of arguments on ctx-8
address, so it's easy to verify argument index and find
return value argument's position.
Moving function ip address on the trampoline stack behind
the number of functions arguments, so it's now stored on
ctx-16 address if it's needed.
All helpers above are inlined by verifier.
Also bit unrelated small change - using newly added function
bpf_prog_has_trampoline in check_get_func_ip.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-5-jolsa@kernel.org
Adding support to access arguments with int pointer arguments
in tracing programs.
Currently we allow tracing programs to access only pointers to
string (char pointer), void pointers and pointers to structs.
If we try to access argument which is pointer to int, verifier
will fail to load the program with;
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
; int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test, int _a, __u64 _b, int _ret)
0: (bf) r6 = r1
; int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test, int _a, __u64 _b, int _ret)
1: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r6 +8)
func 'bpf_modify_return_test' arg1 type INT is not a struct
There is no harm for the program to access int pointer argument.
We are already doing that for string pointer, which is pointer
to int with 1 byte size.
Changing the is_string_ptr to generic integer check and renaming
it to btf_type_is_int.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Coverity issued the following warning:
6685 cands = bpf_core_add_cands(cands, main_btf, 1);
6686 if (IS_ERR(cands))
>>> CID 1510300: (RETURN_LOCAL)
>>> Returning pointer "cands" which points to local variable "local_cand".
6687 return cands;
It's a false positive.
Add ERR_CAST() to silence it.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The helper compares two strings: one string is a null-terminated
read-only string, and another string has const max storage size
but doesn't need to be null-terminated. It can be used to compare
file name in tracing or LSM program.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211210141652.877186-2-houtao1@huawei.com
Andrii Nakryiko says:
====================
bpf-next 2021-12-10 v2
We've added 115 non-merge commits during the last 26 day(s) which contain
a total of 182 files changed, 5747 insertions(+), 2564 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Various samples fixes, from Alexander Lobakin.
2) BPF CO-RE support in kernel and light skeleton, from Alexei Starovoitov.
3) A batch of new unified APIs for libbpf, logging improvements, version
querying, etc. Also a batch of old deprecations for old APIs and various
bug fixes, in preparation for libbpf 1.0, from Andrii Nakryiko.
4) BPF documentation reorganization and improvements, from Christoph Hellwig
and Dave Tucker.
5) Support for declarative initialization of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY in
libbpf, from Hengqi Chen.
6) Verifier log fixes, from Hou Tao.
7) Runtime-bounded loops support with bpf_loop() helper, from Joanne Koong.
8) Extend branch record capturing to all platforms that support it,
from Kajol Jain.
9) Light skeleton codegen improvements, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
10) bpftool doc-generating script improvements, from Quentin Monnet.
11) Two libbpf v0.6 bug fixes, from Shuyi Cheng and Vincent Minet.
12) Deprecation warning fix for perf/bpf_counter, from Song Liu.
13) MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT unification and MIPS build fix for libbpf,
from Tiezhu Yang.
14) BTF_KING_TYPE_TAG follow-up fixes, from Yonghong Song.
15) Selftests fixes and improvements, from Ilya Leoshkevich, Jean-Philippe
Brucker, Jiri Olsa, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Tirthendu Sarkar, Yucong Sun,
and others.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (115 commits)
libbpf: Add "bool skipped" to struct bpf_map
libbpf: Fix typo in btf__dedup@LIBBPF_0.0.2 definition
bpftool: Switch bpf_object__load_xattr() to bpf_object__load()
selftests/bpf: Remove the only use of deprecated bpf_object__load_xattr()
selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf's custom log_buf behavior
selftests/bpf: Replace all uses of bpf_load_btf() with bpf_btf_load()
libbpf: Deprecate bpf_object__load_xattr()
libbpf: Add per-program log buffer setter and getter
libbpf: Preserve kernel error code and remove kprobe prog type guessing
libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program loading
libbpf: Allow passing user log setting through bpf_object_open_opts
libbpf: Allow passing preallocated log_buf when loading BTF into kernel
libbpf: Add OPTS-based bpf_btf_load() API
libbpf: Fix bpf_prog_load() log_buf logic for log_level 0
samples/bpf: Remove unneeded variable
bpf: Remove redundant assignment to pointer t
selftests/bpf: Fix a compilation warning
perf/bpf_counter: Use bpf_map_create instead of bpf_create_map
samples: bpf: Fix 'unknown warning group' build warning on Clang
samples: bpf: Fix xdp_sample_user.o linking with Clang
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210234746.2100561-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Commit 354e8f1970 ("bpf: Support <8-byte scalar spill and refill")
introduced support in the verifier to track <8B spill/fills of scalars.
The backtracking logic for the precision bit was however skipping
spill/fills of less than 8B. That could cause state pruning to consider
two states equivalent when they shouldn't be.
As an example, consider the following bytecode snippet:
0: r7 = r1
1: call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: r6 = 2
3: if r0 == 0 goto pc+1
4: r6 = 3
...
8: [state pruning point]
...
/* u32 spill/fill */
10: *(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = r6
11: r8 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 8)
12: r0 = 0
13: if r8 == 3 goto pc+1
14: r0 = 1
15: exit
The verifier first walks the path with R6=3. Given the support for <8B
spill/fills, at instruction 13, it knows the condition is true and skips
instruction 14. At that point, the backtracking logic kicks in but stops
at the fill instruction since it only propagates the precision bit for
8B spill/fill. When the verifier then walks the path with R6=2, it will
consider it safe at instruction 8 because R6 is not marked as needing
precision. Instruction 14 is thus never walked and is then incorrectly
removed as 'dead code'.
It's also possible to lead the verifier to accept e.g. an out-of-bound
memory access instead of causing an incorrect dead code elimination.
This regression was found via Cilium's bpf-next CI where it was causing
a conntrack map update to be silently skipped because the code had been
removed by the verifier.
This commit fixes it by enabling support for <8B spill/fills in the
bactracking logic. In case of a <8B spill/fill, the full 8B stack slot
will be marked as needing precision. Then, in __mark_chain_precision,
any tracked register spilled in a marked slot will itself be marked as
needing precision, regardless of the spill size. This logic makes two
assumptions: (1) only 8B-aligned spill/fill are tracked and (2) spilled
registers are only tracked if the spill and fill sizes are equal. Commit
ef979017b8 ("bpf: selftest: Add verifier tests for <8-byte scalar
spill and refill") covers the first assumption and the next commit in
this patchset covers the second.
Fixes: 354e8f1970 ("bpf: Support <8-byte scalar spill and refill")
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The pointer t is being initialized with a value that is never read. The
pointer is re-assigned a value a littler later on, hence the initialization
is redundant and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211207224718.59593-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
When CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES is not set
the following warning can be seen:
kernel/bpf/btf.c:6588:13: warning: 'purge_cand_cache' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Fix it.
Fixes: 1e89106da2 ("bpf: Add bpf_core_add_cands() and wire it into bpf_core_apply_relo_insn().")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211207014839.6976-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Jakub Kicinski