VCAP (Versatile Content Aware Processor) is the TCAM-based engine behind
tc flower offload on ocelot, among other things. The ingress port mask
on which VCAP rules match is present as a bit field in the actual key of
the rule. This means that it is possible for a rule to be shared among
multiple source ports. When the rule is added one by one on each desired
port, that the ingress port mask of the key must be edited and rewritten
to hardware.
But the API in ocelot_vcap.c does not allow for this. For one thing,
ocelot_vcap_filter_add() and ocelot_vcap_filter_del() are not symmetric,
because ocelot_vcap_filter_add() works with a preallocated and
prepopulated filter and programs it to hardware, and
ocelot_vcap_filter_del() does both the job of removing the specified
filter from hardware, as well as kfreeing it. That is to say, the only
option of editing a filter in place, which is to delete it, modify the
structure and add it back, does not work because it results in
use-after-free.
This patch introduces ocelot_vcap_filter_replace, which trivially
reprograms a VCAP entry to hardware, at the exact same index at which it
existed before, without modifying any list or allocating any memory.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
PSFP support gate and police action. This patch add the gate and police
action to flower parse action, check chain ID to determine which block
to offload. Adding psfp callback functions to add, delete and update gate
and police in PSFP table if hardware supports it.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently the ocelot driver does support the 'vlan modify' action, but
in the ingress chain, and it is offloaded to VCAP IS1. This action
changes the classified VLAN before the packet enters the bridging
service, and the bridging works with the classified VLAN modified by
VCAP IS1.
That is good for some use cases, but there are others where the VLAN
must be modified at the stage of the egress port, after the packet has
exited the bridging service. One example is simulating IEEE 802.1CB
active stream identification filters ("active" means that not only the
rule matches on a packet flow, but it is also able to change some
headers). For example, a stream is replicated on two egress ports, but
they must have different VLAN IDs on egress ports A and B.
This seems like a task for the VCAP ES0, but that currently only
supports pushing the ES0 tag A, which is specified in the rule. Pushing
another VLAN header is not what we want, but rather overwriting the
existing one.
It looks like when we push the ES0 tag A, it is actually possible to not
only take the ES0 tag A's value from the rule itself (VID_A_VAL), but
derive it from the following formula:
ES0_TAG_A = Classified VID + VID_A_VAL
Otherwise said, ES0_TAG_A can be used to increment with a given value
the VLAN ID that the packet was already classified to, and the packet
will have this value as an outer VLAN tag. This new VLAN ID value then
gets stripped on egress (or not) according to the value of the native
VLAN from the bridging service.
While the hardware will happily increment the classified VLAN ID for all
packets that match the ES0 rule, in practice this would be rather
insane, so we only allow this kind of ES0 action if the ES0 filter
contains a VLAN ID too, so as to restrict the matching on a known
classified VLAN. If we program VID_A_VAL with the delta between the
desired final VLAN (ES0_TAG_A) and the classified VLAN, we obtain the
desired behavior.
It doesn't look like it is possible with the tc-vlan action to modify
the VLAN ID but not the PCP. In hardware it is possible to leave the PCP
to the classified value, but we unconditionally program it to overwrite
it with the PCP value from the rule.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When ocelot_flower.c calls ocelot_vcap_filter_add(), the filter has a
given filter->id.cookie. This filter is added to the block->rules list.
However, when ocelot_flower.c calls ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id()
which passes the cookie as argument, the filter is never found by
filter->id.cookie when searching through the block->rules list.
This is unsurprising, since the filter->id.cookie is an unsigned long,
but the cookie argument provided to ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id()
is a signed int, and the comparison fails.
Fixes: 50c6cc5b92 ("net: mscc: ocelot: store a namespaced VCAP filter ID")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210930125330.2078625-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Unlike sja1105, the only other user of the software-defined tag_8021q.c
tagger format, the implementation we choose for the Felix DSA switch
driver preserves full functionality under a vlan_filtering bridge
(i.e. IP termination works through the DSA user ports under all
circumstances).
The tag_8021q protocol just wants:
- Identifying the ingress switch port based on the RX VLAN ID, as seen
by the CPU. We achieve this by using the TCAM engines (which are also
used for tc-flower offload) to push the RX VLAN as a second, outer
tag, on egress towards the CPU port.
