Once upgrading the minimum supported version of GCC to 5.1, we can drop
the fallback code for !COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW.
This is effectively a revert of commit f0907827a8 ("compiler.h: enable
builtin overflow checkers and add fallback code")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438#issuecomment-916745801
Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
A 'false' return means the value was safely set, so the comment should
say 'true' for when it is not considered safe.
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Fixes: 0c66847793 ("overflow.h: Add arithmetic shift helper")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401160629.1941787-1-kbusch@kernel.org
The typical set of driver updates across the subsystem:
- Driver minor changes and bug fixes for mlx5, efa, rxe, vmw_pvrdma, hns,
usnic, qib, qedr, cxgb4, hns, bnxt_re
- Various rtrs fixes and updates
- Bug fix for mlx4 CM emulation for virtualization scenarios where MRA
wasn't working right
- Use tracepoints instead of pr_debug in the CM code
- Scrub the locking in ucma and cma to close more syzkaller bugs
- Use tasklet_setup in the subsystem
- Revert the idea that 'destroy' operations are not allowed to fail at
the driver level. This proved unworkable from a HW perspective.
- Revise how the umem API works so drivers make fewer mistakes using it
- XRC support for qedr
- Convert uverbs objects RWQ and MW to new the allocation scheme
- Large queue entry sizes for hns
- Use hmm_range_fault() for mlx5 On Demand Paging
- uverbs APIs to inspect the GID table instead of sysfs
- Move some of the RDMA code for building large page SGLs into
lib/scatterlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=LKpl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma
Pull rdma updates from Jason Gunthorpe:
"A usual cycle for RDMA with a typical mix of driver and core subsystem
updates:
- Driver minor changes and bug fixes for mlx5, efa, rxe, vmw_pvrdma,
hns, usnic, qib, qedr, cxgb4, hns, bnxt_re
- Various rtrs fixes and updates
- Bug fix for mlx4 CM emulation for virtualization scenarios where
MRA wasn't working right
- Use tracepoints instead of pr_debug in the CM code
- Scrub the locking in ucma and cma to close more syzkaller bugs
- Use tasklet_setup in the subsystem
- Revert the idea that 'destroy' operations are not allowed to fail
at the driver level. This proved unworkable from a HW perspective.
- Revise how the umem API works so drivers make fewer mistakes using
it
- XRC support for qedr
- Convert uverbs objects RWQ and MW to new the allocation scheme
- Large queue entry sizes for hns
- Use hmm_range_fault() for mlx5 On Demand Paging
- uverbs APIs to inspect the GID table instead of sysfs
- Move some of the RDMA code for building large page SGLs into
lib/scatterlist"
* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma: (191 commits)
RDMA/ucma: Fix use after free in destroy id flow
RDMA/rxe: Handle skb_clone() failure in rxe_recv.c
RDMA/rxe: Move the definitions for rxe_av.network_type to uAPI
RDMA: Explicitly pass in the dma_device to ib_register_device
lib/scatterlist: Do not limit max_segment to PAGE_ALIGNED values
IB/mlx4: Convert rej_tmout radix-tree to XArray
RDMA/rxe: Fix bug rejecting all multicast packets
RDMA/rxe: Fix skb lifetime in rxe_rcv_mcast_pkt()
RDMA/rxe: Remove duplicate entries in struct rxe_mr
IB/hfi,rdmavt,qib,opa_vnic: Update MAINTAINERS
IB/rdmavt: Fix sizeof mismatch
MAINTAINERS: CISCO VIC LOW LATENCY NIC DRIVER
RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix sizeof mismatch for allocation of pbl_tbl.
RDMA/bnxt_re: Use rdma_umem_for_each_dma_block()
RDMA/umem: Move to allocate SG table from pages
lib/scatterlist: Add support in dynamic allocation of SG table from pages
tools/testing/scatterlist: Show errors in human readable form
tools/testing/scatterlist: Rejuvenate bit-rotten test
RDMA/ipoib: Set rtnl_link_ops for ipoib interfaces
RDMA/uverbs: Expose the new GID query API to user space
...
Since the destination variable of the check_*_overflow() helpers will
contain a wrapped value on failure, it would be best to make sure callers
really did check the return result of the helper. Adjust the macros to use
a bool-wrapping static inline that is marked with __must_check. This means
the macros can continue to have their type-agnostic behavior while gaining
the function attribute (that cannot be applied directly to macros).
Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202008151007.EF679DF@keescook/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
The various array_size functions use SIZE_MAX define, but missed limits.h
causes to failure to compile code that needs overflow.h.
In file included from drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_std_types_device.c:6:
./include/linux/overflow.h: In function 'array_size':
./include/linux/overflow.h:258:10: error: 'SIZE_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
258 | return SIZE_MAX;
| ^~~~~~~~
Fixes: 610b15c50e ("overflow.h: Add allocation size calculation helpers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200913102928.134985-1-leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Add flex_array_size() helper for the calculation of the size, in bytes,
of a flexible array member contained within an enclosing structure.
Example of usage:
struct something {
size_t count;
struct foo items[];
};
struct something *instance;
instance = kmalloc(struct_size(instance, items, count), GFP_KERNEL);
instance->count = count;
memcpy(instance->items, src, flex_array_size(instance, items, instance->count));
The helper returns SIZE_MAX on overflow instead of wrapping around.
Additionally replaces parameter "n" with "count" in struct_size() helper
for greater clarity and unification.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200609012233.GA3371@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Pull core fixes from Ingo Molnar:
"A handful of objtool updates, plus a documentation addition for
__ab_c_size()"
* 'core-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
objtool: Fix whitelist documentation typo
objtool: Fix function fallthrough detection
objtool: Don't use ignore flag for fake jumps
overflow.h: Add comment documenting __ab_c_size()
__ab_c_size() is a somewhat opaque name. Document its purpose, and while
at it, rename the parameters to actually match the abc naming.
[ bp: glued a complete patch from chunks on LKML. ]
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190405045711.30339-1-bp@alien8.de
Add shift_overflow() helper to assist driver authors in ensuring that
shift operations don't cause overflows or other odd conditions.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
[kees: tweaked comments and commit log, dropped unneeded assignment]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
In preparation for replacing unchecked overflows for memory allocations,
this creates helpers for the 3 most common calculations:
array_size(a, b): 2-dimensional array
array3_size(a, b, c): 3-dimensional array
struct_size(ptr, member, n): struct followed by n-many trailing members
Each of these return SIZE_MAX on overflow instead of wrapping around.
(Additionally renames a variable named "array_size" to avoid future
collision.)
Co-developed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This adds wrappers for the __builtin overflow checkers present in gcc
5.1+ as well as fallback implementations for earlier compilers. It's not
that easy to implement the fully generic __builtin_X_overflow(T1 a, T2
b, T3 *d) in macros, so the fallback code assumes that T1, T2 and T3 are
the same. We obviously don't want the wrappers to have different
semantics depending on $GCC_VERSION, so we also insist on that even when
using the builtins.
There are a few problems with the 'a+b < a' idiom for checking for
overflow: For signed types, it relies on undefined behaviour and is
not actually complete (it doesn't check underflow;
e.g. INT_MIN+INT_MIN == 0 isn't caught). Due to type promotion it
is wrong for all types (signed and unsigned) narrower than
int. Similarly, when a and b does not have the same type, there are
subtle cases like
u32 a;
if (a + sizeof(foo) < a)
return -EOVERFLOW;
a += sizeof(foo);
where the test is always false on 64 bit platforms. Add to that that it
is not always possible to determine the types involved at a glance.
The new overflow.h is somewhat bulky, but that's mostly a result of
trying to be type-generic, complete (e.g. catching not only overflow
but also signed underflow) and not relying on undefined behaviour.
Linus is of course right [1] that for unsigned subtraction a-b, the
right way to check for overflow (underflow) is "b > a" and not
"__builtin_sub_overflow(a, b, &d)", but that's just one out of six cases
covered here, and included mostly for completeness.
So is it worth it? I think it is, if nothing else for the documentation
value of seeing
if (check_add_overflow(a, b, &d))
return -EGOAWAY;
do_stuff_with(d);
instead of the open-coded (and possibly wrong and/or incomplete and/or
UBsan-tickling)
if (a+b < a)
return -EGOAWAY;
do_stuff_with(a+b);
While gcc does recognize the 'a+b < a' idiom for testing unsigned add
overflow, it doesn't do nearly as good for unsigned multiplication
(there's also no single well-established idiom). So using
check_mul_overflow in kcalloc and friends may also make gcc generate
slightly better code.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/658
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Nick Desaulniers