Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rafael J. Wysocki 26398a70ea PM: Rename struct pm_ops and related things
The name of 'struct pm_ops' suggests that it is related to the power
management in general, but in fact it is only related to suspend.   Moreover,
its name should indicate what this structure is used for, so it seems
reasonable to change it to 'struct platform_suspend_ops'.   In that case, the
name of the global variable of this type used by the PM core and the names of
related functions should be changed accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18 14:37:18 -07:00
Eric Miao 711be5ccfe [ARM] 4488/1: pxa: move pxa25x/pxa27x specific code out of pm.c
1. introduce a structure pxa_cpu_pm_fns for pxa25x/pxa27x specific
   operations as follows:

	struct pxa_cpu_pm_fns {
		int	save_size;
		void	(*save)(unsigned long *);
		void	(*restore)(unsigned long *);
		int	(*valid)(suspend_state_t state);
		void	(*enter)(suspend_state_t state);
	}

2. processor specific registers saving and restoring are performed
   by calling the corresponding (*save) and (*restore)

3. pxa_cpu_pm_fns->save_size should be initialized to the required
   size for processor specific registers saving, the allocated
   memory address will be passed to (*save) and (*restore)

   memory allocation happens early in pxa_pm_init(), and save_size
   should be assigned prior to this (which is usually true, since
   pxa_pm_init() happens in device_initcall()

4. there're some redundancies for those SLEEP_SAVE_XXX and related
   macros, will be fixed later, one way possible is for the system
   devices to handle the specific registers saving and restoring

Signed-off-by: eric miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-07-20 17:25:10 +01:00
Russell King 2aca0a8657 [ARM] pxa: stop doing our own rtc management over suspend
Remove the RTC management over a suspend/resume cycle.  Firstly,
we may not be using the internal RTC for time keeping; some
platforms have an external RTC for this inspite of the PXA having
an internal RTC.  Secondly, the RTC library code handles updating
system time on resume.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-07-12 14:28:16 +01:00
Russell King e176bb05fe [ARM] pxa: move pm_ops structure into CPU specific files
Move the pm_ops structure into the PXA25x and PXA27x support
files.  Remove the old pxa_pm_prepare() function, and rename
the both pxa_cpu_pm_prepare() functions as pxa_pm_prepare().
We'll fix that later.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-07-12 14:28:05 +01:00
Russell King f62c3f2c35 [ARM] pxa: remove useless pxa_pm_finish() function
pxa_pm_finish() does nothing but return zero.  The core code
does nothing with this return value, and will not try to call
the finish method in the pm_ops structure if it is NULL.

Therefore, we can remove this useless function.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-07-12 14:27:53 +01:00
Johannes Berg e8c9c50269 power management: implement pm_ops.valid for everybody
Almost all users of pm_ops only support mem sleep, don't check in .valid and
don't reject any others in .prepare so users can be confused if they check
/sys/power/state, especially when new states are added (these would then
result in s-t-r although they're supposed to be something different).

This patch implements a generic pm_valid_only_mem function that is then
exported for users and puts it to use in almost all existing pm_ops.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-30 16:40:40 -07:00
Johannes Berg fe0c935a6c rework pm_ops pm_disk_mode, kill misuse
This patch series cleans up some misconceptions about pm_ops.  Some users of
the pm_ops structure attempt to use it to stop the user from entering suspend
to disk, this, however, is not possible since the user can always use
"shutdown" in /sys/power/disk and then the pm_ops are never invoked.  Also,
platforms that don't support suspend to disk simply should not allow
configuring SOFTWARE_SUSPEND (read the help text on it, it only selects
suspend to disk and nothing else, all the other stuff depends on PM).

The pm_ops structure is actually intended to provide a way to enter
platform-defined sleep states (currently supported states are "standby" and
"mem" (suspend to ram)) and additionally (if SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is configured)
allows a platform to support a platform specific way to enter low-power mode
once everything has been saved to disk.  This is currently only used by ACPI
(S4).

This patch:

The pm_ops.pm_disk_mode is used in totally bogus ways since nobody really
seems to understand what it actually does.

This patch clarifies the pm_disk_mode description.

It also removes all the arm and sh users that think they can veto suspend to
disk via pm_ops; not so since the user can always do echo shutdown >
/sys/power/disk, they need to find a better way involving Kconfig or such.

ACPI is the only user left with a non-zero pm_disk_mode.

The patch also sets the default mode to shutdown again, but when a new pm_ops
is registered its pm_disk_mode is selected as default, that way the default
stays for ACPI where it is apparently required.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-30 16:40:40 -07:00
Lennert Buytenhek afe4b25e7d [ARM] 3881/4: xscale: clean up cp0/cp1 handling
XScale cores either have a DSP coprocessor (which contains a single
40 bit accumulator register), or an iWMMXt coprocessor (which contains
eight 64 bit registers.)

