While looking into adding atomic-pwm support to the pwm-crc driver I
noticed something odd, there is a PWM_BASE_CLK define of 6 MHz and
there is a clock-divider which divides this with a value between 1-128,
and there are 256 duty-cycle steps.
The pwm-crc code before this commit assumed that a clock-divider
setting of 1 means that the PWM output is running at 6 MHZ, if that
is true, where do these 256 duty-cycle steps come from?
This would require an internal frequency of 256 * 6 MHz = 1.5 GHz, that
seems unlikely for a PMIC which is using a silicon process optimized for
power-switching transistors. It is way more likely that there is an 8
bit counter for the duty cycle which acts as an extra fixed divider
wrt the PWM output frequency.
The main user of the pwm-crc driver is the i915 GPU driver which uses it
for backlight control. Lets compare the PWM register values set by the
video-BIOS (the GOP), assuming the extra fixed divider is present versus
the PWM frequency specified in the Video-BIOS-Tables:
Device: PWM Hz set by BIOS PWM Hz specified in VBT
Asus T100TA 200 200
Asus T100HA 200 200
Lenovo Miix 2 8 23437 20000
Toshiba WT8-A 23437 20000
So as we can see if we assume the extra division by 256 then the register
values set by the GOP are an exact match for the VBT values, where as
otherwise the values would be of by a factor of 256.
This commit fixes the period / duty_cycle calculations to take the
extra division by 256 into account.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-9-hdegoede@redhat.com
PWM controller drivers should not restore the PWM state on resume. The
convention is that PWM consumers do this by calling pwm_apply_state(),
so that it can be done at the exact moment when the consumer needs
the state to be stored, avoiding e.g. backlight flickering.
The only in kernel consumers of the pwm-lpss code, the i915 driver
and the pwm-class sysfs interface code both correctly restore the
state on resume, so there is no need to do this in the pwm-lpss code.
More-over the removed resume handler is buggy, since it blindly
restores the ctrl-register contents without setting the update
bit, which is necessary to get the controller to actually use/apply
the restored base-unit and on-time-div values.
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-8-hdegoede@redhat.com
Before this commit pwm_lpss_apply() was assuming 2 pre-conditions
were met by the existing hardware state:
1. That the base-unit and on-time-div read back from the
control register are those actually in use, so that it
can skip setting the update bit if the read-back value
matches the desired values.
2. That the controller is enabled when the cached
pwm_state.enabled says that the controller is enabled.
As the long history of fixes for subtle (often suspend/resume)
lpss-pwm issues shows, these assumptions are not necessary
always true.
1. Specifically is not true on some (*) Cherry Trail devices
with a nasty GFX0._PS3 method which: a. saves the ctrl reg value.
b. sets the base-unit to 0 and writes the update bit to apply/commit
c. restores the original ctrl value without setting the update bit,
so that the 0 base-unit value is still in use.
2. Assumption 2. currently is true, but only because of the code which
saves/restores the state on suspend/resume. By convention restoring the
PWM state should be done by the PWM consumer and the presence of this
code in the pmw-lpss driver is a bug. Therefor the save/restore code will
be dropped in the next patch in this series, after which this assumption
also is no longer true.
This commit changes the pwm_lpss_apply() to not make any assumptions about
the state the hardware is in. Instead it makes pwm_lpss_apply() always
fully program the PWM controller, making it much less fragile.
*) Seen on the Acer One 10 S1003, Lenovo Ideapad Miix 310 and 320 models
and various Medion models.
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-7-hdegoede@redhat.com
In the not-enabled -> enabled path pwm_lpss_apply() needs to get a
runtime-pm reference; and then on any errors it needs to release it
again.
This leads to somewhat hard to read code. This commit introduces a new
pwm_lpss_prepare_enable() helper and moves all the steps necessary for
the not-enabled -> enabled transition there, so that we can error check
the entire transition in a single place and only have one pm_runtime_put()
on failure call site.
While working on this I noticed that the enabled -> enabled (update
settings) path was quite similar, so I've added an enable parameter to
the new pwm_lpss_prepare_enable() helper, which allows using it in that
path too.
