We're recently encountered a regression due to the rates reported
through the clk_notifier_data being off when changing parents.
Let's add a test suite and a test to make sure that we do get notified
and with the proper rates.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221010-rpi-clk-fixes-again-v1-2-d87ba82ac404@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Let's add a test on the rate range after a reparenting. This fails for
now, but it's worth having it to document the corner cases we don't
support yet.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-26-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
If the clock cannot modify its rate and has CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(), clk_core_round_rate_nolock() and a
number of drivers will forward the clk_rate_request to the parent clock.
clk_core_round_rate_nolock() will pass the pointer directly, which means
that we pass a clk_rate_request to the parent that has the rate,
min_rate and max_rate of the child, and the best_parent_rate and
best_parent_hw fields will be relative to the child as well, so will
point to our current clock and its rate. The most common case for
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is that the child and parent clock rates will be
equal, so the rate field isn't a worry, but the other fields are.
Similarly, if the parent clock driver ever modifies the best_parent_rate
or best_parent_hw, this will be applied to the child once the call to
clk_core_round_rate_nolock() is done. best_parent_hw is probably not
going to be a valid parent, and best_parent_rate might lead to a parent
rate change different to the one that was initially computed.
clk_mux_determine_rate_flags() and the affected drivers will copy the
request before forwarding it to the parents, so they won't be affected
by the latter issue, but the former is still going to be there and will
lead to erroneous data and context being passed to the various clock
drivers in the same sub-tree.
Let's create two new functions, clk_core_forward_rate_req() and
clk_hw_forward_rate_request() for the framework and the clock providers
that will copy a request from a child clock and update the context to
match the parent's. We also update the relevant call sites in the
framework and drivers to use that new function.
Let's also add a test to make sure we avoid regressions there.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-22-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
We will need to know if a clk_core pointer has a given parent in other
functions, so let's create a clk_core_has_parent() function that
clk_has_parent() will call into.
For good measure, let's add some unit tests as well to make sure it
works properly.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-20-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
[sboyd@kernel.org: Move tmp declaration, fix conditional to check for
current parent]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
If a non-rate clock started by default with a parent that never
registered, core->req_rate will be 0. The expectation is that whenever
the parent will be registered, req_rate will be updated with the new
value that has just been computed.
However, if that clock is a mux, clk_set_parent() can also make that
clock no longer orphan. In this case however, we never update req_rate.
The natural solution to this would be to update core->rate and
core->req_rate in clk_reparent() by calling clk_recalc().
However, this doesn't work in all cases. Indeed, clk_recalc() is called
by __clk_set_parent_before(), __clk_set_parent() and
clk_core_reparent(). Both __clk_set_parent_before() and __clk_set_parent
will call clk_recalc() with the enable_lock taken through a call to
clk_enable_lock(), the underlying locking primitive being a spinlock.
clk_recalc() calls the backing driver .recalc_rate hook, and that
implementation might sleep if the underlying device uses a bus with
accesses that might sleep, such as i2c.
In such a situation, we would end up sleeping while holding a spinlock,
and thus in an atomic section.
In order to work around this, we can move the core->rate and
core->req_rate update to the clk_recalc() calling sites, after the
enable_lock has been released if it was taken.
The only situation that could still be problematic is the
clk_core_reparent() -> clk_reparent() case that doesn't have any
locking. clk_core_reparent() is itself called by clk_hw_reparent(),
which is then called by 4 drivers:
* clk-stm32mp1.c, stm32/clk-stm32-core.c and tegra/clk-tegra210-emc.c
use it in their set_parent implementation. The set_parent hook is
only called by __clk_set_parent() and clk_change_rate(), both of
them calling it without the enable_lock taken.
* clk/tegra/clk-tegra124-emc.c calls it as part of its set_rate
implementation. set_rate is only called by clk_change_rate(), again
without the enable_lock taken.
In both cases we can't end up in a situation where the clk_hw_reparent()
caller would hold a spinlock, so it seems like this is a good
workaround.
Let's also add some unit tests to make sure we cover the original bug.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-14-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
clk_set_rate_range() will use the last requested rate for the clock when
it calls into the driver set_rate hook.
However, if CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE is set on that clock, the last
requested rate might not be matching the current rate of the clock. In
such a case, let's read out the rate from the hardware and use that in
our set_rate instead.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-13-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Let's leverage the dummy mux with multiple parents we have to create a
mux whose default parent will never be registered, and thus will always
be orphan by default.
We can then create some tests to make sure that the clock API behaves
properly in such a case, and that the transition to a non-orphan clock
when we change the parent is done properly.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-12-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
We'll need to test a few corner cases that occur when we have a mux
clock whose default parent is missing.
For now, let's create the context structure and the trivial ops, along
with a test suite that just tests trivial things for now, without
considering the orphan case.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-11-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
We have a few tests for a mux with a single parent, testing the case
where it used to be orphan.
Let's leverage most of the code but register the clock properly to test
a few trivial things.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-10-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The clock framework supports clocks that can have their rate changed
without the kernel knowing about it using the CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flag.