- Steering traffic injected into the switch from the network stack
towards the correct front port based on the TX VLAN, and consuming
(popping) that header on the switch's egress.
A tc-flower pseudocode of the static configuration done by the driver
would look like this:
$ tc qdisc add dev <cpu-port> clsact
$ for eth in swp0 swp1 swp2 swp3; do \
tc filter add dev <cpu-port> egress flower indev ${eth} \
action vlan push id <rxvlan> protocol 802.1ad; \
tc filter add dev <cpu-port> ingress protocol 802.1Q flower
vlan_id <txvlan> action vlan pop \
action mirred egress redirect dev ${eth}; \
done
but of course since DSA does not register network interfaces for the CPU
port, this configuration would be impossible for the user to do. Also,
due to the same reason, it is impossible for the user to inadvertently
delete these rules using tc. These rules do not collide in any way with
tc-flower, they just consume some TCAM space, which is something we can
live with.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
We will be adding some private VCAP filters that should not interfere in
any way with the filters added using tc-flower. So we need to allocate
some IDs which will not be used by tc.
Currently ocelot uses an u32 id derived from the flow cookie, which in
itself is an unsigned long. This is a problem in itself, since on 64 bit
systems, sizeof(unsigned long)=8, so the driver is already truncating
these.
Create a struct ocelot_vcap_id which contains the full unsigned long
cookie from tc, as well as a boolean that is supposed to namespace the
filters added by tc with the ones that aren't.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The Felix driver will need to preinstall some VCAP filters for its
tag_8021q implementation (outside of the tc-flower offload logic), so
these need to be exported to the common includes.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The numbers in struct vcap_props are not intuitive to derive, because
they are not a straightforward copy-and-paste from the reference manual
but instead rely on a fairly detailed level of understanding of the
layout of an entry in the TCAM and in the action RAM. For this reason,
bugs are very easy to introduce here.
Ease the work of hardware porters and read from hardware the constants
that were exported for this particular purpose. Note that this implies
that struct vcap_props can no longer be const.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As a preparation step for the offloading to ES0, let's create the
infrastructure for talking with this hardware block.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As a preparation step for the offloading to IS1, let's create the
infrastructure for talking with this hardware block.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In the Ocelot switches there are 3 TCAMs: VCAP ES0, IS1 and IS2, which
have the same configuration interface, but different sets of keys and
actions. The driver currently only supports VCAP IS2.
In preparation of VCAP IS1 and ES0 support, the existing code must be
generalized to work with any VCAP.
In that direction, we should move the structures that depend upon VCAP
instantiation, like vcap_is2_keys and vcap_is2_actions, out of struct
ocelot and into struct vcap_props .keys and .actions, a structure that
is replicated 3 times, once per VCAP. We'll pass that structure as an
argument to each function that does the key and action packing - only
the control logic needs to distinguish between ocelot->vcap[VCAP_IS2]
or IS1 or ES0.
Another change is to make use of the newly introduced ocelot_target_read
and ocelot_target_write API, since the 3 VCAPs have the same registers
but put at different addresses.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Remove the definitions for the VCAP IS2 table from ocelot_ace.c, since
it is specific to VSC7514.
The VSC9959 VCAP IS2 table supports more rules (1024 instead of 64) and
has a different width for the action (89 bits instead of 99).
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The IGR_PORT_MASK key width is different between the 11-port VSC7514 and
the 6-port VSC9959 switches. And since IGR_PORT_MASK is one of the first
fields of a VCAP key entry, it means that all further field
offset/length pairs are shifted between the 2.
The ocelot driver performs packing of VCAP half keys with the help of
some preprocessor macros:
- A set of macros for defining the HKO (Half Key Offset) and HKL (Half
Key Length) of each possible key field. The offset of each field is
defined as the sum between the offset and the sum of the previous
field.
- A set of accessors on top of vcap_key_set for shorter (aka less
typing) access to the HKO and HKL of each key field.
Since the field offsets and lengths are different between switches,
defining them through the preprocessor isn't going to fly. So introduce
a structure holding (offset, length) pairs and instantiate it in
ocelot_board.c for VSC7514. In a future patch, a similar structure will
be instantiated in felix_vsc9959.c for NXP LS1028A.
The accessors also need to go. They are based on macro name
concatenation, which is horrible to understand and follow.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Jakub Kicinski