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-6-hdegoede@redhat.com
When the user requests a high enough period ns value, then the
calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() might result in a base_unit value of 0.
But according to the data-sheet the way the PWM controller works is that
each input clock-cycle the base_unit gets added to a N bit counter and
that counter overflowing determines the PWM output frequency. Adding 0
to the counter is a no-op. The data-sheet even explicitly states that
writing 0 to the base_unit bits will result in the PWM outputting a
continuous 0 signal.
When the user requestes a low enough period ns value, then the
calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() might result in a base_unit value
which is bigger then base_unit_range - 1. Currently the codes for this
deals with this by applying a mask:
base_unit &= (base_unit_range - 1);
But this means that we let the value overflow the range, we throw away the
higher bits and store whatever value is left in the lower bits into the
register leading to a random output frequency, rather then clamping the
output frequency to the highest frequency which the hardware can do.
This commit fixes both issues by clamping the base_unit value to be
between 1 and (base_unit_range - 1).
Fixes: 684309e504 ("pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit")
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-5-hdegoede@redhat.com
According to the data-sheet the way the PWM controller works is that
each input clock-cycle the base_unit gets added to a N bit counter and
that counter overflowing determines the PWM output frequency.
So assuming e.g. a 16 bit counter this means that if base_unit is set to 1,
after 65535 input clock-cycles the counter has been increased from 0 to
65535 and it will overflow on the next cycle, so it will overflow after
every 65536 clock cycles and thus the calculations done in
pwm_lpss_prepare() should use 65536 and not 65535.
This commit fixes this. Note this also aligns the calculations in
pwm_lpss_prepare() with those in pwm_lpss_get_state().
Note this effectively reverts commit 684309e504 ("pwm: lpss: Avoid
potential overflow of base_unit"). The next patch in this series really
fixes the potential overflow of the base_unit value.
Fixes: 684309e504 ("pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit")
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-4-hdegoede@redhat.com
The DSDTs on most Cherry Trail devices have an ugly clutch where the PWM
controller gets turned off from the _PS3 method of the graphics-card dev:
Method (_PS3, 0, Serialized) // _PS3: Power State 3
{
...
PWMB = PWMC /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PWMC */
PSAT |= 0x03
Local0 = PSAT /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PSAT */
...
}
Where PSAT is the power-status register of the PWM controller.
Since the i915 driver will do a pwm_get on the pwm device as it uses it to
control the LCD panel backlight, there is a device-link marking the i915
device as a consumer of the pwm device. So that the PWM controller will
always be suspended after the i915 driver suspends (which is the right
thing to do). This causes the above GFX0 PS3 AML code to run before
acpi_lpss.c calls acpi_lpss_save_ctx().
So on these devices the PWM controller will already be off when
acpi_lpss_save_ctx() runs. This causes it to read/save all 1-s (0xffffffff)
as ctx register values.
When these bogus values get restored on resume the PWM controller actually
keeps working, since most bits are reserved, but this does set bit 3 of
the LPSS General purpose register, which for the PWM controller has the
following function: "This bit is re-used to support 32kHz slow mode.
Default is 19.2MHz as PWM source clock".
This causes the clock of the PWM controller to switch from 19.2MHz to
32KHz, which is a slow-down of a factor 600. Surprisingly enough so far
there have been few bug reports about this. This is likely because the
i915 driver was hardcoding the PWM frequency to 46 KHz, which divided
by 600 would result in a PWM frequency of approx. 78 Hz, which mostly
still works fine. There are some bug reports about the LCD backlight
flickering after suspend/resume which are likely caused by this issue.
But with the upcoming patch-series to finally switch the i915 drivers
code for external PWM controllers to use the atomic API and to honor
the PWM frequency specified in the video BIOS (VBT), this becomes a much
bigger problem. On most cases the VBT specifies either 200 Hz or 20
KHz as PWM frequency, which with the mentioned issue ends up being either
1/3 Hz, where the backlight actually visible blinks on and off every 3s,
or in 33 Hz and horrible flickering of the backlight.