Because of the small amount of state in the DSP coprocessor, access to
the DSP coprocessor (CP0) is always enabled, and DSP context switching
is done unconditionally on every task switch.  Access to the iWMMXt
coprocessor (CP0/CP1) is enabled only when an iWMMXt instruction is
first issued, and iWMMXt context switching is done lazily.

CONFIG_IWMMXT is supposed to mean 'the cpu we will be running on will
have iWMMXt support', but boards are supposed to select this config
symbol by hand, and at least one pxa27x board doesn't get this right,
so on that board, proc-xscale.S will incorrectly assume that we have a
DSP coprocessor, enable CP0 on boot, and we will then only save the
first iWMMXt register (wR0) on context switches, which is Bad.

This patch redefines CONFIG_IWMMXT as 'the cpu we will be running on
might have iWMMXt support, and we will enable iWMMXt context switching
if it does.'  This means that with this patch, running a CONFIG_IWMMXT=n
kernel on an iWMMXt-capable CPU will no longer potentially corrupt iWMMXt
state over context switches, and running a CONFIG_IWMMXT=y kernel on a
non-iWMMXt capable CPU will still do DSP context save/restore.

These changes should make iWMMXt work on PXA3xx, and as a side effect,
enable proper acc0 save/restore on non-iWMMXt capable xsc3 cores such
as IOP13xx and IXP23xx (which will not have CONFIG_CPU_XSCALE defined),
as well as setting and using HWCAP_IWMMXT properly.

Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-12-03 17:52:22 +00:00
Jörn Engel 6ab3d5624e Remove obsolete #include <linux/config.h>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
2006-06-30 19:25:36 +02:00
Lothar Wassmann 1ee9530a71 [ARM] 3201/1: PXA27x: Prevent hangup during resume due to inadvertedly enabling MBREQ (replaces: 3198/1)
Patch from Lothar Wassmann

The patch makes sure, that the ouptut functions of pins are restored
before restoring the Alternat Function settings, preventing pins from
being intermediately configured for undefined or unwanted alternate
functions.

Here is the original comment:
I've got a PXA270 system that uses GPIO80 as nCS4. This system did
hang on resume. Digging into the problem I found that the processor
stalled immediately when restoring the GAFR2_U register which restored
the alternate function for GPIO80. Since the GPDR registers were
restored after the GAFR registers, the offending GPIO was configured
as input at this point.
Thus the alternate function that was in effect after restoring the
GAFR was in fact the input function "MBREQ" instead of the output
function "nCS4". The "PXA27x Processor Family Developer's Manual"
(Footnote in Table 6-1 on page 6-3) states that:
"The MBREQ alternate function must not be enabled until the PSSR[RDH]
bit field is cleared. For more details, see Table 3-15, "PSSR Bit
Definitions" on page 3-71."

There is another note in the Developer's Manual (chapter 24.4.2
"GPIO operation as Alternate Function" on page 24-4)
stating that:
"Configuring a GPIO for an alternate function that is not defined for
it causes unpredictable results."

Since some GPIOs have no input function defined, and to prevent
inadvertedly programming the MBREQ function on some pin, the GAFR
registers should be restored after the GPDR registers have been
restored.

Additional provisions have to be made when the MBREQ function is
actually required. The corresponding GAFR bits should not be restored
with the regular GAFR restore, but must be set only after the PSSR
bits have been cleared.

Signed-off-by: Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-12-12 16:44:05 +00:00
Richard Purdie 756c7b7489 [ARM] 3113/1: PXA: Allow machines to override (and also reuse) pxa pm functions
Patch from Richard Purdie

Update the PXA pm.c file to allow machines (such as the Sharp
Zaurus) to override the standard pm functions but reuse/wrap them
where needed.

The init call is made slightly earlier to give machine code an init
level to override them in removing any race.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-11-06 15:03:23 +00:00
Russell King 36c5ed23b9 [PATCH] ARM SMP: Fix PXA/SA11x0 suspend resume crash
We need to re-initialise the stack pointers for undefined, IRQ
and abort mode handlers whenever we resume.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-06-19 18:39:33 +01:00
Todd Poynor 8775420d2f [PATCH] ARM: 2691/1: PXA27x sleep fixes take 2
Patch from Todd Poynor

PXA27x sleep fixes:
* set additional sleep/wakeup registers for Mainstone boards.
* move CKEN=0 to pxa25x-specific code; that value is harmful on pxa27x.
* save/restore additional registers, including some found necessary for
C5 processors and/or newer blob versions.
* enable future support of additional sleep modes for PXA27x (eg,
standby, deep sleep).
* split off cpu-specific sleep processing between pxa27x and pxa25x into
separate files (partly in preparation for additional sleep modes).
Includes fixes from David Burrage.

Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-06-03 20:52:27 +01:00
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00