kbuilder has begun running the selftests and reported a soft-lockup
inside __igt_insert(), so break up the test loop over different modes
with another call to cond_resched().
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171107104131.5923-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
GFP_TEMPORARY was introduced by commit e12ba74d8f ("Group short-lived
and reclaimable kernel allocations") along with __GFP_RECLAIMABLE. It's
primary motivation was to allow users to tell that an allocation is
short lived and so the allocator can try to place such allocations close
together and prevent long term fragmentation. As much as this sounds
like a reasonable semantic it becomes much less clear when to use the
highlevel GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flag. How long is temporary? Can the
context holding that memory sleep? Can it take locks? It seems there is
no good answer for those questions.
The current implementation of GFP_TEMPORARY is basically GFP_KERNEL |
__GFP_RECLAIMABLE which in itself is tricky because basically none of
the existing caller provide a way to reclaim the allocated memory. So
this is rather misleading and hard to evaluate for any benefits.
I have checked some random users and none of them has added the flag
with a specific justification. I suspect most of them just copied from
other existing users and others just thought it might be a good idea to
use without any measuring. This suggests that GFP_TEMPORARY just
motivates for cargo cult usage without any reasoning.
I believe that our gfp flags are quite complex already and especially
those with highlevel semantic should be clearly defined to prevent from
confusion and abuse. Therefore I propose dropping GFP_TEMPORARY and
replace all existing users to simply use GFP_KERNEL. Please note that
SLAB users with shrinkers will still get __GFP_RECLAIMABLE heuristic and
so they will be placed properly for memory fragmentation prevention.
I can see reasons we might want some gfp flag to reflect shorterm
allocations but I propose starting from a clear semantic definition and
only then add users with proper justification.
This was been brought up before LSF this year by Matthew [1] and it
turned out that GFP_TEMPORARY really doesn't have a clear semantic. It
seems to be a heuristic without any measured advantage for most (if not
all) its current users. The follow up discussion has revealed that
opinions on what might be temporary allocation differ a lot between
developers. So rather than trying to tweak existing users into a
semantic which they haven't expected I propose to simply remove the flag
and start from scratch if we really need a semantic for short term
allocations.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118054945.GD18349@bombadil.infradead.org
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: drm/i915: fix up]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170816144703.378d4f4d@canb.auug.org.au
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170728091904.14627-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Scatter a few cond_resched() in between phases of the drm_mm selftests
to try and prevent us incurring the wrath of the NMI watchdog.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170329091053.13837-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we require valid start/end parameters, we can replace the initial
potential NULL with a pointer to the drm_mm.head_node and so reduce the
test on every iteration from a NULL + address comparison to just an
address comparison.
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-26 (-26)
function old new delta
i915_gem_evict_for_node 719 693 -26
(No other users outside of the test harness.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170204111913.12416-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that if we request bottom-up allocation from drm_mm_insert_node()
we receive the next available hole from the bottom.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170202114434.3060-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The drm_mm range manager claimed to support top-down insertion, but it
was neither searching for the top-most hole that could fit the
allocation request nor fitting the request to the hole correctly.
In order to search the range efficiently, we create a secondary index
for the holes using either their size or their address. This index
allows us to find the smallest hole or the hole at the bottom or top of
the range efficiently, whilst keeping the hole stack to rapidly service
evictions.
v2: Search for holes both high and low. Rename flags to mode.
v3: Discover rb_entry_safe() and use it!
v4: Kerneldoc for enum drm_mm_insert_mode.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@vmware.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@vmware.com> # vmwgfx
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> #etnaviv
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170202210438.28702-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c:1277 evict_everything()
warn: calling list_del() inside list_for_each
The list_del() inside the error handling in the eviction loop is
overkill. We have to undo the eviction scan to return the drm_mm back to
a recoverable state, so have to iterate over the full list, but we only
want to report the error once and once we have an error we can return
early.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Fixes: 560b328429 ("drm: kselftest for drm_mm and eviction")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170110144031.7609-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Including all drivers. I thought about keeping small compat functions
to avoid having to change all drivers. But I really like the
drm_printer idea, so figured spreading it more widely is a good thing.
v2: Review from Chris:
- Natural argument order and better name for drm_mm_print.
- show_mm() macro in the selftest.
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483009764-8281-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Insulate users from changes to the internal hole tracking within
struct drm_mm_node by using an accessor for hole_follows.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: resolve conflicts in i915_vma.c]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Using mm->color_adjust makes the eviction scanner much tricker since we
don't know the actual neighbours of the target hole until after it is
created (after scanning is complete). To work out whether we need to
evict the neighbours because they impact upon the hole, we have to then
check the hole afterwards - requiring an extra step in the user of the
eviction scanner when they apply color_adjust.
v2: Massage kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-34-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Compute the minimal required hole during scan and only evict those nodes
that overlap. This enables us to reduce the number of nodes we need to
evict to the bare minimum.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-31-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The scan state occupies a large proportion of the struct drm_mm and is
rarely used and only contains temporary state. That makes it suitable to
moving to its struct and onto the stack of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Fix up etnaviv to compile, was missing a BUG_ON.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In places (e.g. i915.ko), the alignment is exported to userspace as u64
and there now exists hardware for which we can indeed utilize a u64
alignment. As such, we need to keep 64bit integers throughout when
handling alignment.
Testcase: igt/drm_mm/align64
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_alignment
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-22-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, restricted
eviction scanning finds a suitable hole.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-20-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, eviction
scanning finds a suitable hole.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-19-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, fitting of the
node and its alignment are still correct.
v2: s/no_color_touching/separate_adjacent_colors/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-18-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that if we request top-down allocation from drm_mm_insert_node()
we receive the next available hole from the top.
v2: Flip sign on conditional assert.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-17-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that we add arbitrary blocks to a restrited eviction scanner in
order to find the first minimal hole that matches our request.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that we add arbitrary blocks to the eviction scanner in order to
find the first minimal hole that matches our request.
v2: Refactor out some common eviction code for later
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that we can request alignment to any power-of-two or prime using a
plain drm_mm_node_insert(), and also handle a reasonable selection of
primes.
v2: Exercise all allocation flags
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Exercise drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(), check that we only allocate from
the specified range.
v2: Use all allocation flags
v3: Don't pass in invalid ranges - these will be asserted later.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-13-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reuse drm_mm_insert_node() with a temporary node to exercise
drm_mm_replace_node(). We use the previous test in order to exercise the
various lists following replacement.
v2: Check that we copy across the important (user) details of the node.
The internal details (such as lists and hole tracking) we hope to detect
errors by exercise.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Exercise drm_mm_insert_node(), check that we can't overfill a range and
that the lists are correct after reserving/removing.
v2: Extract helpers for the repeated tests
v3: Iterate over all allocation flags
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Exercise drm_mm_reserve_node(), check that we can't reserve an already
occupied range and that the lists are correct after reserving/removing.
v2: Check for invalid node reservation.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
First we introduce a smattering of infrastructure for writing selftests.
The idea is that we have a test module that exercises a particular
portion of the exported API, and that module provides a set of tests
that can either be run as an ensemble via kselftest or individually via
an igt harness (in this case igt/drm_mm). To accommodate selecting
individual tests, we export a boolean parameter to control selection of
each test - that is hidden inside a bunch of reusable boilerplate macros
to keep writing the tests simple.
v2: Choose a random random_seed unless one is specified by the user.
v3: More parameters to control max_iterations and max_prime of the
tests.
Testcase: igt/drm_mm
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Chris Wilson