There are a number of possible solutions to this problem:
1. Make acpi_lpss_save_ctx() run before GFX0._PS3
Pro: Clean solution from pov of not medling with save/restore ctx code
Con: As mentioned the current ordering is the right thing to do
Con: Requires assymmetry in at what suspend/resume phase we do the save vs
restore, requiring more suspend/resume ordering hacks in already
convoluted acpi_lpss.c suspend/resume code.
2. Do some sort of save once mode for the LPSS ctx
Pro: Reasonably clean
Con: Needs a new LPSS flag + code changes to handle the flag
3. Detect we have failed to save the ctx registers and do not restore them
Pro: Not PWM specific, might help with issues on other LPSS devices too
Con: If we can get away with not restoring the ctx why bother with it at
all?
4. Do not save the ctx for CHT PWM controllers
Pro: Clean, as simple as dropping a flag?
Con: Not so simple as dropping a flag, needs a new flag to ensure that
we still do lpss_deassert_reset() on device activation.
5. Make the pwm-lpss code fixup the LPSS-context registers
Pro: Keeps acpi_lpss.c code clean
Con: Moves knowledge of LPSS-context into the pwm-lpss.c code
1 and 5 both do not seem to be a desirable way forward.
3 and 4 seem ok, but they both assume that restoring the LPSS-context
registers is not necessary. I have done a couple of test and those do
show that restoring the LPSS-context indeed does not seem to be necessary
on devices using s2idle suspend (and successfully reaching S0i3). But I
have no hardware to test deep / S3 suspend. So I'm not sure that not
restoring the context is safe.
That leaves solution 2, which is about as simple / clean as 3 and 4,
so this commit fixes the described problem by implementing a new
LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE flag and setting that for the CHT PWM controllers.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
The DSDTs on most Cherry Trail devices have an ugly clutch where the PWM
controller gets poked from the _PS0 method of the graphics-card device:
Local0 = PSAT /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PSAT */
If (((Local0 & 0x03) == 0x03))
{
PSAT &= 0xFFFFFFFC
Local1 = PSAT /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PSAT */
RSTA = Zero
RSTF = Zero
RSTA = One
RSTF = One
PWMB |= 0xC0000000
PWMC = PWMB /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PWMB */
}
Where PSAT is the power-status register of the PWM controller, so if it
is in D3 when the GFX0 device's PS0 method runs then it will turn it on
and restore the PWM ctrl register value it saved from its PS3 handler.
Note not only does it restore it, it ors it with 0xC0000000 turning it
on at a time where we may not want it to get turned on at all.
The pwm_get call which the i915 driver does to get a reference to the
PWM controller, already adds a device-link making the GFX0 device a
consumer of the PWM device. So it should already have been resumed when
the above AML runs and the AML should thus not do its undesirable poking
of the PWM controller register.
But the PCI core powers on PCI devices in the no-irq resume phase and
thus calls the troublesome PS0 method in the no-irq resume phase.
Where as LPSS devices by default are resumed in the early resume phase.
This commit sets the resume_from_noirq flag in the bsw_pwm_dev_desc
struct, so that Cherry Trail PWM controllers will be resumed in the
no-irq phase. Together with the device-link added by the pwm-get this
ensures that the PWM controller will be on when the troublesome PS0
method runs, which stops it from poking the PWM controller.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
With the intel_modeset_* probe functions clarified, we can continue with
moving more related calls to the right layer:
- drm_vblank_init()
- intel_bios_init()
- intel_vga_register()
- intel_csr_ucode_init()
Unfortunately, for the time being, we also need to move a call to the
*wrong* layer: the power domain init.
No functional changes.
v2: move probe failure while at it, power domain init
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/da229ffbed64983f002605074533c8b2878d17ee.1599056955.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
In commit 4f0b4352bd ("drm/i915: Extract cdclk requirements checking
to separate function") the order of force_min_cdclk_changed check and
intel_modeset_checks(), was reversed. This broke the mechanism to
immediately force a new CDCLK minimum, and lead to driver probe
errors for display audio on GLK platform with 5.9-rc1 kernel. Fix
the issue by moving intel_modeset_checks() call later.