As its name suggests, this flag turns off the rate caching in the clock
framework, reading out the rate from the hardware any time we need to
read it.
Let's add a couple of tests to make sure it works as intended.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-9-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Some more context might be useful for unit-tests covering a previously
reported bug, so let's add a link to the discussion for that bug.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-8-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
We start to have a few test suites, and we'll add more, so it will get
pretty confusing to figure out what is supposed to be tested in what
suite.
Let's add some comments to explain what setup they create, and what we
should be testing in every suite.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-7-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
When clk_put() is called we don't make another clk_set_rate() call to
re-evaluate the rate boundaries. This is unlike clk_set_rate_range()
that evaluates the rate again each time it is called.
However, clk_put() is essentially equivalent to clk_set_rate_range()
since after clk_put() completes the consumer's boundaries shouldn't be
enforced anymore.
Let's add a call to clk_set_rate_range() in clk_put() to make sure those
rate boundaries are dropped and the clock provider drivers can react. In
order to be as non-intrusive as possible, we'll just make that call if
the clock had non-default boundaries.
Also add a few tests to make sure this case is covered.
Fixes: c80ac50cbb ("clk: Always set the rate on clk_set_range_rate")
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-3-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Following the clk_hw->clk pointer is equivalent to calling
clk_hw_get_clk(), but will make the job harder if we need to rework that
part in the future.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-2-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
This reverts commit 7dabfa2bc4. There are
multiple reports that this breaks boot on various systems. The common
theme is that orphan clks are having rates set on them when that isn't
expected. Let's revert it out for now so that -rc1 boots.
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/366a0232-bb4a-c357-6aa8-636e398e05eb@samsung.com
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220403022818.39572-1-sboyd@kernel.org
When clk_put() is called we don't make another clk_set_rate() call to
re-evaluate the rate boundaries. This is unlike clk_set_rate_range()
that evaluates the rate again each time it is called.
However, clk_put() is essentially equivalent to clk_set_rate_range()
since after clk_put() completes the consumer's boundaries shouldn't be
enforced anymore.
Let's add a call to clk_set_rate_range() in clk_put() to make sure those
rate boundaries are dropped and the clock provider drivers can react.
Also add a few tests to make sure this case is covered.
Fixes: c80ac50cbb ("clk: Always set the rate on clk_set_range_rate")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220325161144.1901695-4-maxime@cerno.tech
[sboyd@kernel.org: Reword commit text]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
A bug recently affected the Tegra30 where calling clk_set_rate_range()
on a clock would make it change its rate to the minimum.
This was due to the clock in question being a mux that was orphan at
registration, which lead to the clk_core req_rate being 0, and the
clk_set_rate_range() function then calling clk_set_rate() with req_rate,
effectively making that clock running at the minimum rate allowed, even
though the initial rate was within that range.
Make a test suite to create a mux initially orphan, and then make sure
that if our clock rate was initially within a given range, then
enforcing that range won't affect it.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220325161144.1901695-3-maxime@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
In order to reset the range on a clock, we need to call
clk_set_rate_range with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of ULONG_MAX. Since
it's fairly inconvenient, let's introduce a clk_drop_range() function
that will do just this.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220225143534.405820-8-maxime@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
When we change a clock minimum or maximum using clk_set_rate_range(),
clk_set_min_rate() or clk_set_max_rate(), the current code will only
trigger a new rate change if the rate is outside of the new boundaries.
However, a clock driver might want to always keep the clock rate to
one of its boundary, for example the minimum to keep the power
consumption as low as possible.
Since they don't always get called though, clock providers don't have the
opportunity to implement this behaviour.
Let's trigger a clk_set_rate() on the previous requested rate every time
clk_set_rate_range() is called. That way, providers that care about the
new boundaries have a chance to adjust the rate, while providers that
don't care about those new boundaries will return the same rate than
before, which will be ignored by clk_set_rate() and won't result in a
new rate change.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220225143534.405820-7-maxime@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The current core while setting the min and max rate properly in the
clk_request structure will not make sure that the requested rate is
within these boundaries, leaving it to each and every driver to make
sure it is.
It's not clear if this was on purpose or not, but this introduces some
inconsistencies within the API.
For example, a user setting a range and then calling clk_round_rate()
with a value outside of that range will get the same value back
(ignoring any driver adjustements), effectively ignoring the range that
was just set.
Another one, arguably worse, is that it also makes clk_round_rate() and
clk_set_rate() behave differently if there's a range and the rate being
used for both is outside that range. As we have seen, the rate will be
returned unchanged by clk_round_rate(), but clk_set_rate() will error
out returning -EINVAL.
Let's make sure the framework will always clamp the rate to the current
range found on the clock, which will fix both these inconsistencies.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220225143534.405820-5-maxime@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Let's test various parts of the rate-related clock API with the kunit
testing framework.
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220225143534.405820-3-maxime@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Maxime Ripard