[vsyrjala: It also broke the ability of planes to bump up the cdclk
and thus could lead to underruns when eg. flipping from 32bpp to
64bpp framebuffer. To be clear, we still compute the new cdclk
correctly but fail to actually program it to the hardware due to
intel_set_cdclk_{pre,post}_plane_update() not getting called on
account of state->modeset==false.]
Fixes: 4f0b4352bd ("drm/i915: Extract cdclk requirements checking to separate function")
BugLink: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2410
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200901151036.1312357-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Clang warns:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c:268:3: warning: variable
'ret' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
ret &= check_phy_reg(dev_priv, phy, ICL_PORT_TX_DW8_LN0(phy),
^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c:261:10: note: initialize
the variable 'ret' to silence this warning
bool ret;
^
= 0
1 warning generated.
In practice, the bug this warning appears to be concerned with would not
actually matter because ret gets initialized to the return value of
cnl_verify_procmon_ref_values. However, that does appear to be a bug
since it means the first hunk of the patch this fixes won't actually do
anything (since the values of check_phy_reg won't factor into the final
ret value). Initialize ret to true then make all of the assignments a
bitwise AND with itself so that the function always does what it should
do.
Fixes: 239bef676d ("drm/i915/display: Implement new combo phy initialization step")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1094
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200828202830.7165-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reusing icl_get_combo_buf_trans() for eDP was causing the wrong table
being used when the eDP port don't support low power voltage swing table.
v2: Only use icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr3 if low_vswing is
set as EHL combo phy supports HBR3 (Matt R)
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200826201549.83658-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Reusing icl_get_combo_buf_trans() for eDP was causing the wrong table
being used when the eDP port don't support low power voltage swing table.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200826201549.83658-1-jose.souza@intel.com
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of
the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already
require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f9f
("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks").
But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping
mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match
the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL.
So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while
for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right
revids table.
All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly.
v2:
- removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL.
- fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha)
BSpec: 52890
BSpec: 55378
BSpec: 44455
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Supported and enabled are different things so printing both.
v3: using drrs->type instead of vbt.drrs_type
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas K <srinivasx.k@intel.com>
Cc: Hariom Pandey <hariom.pandey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200825171331.17971-3-jose.souza@intel.com
DRRS and PSR can't be enable together, so giving preference to PSR
as it allows more power-savings by complete shutting down display,
so to guarantee this, it should compute DRRS state after compute PSR.
Cc: Srinivas K <srinivasx.k@intel.com>
Cc: Hariom Pandey <hariom.pandey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200825171331.17971-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Enable HW Default flip for small PL.
bspec: 52890
bspec: 53508
bspec: 53273
v2: rebase to drm-tip
v3: move from ctx to gt workarounds. Remove whitelist.
v4: move to rcs WA init
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200826025724.20944-1-clinton.a.taylor@intel.com
HDCP code doesn't require to access power_well internal stuff,
instead it should use the intel_display_power_well_is_enabled()
to get the status of desired power_well.
No functional change.
v2:
- used with_intel_runtime_pm instead of get/put. [Jani]
v3:
- rebased.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200805114521.867-3-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
Currently intel_hdcp_update_pipe() is also getting called for non-hdcp
connectors and get through its conditional code flow, which is completely
unnecessary for non-hdcp connectors, therefore it make sense to
have an early return. No functional change.
v2:
- rebased.
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200805114521.867-2-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
Our variety of defined gpu commands have the actual
command id field and possibly length and flags applied.
We did start to apply the mask during initialization of
the cmd descriptors but forgot to also apply it on comparisons.
Fix comparisons in order to properly deny access with
associated commands.
v2: fix lri with correct mask (Chris)
References: 926abff21a ("drm/i915/cmdparser: Ignore Length operands during command matching")
Reported-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200817195926.12671-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Add minimum width to planes, variable with specific formats for gen11+
to reflect recent bspec changes.
Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200812210702.7153-1-matthew.s.atwood@intel.com
From the 3 WAs for PSR2 man track/selective fetch this is only one
needed when doing single full frames at every flip.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12
platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL).
This feature consists in software programming registers with the
damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from
memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel,
saving even more power.
But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at
every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future
patch.
Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely
missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the
enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added.
v3:
- calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase
(Ville)
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Hans de Goede